McNulty told to repay £14,000 of expenses
Friday 30 October 2009
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Tony McNulty, former employment minister, had to make a humiliating apology in the Commons after claiming expenses on a property occupied rent-free by his parents.
He was also ordered to pay back almost £14,000 to the taxpayer following an investigation into his use of expenses by Westminster's sleaze watchdog. In a statement to Parliament yesterday, he said he accepted the punishment "with no complaint" and apologised "without reservation".
It comes just two weeks after Jacqui Smith, the former Home Secretary, had to apologise to colleagues for wrongly designating her family home as her second home, allowing her to claim expenses on it.
The Commons Standards and Privileges Committee said that the taxpayer had been effectively subsidising the living costs of Mr McNulty's parents and the Harrow East MP had rarely used his designated "second home", which was just eight miles from his main family home in Hammersmith, west London. Mr McNulty had claimed for the Harrow property from 2002 until 2008, spending around 60 nights a year at the address. That fell to 33 nights in the last nine months of last year.
The investigation concluded that Mr McNulty had not broken the rules but it found that he should only have claimed for the costs incurred from his time spent there. As a result, the committee of MPs said that he had claimed for costs that were "not wholly and exclusively incurred in connection with his parliamentary duties", and ordered him to repay £13,837. He will now face a battle to hold on to the constituency at the next election. He won a majority of 4,740 in 2005.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments