UK

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Labour investigates vote-rigging claims

Enquiry launched as Blair ally's daughter battles to be chosen to fight safe seat

By Michael Savage, Political correspondent

The Labour Party is to investigate claims of voting irregularities in a controversial candidate selection process that could see the daughter of one of Tony Blair’s closest allies handed a safe seat.

Georgia Gould, 22, the daughter of one of the architects of New Labour, Philip Gould, hopes to beat seven other women shortlisted to represent the party in the safe seat of Erith and Thamesmead in south-east London.

But the selection process has developed into a bitter row over the tactics used by Ms Gould’s campaign team. About a third of local party members have registered to vote by post, leading to allegations that those behind Ms Gould’s campaign have been distributing postal vote forms pre-filled with voters’ names, addresses and telephone numbers to make it easier.

John Austin, the Labour MP who is stepping down from the constituency at the next election, has asked the party’s general secretary, Ray Collins, to investigate the claims. He is also furious that prominent Blairite figures, including Alastair Campbell, have been backing Ms Gould’s campaign.

Controversy over the race escalated last night when the party called off today’s vote after finding one of its ballot boxes had been tampered with. An investigation is now underway. No suspects have been named.

A spokesman for the party said: “At 6.45pm this evening it was discovered that the seal on a ballot box containing previously received ballot papers for the selection of Labour's parliamentary candidate for Erith and Thamesmead was broken.”

Labour rules are clear on voting by mail, declaring that postal ballots “shall only be granted to those who are unable to attend [in person] – not to those who choose not to attend”.

They also state that interference in the voting process is banned. “No shortlisted nominee or any person acting on behalf of a nominee should benefit from interference in the process of applications for, or the issue and return of, postal votes,” they state, adding interference “may lead to the disqualification of the nominee concerned”.

A spokesman for the party said the complaint would be taken “very seriously” but added that its initial queries suggested that the total number of postal votes did not look to be “unduly high”.

Ms Gould has close ties with New Labour. Her father was a key figure in reshaping the party along with Lord Mandelson, and she works part-time for Mr Blair’s Faith Foundation. Her likely selection in Erith and Thamesmead, a largely working-class area where Labour has a majority of 11,500, has been described as a New Labour “stitch-up” by some local activists and the central party has even wrested control of the contest. Ms Gould is unable to comment because of party protocol.

Her potential selection, despite her father’s close links to Mr Blair, is not the only constituency battle causing disquiet within the party. A senior Labour figure told The Independent yesterday that the use of postal ballots had to be looked at across the country after similar concerns were raised about the selection of another friend of Mr Blair in Calder Valley, Yorkshire.

Steph Booth, the stepmother of Mr Blair’s wife, Cherie, was chosen after receiving a large number of postal votes despite losing the ballot among those who voted in person after listening to the candidates. There is no suggestion of vote-rigging in this instance.

Peter Kenyon, a member of Labour’s governing National Executive Committee, said he had concerns about the number of postal votes being cast. “There are signs that the use of postal votes has moved on from the way the rules state they should be used,” he said. “We need to have a look at [this].”

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Selection Process
[info]aliruadh wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 11:42 pm (UTC)
How easy to yet again apply the usual formula of voter's perception of Labour in recent times !
postal votes
[info]britfree wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 12:39 am (UTC)
labour have stolen several contests with postal votes . it has made the chances of a free vote impossible , in perception ,if not in fact . there is no democracy in the british state after the GLENROTHES by election ,i mean , hey !!!! have they found the "missing" voter returns yet ? no ? thought not , when they turn up , i'll believe the result. until then ........ oh by the way , vote S N P , oh no you cant , can you ? it'll have to be the equally corrupt tories for you then , soar alba
Erith contest
[info]flashgnu wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 02:28 am (UTC)
Well as someone who lives here. Perhaps it would have been good to know something about this before I was interviewed by a Times reporter today. I'm not active polically anymore but try to keep an eye on local events, but this whole reselection has not made any impact locally, I've yet to hear anyone mention it. Apathy rules OK but I find it disquieting that Labour or other parties seem to have gone out of their way to make sure that it wasn't widely reported here.

Personally I doubt that we're worth vote rigging over for just a candidate and it's just a cock up, my impressions are that alas the BNP will do rather well here listening to few political views I hear around. On the bright side they'll be splitting the Tory vote and neither will get in.



[info]bowesy wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC)
Quite what a 22 year old will offer as an MP is beyond me - she is obviously bright but that is not enough.

The tricks here really high light how low this party have stooped.
[info]rozr wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 10:09 am (UTC)
More vote rigging.
smear campaign
[info]ltg_1 wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC)
I think it is rather interesting that a smear campaign has been reportedly been launched against Ms Gould and now the postal votes which she is thought to have had the majority of have been tampered. This is clearly a sabotage of her campaign and is an appalling reflection on the way politicians try to win these days. The people heading this smear and sabotage campaign clearly do not have enough confidence in their own preferred candidates efforts to engage the labour members in Erith and thamesmead, otherwise they would not result to these tactics. This is utterly appalling and it is a reflection of politics from the highest enclaves of Gordon Browns people trying to fabricate lies about the conservatives to this election in Erith and Thamesmead. No wonder the public have no confidence in politicians.
Re: smear campaign
[info]drasticmeas wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
I think you're spot on SmearCamaign,

Charlie Whelan and his Unite buddies seem to have become experts at dirty tactics and smears. Georia Gould happens to be doing incredibly well and is promising to put Erith and Thamesmead on the map and bring all sorts of young, apathetic people into the political fold.

Yet the business of breaking into ballot boxes filled with Georgia Goud's votes (if popular allegations in the press were correct), means someone was spooked enough by her momentum to go and do something so ridiculous and stupid!

HOwever, while this may benefit Georgia (whose supporters will just be more determined to vote because of this injustice), it is going to hurt the Labour party the most. It makes us looks just so bloody incompetant at a time when we need to show we are capable of governing ourselves, let alone the country!
Re: smear campaign
[info]dinoysus wrote:
Monday, 20 April 2009 at 06:12 am (UTC)
It has not been proven who broke into the ballots but Georgie Gould is sending e-mails trying to smear her opponents for the crime without a drop of evidence, looks like she is perfect for the Labour Party!
The Depths
[info]grumpyashell wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
Can we now have proper investigations into what has been happening to our Democracy........now that the NuLabour spin machine is in the public eye or are journalists still afraid of it.
Lets look at the Glenrothes vote.....Lets look at boundary changes and what they actually mean.....and carry on down in Thamesmead......who is dealing with the postal voting system...the controls....I could go on but they are very important,but we seem to have become a sleep walking,non questioning,head in the sands,everything will be alright population when clearly serious basic things are going wrong,and we have a government which is complisite in these wrongs.
Steph Booth
[info]fuchsiaperfect wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
Regarding Steph Booth's selection, you say "There is no suggestion of vote-rigging in this instance".

Oh yes there is. Supporters of Steph Booth have been accused of helping party members fill in their postal voting forms and it is also alleged that a list of party members was leaked to Unite, Britain's biggest union, which then wrote to those on the list urging them to back her.

I don't know anything about the postal vote issue, but I did receive a letter from Unite asking me to support her.
Merit and ability doesn't count in New Labour
[info]mrmacc wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
Among many things, this proves to show what a sham New-Labour is when it comes to equality of opportunity. Ed Balls and others speak total nonesense when they argue for 5 GCSEs at grade C to enhance prospects. What clearly matter is who you know, who Mummy or Daddy etc know - even Ms Gould's current position is related to connection and not merit. New Labour would happily shove in a 22 y.o clone with zero experience. This is not new, we only need to look at the Milibands, Balls and Cooper to see that New Labour represents all for the connected and its intolerence and contempt of meritocracy.
liebour investigates vote-rigging claims
[info]berewic wrote:
Sunday, 19 April 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
Why bother, every one knows Liebour are corrupt to the core. Every one already knows this was rigged from the very top. Every one knows the whatever Liebours investigation uncovers, it will just be more lies from the Liebour party.
Roll on the General Election. The sooner these SCUM are out of power and locked up in prison the better.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date