UK

5° London Hi 7°C / Lo 2°C

Smith attacked over leaks fiasco

Prosecutors' decision heaps further pressure on embattled Home Secretary

By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent

'Knowing there were a series of leaks, it is our responsibility to have that investigated,' says Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith

PA

'Knowing there were a series of leaks, it is our responsibility to have that investigated,' says Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith

The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, was criticised last night following the collapse of a five-month police investigation into a series of embarrassing leaks from her department.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that the shadow Immigration minister, Damian Green, who was arrested as part of the Scotland Yard probe after prompting by the Home Office, would not face any charges for receiving leaked documents. The case against Christopher Galley, the junior Home Office worker who handed him material, was also dropped. The CPS concluded that none had posed a threat to national security.

The verdict intensifies the pressure on Ms Smith, who is already under investigation by parliament's anti-sleaze watchdog over her expenses claims as an MP. It raises the prospect that Gordon Brown will move her in a Cabinet reshuffle which could follow the European elections in June.

Mr Green said the police should never have been involved and that the Home Secretary had shown "poor judgement" in allowing her frustrations over the leaks to culminate in a Scotland Yard investigation. He said the police's involvement symbolised an "out of touch, authoritarian, failing Government". Last night Mr Green claimed that the police warned him that he could face life imprisonment during his interrogation. "I just thought 'this is absurd'," he told BBC's Newsnight.

The collapse of the case puts the spotlight back on the Commons Speaker, Michael Martin, who let police raid Mr Green's office without a warrant.

The leaks included evidence that the Home Secretary had been warned that thousands of illegal immigrants had been cleared to work in government departments, and an email from Ms Smith to the Prime Minister expressing fears that recession could lead to a rise in crime. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, said that much of the information in the leaked documents was known outside the Home Office already, and that "some of the information leaked undoubtedly touched on matters of legitimate public interest".

"The information leaked was not secret information or information affecting national security," he said, contradicting information given to police by the Cabinet Office, which stated that there had been "considerable damage to national security already as a result of some of these leaks".

Mr Starmer added that the information "did not expose anyone to a risk of injury or death. Nor, in many respects, was it highly confidential. Much of it was known to others outside the Civil Service, for example in the security industry or the Labour Party or Parliament."

Mr Green said he did not expect an apology from the Home Secretary, but called on her to take responsibility for the misleading information handed to police. He is to ask the police to remove his DNA from their database now that he has been proved innocent.

Mr Green told Channel 4 News how he was first approached by Mr Galley, saying that Home Office insider was "appalled at what he saw around him". He added: "I have to tell you, he was not the only person who gives information from inside government and I am not the only MP who's received them."

Ms Smith defended the decision to involve the police. "Knowing there were a series of leaks and knowing that we deal with some of the most sensitive information in government... it is our responsibility to have that investigated," she said. She has ordered an investigation into the police's handling of the case.

Last night, several MPs called for the Speaker to step down. "The longer he remains in the job, the lower the reputation of the Commons will sink," said Douglas Carswell, a Tory backbencher. "He has failed over many matters. The guy is not up to the job."

Chris Huhne, Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, said: "This foolish complaint has wasted police time [and] tied up prosecutors unnecessarily... and all for a matter that should have been handled as an internal Civil Service disciplinary case."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

how lucky we are.....
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:05 am (UTC)
........to have good, straight, independent DPP. always assuming that is that pressure was not put on him by Gollum and la Smith NOT to prosecute
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]thefirstfather wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:53 am (UTC)
Yes, the backlash would have been much greater if this had gone to court. In all likelihood Mr Green would have been found innocent and with the whole story investigated in public, and at greater expense, then the government would look even more malicious than they appear now.
On top of that I think more questions would have been asked about the legality of the police action in the first place.
Surely it is not enough that someone says "harm has been caused to national security" in order to initiate a police investigation of this magnitude.
The police should have required some real evidence be produced as to what harm had happened.
Or else how would they know what to look for in their raid?
I leave you to ponder on the implications of that.
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]bowesy wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
All in all a dirty little trick by dirty people.

Lets hope some real evidence if found of this lots misdeeds and we see a few in the dock.
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
yes their prayers were answered a good straight barrister came to the ONLY CONCLUSION POSSIBLE,makes me proud to be a member of the profession- but I HAVE NO DOUBT that Kieran would have sent anyone trying to put pressure on him away with a flea in their ear. he has my ENORMOUS RESPECT and that of the entire Bar
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]sobatai wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 01:06 am (UTC)
Isn't it about time Ms Smith was sent off to spend more time watching mucky movies with her old man? How many more times does her department have to make an almighty mess of things before Golem Brown screws up the courage to get rid.
And, trust me, this is all about the Golem's cowardice - Blair, for all his faults and they were legion, went through Home Secretaries at a rate of knots. This God-awful woman has presided over a department that lost the personal details aof around half the population, has had a member of the opposition wrongly arrested and many other things.
She has the brains of a cabbage.
If Golem Brown wasn't such a pathetic coward, she'd be gone. But he is a pathetic coward, so we're just stuck trying not to get trodden by her jackboots until the election.
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]anabela18 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
Quote........ She has the brains of a cabbage.
Unquote.......She is bad news for Britain.s kingdom
She is bad news for Europe and Europeans
She is bad news for the Commonwealth
She is bad news for Mr Brown
She is bad news for the whole wide World
But...............She is Good news for drs G and K McCann
She is bad news for Justice and Fair Square Deals.
Re: how lucky we are.....
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 03:39 pm (UTC)
finger on button, dear chap-Gollum big time coward- Bliar just slime
Ms Smith Has Corrupted The Office Of Home Secretary
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:29 am (UTC)
abuse of office, false accounting, failing to stand by agreements. How corrupt can one be without losing her job
Re: Ms Smith Has Corrupted The Office Of Home Secretary
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
the foolish woman has BEEN corrupted by the evil fascist cabal in the home office
Poem About all things despicable about Labour
[info]xyberia44 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 01:08 am (UTC)
Mr Damien Green got Labour right
no Anti terrorist police or Jaqui's might,
would give, the man a sleepless night
He said it was a rotten fish,
best served up as a Labour Dish

Smeargate" caused a panic and a stir,
for labour and for Brown, it was rather funny one
that brown could not flush down,
As emails sent by Damien McBride
took new labour for a nasty ride,
Mcbride he spun a tory smear,
That ended up with Browns despair

Appologies came way to late,
As tories bayed for blood,
it shows that labour really think
that they can ride roughshod,
in the Political neighbourhood.

It's been a bad year for all of labours will,
as the G20 Police was allowed to Kill, and maim
Their respect for them, if ever there was, will never be the same
They beat us up where ever we go, their mindset is too lame

The IPCC was on the side of police, We know the plod are thugs,
who all had ill intent, for us, as batons their broke our mugs.
A slapping here, a beating there, a broken nose to see,
oh what a gleeful day it really failed to be,
It is our constitutional right to really have a say,and stay
before the thugs in uniform can make us go away.

The racist thugs in uniform, above the law,
Who Maim and Kills for fun,
beatings, oppressions endured as we saw,
As our freedoms evaporated in the sun.

Their hands, boots and batons are dripping blood red,
by hands of facists uniformed met police, an innocent man is dead,
their hands are crimson red with our nations precious Blood,
the curtesy of uniformed thugs we choose to call the Plod.
Re: Poem About all things despicable about Labour
[info]gerard1904 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
are you related to the "Great McGonigal"?
Re: Poem About all things despicable about Labour
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 03:40 pm (UTC)
oh don't be cruel, he gave it his best shot bless him
Competence at the Home Office
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 05:32 am (UTC)
Jacqui Smith is just the latest in a series of office holders who have been unable to master their brief as Home Secretary, however she is the first to be repeatedly distracted by the her conduct of her personal affairs at the same time. The constant focus on her housing allowance, refusal to use a 'grace and favour' apartment, her expense claims and other personal issues has meant that she was unable to give her undivided attention to her responsibilities at one of the great offices of state.

Putting party politics to one side, it would appear that she is unable to effectively deal with the challenges facing her as Home Secretary. This has been made clear by her repeated failure to exercise her judgement in a manner that demonstrates the competence or professionalism that is expected of a Home Secretary.

To select a single issue, why have the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Management Board been so ineffectual?

The current Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, replaced a man 'sacked', Sir Ian Blair, and has been in position for only eleven weeks? The Assistant Commissioner for Specialist Operations, who leads the fight against terrorism on a national scale, John Yates, has replaced Bob Quick, who resigned after a series of gaffes. Quick had replaced Andy Hayman who resigned amongst a plethora of issues including fraudulent expenses,improper relations with a female staff member and possible disciplinary action following his handling of he Jean de Menezes affair. John McDowell and Pete Clarke also departed from this position under a cloud.

http://www.met.police.uk/about/leadership.htm

The other police members of the Board, including the Deputy, are all 'Acting' while the other Board members, with the exception of Dick Fedorcio, have very limited experience.

Whether Jacqui Smith stays in post or leaves is NOT the point, the issue is what can be done to ensure that the UK gets a Home Secretary who is able to deal with the job.
Re: Competence at the Home Office
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:10 am (UTC)
What can be done ? A General election.
SMITH MUST CONSIDER HER POSITION.
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 06:15 am (UTC)
This gaffe prone Home Secretary must now consider her position. It is frightening to think that security matters are in the hands of such a distrusted incompetent. The electorate have no confidence in her ability and she must resign.
we knew this
[info]bowesy wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC)
The raid etc had all the hallmarks of dirty labour spin. Happily after so long in office and producing such a hateul place to live, people within the civl service are prepared to leak information that is in the public interest.

What is clear from this fiasco is both Smith and Martin are not fit for purpose - but we also new that as well.

The fact that Smith is useless and was handpicked by Brown, sums up Brown's ability as well. Quite why Martin is still in place is beyond me - he is a cretin and a scrounger - but again that sums up Brown and his scottish croneyism.

Smith will no doubt counter that any criticism of her is because she is a woman - well again happily I can report that when I look at her all I see is a useless lump neither male nor female.

MArtin would respond by sending his wife shopping before they took a holiday - sorry fact finding trip - on our credit card.
Home Office
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:07 am (UTC)
It loks like the Home Sec. and Home Office are still not fit for purpose. Still only a year to go.
What is National Security?
[info]neil639 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:20 am (UTC)
It seems the issue of what is and what isn't national security is decided by a few politicians according to their own political dogma. To suggest that the Home Secretary knew nothing of this investigation beforehand is utterly unbelievable, and I believe she authorised it. Any normal person in Smith's position would have realised a long time ago that after making false claims for expenses, purchasing pornography with taxpayers money, and now this, that they were totally and utterly unfit for High Office, and would have resigned with perhaps a tiny shred of dignity still intact. It seems, however, that Smith is going to brazen it out until she is summarily dismissed in shameful disgrace by her constituents.
Fat Jaq
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
"This gaffe prone Home Secretary must now consider her position. "

She has, bgarvie, and she likes it!!
Freedom of Information
[info]geiseric wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:33 am (UTC)
The information that was leaked should rightly be in the public domain. This is our country and we have a moral right to know what is being done with it. In a democracy it is imperative that the public are kept properly informed of what is being done or how will they know how to vote? There should be laws that require governments to make this sort of information public.

The fact that Labour used the threat of life imprisonment against those who did make this information public demonstrates that Labour is an anti democratic party. They consider this country to be their own plaything and the people as subjects rather than citizens.

Labour ministers never resign these days, no matter how incompetent or corrupt, because they are shameless. Power is all that matters to them. Role on the election.
[info]watchgov wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
Typical Smith response! If a Chief Fire or Police Officer had done half of the expense cheating that she and her lot have done they would have been kicked out in disgrace and lambasted by her and her hypocritical army. Equally, talk about using the Police to do her dirty political tricks is a national disgrace. Not only should she resign but be herself investigated for fraus and wasting Police time.
So who lied
[info]deimosp wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:44 am (UTC)
Whether National Security was put at risk or it was not. One body says it was, two others (incl. police) say it was not. Whoever decided to lie about this should now go. We cannot go on having this "National Security" used as an excuse of everything where this Labour gov. do not want us to know something. It seems it was not true here and they have been caught using it as an excuse and it was a lie. We should not tolerate a government who deliberately and knowingly lies to the electorate to cover its own mistakes.
Accountability to their masters in the Home Office
[info]frankgwasere wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
Only cost 5 Million and not a shred of evidence? So I assume this all went on wages to numerous agencies and not one of them was capable of realising each and every one of them was misleading the other into believing there was actually some grounds for the case - or they were just happy to squeeze every extra penny from the taxpayers coffers. For 10 years this Labour Party via its management of the Home Office has gradually turned both the Police and CPS (judicial) into its own Political and Government Private Army using them for Political gain at the expence of Justice as self governing bodies they are accountable to no one? well except themselves and the Home Office ofcourse.

What is the most damning is the Conservative Parties reaction, or lack of, to simply allow this to blow over is crazy dont they even care about one of their own members of Parliament whom was the target of these cronies? DC I am afraid this is a damning inditment of your leadership to allow Labour to influence the judicial against your own in such an open and dishonest manner

But then its what we have some to expect and following G20 smeargate and numerous other examples it is now quite acceptable for Politicians, judicial and Police to lie exaggerate and mislead using their media propoganda machinery even when they all know there is no case to answer? Ah yes refer it to our other cronies in the IPCC - sounds great BUT they are not independent !!
SMITH'S FRAUDULENT CLAIMS FOR EXPENSES
[info]rfarley wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC)
Smith along with all the other MPs who are thieving from the public purse have turned Westminster into a cess pit, led by an unelected PM who "supports" their fraudulent claims.
The Home Secretaty
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
Jaqui Smith is incompetent and greedy.
The quicker she goes - and the quicker her incompetent, greedy colleagues go too - the better.
Do not go please!
[info]poges wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 12:44 pm (UTC)
Jacki as I would like to call you.Please do not go, I would like to laugh at yuor stupidity, being the porn queen of the government is a nice title, noone can "arrest" from you!
What is about the illegal immigrants?The immigrants that guard the Home Office?In which country would you find such a nonsense?I reaaly hope Jacki, that your party will be annihilated and disappear for 100 years as the Liberals did after 1918!
Failed Immigration Policy
[info]geiseric wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 02:27 pm (UTC)
Many people have spoken of Labour's failed immigration policy. The purpose of labour's immigration policy is and has been to increase the number of Labour voters. It has been spectacularly successful. The only failure has been in the cover up.
Jacqui Smith
[info]geordiejim wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 02:44 pm (UTC)

Smith is beyond shame and embarrassment. She has been universally pilloried for squeezing herself into her sister's boxroom in order to claim her housing allowance while her husband sits at home twiddling his todger at the taxpayers expense. Anyone with an iota of dignity or self-esteem would have resigned months ago. She is determined to sit it out and fiddle as much money as she can before the voters of Redditch boot her and her useless tosspot husband into the nearest landfill with all their other rubbish.
jaqui five bellies
[info]britfree wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 02:58 pm (UTC)
give her to the amerikkkans ,they can fit a plastic collar on her , and slam her head in a box of insects .after all, who would campaign for her release ?
[info]xyberia44 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 05:24 pm (UTC)
Jaqui Smith is a TIT,
but claims her husband watched IT,

Her time is up, we all know.
Jaqui Smith resign and Go

Gordon Brown the Scottish Clown
we should really flush him Down.

Lack Of faith in Labour Show
Time for change, A time to GO

Time for Change before we become Socialist Protalitarian Police Dictature
But No Tories Please, Just Imagine That, A cabinet full of Boris & clones....

Time for the Greens and Liberal Democrats
To take the Helm and Steer this Downtrodden Rat Infested Sinking Ship onto safe ground...They cant be any worse than whats gone before them......

Looking at the labour party today, its like looking at day release from the Asylum..they all bleedin maaaaad.....

[info]dreadmorayeel wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:02 pm (UTC)
No ifs or buts...she'll have to go.

Not fit for purpose still it would seem.
[info]misnomer11 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 09:02 pm (UTC)
As my dear old mother-in-law the second was wont to say - " that lass is neither use nor ornament."
Gordon & George
[info]remy_germain wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:28 pm (UTC)
Gordon & George are always right even when they are wrong
Next election elect the Labour Party not the New Labour Party
Re: Gordon & George
[info]britfree wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 01:10 am (UTC)
labour smells , new labour stinks ,vote S N P
Just rewards
[info]aegian wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:38 pm (UTC)
Poges makes a good point. The Liberals deserved to disappear after 1918 after the way Asquith's government treated suffragettes. Nulabour will even more bite the dust and never be thought of again with any respect after their disdain for the freedoms, justice and human rights of their people.
Hag!
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 11:03 pm (UTC)
Look, she looks like an old hag, the leftovers even your dog wouldn't touch. All Ministerial birds should be fit, hot types. That way, none of use would criticise her political kudos etc. She needs to work on her body, face, well the whole lumpy package, and come back as a hot-rod sex bomb. Is there a surgeon out there who could help?....on second thoughts forget it....what the bloody hell was I thinking......
Jacqui Smith..........
[info]gibsonsway wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 05:57 am (UTC)
Does she get staff discount for 24 hour protection? At this rate, she'll need it?

The country must hate this woman.
pass the sick bag Alice
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 01:34 pm (UTC)
under this vile Zanulabour government of thieves and murderers. we shall all have t buy many, many more sickbags

oh to be in thesickbag business underZanulabour one would make an absolute FORTUNE


quis custodiet ipsos custodies? when the custodies hide their ID markings? now old waggy tail here, thinks that is sinister
Yet another smoke screen
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 09:55 pm (UTC)
Arrest a Tory, get weeks of the focus being taken off the real issues... This one has great mileage and the old cunt does not even want an apology...

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date