UK

4° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

He may be implicated, but Coulson is too important to lose

By Andy McSmith

Denis MacShane, the sharp-eyed Labour MP, was one of the few people outside the Conservative Party to spot the embattled spin doctor Andy Coulson yesterday – in an inner courtyard of the House of Commons beneath Big Ben.

"At seven o'clock this morning I saw a hunched figure with a suit bag and a mobile phone walking across Speaker's Yard," Mr MacShane told the Commons. "I thought he was on the way out, having been fired."

He was wrong. Rather than fire him, David Cameron and his supporters closed ranks around the former tabloid newspaper editor, determined not to lose his highly valued services. The Conservative leader claimed to be "relaxed" about allegations of phone tapping by the News of the World, which Mr Coulson edited until his resignation two years ago when his royal correspondent, Clive Goodman, was jailed for phone hacking.

"I believe in giving people a second chance," Mr Cameron said. "As director of communications for the Conservatives, he does an excellent job in a proper, upright way at all times."

In contrast, when another of Mr Cameron's inner circle, the MP Andrew Mackay, was caught in the expenses row two months ago, he was instantly thrown to the wolves; his parliamentary career will be over at the next election. Mr Coulson's job is safe for as long as Mr Cameron is able to protect him, and there will be an office for him in 10 Downing Street if Mr Cameron becomes Prime Minister.

Yesterday, Mr Coulson was in his office, and was said to be trying to work normally, despite the political storm raging outside. This reaction appears to break a well-known rule – perhaps cliché – of politics, ruefully stated by Gordon Brown's former spin doctor Charlie Whelan when he was forced to resign: "The job of press secretary becomes extremely difficult if the press secretary, and not the department he serves, becomes the story and the subject of excessive attention."

But Mr Coulson is more than a "press secretary". He is the man in the office next to David Cameron's, and one of the brains behind the whole Cameron operation, who has guarded his boss's reputation as fiercely as he is now being guarded.

Mr Coulson is the one who reminds Mr Cameron not to forget the staples of Tory politics – crime and tax, and good relations with the mass-circulation Conservative newspapers.

Mr Coulson is credited with a coup at the start of the expenses row. On day one of the revelations published in The Daily Telegraph, the newspaper generously praised the Tory leader for his "straightforward" expenses claims. They did not mention that Mr Cameron had taken a £350,000 mortgage on his second home, on which he could reclaim the interest, at the same time that he had paid off a £75,000 loan owing on his London home, which he could not claim. If that information had been public from the start, it would have made Mr Cameron's handling of the row very difficult. Andy Coulson is credited with persuading the Telegraph to go easy on his boss.

But that same expenses scandal means that there are people in the Conservative Party who would not mind seeing Mr Coulson humiliated. They resent the way it was used to rid the party of some of the old guard, with their duck islands, moats, and tree-lined estates, while party modernisers with questionable expenses claims were protected.

The Tory chairman of the Commons Culture and Media Select Committee, John Whittingdale, made it plain yesterday that he is not going to defend Mr Coulson if evidence emerges that he was personally implicated. Mr Whittingdale was Margaret Thatcher's political adviser 20 years ago, and his devotion to her legacy makes him less than enthusiastic about the Cameron operation.

The danger for Mr Coulson now is that revelations of phone-tapping could become so embarrassing that they outweigh his usefulness to his boss. But that has not happened yet. For the time being, it is business as usual in the office next door to Dave's.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Good article
[info]stewartpa wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 05:53 am (UTC)
Says it all - no need to comment
Spin Doctors
[info]dylanatstrumble wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:37 am (UTC)
I was struck whilst watching the news yesterday how similar the stance taken by by Colson whilst watching his boss perform during a news conference was to the stance taken by Alaister Campbell whilst he was keeping an eye on Blair during another news conference some years back. It made me wonder if there was a style shool for spin doctors to attend where they are taught not only political spin, but also how to stand whilst in the public eye. Finally should Cameron resign in view of the above disclosures or is this another example of him giving himself a second chance which as you say above he did not extend to those Tory MPs he didn't want in the party
Coulson too important to lose?
[info]nigel1992 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
Is he really too important? If so, it's very worrying. I suspect though that the real problem is that he is too dangerous to sack. After all, he knows all of Cameron and his inner circle's secrets.
But he is still innocent
[info]deimosp wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:36 am (UTC)
Last time I read about the UK law people were innocent until proven guilty (e.g. n Court - ignoring Labour's court of Public Convenience). As I see it the police have already said there is insufficient evidence, yet Prescott and others seem to be treating the guy as guilty. Do the (Prescott and Labour) not realize this long standing "Innocent until proven guilty" tradition in the UK. I guess not what with control orders, anti-terrorism laws being used where there is no question of terrorist activity, etc. I suspect they will soon be changing the foundation of UK law to "guilty until proven innocent" - 'cos it seems to be how they work anyway.
put off
[info]artsit_e wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
I am realy put off Cameron for keeping this apparently slimy dodgy unethical guy so close to him.
I didnt know he was so in bed with News International, this shines a new light on the "new" Tories.
No thanks.
Conservatives great weakness
[info]deimosp wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
This has shown one of the great weaknesses of the Conservatives under Cameroon. If you are one of "his mates" then ...

Look a sOsborne. A massive weakness in the Conservatives and generally recognised he would be a disaster as the Chancellor. Yet he is an "old school chum" of Cameroon's so nothing will shift him to allow somebody better suited to teh rle to take over. It is this "mates" attitude Cameroon has that is such a weakness as you dont get the best but his mates. And so many of his mates also have old school ties that it can make the conservatives look like a public school club. It is that aspect to them that means they will not be getting my vote (and I suspect will be discouraging many others from moing from Labour).

Of course, nothing will chnage because that is how Cameroon is.
Double standards and double dealing,
[info]twellian057 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
dirty tricks and phone tapping, smear campaigns, hiding (sorry "redacting",) expenses claims, all just another day at Westminster. We don't expect anything else. Guilty or not, we will never find out the truth from this conniving bunch because we can't trust any of them. They don't even trust each other. Quite rightly too.
... Coulson is too important to lose.
[info]john_b_ellis wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
If your headline proves to be prophetic, expect the already considerable public disillusion with, and disengagement from, politics and the whole "democratic" process in this country to continue and grow ...
Is he a liar or an imbecile?
[info]timonsays wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 01:18 pm (UTC)
The point is that Coulson is either an imbecile (if he didn't know what was going on at the NOTW while he was in charge) or a liar (if he did know, as he says he didn't).

If there is a third possibility please say what it is, as I do not see it myself.

If Cameron is employing an imbecile then I suppose that's up to him. But if he is employing a liar then surely that is not morally right.

Either way, I'm afraid this reflects very badly on Cameron. Will I be voting Tory? No way!!!
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
The Tory chairman of the Commons Culture and Media Select Committee, John Whittingdale, made it plain yesterday that he is not going to defend Mr Coulson if evidence emerges that he was personally implicated.

As opposed to Labour chaired and dominated Committees like McFall talking nonesense to defend his supreme leader?
Is he a liar or an imbecile?
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 01:20 pm (UTC)
tomonsays- you won't be voting Tory. presumably in the same vein, I assume after McBride you won't be voting Labour and the Lib Dems have kept a donation of 2.5 million from a convicted and now jailed fraudster, and have refused to return the money to those that were defrauded, so I guess they are definitely out of the picture. Maybe best not to vote at all?

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date