Parents – and even children – may have to pay for care under radical plans from Tory-controlled council
Worcestershire County Council's controversial plan branded 'outrageous'
James Cusick is political correspondent of The Independent and The Independent on Sunday. As an experienced member of the lobby, he has previously worked at The Sunday Times and the BBC. His career as a journalist has been split between print and television, including senior positions as producer with Sir David Frost and at BBC Newsnight. He is also an award-winning golf and travel writer, working for over a decade as the UK contributing editor for one of the USA’s leading golf magazines. He broadcasts regularly for the BBC and CNN. He lives in London.
Tuesday 13 August 2013
A Conservative-controlled council in the Midlands are considering radical plans that would force the parents of children taken into care to pay or make contributions towards the cost of the child’s social care bill.
Worcestershire County Council, who are looking to make cuts in their budget of £90m over a four year period, launched the consultation on child care support stating that their future policy could mean “parents asked to contribute towards the cost of certain services provided for their child, provided they have the means to do so.”
Social care, according to the council, becomes necessary when a family is in crisis, their child has special needs, or there are concerns about child safety or well-being,
The consultation document identifies “rare cases” where parents who can offer their children a home again [after a period in care], refuse to do so, and this allows us to ask those parents for a contribution towards the cost of their care. “
The councillor with responsibility for children and families, Elizabeth Eyre, told The Independent that “finance was not the issue and nothing has yet been decided.” Ms Eyre said the council were simply examining “options that could be put in social services’ toolkit.”
She said the council currently had “no mechanism” that could allow it to accept payments for families or extended who wanted to contribute to care costs. She claimed the council accepted no other authority in England or Wales who were looking such payments.
However the Worcestershire’s Labour leader, Peter McDonald, branded both the plan and the consultation “really outrageous and really stupid.” He added “Expecting parents who have had their children taken into care, often against their wishes, to then pay towards the costs of their care, is something that just will not happen.”
Cllr McDonald said the policy was “being driven by finance rather than by children’s welfare and raises the spectre of turning social workers into bailiffs as they chase unpaid bills from troubled families. That is not the job of any social worker in the worker.
Although the consultation on parents being asked to pay care costs is so far limited to Worcestershire, the issue is being regarded by Labour shadow ministers at Westminster as a policy that could resonate nationally as other councils struggle with shrinking budgets.
Among the more radical proposals in the Worcestershire consultation, which will last till October, is the notion that outstanding charges could be shifted on to the child as they pass the age of 16. If they are deemed capable of paying, they would be expected to contribute
Lisa Nandy, Labour’s shadow children’s minister said “Vulnerable children in need of care and support shouldn’t face a bill for being cared for. David Cameron and Michael Gove must explain how a Tory-controlled council can be planning to make this change. We look forward to hearing the education secretary condemn this proposal in the strongest terms.”
Tom Rahilly, head of strategy and development at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, branded the consultation an exercise that held “significant risk.”
He said “If this council are saying parents should be charged for care services, then they have seriously misjudged the complex needs of often vulnerable families.
“Rather than saving money, this is a policy that could, if copied, end up costing councils far more. Families that need support at an early stage will worry that they could face bills in the future and will avoid seeking the help they need. Help and care arriving at a later stage, will inevitably cost more as the problems will often have got much worse.”
- 1 Tourist films plane's descent just metres above packed Caribbean beach
- 2 Kate Moss: Previously unpublished nude photo revealed by Mert and Marcus
- 4 World Book Day: Boy 'excluded' from school after dressing up as Fifty Shades' Christian Grey
- 5 Bad Jews poster 'censored' on London Tube
Tourist films plane's descent just metres above packed Caribbean beach
Indian woman creates 'Marriage CV' after parents put her on dating site: 'Definitely not marriage material. Won’t grow long hair, ever'
Becky Watts: Four appear in court charged with hiding body parts after teenager's death
Isis 'bulldozes' Nimrud: UNESCO condemns destruction of ancient Assyrian site as a 'war crime'
Professor Brian Cox brands astrology-believing Tory MP David Tredinnick an 'outlier on the spectrum of reason'
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Elif Shafak: Turkish author warns against rise of British nationalism
Most people think legal tax avoidance is just as wrong as illegal tax evasion, poll suggests
Nigel Farage promises Ukip will not 'stigmatise' would-be migrants – and says he wants 'everyone to speak the same language'
£65000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Technical Presales Engineer - central London ...
£20000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Physiotherapist / Sports Ther...
£8 - £9 per hour: Recruitment Genius: Sales Executives / Advisors are required...
£14000 - £15000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An opportunity has arisen for a...