Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hain: 'Holidays more important than Hutton'

Paul Waugh,Deputy Political Editor
Friday 23 January 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Peter Hain, the Leader of the Commons, was accused yesterday of suggesting that the Hutton report was less important than MPs' holidays after he refused to grant extra time to a parliamentary debate.

In the Government's first detailed announcement on the issue, Mr Hain revealed that the debate would be held on 4 February, a week after the publication of the report.

Mr Hain left open the possibility of a vote on the debate, but he infuriated opposition MPs when he said that it would be restricted to five and a half hours and refused to allow MPs to sit beyond 7pm. Mr Hain said that such a move to extend the parliamentary day could occur only in "exceptional circumstances", such as when MPs sat late last summer to avoid ruining their holidays.

The minister also refused to grant a two-day debate, claiming a precedent had been set by the Tories when they granted only one day for discussion of the Scott report into the arms-to-Iraq affair.

MPs can vote to delay beyond 7pm, what is known as the "moment of interruption", the point at which the Commons adjourns until the next day.

Paul Tyler, the Liberal Democrat spokesman on the Commons, said MPs should at least be allowed to sit to 10pm on such a matter of national importance. "There is nothing to stop us doing that and the extra three hours would be very valuable," he said.

Mr Hain pointed out that previous extended sittings took place before the summer recess and just before the prorogation or end of the parliamentary session in November. "On the question of the length of the debate, I do not intend to go past the moment of interruption," he said.

"We have agreed sitting times, except in exceptional circumstances such as occurred just before prorogation and such as occurred just before the summer recess, when members would not have wanted us to go into the summer recess having booked their holidays."

Mr Tyler accused Mr Hain of "trivialising" parliamentary scrutiny of the issue. "Members of the public would be horrified to think that the Leader of the House of Commons was suggesting that the Hutton report was somehow less important than MPs' holidays."

When John Major allowed only one day for the Scott report debate, Tony Blair and a string of Labour MPs accused the Tory government of treating Parliament and the public with contempt.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in