Osborne ignored Budget warning that women would be hit hardest
Public sector pay shake-up will reverse workplace equality trend for first time, campaigners say
Controversial measures announced in the Budget will lead to a widening of the pay gap between men and women, reversing the long-term trend for workplace equality for the first time.
Campaigners and unions said the Government's determination to reduce public sector pay outside the South-east to market levels will hit women much harder than men, with some female workers fearing they may lose up to a fifth of their current salary.
The move is aimed at boosting private sector job growth and cutting the state wage bill. But findings by The Independent will renew pressure over the fairness of last week's Budget and fuel criticism of the Coalition, which is accused of letting women bear the brunt of its austerity measures.
Worst hit will be female graduates and professionals who are disproportionately represented in the public sector, it was claimed.
Chancellor George Osborne is accused of ignoring huge differences in the regional public sector premium between men and women in his own evidence submitted to the pay review bodies and threatening to end the narrowing of the gender pay gap for the first time since records began in 1997.
The Cabinet Office report includes a study by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) which shows that women working in the public sector enjoyed an average boost of 11.3 per cent in their salaries across the UK compared with the private sector.
Their male colleagues' pay was just 5.5 per cent higher nationally over the same period. But the regional analysis shows that in some areas the premium for female public sector workers was far higher.
In Scotland it rose to 19.9 per cent, compared with 5.6 per cent for men. In the North-east it was 18.3 per for women and 4.6 per cent for men.
Although the study did not address the issue directly, Wenchao Jin of the IFS said reducing wages equally for men and women across the public sector would increase the average gender-pay gap in the economy as a whole.
"Whatever happens to public sector wages tends to affect the average female wage more [than the male average], simply because women are more likely to be working in the public sector," she said.
Dai Hudd, deputy general secretary of Prospect, the union for public service professionals, said Mr Osborne's plan would lead to an exodus of skilled white-collar workers from the nations and regions and "drive a stake through the heart" of the UK.
"This is a massively regressive measure. For a Government that already has low poll ratings among women this will make them even worse," he said.
Mr Osborne is already under pressure for cutting the 50p rate for the highest earners last week while imposing a new "granny tax" on pensioners.
Unions claim that levelling off the public sector pay premium would suck £1.7bn out of workers' pockets and hit areas already struggling to cope with the aftermath of the recession.
Among the first groups likely to be affected by marketising salary rates will be employees at the DVLA in Swansea, Border Agency staff and those working in benefits offices whose pay freeze ends later this year.
But the impact on women will be particularly hard felt, it was claimed.
Anna Bird, deputy chief executive of the Fawcett Society, said in areas such as the North-east nearly half of all working women were employed in the public sector. Better and more equitable wages in the public sector had been an important source of promoting equality, she added.
"Driving down public sector pay to reflect private rates will cancel out many of the gains made for women's pay in recent years and, for the first time ever, risks reversing the progress made on closing the pay gap between men and women," said Ms Bird.
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said it would also affect women working in lower grades who were often the main carers of children and older relatives which meant they were less able to relocate.
"This Government's policies threaten to take us back generations by forcing women out of work and into the home," he said.
- 1 Frank Lampard's face drops when Holly Willoughby introduces him as a 'Man City legend'
- 2 Company breaks open Apple Watch to discover what it says is 'planned obsolescence'
- 3 The confessions of men who ordered mail-order brides
- 4 General Election 2015: Stephen Hawking says he will vote Labour
- 5 Yazidi sex slaves undergoing surgery to 'restore virginity' after being raped by Isis militants
General Election 2015: Tories sack candidate who said she would never support 'the Jew' Ed Miliband
The four utterly contradictory polls that tell the story of this election and why it is pointless trying to predict the outcome
9/11: Iranian General accuses US of organising September 11 terror attacks
General Election 2015: Prospect of Labour-SNP coalition makes one in four voters less likely to support Ed Miliband, says survey
General Election 2015: Stephen Hawking says he will vote Labour
General Election 2015: Chuka Umunna on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
Aaron and Melissa Klein: Oregon anti-gay bakers ordered to pay $135,000 after refusing to make cake for same-sex wedding
Andrew Lloyd Webber: Phantom of the Opera writer mocked after issuing a warning about Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon
General election 2015: Labour will toughen hate crimes legislation surrounding Islamophobia
EU exit would hit UK economy much harder than neighbouring countries, study finds
£5120 per annum: Recruitment Genius: You will be working for one of the countr...
£20000 - £23000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An opportunity has arisen for a...
£9000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: You will be working for one of the countr...
£17000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An opportunity has arisen for a...