Miliband backs Blair for EU presidency
Foreign Secretary denies he is candidate for key role in new Brussels leadership
The EU needs a new president like Tony Blair, a big name whose arrival in a foreign capital would "stop the traffic", the Foreign Secretary said yesterday. David Miliband has been tipped in some European capitals to be the EU's first foreign minister, an appointment that would eliminate Mr Blair's chances of occupying the presidency, because it is unthinkable that both posts could be occupied by politicians from any one EU country.
But Mr Miliband made it plain that he would rather see Mr Blair in the top job. Asked about the second of the new jobs, he said: "I am not a candidate for that. I am not available."
The question of whether other EU countries want Mr Blair as their first president is looming larger since the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, appeared to drop his opposition to the Lisbon Treaty, which could be ratified by the time EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday. The treaty, if Mr Klaus signs, will create the two new jobs, which eurosceptics see as another step towards the creation of a European superstate.
The Conservatives oppose the treaty outright, and have said they will call a referendum on it if they come to power before it is ratified. If it has been ratified, David Cameron will be under pressure from the eurosceptic right of his party to call a referendum anyway.
Opponents had been relying on President Klaus to hold out for them and prevent ratification. He opposed the treaty on the grounds that it might open the way for compensation claims from Germans whose families were deported after the Second World War. This objection was ridiculed yesterday by the former Chancellor, Ken Clarke, a long standing supporter of the EU, who described it as "the most nonsensical argument about the treaty I've ever heard".
Speaking on the BBC's Politics Show, Mr Clarke said: "He's the Boris Johnson of central Europe. Like Boris, he's intelligent and he's a rather huge personality. He also loves making mischief. But I suspect Czech politics and the Czech constitution will determine how far he can carry on delaying the treaty."
As a member of David Cameron's shadow Cabinet, Mr Clarke formally supports party policy in public, though it is well-known that he privately backs the treaty.
The government of other small EU nations which support the treaty oppose the idea of having a major political figure as president. They have a preference for a low-profile candidate who would do little more than chair meetings.
Mr Blair has not yet said whether he wants the job, if offered, but Mr Miliband, an ally and former adviser to the ex-prime minister, said that his decision was likely to depend on the nature of the job. "It is important for Europe that it has a strong figure in that role, that it has someone able persuasively to advocate the case that is decided by the 27 member states of the EU," he said. "It would be good for Britain as well as very good for Europe if Tony Blair was a candidate and was chosen.
"We need somebody who can do more than simply run through the agenda. We need someone who, when he or she lands in Beijing or Washington or Moscow, the traffic needs to stop. Europe has suffered from the lack of that clarity."
His comments drew a scathing reaction from the Conservatives. Mark Francois, the shadow minister for Europe, said: "David Miliband has shown that securing jobs for the boys is more important than respecting the democratic wishes of the British people."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Personal political gain was the motive for Bliar not allowing a promised referendum to the British people. The whole rotten edifice of the EU project should be rethought.
A referendum on whether the UK should remain members should be put to the British people.
He has murdered millions and turned his country into a police state already.
1. British contributions did not exceed British receipts from the EU
2. British exports to the EU exceeded British imports from the EU
3. The cost of living was not greater as a result of Britain being in the EU
In other words, we are paying other EU countries to export their products to us.
During that period:
1. British coal mines were closed so that Polish mines could export coal to the UK
2. 90% of the British fishing fleet has been laid up so that french, Spanish and Portugese trawlers can fish in our waters. As a result of this we have lost thousands of jobs, and our fish stocks have been severely depleted.
3. France now owns more British power stations than Britain. When the power runs out the first cuts will be in Britain.
4. Corruption in Brussels is so entrenched that their own accountants have refused to sign their own accounts for the past ten years.
5. Illegal immegrants, terrorists and foreign nationals who commit serious crimes including, murder, rape, high value fraud and theft, cannot be deported because EU Human Rights law enables them to drag outtheir cases for years.
6. Brussels is a gravy train for failed British politicians. Kinnock, Mandleson, Lamont and Patten, were all thrown out by the British electorate but all wound up working for the EU.
7. And now, the EU is telling us what light bulbs we are to use in our own homes.
One would have thought that after all the disconnect between British politicians and the British public in recent months, Mr Miliband would think a little more closely about the views of those who put him and other politicians into power, before committing his support to a war criminal.
All the opinion polls which have been published on this subject have suggested that the British people don't want Blair in this post - for whatever reason. At what point will the political class give us the right to express our view? I'm not holding my breath.
I simply do not understand what is going on at the moment but have to believe there is a plot to so discredit our own Parliament that Europe will be seen as the best of two bad deals. Things that are being disclosed and then ignored, such as the abuses in the Lords are designed to drive us to distraction while the real deals go unnoticed. While we lambast Nick Griffin and or the BBC jolly Jack Straw shows once more his determination to take the Coroner's process out of the Public domain - something far more damaging to democracy (because it will happen) than anything Nick Griffin can achieve. Imagine if the inquiry into the death of David Kelly was held by a minister behind closed doors? Where is the press coverage of this? On page 21 in two paragraphs. The ultimte aim of this government and by that I mean the select few with any power is to take away any power the electorate may have and for a small group of confederates to run the show as they see is right. Where are all the good investigative journalists or are the owners of the papers in on the plot?
They are all subject to the global corporatocracy.
B-Liar would discredit both Great Britain and Europe, as nobody across the World trusts him.
He has shown low self-esteem in kowtowing to Bush, and manufacturing lies to perpetrate the Iraq War.