Lord Ashcroft: Reshuffle was 'mystifying'
Prominent Tory donor voices discontent in party over removal of ministers who were doing 'good job'
David Cameron's decision to sack several high-performing ministers in last week's reshuffle was "mystifying" and will do nothing to help the party win a majority at the next election, one of the Conservatives' most significant donors has warned.
In a public intervention which echoes the private concerns of a number of Tory MPs, Lord Ashcroft said the removal of several ministers who had concrete achievements to their name could backfire.
His comments came as the new party chairman Grant Shapps admitted for the first time that the Tories have given up hope of boundary changes going through before the next election.
Mr Shapps confirmed that the party will start selecting candidates immediately after November's police commissioner elections on the basis of existing constituency boundaries.
Fighting the election on the current boundaries will make it much harder for the Tories to win an outright majority in 2015. At the last election, the campaigns in many of the Tories' key seats were funded directly by Lord Ashcroft who has given millions of pounds to the party over the years.
But writing yesterday on the political website ConservativeHome, he hinted at dissatisfaction with the reshuffle. "For voters, the reshuffle is part of soap opera politics," he wrote. "[But] that is not to say it was unimportant; it matters to the extent that we are now more, or less, likely to govern well and keep our promises.
"On that score I cannot help but find one or two of the decisions mystifying – the removal of Nick Gibb, for example, who has a concrete achievement to his name (and how many ministers can say that?) in improving the way primary school children are taught to read, makes you wonder whether delivery was the driving factor in all decisions.
"Those who think reshuffles are mainly a tool for 'party management' would do well to remember that it is delivery that wins and loses elections. It is losing parties that are unmanageable, just as winning parties are disciplined, not the other way round."
His comments reflect dissatisfaction among the Conservative backbenches that a number of ministers – such as Mr Gibb and the policing minister Nick Herbert – were sacked despite clearly doing a good job in their ministerial roles. Others like Charles Hendry, the energy minister, were moved to departments outside their areas of expertise.
When Mr Gibb was called to ask Mr Cameron a question at PMQs on Wednesday, he rose to cheers from the backbenches.
Mr Cameron used the occasion to praise Mr Gibb for his "long-standing work on educational standards and his belief in true rigour in schools", adding, "he has seen many of his ideas put into practice, and that is what we come into politics to achieve".
The intervention led one backbencher to ask privately: "If he was so good, why did Cameron decide to sack him then?"
- 1 Half of young women unable to ‘locate vagina’ and 65% find it difficult to say the word
- 3 Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
- 4 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
- 5 Mexican woman becomes world’s 'oldest person' at 127
Perez Hilton apologises for publishing Jennifer Lawrence naked 4Chan photos
Jennifer Lawrence 'nude photo hacker' claims there are hundreds more celebrity images to come
Victoria Justice on naked photo leak: 'Let me nip this in the bud right now – pun intended'
Ariana Grande nude photos leak: Pictures are completely fake, say representatives
Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
Rotherham child sex abuse scandal: Labour Home Office to be probed over what Tony Blair's government knew - and when
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral
Ashya King: Parents of five-year-old boy refused permission to visit him in hospital and denied bail at Spanish court
With Douglas Carswell joining Ukip, my party has taken another giant step forward
When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
Ashya King: 'Cruel NHS has not given us the treatment we need', says father of five-year-old with brain tumour who fled to Spain
£21000 - £35000 per annum: Randstad Education Cambridge: Maths teachers requir...
£35000 - £38000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: Executive Assistant/Event...
£23760 - £33600 per annum + pre 12 week AWR : Randstad Education Manchester Se...
£21000 - £35000 per annum: Randstad Education Cambridge: The JobAre you a trai...