Lord Cocks - an apology
In an article headlined "New peers promise to work harder" (2 April) it was wrongly stated that Lord Cocks of Hartcliffe was conspicuous by his absence from the vote on the Section 28 amendment. In fact he was in attendance but abstained from voting. We apologise to Lord Cocks for the embarrassment caused by the error.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies