Labour rocked by expenses revelations
Brown, Mandelson, Straw and Blears highlighted in embarrassing leak
Gordon Brown and several members of his Cabinet were deeply embarrassed last night when the full details of their expense claims as MPs were revealed.
It emerged that the Prime Minister claimed £6,500 after paying his brother Andrew for a cleaner's bill for his Westminster flat, while the Justice Secretary Jack Straw overclaimed for council tax and mortgage payments and the Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for three different properties in one year.
Some 700,000 pages of expense claims by all MPs over five years were due to be published in July after the Commons lost a Freedom of Information battle. But the details have been obtained by the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which plans to disclose them over several days. The newspaper declined to say whether it paid for the information, following reports that a disc containing it had been offered for sale at £300,000 and that two other papers had turned it down. Today's first instalment, covering 13 Cabinet ministers, lays bare the MPs' discredited £24,000-a-year "second homes" allowance. It suggests that rules were lax, mistakes were made by senior politicians and MPs were subject to little scrutiny by Commons officials who approved their claims. It will raise questions over whether some of the errors would ever have come to light without the fight by freedom of information campaigners.
According to the Daily Telegraph:
* Ms Blears spent almost £5,000 of taxpayers' money on furniture in three months.
* The Business Secretary Lord Mandelson claimed thousands of pounds to improve his constituency home in Hartlepool after he had announced his resignation as an MP.
* Foreign Secretary David Miliband spending hundreds of pounds on gardening at his constituency home
* Chancellor Alistair Darling changed his official "second home" designation four times in four years
* Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon switched his second home in a way which allowed him to improve his family home in Derbyshire at taxpayers' expense before buying a London townhouse.
* Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, Europe Minister Caroline Flint and Welsh Secretary Paul Murphy bought flats – or the freehold on properties they already owned – and claimed back stamp duty and other moving costs. Mr Murphy is said to have claimed for a new boiler because his water was too hot.
Last night the ministers insisted they had not broken the rules.
Although the premature publication of the expense claims is bound to embroil MPs from all parties in controversy, it comes at a bad time for Mr Brown. His authority has been weakened by a Labour plan to smear senior Tories, a Commons defeat over residence rights for Gurkha veterans and his rushed attempt to reform the expenses system. While most of his proposed changes were approved last week, his plan to replace the "second homes" allowance with a daily payment for turning up in parliament was scuppered by an all-party revolt.
Receipts submitted by the Prime Minister between 2004 and 2006 disclosed that he paid his brother Andrew, a senior executive at EDF Energy, £6,577 for cleaning services.
A spokesman for Mr Brown said he and his brother had shared a cleaner at their two flats. Andrew Brown paid the cleaner and the Prime Minister reimbursed his share of the cost. "Her contract made clear the allocation of hours of work and payment," said the spokesman. "Inland Revenue and National Insurance receipts show the payments made, but it was easier for her in terms of National Insurance arrangements to be paid by one person. There is no question of Andrew Brown doing the cleaning or receiving any financial benefit."
The spokesman confirmed that Mr Brown received a £153 payment for a plumbing bill twice in two successive quarters in 2006 after a mistake in one of his claims, but had repaid £150. "That was an inadvertent error and as soon as it was brought to Gordon's attention, he contacted the parliamentary Fees Office and repaid the money," he said. The Telegraph said it told Downing Street about the mistake.
Mr Straw reportedly claimed the full cost of council tax even though he received a 50 per cent discount from his local authority. He repaid the money last summer, shortly after a High Court ruling requiring the receipts to be published. Mr Straw also repaid money he was overpaid for his mortgage.
His spokesman insisted all his claims had been in accordance with the rules. "An error arose because the amount of interest declined rapidly towards the end of the mortgage. This error was identified by the Commons authorities on information provided by Mr Straw and then repaid," he said. "It was also Mr Straw himself who spotted errors in the claims for council tax and alerted the authorities. He repaid the difference."
A controversy erupted over how the information leaked out. Sir Stuart Bell, a member of the House of Commons Commission, said: "If this was received by unauthorised means, it is disgraceful that a national newspaper should stoop so low as to buy information which will be in the public domain in July. It undermines the very basis of our democracy."
Benedict Brogan, assistant editor of the Daily Telegraph, said: "What matters is that we've established that this information is reliable and it is certainly in the public interest that we publish it."
The Commons Leader Harriet Harman insisted that no minister would have to resign: "The old system was the system that those claims were made under. We've recognised that though they might have been claims made in good faith, that's not acceptable for the future and we are changing the system."
The bill: Cabinet claims
* Prime Minister Gordon Brown claimed £6,577 in bills for a cleaner, which he shared with his brother. Also claimed for a £150 plumbing bill twice, that was subsequently paid back.
* Jack Straw claimed the full cost of council tax back, despite receiving a 50% discount from his local authority. He repaid the money last summer, shortly after a High Court ruling requiring the receipts to be published. Mr Straw also repaid money he was overpaid for his mortgage.
* Business Secretary Lord Mandelson's claimed for thousands of pounds to improve his constituency home in Hartlepool after announcing his resignation as an MP.
* Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for three different properties in a single year, spending nearly £5,000 of taxpayers' money on furniture in three months.
* Foreign Secretary David Miliband spent hundreds of pounds on gardening at his constituency home.
* Chancellor Alistair Darling changed his official "second home" designation four times in four years.
* Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon switched his second home in a way which allowed him to improve his family home in Derbyshire at taxpayers' expense before buying a London townhouse.
* Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, Europe minister Caroline Flint and Welsh Secretary Paul Murphy bought flats – or freehold on properties they already owned – and claiming back stamp duty and other moving costs.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
While other parties have taken equal advantage they will not be judged in the same way.
The war on poverty looks like snouts in troughs,bring back Champagne socialism?
To try and confound the Gurkhas was such blatant stupidity.
The verdict Brown and dream of social equitydowned by a Purdey.
Will "hug a-Hoodie" Camerons hit squad cleanse these Augean stables and endorse restraint austerity and prudence.I fear Hague is the only man up to it.
Where else in public service is such expense abuse tolerated?
Remedy:Pay the price for the job and make MPs pay their own bills with their own money.
Rules, schmules. It matters little. MPs will always find a reason for treating taxpayers' money with contempt. They always have, & unless some very tangible steps are taken to stop this internal "freebies rot" once & for all, we have every reason to suppose that it will continue. Ultimately, the situation rests with us, the general public. For as long as we are content to allow MPs unquestioned reign in the way they not only conduct our national & international affairs but also dispose of our hard-earned tax pounds, MPs will be content to continue the profligacy.
They are ALL the same. There will be an equal number of Tories taking the piss.
The saddest thing is it not going to change either.
Furthermore, any truly outrageous claims by Tory MPs will probably be dealt with by Cameron, whereas, as we can see from the attitude to these shameful expense claims, Golem Brown hasn't the courage to say anything other than they were "in good faith" or "in line with the regulation" and other nonsense. Cameron is in the position of being strong enough to deal with miscreants, Golem Brown isn't.
"...humility, pride and great sense of duty."
"I will endeavour to justify every day and in every act the trust you have placed in me."
"And so I say honestly: I am a conviction politician."
These expense claims reveal his sense of duty, or are they revealing his sense of entitlement?
Let us judge Gordon Brown by his very own words, has he not abused our trust?
A conviction politician, or convicted in the court of public opinion?
"For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." Matthew 7:1
Gordon Brown revels in his 'son of the manse' status, so a Biblical quote would seem most appropriate when considering the expenses claims of our elected Members of Parliament. The general public rely on their duly elected representatives to use their judgement on our behalf every day. If they cannot see that their judgement was flawed, they will not understand the anger theur behaviour has aroused.
Gordon Brown was not elected either as Leader of the Labour Party or as Prime Minister but as quoted above in his acceptance speech, he asked for the trust of the public nevertheless.
This trust was given, and these expense claims give some insight to Gordon Brown the man, his values, and 'every act' that he has taken. The point of the Biblical quote is to illustrate the need for a consistent set of standards by which to judge both MP's and the public at large.
If members of the public accept that they would have behaved just as the MP's have behaved, then there is not a problem, no rules and laws have been broken, the MP's acted in good faith to claim what they were allowed to claim.
On the other hand, if the public would not, or could not make the same claims from their employers, then this is unjust and the MP's have committed the equivalent of fraud. They will be judged accordingly at the ballot box.
Dont forget in 10 years all senior employees of the political system (and civil servents) have increased their expences, both national and local, and we the idiots have to pay for them ! Labour also increased MPs mages by over 50% !!!
What a waste of money, what a waste of money. Worst thing is we cant, no one can sack them !!
Ask yourself...
~~ What would you vote FOR?
~~ Which politician will make an *enforceable* election promise, that they will listen to and obey the wishes of the PEOPLE?
In this age of wide-scale communication with each other, and on-line interaction, there should be made means for the population to easily register their wishes over matters too important to be left to "politicians". For example, *legally binding* referenda over going preemptively to war, or whether an MP should be brought before a judge, or whether we want the Human Rights Act to be more than a weak gesture...
The think the golden age of politicians *may* be finishing right about now, so perhaps we need to think *how* we are going to get the democracy we so clearly need. I think that insisting on a greater participation in the decisions of government is a good first step! Public Servants, anyone?
Thanks for reading this...
please don't forget that the Liberals have NOT abused the second homes system.
All MP's regardles of party have used the system of expenses to improve their salary because the system was set up to allow this. The majority have stayed within the rules, its just that the rules are so generous the rest of the country look on in stunned amazement.
The only clean politician is John Denham; who promptly resigned his ministerial seat when he could not reconcile with the greediest pig of them all; none other than Tony "the poodle " Blair.
The other clean guy was John Smith; but he met a mysterious untimely death in the bath tub.
[info]had_it wrote:
Not only is this story a service to the body politic, it is a service to all political parties other than labor. By the time the details of Conservative and Liberal wallet padding goes public, people will be bored with the story.
As an Independent reader you will no doubt remember J. Hari's article entitled 'What about...' type argument. We are all aware that the other parties are just as bad but that does not excuse what the government MPS are doing. Please see beyond the 'political party' picture. What is important is that the entire system is rotten.
This story really is far too late......surely 100% of the public are already aware- those that can read and write or watch television. Have I missed a category? It's frightening that still 26% would still vote for them tomorrow so the polls say.
I quote from the article...but it was easier for her in terms of National Insurance arrangements to be paid by one person.
Well Gormless I work for five different companies on an 'as and when needed' basis and I manage to keep my affairs in order.
This excuse is an insult to readers of this article and just shows how much you hold people in contempt.
Perhaps it's time they had a look at some MP's expense claims.