UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 5°C

Labour rocked by expenses revelations

Brown, Mandelson, Straw and Blears highlighted in embarrassing leak

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor and Michael Savage

Gordon Brown and several members of his Cabinet were deeply embarrassed last night when the full details of their expense claims as MPs were revealed.

It emerged that the Prime Minister claimed £6,500 after paying his brother Andrew for a cleaner's bill for his Westminster flat, while the Justice Secretary Jack Straw overclaimed for council tax and mortgage payments and the Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for three different properties in one year.

Some 700,000 pages of expense claims by all MPs over five years were due to be published in July after the Commons lost a Freedom of Information battle. But the details have been obtained by the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which plans to disclose them over several days. The newspaper declined to say whether it paid for the information, following reports that a disc containing it had been offered for sale at £300,000 and that two other papers had turned it down. Today's first instalment, covering 13 Cabinet ministers, lays bare the MPs' discredited £24,000-a-year "second homes" allowance. It suggests that rules were lax, mistakes were made by senior politicians and MPs were subject to little scrutiny by Commons officials who approved their claims. It will raise questions over whether some of the errors would ever have come to light without the fight by freedom of information campaigners.

According to the Daily Telegraph:

* Ms Blears spent almost £5,000 of taxpayers' money on furniture in three months.

* The Business Secretary Lord Mandelson claimed thousands of pounds to improve his constituency home in Hartlepool after he had announced his resignation as an MP.

* Foreign Secretary David Miliband spending hundreds of pounds on gardening at his constituency home

* Chancellor Alistair Darling changed his official "second home" designation four times in four years

* Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon switched his second home in a way which allowed him to improve his family home in Derbyshire at taxpayers' expense before buying a London townhouse.

* Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, Europe Minister Caroline Flint and Welsh Secretary Paul Murphy bought flats – or the freehold on properties they already owned – and claimed back stamp duty and other moving costs. Mr Murphy is said to have claimed for a new boiler because his water was too hot.

Last night the ministers insisted they had not broken the rules.

Although the premature publication of the expense claims is bound to embroil MPs from all parties in controversy, it comes at a bad time for Mr Brown. His authority has been weakened by a Labour plan to smear senior Tories, a Commons defeat over residence rights for Gurkha veterans and his rushed attempt to reform the expenses system. While most of his proposed changes were approved last week, his plan to replace the "second homes" allowance with a daily payment for turning up in parliament was scuppered by an all-party revolt.

Receipts submitted by the Prime Minister between 2004 and 2006 disclosed that he paid his brother Andrew, a senior executive at EDF Energy, £6,577 for cleaning services.

A spokesman for Mr Brown said he and his brother had shared a cleaner at their two flats. Andrew Brown paid the cleaner and the Prime Minister reimbursed his share of the cost. "Her contract made clear the allocation of hours of work and payment," said the spokesman. "Inland Revenue and National Insurance receipts show the payments made, but it was easier for her in terms of National Insurance arrangements to be paid by one person. There is no question of Andrew Brown doing the cleaning or receiving any financial benefit."

The spokesman confirmed that Mr Brown received a £153 payment for a plumbing bill twice in two successive quarters in 2006 after a mistake in one of his claims, but had repaid £150. "That was an inadvertent error and as soon as it was brought to Gordon's attention, he contacted the parliamentary Fees Office and repaid the money," he said. The Telegraph said it told Downing Street about the mistake.

Mr Straw reportedly claimed the full cost of council tax even though he received a 50 per cent discount from his local authority. He repaid the money last summer, shortly after a High Court ruling requiring the receipts to be published. Mr Straw also repaid money he was overpaid for his mortgage.

His spokesman insisted all his claims had been in accordance with the rules. "An error arose because the amount of interest declined rapidly towards the end of the mortgage. This error was identified by the Commons authorities on information provided by Mr Straw and then repaid," he said. "It was also Mr Straw himself who spotted errors in the claims for council tax and alerted the authorities. He repaid the difference."

A controversy erupted over how the information leaked out. Sir Stuart Bell, a member of the House of Commons Commission, said: "If this was received by unauthorised means, it is disgraceful that a national newspaper should stoop so low as to buy information which will be in the public domain in July. It undermines the very basis of our democracy."

Benedict Brogan, assistant editor of the Daily Telegraph, said: "What matters is that we've established that this information is reliable and it is certainly in the public interest that we publish it."

The Commons Leader Harriet Harman insisted that no minister would have to resign: "The old system was the system that those claims were made under. We've recognised that though they might have been claims made in good faith, that's not acceptable for the future and we are changing the system."

The bill: Cabinet claims

* Prime Minister Gordon Brown claimed £6,577 in bills for a cleaner, which he shared with his brother. Also claimed for a £150 plumbing bill twice, that was subsequently paid back.

* Jack Straw claimed the full cost of council tax back, despite receiving a 50% discount from his local authority. He repaid the money last summer, shortly after a High Court ruling requiring the receipts to be published. Mr Straw also repaid money he was overpaid for his mortgage.

* Business Secretary Lord Mandelson's claimed for thousands of pounds to improve his constituency home in Hartlepool after announcing his resignation as an MP.

* Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for three different properties in a single year, spending nearly £5,000 of taxpayers' money on furniture in three months.

* Foreign Secretary David Miliband spent hundreds of pounds on gardening at his constituency home.

* Chancellor Alistair Darling changed his official "second home" designation four times in four years.

* Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon switched his second home in a way which allowed him to improve his family home in Derbyshire at taxpayers' expense before buying a London townhouse.

* Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, Europe minister Caroline Flint and Welsh Secretary Paul Murphy bought flats – or freehold on properties they already owned – and claiming back stamp duty and other moving costs.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
People have already made their minds up about this Labour government..
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 12:02 am (UTC)
All this is only reconfirming peoples views of this government. The electorate have already lost all trust in this government, through their lies,general incompetence,financial incompetence, sleaze and slurs. This just means a few more seats lost, as Brown is humiliated at the next election.
New Labour old greed
[info]johnronan wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 12:36 am (UTC)
This will be the New Labour project Waterloo.
While other parties have taken equal advantage they will not be judged in the same way.
The war on poverty looks like snouts in troughs,bring back Champagne socialism?

To try and confound the Gurkhas was such blatant stupidity.
The verdict Brown and dream of social equitydowned by a Purdey.

Will "hug a-Hoodie" Camerons hit squad cleanse these Augean stables and endorse restraint austerity and prudence.I fear Hague is the only man up to it.
Where else in public service is such expense abuse tolerated?
Remedy:Pay the price for the job and make MPs pay their own bills with their own money.
Clean thy desk
[info]zened wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 12:41 am (UTC)
Six grand for a cleaner while he has been taking the country to the cleaners? If the Police can be called on the opposition for disclosing government dirty secrets do we think that Brown is getting value for money? Time to get the cleaning lady to clean out your desk little man.
Rules - schmules
[info]nled63 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 12:53 am (UTC)

Rules, schmules. It matters little. MPs will always find a reason for treating taxpayers' money with contempt. They always have, & unless some very tangible steps are taken to stop this internal "freebies rot" once & for all, we have every reason to suppose that it will continue. Ultimately, the situation rests with us, the general public. For as long as we are content to allow MPs unquestioned reign in the way they not only conduct our national & international affairs but also dispose of our hard-earned tax pounds, MPs will be content to continue the profligacy.
Re: Rules - schmules
[info]cm999 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
I agree we cant trust any of them. Presumably we are only going to hear of the Labour excesses from the Torygraph as part of its election support
Re: Rules - schmules - [info]nightside242 - Friday, 8 May 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC) Expand
Out !
[info]il_767 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 12:54 am (UTC)
Will no one rid me of this meddlesome PM?
Face it
[info]razygentry wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 01:56 am (UTC)

They are ALL the same. There will be an equal number of Tories taking the piss.

The saddest thing is it not going to change either.
Re: Face it
[info]sobatai wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 02:31 am (UTC)
Yes, but it is expected of the Tories, especially at the lower levels. That's why this will always be worse for Golem Brown and New Labour.
Furthermore, any truly outrageous claims by Tory MPs will probably be dealt with by Cameron, whereas, as we can see from the attitude to these shameful expense claims, Golem Brown hasn't the courage to say anything other than they were "in good faith" or "in line with the regulation" and other nonsense. Cameron is in the position of being strong enough to deal with miscreants, Golem Brown isn't.
Re: Face it - [info]mannygoldstein - Friday, 8 May 2009 at 05:17 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Face it - [info]bowesy - Friday, 8 May 2009 at 07:16 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Face it - [info]sobatai - Friday, 8 May 2009 at 03:53 pm (UTC) Expand
Embarrassed?
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 02:45 am (UTC)
Impossible!!
ROTTING EDIFICE SHOULD BE PULLED DOWN:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 04:40 am (UTC)
How can this dysfunctional Government remain in power? The whole rotten edifice should be pulled down. The country needs and wants a General Election. Are we going to allow these greedy, sleazy champagne socialists to continue to mike the system? The country cannot afford to keep Labour in office.
A sanctimonious hypocrite and his 'values'
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 04:42 am (UTC)
When he became Leader of the Labour Party, and thus Prime Minister, Gordon Brown he talked of his;

"...humility, pride and great sense of duty."
"I will endeavour to justify every day and in every act the trust you have placed in me."
"And so I say honestly: I am a conviction politician."

These expense claims reveal his sense of duty, or are they revealing his sense of entitlement?

Let us judge Gordon Brown by his very own words, has he not abused our trust?

A conviction politician, or convicted in the court of public opinion?

"For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." Matthew 7:1

Gordon Brown revels in his 'son of the manse' status, so a Biblical quote would seem most appropriate when considering the expenses claims of our elected Members of Parliament. The general public rely on their duly elected representatives to use their judgement on our behalf every day. If they cannot see that their judgement was flawed, they will not understand the anger theur behaviour has aroused.

Gordon Brown was not elected either as Leader of the Labour Party or as Prime Minister but as quoted above in his acceptance speech, he asked for the trust of the public nevertheless.

This trust was given, and these expense claims give some insight to Gordon Brown the man, his values, and 'every act' that he has taken. The point of the Biblical quote is to illustrate the need for a consistent set of standards by which to judge both MP's and the public at large.

If members of the public accept that they would have behaved just as the MP's have behaved, then there is not a problem, no rules and laws have been broken, the MP's acted in good faith to claim what they were allowed to claim.
On the other hand, if the public would not, or could not make the same claims from their employers, then this is unjust and the MP's have committed the equivalent of fraud. They will be judged accordingly at the ballot box.
HYPOCRITICAL CHAMPAGNE SOCIALISTS:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 04:53 am (UTC)
The country needs a General Election soonest. This dysfunctional Government cannot be allowed to continue to support their members milking the system. Brown and his Government are serial hypocrites.
I want an expences rise if not a pay rise !!
[info]frankgwasere wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 05:24 am (UTC)
If I dared to claim any of these out of pocket expences I'd get fired. If I need to arrange a meeting I book a room or hotel facilities I dont and wouldnt use my own home. Yes an MP can wow I should change jobs, except Im too honest to be a Politician.

Dont forget in 10 years all senior employees of the political system (and civil servents) have increased their expences, both national and local, and we the idiots have to pay for them ! Labour also increased MPs mages by over 50% !!!

What a waste of money, what a waste of money. Worst thing is we cant, no one can sack them !!
Expenses
[info]respectedgraham wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 05:55 am (UTC)
Now is the time for the electorate to get up of their 'backsides' and demand that theise 'thieves' step down from public office. What sort of example do they set to a nation faced with rising crime, record levels of anti-social behaviour, et. Sleaze and greed have become the norm during the last decade, encouraged by the behaviour of our political and financial leaders. For the sake of democracy things must change, and quickly. For the next few days we will be subjected to a number of MPs standing before the cameras telling us that 'no rules have been broken' and that they themselves were the ones to reveal certain errors etc. (coincidental that this took place 1 day after being questioned by the media). Thie level of corruption as revealed by the 'Private Eye' should frighten us all as there are clearly 2 groups of people in this nation-the haves and the have nots. It is said that a nation gets the government it deserves and if the electorate does not rise up and expel these people then God help us all.
Re: Expenses
[info]linchung wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:04 pm (UTC)
I think we need to look to the future. The post of politician desperately needs a new job description, with a whole new set of *enforceable* responsibilities.

Ask yourself...

~~ What would you vote FOR?

~~ Which politician will make an *enforceable* election promise, that they will listen to and obey the wishes of the PEOPLE?

In this age of wide-scale communication with each other, and on-line interaction, there should be made means for the population to easily register their wishes over matters too important to be left to "politicians". For example, *legally binding* referenda over going preemptively to war, or whether an MP should be brought before a judge, or whether we want the Human Rights Act to be more than a weak gesture...

The think the golden age of politicians *may* be finishing right about now, so perhaps we need to think *how* we are going to get the democracy we so clearly need. I think that insisting on a greater participation in the decisions of government is a good first step! Public Servants, anyone?

Thanks for reading this...
Well done Torygraph!
[info]had_it wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:00 am (UTC)
Not only is this story a service to the body politic, it is a service to all political parties other than labor. By the time the details of Conservative and Liberal wallet padding goes public, people will be bored with the story.
liberals
[info]andrewravesax wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:05 am (UTC)
Not all MP's in all parties are the same in this scandal.

please don't forget that the Liberals have NOT abused the second homes system.
Re: liberals
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 07:27 am (UTC)
You will find that it is only the Liberal MP's with a London constituency that don't abuse (sorry use) the second home system.

All MP's regardles of party have used the system of expenses to improve their salary because the system was set up to allow this. The majority have stayed within the rules, its just that the rules are so generous the rest of the country look on in stunned amazement.
easy to look at one side
[info]helen40 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:08 am (UTC)
So what were the figures for the Conservative shadow cabinet? No chance of the Telegraph publishing them then.
Why will having an election change anything?
[info]wellington1815 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:11 am (UTC)
Its not having an election that will change anything.Voting CON,will that change anything?Of course it will change nothing of substance.You know this,I know this. This is because we know the whole political system at Westminster is rotten.Central to this corruption is the self-serving media who were very happy to be cheer leaders for their man Blair.Now,since they have the perfect Blair clone in Cameron,they have turned on Brown.These people have been shown to be lying,theiving scum.So you can vote for them if you want to.If you do then don`t complain when future filth is uncovered.This is why I shall be voting BNP during future elections.They are the only party who a will clean up the cess pit that Westminster and PC politics has become.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:11 am (UTC)
So what is new ?? All the bleeding politicos are on the gravey train; their snouts in so deep in the trough; they just can't see beyond their greedy noses.

The only clean politician is John Denham; who promptly resigned his ministerial seat when he could not reconcile with the greediest pig of them all; none other than Tony "the poodle " Blair.

The other clean guy was John Smith; but he met a mysterious untimely death in the bath tub.
Labour rocked by expenses revelations
[info]leminier wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
Now lets see the Telegraph play fair and publish the Tories and Lib Dems claims. Will they I wonder?
what a mess
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:23 am (UTC)
alladin´s cave and the 600 thieves !!!!!!!!! and these clowns and crooks claim that they are there for the benefit of the people?????
[info]respectedgraham wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:29 am (UTC)
Well done Torygraph!
[info]had_it wrote:
Not only is this story a service to the body politic, it is a service to all political parties other than labor. By the time the details of Conservative and Liberal wallet padding goes public, people will be bored with the story.

As an Independent reader you will no doubt remember J. Hari's article entitled 'What about...' type argument. We are all aware that the other parties are just as bad but that does not excuse what the government MPS are doing. Please see beyond the 'political party' picture. What is important is that the entire system is rotten.
new labour
[info]9plattoon wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC)
cannot and should not ever be trusted to run our nation ever again,this and previouse labour goverments have failed to deliver on there promises new labour wide boy's and spivs more like it more than ever people need to use there democratic right and vote on mass that will do two things first get rid of these failures but also warn others that we can get rid of anybody at the ballot box at any time
Labour rocked......
[info]victormc wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:44 am (UTC)
Don't be daft this lot of thieves are far too brazen to be rocked by anything.
This story really is far too late......surely 100% of the public are already aware- those that can read and write or watch television. Have I missed a category? It's frightening that still 26% would still vote for them tomorrow so the polls say.
Labour expenses
[info]sandn09 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
Great stuff. The figures are impressive. Could we not have the same thing for EMPs, the Brussels overpaid admin and how much money is used by lobbyists, where it comes from and where it goes and what the Candidates for the next election intend to do to thin Europe's waist in Brussels and Strasbourg?
Expenses revelations
[info]pastcaring wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:54 am (UTC)
Interesting to note that the Brown brothers were so accommodating towards their shared cleaner.
I quote from the article...but it was easier for her in terms of National Insurance arrangements to be paid by one person.

Well Gormless I work for five different companies on an 'as and when needed' basis and I manage to keep my affairs in order.

This excuse is an insult to readers of this article and just shows how much you hold people in contempt.
Expenses Can Be Taxable!
[info]foxtrotuk wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 06:55 am (UTC)
One point that may have been missed is that HM Revenue and Customs can tax expenses as income where they have not been wholely and necessarily incurred in the performance of the claimant's work.

Perhaps it's time they had a look at some MP's expense claims.
Re: Expenses Can Be Taxable!
[info]maxquortleplean wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 05:44 pm (UTC)
Well said, set their own civil servants against them. Ah, but we're both dreaming, as long as the politicians are able to manipulate their underlings in the police and civil service. After all, most of them are lawyers who are all experts in bending, manipulating and breaking the law. You would need an independent civil service, police and courts system and thats as likely as Robert Mugabe becoming a benevolent leader.
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date