UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 8° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

Hague: Treaty referendum 'no longer possible'

By Gavin Cordon, Press Association

The Tory leadership tonight conceded defeat over their plans to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

Shadow foreign secretary William Hague said it was "no longer possible" to put the treaty to a popular vote after Czech President Vaclav Klaus removed the last obstacle to full ratification.

"Now that the treaty is going to become European law and is going to enter into force, that means a referendum can no longer prevent the creation of the president of the European Council, the loss of British national vetoes," he said.

"These things will already have happened and a referendum cannot unwind them or prevent them."

Mr Hague said party leader David Cameron - in a speech to be delivered at 4pm tomorrow - would set out "in detail how we will now go forward in European matters".

He denied that the party had broken any promises by dropping the referendum pledge.

"A British referendum until this very day would have meant that the Lisbon Treaty wouldn't enter into force if people voted no. The position of president of the European Council, the foreign minister of Europe, would never have been implemented," he said.

"We were very clear that our promise applied to those circumstances. After today, those things will come into force and a referendum can't change them, it can't unwind them, it can't prevent those things being created.

"That is why we are now in new circumstances and David Cameron will set out very clearly tomorrow how we now intend to proceed."

Earlier, the deeply Eurosceptic Mr Klaus announced he had signed the treaty after the Czech Constitutional Court finally rejected an attempt to block its implementation.

The move threatens to throw the Tories into a renewed round of turmoil over Europe after years of relative peace.

The Conservative leadership has been signalling for some weeks that it would not be able to go ahead with a referendum if the treaty was ratified by the time a Tory government came to power.

However for Tory Eurosceptics it has become an article of faith after Mr Cameron gave a "cast iron guarantee" two years ago that he would give the British people a chance to vote on the treaty.

He is now expected to announce a general election manifesto commitment to "repatriate" powers from Brussels, including control of social and employment policies - a long-standing Tory aim.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

If the treaty is signed it is too late for a referendum on the Treaty, but-- .
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 04:57 pm (UTC)
If the Lisbon Treaty is signed it cannot be changed and a referendum on it would be a pointless exercise. The wisest thing that Cameron should now do is list all the areas of decision making that he wants repatriated and then ask the electorate in a referendum if they support him pursuing this action even though it may well mean that we will have to withhold our contributions and seriously upset the other EU countries. The UK is in a strong negotiating position, being a large contributor to the EU budget ( particularly after Brown gave away our rebate and got nothing in return) and we import more from the EU than we export and with the UK peoples support he would have a very strong hand. There is then no need for us to leave the EU and there is a strong opportunity to get back the powers we want.
It has been suggested that he could include these items in his election manifesto and that would act as a referendum, but I think he would be wise to hold a separate referendum, thereby making the people empowered and unlike Labour and the Lib Dems who both lied, keeping his promise in a meaninful way.
Re: If the treaty is signed it is too late for a referendum on the Treaty, but-- .
[info]stephengash wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:09 am (UTC)
What English Parliament would that be then? England is the only country in the EU without its own parliament or assembly.

I want England out of the UK, let alone the EU. With friends like our "fellow Brits" the English don't need enemies.
[info]gowithwi wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC)
well ,he did try. it is good bye to the old feudal lord regime.
as they say . if your afraid ,you got something to hide.
perhaps a kind of french revolution is on the make.
is it not true that people make a country ? is it not true that the
queen is without power? the english parliament is hereditary and
people of a country are more important then peers? everything has to come to an
end. modernizing means that ,and nothing else. how can you be a peer
without realizing that you play a royal game, ignoring your queen.
it is the the peoples way or none at all. ciao
[info]billyquiz wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC)
"If the Lisbon Treaty is signed it cannot be changed and a referendum on it would be a pointless exercise"

Of course it's not a pointless exercise. Politics is very much about symbolism and a referendum on Lisbon would be a very decisive (if symbolic) NO. This would give tremendous clout to Cameron's negotiations.

He promised a referendum, if we don't get it then he's no better than Brown.
Seek opinion on things that can be changed not on things that can't
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC)
Surely it is better and more meaningful to ask people's opinion on things that can be changed rather than on things that cannot. I am sure he would receive massive support and he would actually be asking about specifics which he could then go to the EU with. What is it going to achieve now if people say they don't support the Treaty when it will already be law and will have been law for over 6 months. The EU are not going to change the law and the UK will only then have the option of leaving the EU.
The CONservatives...
[info]moresomaplease wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 07:45 pm (UTC)
are full of BS, why can't we just bloody have one!! Are we not a sovereign nation state anymore??!!!

Who gives a @!*! about European law, give us our democratic right to vote on this you bastards!!!

TREASONOUS QUISLINGS!!!

A vote for the LIB LAB CON is a vote for slavery. All you EU lovers should move to Brussels if you love it so much or how about communist China, coz thats the way its going.
If Britain isn't happy, then Britain should leave.
[info]annedebruce wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 08:09 pm (UTC)
It is wrong, absolutely wrong to suggest or believe that Britain will lose her sovereignity if she becomes full-pledged European, i.e., signs Lisbon Treaty. Those who pronounce such unfounded declarations are fear mongering.

But if the Brits aren't happy being members of the EU, then they should get out. Really simple. No one is forcing Britain to stay and be fully European, absolutely no one.

Re: If Britain isn't happy, then Britain should leave.
[info]49niner wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 08:28 pm (UTC)
Spot on! I am sick and tired of the serial whingers banging on about sovereignty when they haven't a clue of what they are talking about. What they really mean is that they want all their own way and stuff everyone else, and if they don't get it they'll spit the dummy.

In the modern world, nations must learn to work together. Many problems we face are international in nature and beyond the means and competence of national governments to deal with, let alone solve.

To me, sovereignty means having the power to solve problems. To be effective Britain must belong to multi-national organisations. This not only means the EU, but the UN, NATO and many other similar bodies. By combining with other nations, together we are stronger.

I'm glad the Lisbon Treaty is finally ratified and we can move on to next business. The Eurosceptics can whinge on all they like about a referendum. Most people aren't listening. We want to know what is being done to rebuild our busted economy. Now that really does concern us.
Re: If Britain isn't happy, then Britain should leave.
[info]rayamiles wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 09:56 pm (UTC)

Yep i agree 100%, i am bloody sick of listening to people in this country bang on about this being the end of Britain and how we don't need Europe.

First of all if this is such a disaster for sovereign governments why have the leaders of 27 nations just approved the treaty? Are you suggesting that turkeys really do vote for Christmas? And as for the argument that we would be better off outside of the EU, well have you clowns taken a look at a map lately? The UK is NOT some massive world power, we are a mid ranked economy, in a world where new power blocks are being created and born. Exactly what role do you people think that this little country all on its own could play in the 21 century?

And do not think that our "special relationship" with the US makes us "special" it is strictly a one-way arrangement; the only way we can hope to have any meaningful role in the 21 century is too fully and enthusiastically embrace the EU.



Re: If Britain isn't happy, then Britain should leave.
[info]billyquiz wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 08:31 pm (UTC)
"No one is forcing Britain to stay and be fully European, absolutely no one."

Don't be so facetious. Maybe you would be so kind as to persuade one of our treacherous prime ministers to give us the chance first! The rest we'll do for uorselves.
[info]social_liberal wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 08:40 pm (UTC)
The Lisbon Treaty was never unreasonable.

I did not want a referendum, the British people know nothing about this treaty other than the press and even the BBC which always have a negitive slant on things.

The Torys can moan and groan all they want, but the fact is that the EU can now say, if you dont like it then leave. The EU does not need the UK, the Eurozone is the second largest economy in the world and the fact is that the price of leaving the EU would be a disaster for this country. All the major parties accept this.

If little Dave wants to cry he should have a referendum on EU membership. We'll see how that works out for him...
Can we leave?
[info]justwent wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 09:20 pm (UTC)
It would be suicide to leave now that the treaty is in place. 2 years would have to pass, during which, we are subject to all their rules (and any new ones they dream up. Article 51). They would destroy us. If they did not then EU would slowly destroy itself. As they raise the bar more people will not accept rule by others.

It is now illegal to argue with any EU foreign policy. No member state can openly say they do not like a policy. How much rule of law do you want to be taken away from you, and put in the hands of an un-elected foreign minister that an un-elected president has to chosen.

If they had just made the system a real democracy it would not stick in so many guts. But they know that democracy over huge areas and peoples does not work.
[info]caurnie1 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 10:13 pm (UTC)
The media are having a field day on The Treaty of Lisbon or as Glorious Gordo said to-night on the news a treaty of constitutional change. So why are the media chasing Cameron. The man who sold us out was Glorious Gordo and his friends. DID THEY PROMISE A REFERENDUM? YES YES YES.
I heard Cameron say last week that the policy would be to continue to ask for a referendum as long as the treaty had NOT been signed. If the treaty was signed then his party would have to consider the situation. At no time did I hear him say that there would be a referendum if the treaty was signed. The media detest the Tories and they are now trying to stir it up. David hold firm to your line and come up with the changes that you would want to negoiate WHEN you become the ELECTED PRIME MINISTER.
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 10:36 pm (UTC)
Blindly loyal Tory supporters must be feeling bitter and betrayed.
Cameron, up until Ireland's 'yes' vote, never put pre-conditions and exclusions on his PROMISE to hold a referendum. At the very least, he knowingly allowed people to believe he would hold a referendum come what may.

The media detest the Tories?? I think you will find that the overwhelming majority of newspapers and Sky support the Tories. The BBC can hardly be said to 'detest the Tories'!! Perhaps the newspapers are pointing out that there may have been some hypocrisy, U-turns and empty boasting.

Hopefully now that David the Boy King has reneged on his very clear promise to hold a referendum, we will hear no more caterwauling about Labour not holding a referendum.
[info]caurnie1 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 11:18 pm (UTC)
To try and deflect criticism from Glorious Gordo, the person who promised and could have delivered a referendum, but renegaded on his promise smells of hypocracy. Cameron to fulfil his promise had first get elected and secondly the treaty (or as Glorious Gordo nearly mumbled to-night Constitution) had to still not be ratified. Neither of those conditions exist so why are the media trying to stir up a story. Are they frightened to mention that by his actions in "SAVING" the banks he has increased our debt by £50billion. Come on, lets get real, Cameron continually pointed out that those conditions had to be available for him to call a referendum.
LABOUR HAD THE AUTHORITY TO CALL A REFERENDUM BUTTHEY SHIRKED THEIR RESPONSIBILTY
Petition to leave EUSSR
[info]rogersbrother wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 11:44 pm (UTC)
EU membership referendum
[info]stephengash wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:12 am (UTC)
Two promises would guarantee the Tories a landslide victory at the next general election.

1 A referendum on EU membership. This would also kill off the SNP as most people in Scotland want out too.

2 A referendum on an English Parliament.

Once having won the election the Tories could then break their promises in true blue fashion.
Lisbon Treaty
[info]citizenofeurope wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
I have been a subject of a monarch far too long. now, at least, I can be a citizen of a greater European community which has protected my fundamental human rights and removed me from the unrepresentative slavery of the Crown in Parliament ( ie the dictate of the Queen's First Minister). May the citizens of Europe protect me from the slavery of being a subject of the whims of a Cameron or Brown

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date