Gay group's anger at Tory amendment to IVF Bill
,
Whitehall Editor
Sunday 18 May 2008
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Gay campaigners criticised the Conservative Party last night after its health spokesmen attempted to force women to give the name of their sperm donor before being allowed IVF treatment.
Stonewall, the gay and lesbian campaign organisation, claimed that the Tories are limiting lesbian couples' access to in vitro fertilisation through an amendment to the controversial proposals which would require such children to have "a father or male role model".
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill returns to the House of Commons for two days' debate tomorrow. The Government had believed it had headed off damaging internal divisions over the creation of hybrid animal-human embryos and "saviour siblings" by allowing Catholic MPs and ministers a free vote on the most contentious elements of the Bill.
But campaigners on both sides of the genetic research and abortion rights debate have made it clear that they will return to the trenches tomorrow afternoon.
And last night Stonewall complained that the Tory frontbench, and a cross-party alliance of backbench MPs, was trying to block a move to stop fertility clinics from refusing treatment to single women or lesbians.
The shadow Secretary of State for Health, Andrew Lansley, has tabled an amendment to make the proposed legislation state the "need for supportive parenting and a father or male role model" for IVF-conceived children – rather than just the "need for supportive parenting". A Stonewall spokesman said the proposed amendment, along with another stating the "need for a father and a mother", would discriminate against non-traditional families.
He added: "Lesbian couples in stable, long-term relationships should have the same right to access these publicly funded services as anyone else."
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments