Government rules out database of emails
The Government has ruled out a controversial proposal to set up a database to store internet and telephone traffic, saying it prefers to have such information held by private companies.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith says the data is needed to combat terrorism and other crimes. Critics have called the idea excessive and an infringement of civil liberites.
Home Office research has estimated the proposal would cost up to £2bn to implement.
In a statement, Smith stressed that the information from mobile phones and computers that might be needed would be the "who, when, where and how" of communications and not the content.
"My key priority is to protect the citizens of the UK, and communications data is an essential tool for law enforcement agencies to track murderers and paedophiles, save lives and tackle crime," she added.
"It is essential that the police and other crime-fighting agencies have the tools they need to do their job. However, to be clear, there are absolutely no plans for a single central store."
In nearly all recent major counter-terrorism trials, prosecutors have used data about phone calls as part of their court case against suspects.
Details about where calls were made, to whom and for how long have been used to show links between mobile members and as evidence of preparation for an attack.
The Government still proposes legislating to allow all data that public authorities might need, including that generated overseas but crossing British networks, to be collected and retained by communication service providers (CSPs).
Opposition parties have strongly criticised the idea, saying officials had shown they could not be trusted with people's confidential information after a series of embarrassing data-loss scandals.
Civil rights groups say it would be a massive invasion of privacy.
"The big problem is that the Government has built a culture of surveillance which goes far beyond counter-terrorism and serious crime," said Conservative home affairs spokesman Chris Grayling.
"Too many parts of government have too many powers to snoop on innocent people and that's really got to change."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
And the difference is, what exactly?
"In nearly all recent major counter-terrorism trials, prosecutors have used data about phone calls as part of their court case against suspects. "
She means suspects that are generally released without charge (unless they can come up with some trumped up immigration misdemeanor that is).
http://www.vimeo.com/4165434
Give all our details to private companies? ! thanks Jackie you stupid woman. my only joy from all this is watching you having the begining of a breakdown in public because your fella likes watching porn while you are at work ordring bath plugs. infact, dont go just yet jackie, the longer you stay the more damage you do to your party, and for now that can only be a good thing. lets hope the damage done will be is so immense that your party is wiped off the political map for decades to come at least.
sorry for the rant....as you can tell i'm at the end of my wits with this government...who i never even had a chance to vote against.
Pete -
I don't think the problem lies with Jacqui Smith. It lies with Home Office civil servants.
EVERY Labour minister in recent years has turned into a fascist once they were appointed Home Secretary and got inside the Home Office. Many of them have NOT been strong intellectually - our cunning civil servants completely outclass them. The politicians end up agreeing to their 'suggestions', as the politicians aren't clever enough to think of arguments to refute them.
It's worth bearing in mind that much of what Ms Smith proposes is (probably) being done already, at this minute.
For many years, our guys at GCHQ in Cheltenham have been receiving data downlinked from the massive American intelligence-gathering system known as "Echelon". Although British and American authorities refuse to confirm its existence, the European Commission wrote a report on Echelon a few years ago.
Informed opinion holds that not only the sender and recipient of each email are monitored, but that its content is automatically scanned, in an attempt to detect terrorists, organised criminals, climate protesters, Liberal voters (?) etc.