For sale: one bridge, a bookmaker and millions of student loans
Brown gambles on huge sale of assets to balance books
A fire sale of public assets will be announced by Gordon Brown today to help cut the Government's mounting deficit.
The Tote, the Dartford crossing, the student loan book, the Channel Tunnel rail link and the Government's stake in Urenco, which enriches uranium for nuclear power stations worldwide, will all be offered to private bidders in the next two years, in an attempt to raise £3bn.
The Prime Minister will make his announcement in what he hopes will be the opening salvo of a campaign to convince voters that Labour, not the Conservatives, can be trusted to bring down government debt without plunging the country into a "double-dip" recession.
On the day that MPs return from their long summer break, he will deliver a long-planned speech on economic management and hold a question-and-answer session with leading economic commentators to lay out a strategy for steering the economy out of crisis.
The most controversial of the proposed sales is the 33 per cent government stake in Urenco, because of the risk of enriched uranium getting into the wrong hands, but Mr Brown will promise that the sale will include safeguards to protect national security.
Selling the Tote has been on Mr Brown's list of things to do for more than a decade, but each attempt to dispose of it has hit political problems. The Horserace Totalisator Board, as it is officially known, has a string of betting shops, 540 outlets in all, and a pools business. The first time that Mr Brown hinted that it might be for sale, before Labour came to power in 1997, he was blocked by vigorous opposition from the late Robin Cook, a devoted habitué of the racetracks. In 2000, Mr Brown overcame the Foreign Secretary's opposition and announced that the Tote would be sold to a racing industry trust. This pledge was included in Labour's manifesto for the 2001 election, but it ran into problems from the European Commission. In 2007, a consortium of Tote executives and the Racehorse Owners Association, backed by private equity borrowing, was prepared to buy the Tote for £400m, but the sale collapsed because of opposition from within the Treasury.
In March, the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, appointed Rothschild to prepare the sale of the Royal Mint, which is expected to fetch £35bn. It was thought the next asset to be put on sale would be Ordnance Survey.
Local councils are also feeling the pressure from government to prepare more surplus assets for sale. Mr Brown is hoping that the combined sales by local and central government will come to £16bn, to add to £30bn-worth of asset sales set out in a Treasury report by Sir Michael Lyons, commissioned by Mr Brown five years ago.
Nearly half the sales that made up Sir Michael's total came from council housing, and more than a quarter from sales by local government. Central government was expected to contribute only about £1bn a year for seven years.
The Ministry of Defence has been the biggest single contributor to government asset sales since the ending of the Cold War 20 years ago. The sale of Chelsea Barracks alone, in 2007, raised £959m. NHS trusts are expected to raise £200m this year, and a similar sum next year, from selling surplus land and buildings.
Another major source of capital for the Government comes from rationalising the use of office space in central London. Since the Lyons review in 2004, 85 leases on government buildings, occupying 250,000 sq m of central London, have come to an end, and many were not renewed. In that way, it is estimated the cost to central government was cut by £150m a year.
The various government departments are reckoned to hold about £220bn worth of assets, not counting the vast quantity of land, buildings and equipment held by NHS trusts. The two departments with the largest asset base are the Ministry of Defence and Department for Transport, which together hold about £152bn worth of assets.
Britain's budget deficit is becoming the biggest single issue between the main political parties, as the 2010 general election approaches. It could hit a record £220bn this year, or 12 per cent of gross domestic product.
But Mr Brown will repeat his warning today that if the Government were to start cutting the deficit too quickly, it would exacerbate the problems of falling output and rising unemployment.
Yesterday, Mr Darling, accused the Conservatives of "wallowing in the opportunity to seriously damage our economy and our prospects in the future".
Speaking on BBC Scotland's Politics Today programme, he claimed: "They don't recognise that maintaining support now is essential. Otherwise if the economy crashes, millions of jobs would be threatened. They don't understand that, they don't accept that."
That warning will be echoed today by the Prime Minister. "We also need a deficit reduction plan that supports growth and jobs, not one that snuffs out recovery before it has started," he is expected to say.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I didn't think you could get more capitalist than Brown, but the Tories seem to be hell-bent on topping him.
Hasn't Mugabe's apprentice done well?
Well, that's a little strange to hear since Labour has never stopped reminding its dwindling support base - no one else listens - of the previous disasters of privatisation of so many assets.
He wasn't able to sell much in 12 years because there weren't buyers at his price, in good times, and he couldn't even persuade his own MPs anyway.
No business buys assets without a concrete belief in turning a decent profit. Is he trying to create another Amway business?
In his blundering, misguided avoidance of spending cuts at all costs, he would have to have a discount (fire) sale to move that "stock", as he did with gold. Once those "surplus assets" are gone, they can generate no profit for taxpayers, only for their new owners.
It's the worst possible time to sell assets, which can be held on to until the economy does pick up - spending cuts are the correct option, where some of the savings can be ploughed back into developing and supporting real, productive businesses, not a mountain of public sector non-jobs which only cost money.
After 25-ish years in politics, and 12 years running the economy (forget Darling), he's never acquired even the slightest grasp of how economies and their component businesses operate effectively.
absolutely spot on again mr jones.
www.prisonplanet.com
Toolan
There is a reason why pretty much every democracy has two houses.
Well here's a suggestion - sell MPs to the highest bidder. They're pretty much doing that now, so why not make some money on the deal?
As with the rescue of the banks, railways and power companies in the long run it will be Joe Public who is bled even drier.
It seems as though in time all working peoples future salaries and wages will be paid directly to the government
The army of jobsworth officious officials that couldn't get a job in the real world and have got their feet firmly under the table and their snouts in the trough - sell them off! Conscript them to wrok the land or cklean the streets, something useful. Finally, does this hopeless man not realise you can only sell your assets once?
Shameless and shameful govt. We are the laughing stock of the world.
We saw what happened when the Severn Bridge was sold off - remember, it was suppposed to be free once the initial investment was recovered, - and now it's sold off to a french company and the charges mount every year. The fact that the government had no right to sell what wasn't theirs did not deter them then, and I doubt if it will now, even though the assets which they wish to sell do not belong to them this time either. Tories do this: not socialists.
...and NuLabour claim that they are the only party capable of handing the recession - what arrogance. And they are asking us to vote for more of teh same - incredible.
ALL IN ALL COMPARED WITH THATCHER'S SALE OF BT, BR,BAAND THE RESTto make the reich richer not deal with the deficit of repair infrastructure in comparison it is being done for better reasons,to at least lessen the impact of any cuts to public services which the tories would rather see in order that their friends in the banksdon't pay back what they owe joe public for causing the recession which those without a clue blame gordon brown for
In a business that write down would be taken as a loss now.
So how can giving an asset away at a discount help reduce a deficit ?