Government spends £100,000 on lawyers to defend the bedroom tax

The DWP is fighting a rape victim and the family of a severely disabled child

The Department for Work and Pensions has spent over £100,000 on lawyers fighting a court battle to save its controversial “bedroom tax” policy.

Ministers were told that the under-occupancy charge – which mainly affects disabled people – was “unlawful” and “discriminatory” by the Court of Appeal in January.

The Government had been taken to court by the parents of a severely disabled child, who were forced to pay the charge on a room slept in by overnight carers and used to store specially adapted equipment.

Iain-Duncan-Smith-Reuters.jpg
Former Secretary for Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith, who introduced the 'bedroom tax' (Reuters)

A rape victim who was also being forced to pay the charge on her police-installed panic room was also successful in her case against the Department at the same time.

Ministers rejected the court ruling and said they would get it overturned at the Supreme Court, however.

As previously reported, around £50,000 of taxpayers’ cash was spent fighting the vulnerable people’s claims up to the point the Court of Appeal ruled against the Department.

6-Crabb-AFP-Getty.jpg
New DWP secretary Stephen Crabb has yet to cancel the charge (AFP/Getty)

Now new figures disclosed by ministers show £52,299 extra has already been spent on legal costs since the Government decided to appeal the ruling at the Supreme Court.

Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Owen Smith told the Daily Mirror newspaper:

“The new Secretary of State has a chance to quickly bring an end to the Bedroom Tax, one of Iain Duncan Smith’s most shameful legacies.

“It’s a brutal policy that’s being used to take money from disabled people, so the Tories can give tax breaks to the wealthiest and big business.

“If Stephen Crabb doesn’t drop this eye-wateringly expensive legal case against a family in his own constituency with a severely disabled grandson, it’ll show the change of management at the DWP just means meet the new boss, same as a the old boss.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: “Removing the spare room subsidy has restored fairness to the system.

“We know there are cases like these where people need extra help which is why we’re giving local authorities £870 million for discretionary payments.”

Comments