UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

No 10 aide fired over 'obscene' email smears

'Dirty tricks' campaign making serious allegations about senior Tories backfires on Gordon Brown adviser. Jane Merrick and Matthew Bell report

Damian McBride: The spin-doctor who became the story was 'shocked and appalled' that his emails were obtained by a right-wing blogger

REUTERS

Damian McBride: The spin-doctor who became the story was 'shocked and appalled' that his emails were obtained by a right-wing blogger

Gordon Brown sacked his closest political adviser yesterday over a series of "hugely defamatory" and "obscene" emails about a plan to smear David Cameron and other senior Conservative MPs.

The Prime Minister was forced to remove Damian McBride, his long-standing but controversial spin-doctor, after the private emails were obtained by a right-wing blogger.

Mr Brown took the view that there was "no place in politics for the dissemination or publication of material of this kind", Downing Street said.

Mr McBride, 34, used his official No 10 email address to suggest the leaking of damaging allegations about a number of Tories, including Mr Cameron and George Osborne. He also proposed a story concerning an unwarranted personal slur on George Osborne's wife Frances.

A Tory backbencher, Nadine Dorries, is planning to sue Mr McBride after learning that she was the subject of a "salacious" allegation relating to her and a senior Tory, which she said was untrue.

They were sent to the prominent Labour blogger Derek Draper and, although they were private, they suggested possible "stories" on a future Labour-supporting "attack blog", Red Rag. However, the emails were obtained by Paul Staines, who writes a right-wing Westminster blog under the name Guido Fawkes.

Labour sources believe Mr Draper's email account was hacked into, although the messages were copied to at least one other person.

Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke had earlier called on the Prime Minister to sack Mr McBride for bringing "shame" to the Labour Party.

Downing Street announced shortly before 5pm yesterday that Mr McBride had resigned, though it was clear he had been sacked.

A No 10 spokesman said: "Neither the Prime Minister, nor anybody else in Downing Street, had knowledge of these emails. It is the Prime Minister's view that there is no place in politics for the dissemination or publication of material of this kind, which is why it is right that Mr McBride and Mr Draper took the decision not to publish this material and regrettable that others are choosing to do so."

Mr McBride, who began working for Mr Brown as a Treasury civil servant, said in a statement that he was "shocked and appalled" at the way his emails had been used.

He added: "I have already apologised for the inappropriate and juvenile content of my emails, and the offence they have caused, but I did not want these stories in the public domain – it is because Paul Staines has put them there, and I am sickened that he has done so. However, we all know that when a backroom adviser becomes the story, their position becomes untenable, so I have willingly offered my resignation."

The row has brought to a head the ongoing war between the right and left in political blogging. Mr Staines hinted at the existence of the emails on Thursday, by posting "He who lives by the smear..." next to a picture of Mr McBride. Shortly after the resignation was announced yesterday, he wrote: "Mission Accomplished: McBride Fired."

The swift action by the Prime Minister came as a surprise to some MPs because Mr McBride had been a close and loyal aide for more than a decade. Mr Brown has a reputation for fiercely protecting his inner circle.

It is unremarkable that members of political parties plan dirty tricks campaigns against their opponents. Mr Brown had little choice, however, but to remove him, because of the salacious nature of the emails.

Mr McBride's closeness to the Prime Minister meant the emails had the potential to drag Mr Brown into the row.

Mr Draper told the BBC: "You are hanging a man for sending a silly email to a mate. Is that really fair?"

But the shadow Home Secretary, Chris Grayling, said: "This whole episode has been quite disgraceful. This resignation is a clear admission that Gordon Brown's team at No 10 was involved in a deliberate attempt to spread unpleasant false rumours about opposition politicians. Gordon Brown needs to provide a clear explanation about what happened."

Last year Mr McBride was moved from his role as the PM's press secretary after divisions emerged in the Downing Street operation.

Damian McBride

The spin-doctor who became the story was 'shocked and appalled' that his emails were obtained by a right-wing blogger

Nadine Dorries

Tory backbencher is the subject of one 'salacious' email involving her and a male senior Tory. She has read the email and plans to sue for defamation

Charles Clarke

Was the first Labour figure to call on the Prime Minister to sack Mr McBride. The spin-doctor had brought 'shame' to the Labour Party, he said

Paul Staines aka Guido Fawkes

Right-wing blogger and scourge of the political establishment who obtained the emails. Posted yesterday: 'Mission Accomplished: McBride Fired'

Derek Draper

The former adviser to Peter Mandelson was sacked in 1998 over the Lobbygate scandal. 'Why hang someone for sending a silly email to a mate?' he said

The 'lies and innuendo' that McBride was peddling

The emails begin with a BlackBerry message from Damian McBride on 13 January 2009 at 18.34. He wrote:

Gents, A few ideas I've been working on for Red Rag. For ease, I've written all the below as I'd write them for the site, but obviously Andrew will want to adapt for his own house style, length, etc. The first one is a solid investigative story, so may be a good one to use early. The other three are gossipy and mainly intended to destabilise the Tories. I'm not sure how to set up easy links in the copy of the text, so I've stuck in the full links below each bit of relevant text. Damian

Mr McBride then suggests a "solid investigative story" about a gay Tory MP promoting his companion's business interests in the Commons, suggesting that it "may be a good one to use early". The other three, he admits, "are gossipy and mainly intended to destabilise the Tories".

On David Cameron:

"He could clear up exactly how much the Camerons are worth ... and he could make clear that he's not hiding any embarrassing illnesses."

On George Osborne:

"Embarrassing photos have followed George Osborne around throughout his career: posing in his Bullingdon Club uniform at Oxford, lying on the carpet at home in his permed mullet playing Monopoly with his fellow viscounts ... But he knows that the most embarrassing photos from his past have yet to emerge."

Derek Draper replied:

Sent 13 January 2009 at 18.56. To: Damian McBride Subject: Re: Rag [UNCLASSIFIED] [Non-Record]

These are absolutely totally brilliant Damian. I'll think about timing and sort out the technology with Andrew so we can go asap. Do we want to tip off anyone about Red Rag having set up? Walters? I could do it and say LabourList had been sent the link anonymously. PS: Don't forget LabourList, Damian!

From Damian McBride

I think Red Rag should appear with no preview – as you say – but with a good initial story and with LabourList then mentioning that the bug is catching ... Tom was going away today after a chat with me to work on a couple of insiderish announcements for LabourList about appointments to Labour HQ and No10. I'm working on a couple of other things as well ... we've got to keep the momentum going over the weekend – it's been brilliant so far.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

This rotten government is heading for annihilation
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 11:53 pm (UTC)
Every day there is a new instant of incompetence or sleaze from this government, which is rotten through and through. This surely cannot go on much longer and if Brown had any respect left for this country he would call an immediate election. The longer he leaves it the greater will be his humiliation and the speed with which things are deteriorating, he won't be just defeated he will be annihilated and deservedly so.
Claiming For Porno Films Is OK
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:08 am (UTC)
getting caught fiddling expenses is OK. Getting caught setting up sleaze and you have to resign. Seems a strange order of priority.
Sacked?
[info]john_gray wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 12:35 am (UTC)
Unfortunately, being sacked doesn't mean the same for the Charmed Circle as it does for the rest of us. After a pause for the dust to settle, McBride will be given a well-paid sinecure, probably on a quango.

I don't need to be a fly on the wall to hear the conversation: "I'm sorry we have to do this, Damian, but don't worry - we look after our friends."
Liebour are pathetic.
[info]blastarrbxiii wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:56 am (UTC)
We are told Gordon Brown nor anybody else in Downing Street had knowledge of these smears.
What an ignorant lot they are!.

People know what other cronies are up to, even in general.
Word gets around.
Then when all this corruption gets out, they are all so sorry, but nobody else knew a thing.

I don't believe it for one minute.

Just shows Gordon Brown is not doing his job as party leader, maybe that's how he wants it.
Nasty liebour staff surrounded by ignorant liebour staff.
He cannot run his own party properly, let alone this country.
I'm sick of the entire lot.


How politics is 'done'.
[info]pflan76 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 02:21 am (UTC)
This is how politics is done, and I personally find it utterly fascinating.

For anyone to suggest that the Conservative Party doesn't indulge in this type of activity is just wrong, if not deceitful.

To be given a glimpse of the party machinery is fantastic, if only we had access to it all!

Re: How politics is 'done'.
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC)
Spot on !
LABOUR REALLY IS THE DIRTY, SLEAZY PARTY.
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 03:42 am (UTC)
McBride is an untrustworthy character specialising in sleaze. He is Brown's 'attack dog' used to try and distract public opinion away from the numerous sleazy stories coming from Labour's front bench. He has always been mired in the filthy world of sleaze and it has finally caught him out. He has spun so many stories he cannot tell truth from fiction.
It speaks volumes about Brown's apparent scantimonous attitude. He likes to dam his enemies, especially those he saw as rivals within his own Party for the leadership. He used McBride to smear his enemies, but disownes him as soon as he was caught. No loyalty at No 10.
There will be no tears within Labour for his passing, but he, like Draper, will cling to the apron strings of Labour because they are virtually unemployable in the normal world. They specialise in sleaze and that is the sum total of their worth.
The electorate know about them and their exposure reinforces their knowlege that Labour really is the dirty sleazy Party.
These are not private emails
[info]dinoysus wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
If these emails are sent on a government account then it is government business. If McBride had wanted to send private emails he coul dhave set up a homail account in ten minutes. Is he really too inept or naive to do so? If smears were typed on official writing paper, the Government woul have to take some responsibility, it should be no different with email.
(no subject) - [info]rojaws - Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info] - Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:49 am (UTC)
Re: The question is.....
[info]rojaws wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC)
What a damn stupid comment!
Stick to reading the Sunday Sport.
shocked and appalled'
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:04 am (UTC)
at last we have come to the heart of 21st century morality: this plump wee mannie with the sissy nursery name has said it out loud for us - he is 'shocked and appalled that his emails were obtained by a right-wing blogger'; note, not shocked and appalled at what he has done, but shocked and appalled that what he has done has been revealed to poor old trusting joe public; wasn't there another case like this not so long ago, about a man and a dodgey establishment he visited - his comment on being exposed revealed the same mind-set : its not what i do, but what my family and/or the public is told about what i do that matters;
its going to take a generation or two (if we are spared) to get rid of such toxic clearly deeply held attitudes - where were they learned in the first place, i wonder?
School games? How politics is done, well said.
[info]mekap wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:13 am (UTC)

Who started this little ruck then/ Read the horrendous claptrap on Guido Fawkes, and the filthy language of their posters. Why should anyone have to tolerate cyberbullying and mendacious accusations?

Looks like we are all going to be bored to tears by muck raking and libels. Wimbledon has arrived early this year!

Politics is a cesspit anyhow, and only adrenaline junkies get a kick out of it.

Still , in an open season , anything and everything will surface, just don't leave the 6th form common room door ajar too often!

Where are our Tory voices, crying feebly in the background? There is a sort of leadership HUSH.

Dan Hannans is the only memorable loud passionate voice heard recently.

Draper is a liar
[info]tallbendyman wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)
1. He denied the existence of these emails

2. He continually refers to them as private. They are not - they were sent from a PC in the Number 10 network, therefore definitely not private, as they could be subject to an FOI request.

How much lower will Labour stoop before the next election?
they don't get it
[info]pilsden wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
This man if I understand it was a civil servant and paid by us.So the govt is using our money to try to cling on to power by foul means.Clearly the people involved do not have a moral guidance nor any integrity.Hopefully they will go soon and their foul stench will leave with them.
Obscene?
[info]mekap wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:33 am (UTC)

Repugnant is a far better description.

I am concerned though that government aides and journalists are pretty much the same sort of person, gossip gatherers . Newspapers exist in these hard times on rumour , salacious banter and disgraceful innuendo. Politics and Celebrity attract like moths to a flame.
Disgusted
[info]melker88 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
This labour government is morally bankrupt and rotten through and through. From the sleaze over MP's expenses to this latest revelation, these "honourable" people in government seem to miss the most important point of all this. It may be within the "rules" or it may be private emails but it is not the way one behaves either in private or public especially in such positions of trust. Do they have no "moral compass" which intuitively tells them what is right or wrong and not based on I will do whatever I can if I can get away with it and if I get found out, I will just spin until the media moves on to the next story. How low a person do you have to be to even think up such unfounded stories and put them to paper. It is immaterial if you later try to spin that they would not be made public. It is unbelievable that Brown did not know what McBride was up to but again the more important point is how could Brown appoint and work so closely for so many years with someone whose character is such that he behaves in such a despicable way and it is naive to believe that this is is a one off incident. The Chinese have an apt saying "snakes and rats in the same nest". I get the feeling this government is getting desperate and is just sticking one figure up to the British public and seeing what they can get away with before they get chucked out. This government is morally bankrupt and will leave the country financially bankrupt but what do they care. They will leave with generous pensions and get lucrative sinecures on the lecture circuit as well as directorships with those companies they have "assisted" in government and will appear on TV talk shows as commentators on the political scene and the stupid supine public will have forgotten what a mess they made in government. It is the public that will suffer for decades for the incompetent and immoral conduct of this government.
Decay
[info]grumpyashell wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:00 am (UTC)
There is a stench pervading Downing Street that comes the rotting of any morals that Labour was supposed to have.This was supposed to be the party that was "whiter that white" when compared to the Tory "Nasty Party"but can be seen to be clearly far worse.
Brown's in the gutter
[info]arclight99 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:01 am (UTC)
You can judge a man by his friends and as such Gordon Brown must take full responsibility for this smear campaign. It is he who has been reassembling the old Labour smear sqaud from the 1990s.

Brown resurrected Peter Mandelsson not for his skills as a minister (very limited) but his penchant for spin, deceit and smears. Similarly the truly dreadful and discredited Derek Draper - he of Lobbygate fame and someone with a serial problem when it comes to telling the truth has also reappeared at Labour head office at Brown's behest. People familiar with Damon McBride stress he has always been a vile insect interested only in smears and lies, and always very close to Brown.

Why does Brown surround himself with such people? Because this is the way he likes to conduct politics and this is the way he intends to fight the next election campaign. Brown sacrificed McBride for the cardinal sin of getting caught not for what he did. It was Brown who assembled this motley team of loathsome gossipers, Brown who decided he wanted to fight the next election campaign from the gutter, and it is Brown who should rightly resign.
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
I find it entirely SURREAL that Jane Merrick and Matthew Bell can talk about the "left and the right" when talking about the New Labour and the Tories.

What a way to try and sap the meaning out of words!


"One political party with two right wings", as Gore Vidal said of the US political scene.

The Calibre of Government
[info]tomearl2 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
Let's for one moment forget how vile and viscious this behaviour is and take their actions at their mildest face value.
The kindest interpretation I can think of is that we have a couple of moronic yobs having a laugh.

But wait a minute, one of these morons is the prime Minister's most influential advisor, the other a self styled mover and shaker, confidant of all the Government big wigs.

i have paid some 100.000 pounds in direct taxation to this government over the last twelve years. And this is the calibre of people administering it.

My goodness, it makes you weep with despair.

Re: The Calibre of Government
[info]cuthbertb wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 12:13 pm (UTC)

The most shocking thing I've noticed so far during this tawdry affair is that Damian McBride is only 34 years old. Looking at his photo I assumed he was at least 20 years older. So that's what being at the centre of this government does to you. It somehow makes all those taxes paid over well worth it.
Labour Spin
[info]billbo9 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
Please stop printing labour spin eg "Guido Fawkes is right wing"- Guido Fawkes is not right wing it is an anti sleaze and anti hypocrite. It attacks anyone or any organisation left or right who have too much power and not enough accountability.
Re: Labour Spin
[info]sobatai wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:21 pm (UTC)
You think the above is bad, wait an hour or so and see what drivel Steve Richards has come up with.
GLENROTHES
[info]britfree wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:59 am (UTC)
never mind sleeze , never mind expenses , what about the electoral fraud that was the GLENROTHES by election ? if the british secret police had not stuffed the ballot boxes of GLENROTHES ,just as the banking corruption was being exposed , rotten labour would have already been consigned to the bin . i know the english don't really care what happens in jockland , but after all , if he had lost (as was UNIVERSALY expected) brown would have been history in your country too . we cant be sure what the exact degree of vote theft actually was , as the VOTING RECORDS HAVE " DISAPPEARED". Scotland will vote for the S N P at the very next test of public opinion , they cant steal a general election , can they ? welllllll, dont put anything beyond the filthy labourites !
Gordon Brown
[info]6661969 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
This is indicative of Labour's spin culture which Gordon Brown has taken the lead in creating. He is culpable. I'm sure the only crime as far as Labour are concerned is being caught, hence already talk of police being bought in to investigate the leak. He sacked McBride so quickly because Brown is potentially close to the story. Do politicians have any morals at all?
This isn't how politics SHOULD be done.
[info]cosmo_cosmo wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
This smacks terribly of the nasty, petty smear campaign of the (lost anyway) Crewe by-election last year. I remember thinking back then, for all my youthful, lefty ideals, that the party I always wanted to align myself to (or perhaps I wanted them to align to me?), deserved to lose that, just for stooping that low. And here we are again.

This might well be how politics is done, and I'm under no illusion that it's common practice, but every time I see it happen I hate it, I hate it more when it's the governing party doing it, and even more when it's the party I helped elect.

How much more of this shit do we have to come? Perhaps fortunately, not much more.
Re: This isn't how politics SHOULD be done.
[info]britfree wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC)
you labourites .....how typical , all this pretence of inate virtue , talking for the "people" in opposition , screwing them royally from the first day of government . here in Scotland , thankfully we have an alternative to the two cheeks of the same bum that is party politics in engerland . lefties ? joining the labourites ? how naive would you have to be , to consider being that dumb ?
Corruption
[info]neil639 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:55 am (UTC)
Isn't this the Government that wants to monitor all the e-mails sent by its citizens? Isn't the Home Secretary the one who wants to legislate to control the porn "industry"? Hypocrisy, is the word which springs to mind. Sheer unadulterated hypocrisy.
Staines
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
Amusing, was it not, that while the louse at the centre of the Guido Fawkes panoply of deceit was 'interviewed" on BBC tv he libeled Peter Hain, necessitating a smart apology by the Beeb.

Says just about all we need to know . . . . . but there's more . . .
The dirty goings on of the liebour party.
[info]blastarrbxiii wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
From the last two paragraphs of the above story, looks to me like Derek Draper is up to his neck in it as well.
Time for him to clear his desk!!
Sounds like these shysters conspired to defame people, and fellow liebourites deny all knowledge of anything about it and anything to do with it.

A bit more 'digging' by uncorrupted newspaper reporters,
will bring more light to 'the dirty goings on of the liebour party'.
To Forgive is DIVINE
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 12:15 pm (UTC)
Romour mongering is bad. Bringing the Number 10 in here is worse. You always lose.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Crass stupidity
[info]sobatai wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:25 pm (UTC)
"The greatest joy a man can know is to conquer his enemies and drive them before him. To ride their horses and take away their possessions. To see the faces of those who were dear to him bedewed with tears, and to clasp their wives and daughters in his arms." - Genghis Khan

The crass stupidity of Golem Brown and this Labour administration never ceases to astound. Once again they've lost bigger than they ever thought they'd win.
They get themselves into such a tizzy over this "Guido Fawkes" guy that they determine to play fire with fire. But they were out of their depth, didn't understand the rules of the game, or that you had to be rather clever to play it. "Guido Fawkes" is jolly good at what he does. He goaded them, then lured them into a trap, played them along and then annihilated them.
One of them has resigned (no doubt with a considerable "golden goodbye" and as someone noted above, the certainty of another position when the dust has settled - such is the arrogance and degeneracy of this government) and the other - Derek Draper - is now just a figure of scorn and ridicule, making things worse for himself with his pathetic attempts at justification.
Going back to the quote of Genghis Khan above, I guess Kate Garraway should get ready to cosy up to "Guido Fawkes" - seldom has a man been quite so conquered as Derek Draper.
Continued Lies Over McBride
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:33 pm (UTC)
The most incredible thing so far was to hear Liam Byrne claiming that these e-mails amount to nothing more than a pesonal and private exchange between two friends.

They were sent from Ten, Downing Street by a man who is paid out of public funds, for crying out loud.

Caught lying, New Labour has only one response; namely, to tell a bigger lie.

The Labour Party sold its soul when it accepted Blair and Campbell: personaly, I suspect it will never recover.
its just the status quo
[info]pete_bruffell wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:45 pm (UTC)
this type of behaviour has always been there and always will be there in politics. the only reason mcbride was sacked was because he was caught. someone one else will take his place and continue with more of the same, only a little bit more carefully. i'm sure the tories are at it and the lib's and all the rest.
[info]bishbashbong wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:47 pm (UTC)
" Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke had earlier called on the Prime Minister to sack Mr McBride for bringing "shame" to the Labour Party. "

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Priorities
[info]ilkalottie wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 01:50 pm (UTC)
The UK establishment acts with more speed and resolve to investigate a number of allegedly defamatory emails, which, will, in the long term, harm nobody, than it does to determine the legality of a war that has cost thousands of lives.
Good to see that we still have a sense of priority.
The Ongoing Sleaze
[info]cloudy4463 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 02:16 pm (UTC)
The Labour Party is not dead yet, it just smells funny...
Re: The Ongoing Sleaze
[info]mekap wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 03:21 pm (UTC)

Sounds more like as if the Tory party is definitely dead though, and will take a miracle to resurrect it to be born again. Perhaps on the third day it will rise , again!

Ooooooooooooooh Daniel Hannan, please talk loudly for us again.
I DON'T BELIEVE IT !!!
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC)
ARE THESE SPIN DOCTORS PAID BY THE ORDINARY BRITISH TAXPAYER?
Infants in government
[info]ameliemaryann wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 03:24 pm (UTC)
Do these infantile Liebore cretins really think that we CARE what photos they dig up of members of the Conservative Party, what smears they can displace on to them from the ice-lollies they are sucking through their rotten teeth?? We care ONLY ABOUT THE STATE OF THE NATION and the Nation is going down the tubes fast with these infants in charge. Therefore, Mr. McBride, Mr. Mc Broon, Mr. D for Dunce Draper and all the little people in your nursery who think you are wonderful.......HA! HA! HA! Stay on the naughty step, for ever!
Ronnie
[info]ronnie250 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 04:32 pm (UTC)
they send out smears all the time and not just to the cons party ....look at the lies they spread about the BNP !! but then nothing is said about that
Re: Ronnie
[info]sobatai wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 04:54 pm (UTC)
I don't like the BNP, but every time Golem Brown fails to deliver on "British jobs for British workers", people will listen to what they have to say. And they are very active. Golem Brown and his minions think blogs, newspapers and television are all important, but the BNP is on the ground, in the constituencies of Labour's heartland.
Labour probably fear the BNP more than anyone else - they know they're going to take a hiding in Labour-Tory marginals, but if the BNP start to take their "core vote" in the heartlands (together with the SNP squeezing them north of the border), they are in danger of being wiped out.
Re: Ronnie
[info]ronnie250 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
each to our own mate , no one asking you to like a party that does not fill the public with lies.
its not just "british jobs for british workers" but the promise of getting us out of the EU and stopping the mass immigration that they get my support , that and the sleazy labour mp we have here who wont even answer any serious concerns for the community ... well the tide is now turning on them and UK citizens have had enough of all the CONNING PARTIES !
(no subject) - [info]britfree - Monday, 13 April 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Ronnie
[info]ronnie250 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
Its silly remarks like that my friend that are gettin the governments in trouble , please act like an adult and dont throw insults
Thank you
Damian McBride
[info]dave195 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC)
This man is a civil servant on a six figure salary, his title is "Director of Strategy and Planning" and he reports directly to Gordon Brown. I realise and accept the need for political and special advisors, but not for party political ends. It would appear that NuLab's spin doctors are paid out of the public purse.

This man should not be working in Downing Street, he should work in Millbank and his salary paid out of NuLab's party funds, because he clearly works for them.

How many more?
Re: Damian McBride
[info]sobatai wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:37 pm (UTC)
I doubt New Labour could afford him. Mind you, with Golem Brown creating a dystopian wasteland where once their was a British economy, I doubt the country can either.
We need to know his leaving package and also immediately when he is re-hired by Golem Brown in some capacity.
[info]adey_t wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:30 pm (UTC)
I see this article has slipped down to a sub item in the UK section. Not a big deal then is it Mr Editor?
BROWN SHOULD RESIGN.
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:02 pm (UTC)
The PM, Mr.Brown, is responsible for employing McBride and must take responsibility for his staff's actions. Brown has no alternative but to apologise and resign.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date