Gurkhas force Brown into yet another retreat
AP
The actress Joanna Lumley celebrates outside the Houses of Parliament yesterday after the vote to grant equal residence to 36,000 Gurkha veterans
Gordon Brown's authority took another battering yesterday when he suffered his first Commons defeat as Prime Minister amid growing criticism of his leadership by Labour MPs.
In a surprise move, MPs voted by 267 votes to 264 to grant equal residence rights to 36,000 Gurkha veterans – four hours after Mr Brown opposed the move. Some 27 Labour MPs voted against the Government. Last night ministers announced they would respect the Commons decision but said it could cost billions of pounds and may be phased in.
Some senior Labour MPs speculated that Mr Brown could face a "crisis of confidence" if, as expected, the party gets a bloody nose in the council and European Parliament elections on 4 June. "People are starting to ask whether he should lead us into the general election," said one Labour MP. Another added: "We are back to where we were last summer" – when Mr Brown had to see off the threat of a Cabinet-led mutiny.
Even some ministers admitted Mr Brown was making "too many misjudgements." One said the Government looked "out of touch".
Since a successful G20 summit at the start of this month, the Government has been derailed by the resignation of a Brown aide, Damian McBride, over a plot to smear senior Tories, a hostile reaction to last week's Budget and a botched attempt to reform MPs' expenses. Today the Prime Minister faces another test of his credibility when the Commons votes on expenses. Many Labour MPs believe Mr Brown has mishandled the issue and there will be an all-party move to delay a decision until after an independent review of the expenses system reports later this year. That would be seen as a snub to the Prime Minister, who called today's vote but saw his proposed reforms run into strong opposition.
Labour MPs are in an increasingly rebellious mood as Mr Brown's authority appears to wane. They have already forced Mr Brown to abandon his plan to replace the £24,000-a-year "second homes" allowance for MPs with a £150-a-day "clocking in" or attendance payment. Brown aides hope that yesterday's humiliating defeat over the Gurkhas will make a second defeat in two days less likely. They are preparing to argue that he would not be damaged if MPs kick expenses reform into the long grass because the public will know he backed urgent reforms to a system they regard as discredited.
The Government's defeat over the Gurkhas was a coup for Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, who has led the campaign at Westminster for the veterans to be allowed to live in Britain and called yesterday's debate.
Although the decision was not binding on the Government, the Immigration minister Phil Woolas told MPs in an emergency statement: "The Government respects the will of the House." But he said allowing all 36,000 to live in Britain could set a precedent for other immigration issues and wider government policy.
Mr Woolas suggested that no Gurkhas would be deported from Britain while the Government conducted a review. It would announce firm proposals before the Commons summer recess starts in July.
One ministerial aide, Stephen Pound, resigned so that he could oppose the Government. "I couldn't look my Gurkha friends in the eye if I wasn't doing everything I can to attempt to match their contribution to our country with our support for them," he said.
Home Office rules announced last week said that Gurkhas who retired before 1997 would only be allowed to stay in the UK if they had served for 20 years, had won bravery medals, or had sustained injuries in combat. The rules provoked outrage among their supporters, who claimed that only 100 of the 36,000 former Gurkhas currently prevented from settling would qualify.
Mr Brown had launched a lengthy defence of the policy during Prime Minister's Questions, arguing that 4,000 former Gurkhas would be allowed into Britain. He warned an open-door approach would cost as much as £1.4bn.
David Cameron, who backed Mr Clegg's move, said after the vote: "The Government now has to act. If they come back to the House of Commons and they haven't produced a proper system to help these people settle in our country, they'll get defeated again."
Mr Brown had tried to head off the defeat by promising that the policy would be reviewed before the summer. Labour backbenchers were also handed a note from the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, assuring them that no veterans would be deported in the meantime. But the concessions were not enough to stop 27 Labour MPs voting with the opposition parties, including Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Gordon Brown, phil Woolasand the 264 labour MPs who voted against the Gurkhas are cowards and are not fit even to clean there shoes, For them it was not about the Gurkhas it was about saving Gordon Brown and the lie-bour party from another humiliating defeat
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/pl
Get rid of him then
Mercenaries there certainly were not, they were members of the british armed forces.
I'm glad that Gordon Brown had to take this humiliating step down. Well done to the MP's from the labour party who voted against the government. Those who did vote for the government should really look themselves in the mirror.
They sacrificed their lives in both first and second world wars and were not allowed to even eat tomatos in military canteens like white men did.
And now they are not allowed even a tiny book called British passport.
How humiliating is that?
BUT MIND YOU WE ARE TALKING HERE ABOUT THE NUMBER ONE RACIST BIGGEST COLONIALIST IMPERIALIST COUNTRY IN RECENT HISTORY. THAT IS CALLED RULE BRITANNIA!
So Brown worried about the cost, just look at Nu Labs financial waste going into Billions since Blair and co came to power, and who was in control of UK financial, say no more.
31000 signatures and growing.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/pl
Labour as a part all suffer from poor judgement. The had the opportunity last conference but chickened-out "maybe things will get better". They misjudged their leader and it was always obvious what would happen. If they are going to change it had better be very quick as not long until the next election. as things stand they can easily guess the result. The have everything they need to make a change but I doubt they will have the good sense to do anything.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_polit
http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.p
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
I wonder if Brown has any pride whatsoever, or is he just another arrogant bully, only there to feather his own nest?
And now, that the battle has been won - you deny them the right to be in the country they fought for??
Wake up!! The world needs people with a sense of conscience to understand that these great soldiers are not asking for handouts - just a recognition of their services to UK!!