UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

For sale: one bridge, a bookmaker and millions of student loans

Brown gambles on huge sale of assets to balance books

By Andy McSmith

A fire sale of public assets will be announced by Gordon Brown today to help cut the Government's mounting deficit.

The Tote, the Dartford crossing, the student loan book, the Channel Tunnel rail link and the Government's stake in Urenco, which enriches uranium for nuclear power stations worldwide, will all be offered to private bidders in the next two years, in an attempt to raise £3bn.

The Prime Minister will make his announcement in what he hopes will be the opening salvo of a campaign to convince voters that Labour, not the Conservatives, can be trusted to bring down government debt without plunging the country into a "double-dip" recession.

On the day that MPs return from their long summer break, he will deliver a long-planned speech on economic management and hold a question-and-answer session with leading economic commentators to lay out a strategy for steering the economy out of crisis.

The most controversial of the proposed sales is the 33 per cent government stake in Urenco, because of the risk of enriched uranium getting into the wrong hands, but Mr Brown will promise that the sale will include safeguards to protect national security.

Selling the Tote has been on Mr Brown's list of things to do for more than a decade, but each attempt to dispose of it has hit political problems. The Horserace Totalisator Board, as it is officially known, has a string of betting shops, 540 outlets in all, and a pools business. The first time that Mr Brown hinted that it might be for sale, before Labour came to power in 1997, he was blocked by vigorous opposition from the late Robin Cook, a devoted habitué of the racetracks. In 2000, Mr Brown overcame the Foreign Secretary's opposition and announced that the Tote would be sold to a racing industry trust. This pledge was included in Labour's manifesto for the 2001 election, but it ran into problems from the European Commission. In 2007, a consortium of Tote executives and the Racehorse Owners Association, backed by private equity borrowing, was prepared to buy the Tote for £400m, but the sale collapsed because of opposition from within the Treasury.

In March, the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, appointed Rothschild to prepare the sale of the Royal Mint, which is expected to fetch £35bn. It was thought the next asset to be put on sale would be Ordnance Survey.

Local councils are also feeling the pressure from government to prepare more surplus assets for sale. Mr Brown is hoping that the combined sales by local and central government will come to £16bn, to add to £30bn-worth of asset sales set out in a Treasury report by Sir Michael Lyons, commissioned by Mr Brown five years ago.

Nearly half the sales that made up Sir Michael's total came from council housing, and more than a quarter from sales by local government. Central government was expected to contribute only about £1bn a year for seven years.

The Ministry of Defence has been the biggest single contributor to government asset sales since the ending of the Cold War 20 years ago. The sale of Chelsea Barracks alone, in 2007, raised £959m. NHS trusts are expected to raise £200m this year, and a similar sum next year, from selling surplus land and buildings.

Another major source of capital for the Government comes from rationalising the use of office space in central London. Since the Lyons review in 2004, 85 leases on government buildings, occupying 250,000 sq m of central London, have come to an end, and many were not renewed. In that way, it is estimated the cost to central government was cut by £150m a year.

The various government departments are reckoned to hold about £220bn worth of assets, not counting the vast quantity of land, buildings and equipment held by NHS trusts. The two departments with the largest asset base are the Ministry of Defence and Department for Transport, which together hold about £152bn worth of assets.

Britain's budget deficit is becoming the biggest single issue between the main political parties, as the 2010 general election approaches. It could hit a record £220bn this year, or 12 per cent of gross domestic product.

But Mr Brown will repeat his warning today that if the Government were to start cutting the deficit too quickly, it would exacerbate the problems of falling output and rising unemployment.

Yesterday, Mr Darling, accused the Conservatives of "wallowing in the opportunity to seriously damage our economy and our prospects in the future".

Speaking on BBC Scotland's Politics Today programme, he claimed: "They don't recognise that maintaining support now is essential. Otherwise if the economy crashes, millions of jobs would be threatened. They don't understand that, they don't accept that."

That warning will be echoed today by the Prime Minister. "We also need a deficit reduction plan that supports growth and jobs, not one that snuffs out recovery before it has started," he is expected to say.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Brown should NOT handle Asset sales....
[info]misnomer2009 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:18 pm (UTC)
Gordon Brown is NOT the man to handle asset sales. He will end up selling at bargain prices, probably to friends, family and new political best friends. You only need to think back to the sale of gold reserves to prove that he's incompetent.
Re: Brown should NOT handle Asset sales....
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:55 pm (UTC)
Couldn't agree more. Brown sold 395 tons of gold at 276 dollars an ounce, the current price is 1050 dollars an ounce, the current loss is just under £ 10 billion pounds. Incidentally the cost of Black Wednesday was only £ 3.3 billion, so Brown's gold sale has so far cost the country the equivalent of three Black Wednesdays. Good old 'prudence' Brown.
Re: Brown should NOT handle Asset sales....
[info]hurstgreen wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 12:39 am (UTC)
I'm working on the principle that however good or bad the Conservatives will be in government, they cannot possibly be as incompetent or as uninspiring or as unimaginative or as restrictive on business or as political as Gordon Brown and his team. Gordon Brown selling $3bn of assets, given the size of the debt, is hardly likely to resolve any significant problems. What he really needs to do is provide an environment for SMEs to flourish as they create employment and wealth for the country.... something that the Conservatives show a flickering of an understanding and clearly something that Labour does not.
Re: Brown should NOT handle Asset sales....
[info]starlingnl wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 08:15 am (UTC)
The Cons will be selling off SCHOOLS.

I didn't think you could get more capitalist than Brown, but the Tories seem to be hell-bent on topping him.
Re: Brown should NOT handle Asset sales....
[info]hurstgreen wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 10:07 am (UTC)
Brown's interference hardly makes him a good capitalist. His interference is more reminiscent of a fascist state - companies privately owned but controlled by the state. Mussolini would be proud.
Brown ....
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:45 am (UTC)
came in and sold the family gold for next to nowt. Now the country's remaing assests are up for hock.
Hasn't Mugabe's apprentice done well?
Roll up! Roll up! Every one a bargain!
[info]elevengoalposts wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:58 am (UTC)
So Brown's finds there is a raft of "surplus assets"which can be sold off.

Well, that's a little strange to hear since Labour has never stopped reminding its dwindling support base - no one else listens - of the previous disasters of privatisation of so many assets.

He wasn't able to sell much in 12 years because there weren't buyers at his price, in good times, and he couldn't even persuade his own MPs anyway.

No business buys assets without a concrete belief in turning a decent profit. Is he trying to create another Amway business?

In his blundering, misguided avoidance of spending cuts at all costs, he would have to have a discount (fire) sale to move that "stock", as he did with gold. Once those "surplus assets" are gone, they can generate no profit for taxpayers, only for their new owners.

It's the worst possible time to sell assets, which can be held on to until the economy does pick up - spending cuts are the correct option, where some of the savings can be ploughed back into developing and supporting real, productive businesses, not a mountain of public sector non-jobs which only cost money.

After 25-ish years in politics, and 12 years running the economy (forget Darling), he's never acquired even the slightest grasp of how economies and their component businesses operate effectively.
BROWN HAS FAILED THE COUNTRY:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 04:06 am (UTC)
Brown has ruined our country and now trying to sell off the 'family silver' at bargain prices. This idiot, as Chancellor, is so good at selling, he sold our gold reserves at the lowest price as a quick option to fund his ill thought out schemes. The schemes have failed and our gold gone. If our reserves had been retained, they would be worth 500% more at today's prices. This PM is a cretin, receives poor advice and must not be allowed to sell anything. We need a change of Government to enable a proper assessment of assets for disposal. Brown cannot be trusted. He must be thrown out of office quickly.
alex jones gets it right
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:12 am (UTC)
AGAIN!!! love him or loathe him, alex jones usually, in fact pretty much always, gets it spot on. he stated over 2 years ago that the economy will be crushed by design to allow the government (he was talking about the USA) to have a firesale of roads, bridges etc that the NWO will buy up, enslaving the man in the street to their whims even more so. weel, the UK is well and truly on that road.

absolutely spot on again mr jones.

www.prisonplanet.com
and while we're at it
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
mr brown, start off by getting rid of this massive excess of government waste in its own departments. from the civil service to quangos, an absolute fortune is being wasted. the hard assests are not yours to sell. you are merely the unelected leaseholder
Re: and while we're at it
[info]benmc1985 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 04:21 pm (UTC)
Glad to see there are no broad sweeping statements here!

Here's an idea...
[info]toolan wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:32 am (UTC)
... he could start by selling the Lords - they've cost the taxpayer enough to buy, with little or no return. Who fancies owning Mandy ?

Toolan
Re: Here's an idea...
[info]mightydrunken wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
Well the Lords are an essential break on Parliament. Often Parliament generates some pretty bad laws and the Lords usually find the most odious parts and get them amended. Also they don't actually cost that much money either. Especially not compared to many other things which could be cut.

There is a reason why pretty much every democracy has two houses.
muppet
[info]repton4 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:48 am (UTC)
Gorden Brown is a muppet, he has surounded his self with idiots and incompentence to make him self look good and even thats failed as will this sell off
selling student debt
[info]fencerkath wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:56 am (UTC)
Gordon Brown ought to realise the serious problems he's creating for his party and the future in selling student debt. There's something slightly sick in seeing the future of millions of young people as a saleable asset. When current students and recent graduates find themselves pursued by debt-collectors and are told that there is nothing the government can do because the debt was sold on, I doubt they will ever wish to vote Labour. They will remember the way this government assured them their debt was a good investment. Then they will recall how, in a moment of crisis, just as it became evident that graduate debt wouldn't buy a good job, the government sold that debt and the students' future to the highest bidder.
Asset Sales
[info]gaduggan wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 06:50 am (UTC)
I agree entirely with misnomer2009. The only thing worth selling off is the BBC.The Tresury would get billions, not enough to balance the books, but every little helps.The BBC would then become truly independent.It has global brand recognition.It has a huge back catalogue of shows to broadcast. A private BBC would then be able to compete on an equal footing with CNN, FOX, MSNBC and Bloomberg and may be able to buy some of the afore so networks or buy a stake in Hollywood.Everyone wins.
Re: Asset Sales
[info]thiscausticlife wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
A commendable but ultimately utopian senario.
Roll Up, Roll Up Country For Sale
[info]ironspiderzero wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 06:50 am (UTC)
And while he's at it, why not privatise all those pesky assests and services still held in Government hands? Sell the whole lot. Foreign investors are guaranteed a warm welcome and low, low rates...

Well here's a suggestion - sell MPs to the highest bidder. They're pretty much doing that now, so why not make some money on the deal?
Who loses out
[info]geo32 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:36 am (UTC)
No doubt the ones who purchase OUR assets will not do so out of generosity. The will automatically expect returns for their outlay so who will be inline to pay for them.

As with the rescue of the banks, railways and power companies in the long run it will be Joe Public who is bled even drier.

It seems as though in time all working peoples future salaries and wages will be paid directly to the government




Worst MP ever
[info]peersrogue wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:39 am (UTC)
Because this dreadful man is a miserable failure he plans to sell OUR country's assets to cover the debts caused by his govts mismanagement and over the top public spending. i.e. one silly example translating everything printed by council etc into about ten different languages. It all costs money and is a stupid and uneccesary, if you live in Britain learn the local language, I did when I lived abroad.

The army of jobsworth officious officials that couldn't get a job in the real world and have got their feet firmly under the table and their snouts in the trough - sell them off! Conscript them to wrok the land or cklean the streets, something useful. Finally, does this hopeless man not realise you can only sell your assets once?

Shameless and shameful govt. We are the laughing stock of the world.
Student debt
[info]kingofmumu wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:44 am (UTC)
He already sold UK gold reserves, when we joined the Fiat money scam. I wonder why student loans are included amongst the few debts a person going bankrupt cannot write off, if they go bankrupt. These loans should be written off for all students, it seems criminal to sell on the debt. Putting young people on the lifetime of debt treadmill, was not instigated by chance. Just another move, pushing us all into modern serfdom. Have a nice day landless peasants! :-)
Yes, but what happens next time?
[info]ouldbob wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
Thatcher, - accursed be her name - sold off the family silver in similar circumstances - short term gain, as opposed to maintaining a long term profitable organisation. Once this lot has gone, what on earth will we have left? Brown's decision shows the abysmal incompetence and judgement of an alcoholic who sells anything to get booze, or a more apt simile might be - the bloke who sells the lead off his roof to wood for his fire.
We saw what happened when the Severn Bridge was sold off - remember, it was suppposed to be free once the initial investment was recovered, - and now it's sold off to a french company and the charges mount every year. The fact that the government had no right to sell what wasn't theirs did not deter them then, and I doubt if it will now, even though the assets which they wish to sell do not belong to them this time either. Tories do this: not socialists.
What was once ours is now theirs..
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)
Successive governments have sold off most of our assetts; utilities, social housing, gold, manufacturing etc etc - and here we are once again looking for a few trinkets to pawn to teh cheapest bidder.

...and NuLabour claim that they are the only party capable of handing the recession - what arrogance. And they are asking us to vote for more of teh same - incredible.
PR arm of Network Rail could go
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 08:20 am (UTC)
It would save quite a bit to hack off the PR and media arm of network rail, which has a useless and parasytical board member in Victoria Pendar, and pays a fortune in unneeded salaires to media people, and unwarrented bonuses to herself.
Re: PR arm of Network Rail could go
[info]therealsomniac wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 08:59 am (UTC)
No good trying to sell the MP's. There would be no takers. They are worth F.all.
bROWN'S SALE
[info]mikeknoth wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
THIS SALE IS REMINISCVENT OF THE THATCHER YEARS THERE MUST BE SAFEGUARDS OVERSTUDENT LOAN RATES IF THOUSANDS OF STUDENTS ARE NOT TO BE PUT OFF
ALL IN ALL COMPARED WITH THATCHER'S SALE OF BT, BR,BAAND THE RESTto make the reich richer not deal with the deficit of repair infrastructure in comparison it is being done for better reasons,to at least lessen the impact of any cuts to public services which the tories would rather see in order that their friends in the banksdon't pay back what they owe joe public for causing the recession which those without a clue blame gordon brown for
Brown and out.
[info]bogbrush2 wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC)
But anybody can gamble, why do we want to pay a prime minister to do it? Brown is reaching rock bottom now, flogging off the family silver to make a few bob, jut like Thatcher, its like a giant boot sale! Thatcher sold things to cover up the fact that the taxes had not been used to maintain the infrastructure of the country for years, and the wheels were about to fall off. Brown is doing it to make enough money to keep the country afloat until he can get re-elected and bu***er what happens afterwards. It wont work of course. It will end up getting owned by foreigners, just like the energy services, and look how we are getting screwed there. Brown is a corrupt, greedy and stupid megalomaniac. The BNP frighten me less than his lot, that's why I'll be voting for them next time round.
[info]mwreid wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)
How on earth is selling student loans going to help. All that will be paid is an asset value hugely discounted in return for cash today against loans that might or might not be paid tomorrow. I should thing the book will go for less than half its current value.

In a business that write down would be taken as a loss now.

So how can giving an asset away at a discount help reduce a deficit ?
Student Loans
[info]quizbook wrote:
Monday, 12 October 2009 at 10:54 pm (UTC)
As one who is part of the Student Loan book, I wonder how the government can sell my debt to it. My loan agreement was to the government, all be it administered by a private body. My agreement said I do not have to pay the loan or interest until I earn £15.000 a year. If it is sold to a private company can they demand that I start to pay it back now, even though I am unemployed ? Will my debt end when I am 60 as it said in the agreement I signed ? Talk about a can of worms ! I suggest to all my fellow Student Loan Book members, that we make it clear to all and sundary that if any privatized Student Loan Company attempts to change the rules, we will organize a re-payment strike. "Cant pay wont pay" worked for the Poll Tax campaign, It can work again !

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date