UK

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Stop going on about women's rights, Prescott tells Harman

By Michael Savage, Political correspondent

John Prescott believes Labour's campaigning lacks direction

TERI PENGILLEY

John Prescott believes Labour's campaigning lacks direction

John Prescott has unleashed an outspoken attack on Harriet Harman and blamed a lack of talent for Labour's failure to communicate a clear message to the public.

In a frank interview on the eve of Labour's crucial annual conference in Brighton, the former deputy prime minister said that a lack of direction from the top had left the party wallowing in defeatism.

He told The Independent that the Government had no clear campaign strategy which left it reliant on somehow producing a desperate "knock-out punch" in the "last round" of the fight to win the general election.

He warned that Gordon Brown was being poorly advised and that Lord Mandelson was the only major figure left organising the Labour fight behind the scenes. "There is no direction in campaigning – we are drifting," he said. "You ask yourself, why did we get in the Gurkhas situation? That would never have happened before. So there's a feeling in the party that, somehow, we're not getting a grip on it. There is something lacking."

He accused Ms Harman, his successor as deputy Labour leader, of spending too much time championing equalities issues. "I think the deputy leadership role is for going out and campaigning," he said.

"I suppose, if I was being honest about it, I think too much of the emphasis has been on female rights, which I have supported all my life, and we're not getting other messages across. Most of it is about the equality issue. It is very important, but it is not our biggest campaigning issue, whatever they say about it."

Ms Harman and Labour's election co-ordinator, Douglas Alexander, were not motivating the party and accused the leadership of "hiding behind a lack of money" to fund a campaign strategy, which meant that David Cameron was "not being challenged". "Those who have responsibility for campaigning – it is not reaching out to the depths of the party," Mr Prescott said. "I don't believe, neither will I accept, it is simply about money. We've got a whole bank of MPs who should be out there, doing that job.

"I worry somehow that we've been in a 15-round fight. We're just losing the other rounds when we shouldn't and it's almost getting to the stage where we have to win with a knock-out. There's got to be leadership and there's got to be a message. If we don't get that, then we won't get the knock-out punch in the last round. And we are in the last round."

A lack of experience within Labour's team of special advisers was "an increasing problem", he said, but MPs needed to do more. "We've got a whole bank of MPs, but everybody seems despondent. There's too much defeatist thinking. There's no central direction to campaigning.

"Look at the European elections. We decided we were going to lose it, so we did nothing. My main worry is, are we about to do the same thing again?

"What I cannot understand about our position is that I don't know of any other Labour government that has got as superb a record as this one. Given all its blemishes, given all its difficulties, whether it's on the economy, public services, hospitals or the minimum wage, we can talk about how we turned things around since 1997."

Mr Brown was the right man to lead the party into the general election: "We can still win because we've got the man with the big, clunking fist. But it cannot be just one man making a speech. It has to have direction. I was hoping that would happen last September, but it didn't. And I do worry that it might not happen again. But we don't have any options left."

Labour lacks strategists of the calibre of Alastair Campbell, Philip Gould and Jonathan Powell, who led the party to victory in 1997: "We would have a reply within minutes of a story coming out. Alastair had a good smell for that. These people were exceptional. I don't think the same talent is around today."

Mr Prescott said that Lord Mandelson, who has become the de facto deputy Prime Minister under Mr Brown, was the "only one making a real campaign" for the Government.

"Peter was always the core of that team. We've got individual ministers saying things about their departments, but there's no overall message."

He criticised the former pensions secretary James Purnell and the influential backbencher Jon Cruddas for spending too much time with think-tanks, rather than knocking on doors: "They're a bloody party of whiners, when what we want is a party of campaigners."

Mr Prescott said that he believed Rupert Murdoch had turned decisively against Labour, comparing The Sun's treatment of Mr Brown to its campaign against the party's former leader, Neil Kinnock. The day of the 1992 general election, the paper ran a headline declaring: "If Kinnock wins today will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights".

"They have decided that is what they're going to do," Mr Prescott said. "They've gone back to that. They want to be able to say, 'We led the change'."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Well said JP.
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 03:26 am (UTC)
Quote:He accused Ms Harman, his successor as deputy Labour leader, of spending too much time championing equalities issues. "I think the deputy leadership role is for going out and campaigning," he said.
Harriet is more concerned about the emasculation of mankind and has used her position of power to advance this goal!!!!
He 's only just noticed
[info]pete_s wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)

Well, it does take Labour a VERY long time to notice any thing, usually far too late. If prezza had done his job rather than doing his assistant he MIGHT have noticed.
MPs were too busy with the expenses scandal!
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 06:27 am (UTC)
MP's of all parties were consumed by the expenses scandal, and this has affected the Labour Party more than the others as they have most MP's!

While they were enriching themselves, the very same Labour MP's failed to ensure that the Labour Party finances were in good order, the party is now running on empty with a massive overdraft and no money to fund election campaigns. The anti-union policies of the Labour Party have lead to their main paymasters reviewing their funding policies, individual donors were driven away by the cash-for-honours scandal and the volunteers who normally work for the party during a general election are so disgusted by the performance of the party in general and MP's expenses in particular that they will not participate in the next election campaign.

Instead of blaming Harriet Harman, Prescott ought to be addressing the leadership shown by Gordon Brown!
Quite right John
[info]adullamite wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 07:14 am (UTC)
Harriet the man hater is determined to live out her fantasy world.
I would never vote for a Labour Party in which she has so much say.
She cares nothing for women, just the imagined chips on her shoulder.
Maybe she should get out and work for a living like most women have to instead of living of the nation as she does. Try looking after your own children Harriet, that's a start!
Pot, Kettle
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 07:50 am (UTC)

I agree with his comments about Harman, but I don't recall Prescott being a particularly effective Deputy Leader either. Wasn't he preoccupied with filling both his pockets and his secretary?
Prescott
[info]freddyboy44 wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
How much longer do we have to suffer the views this dreadful man?. He brought shame on himself, his family and his high office. His long years in office with his snout deep in the trough produced precisely nothing. Bloated, biased and utterly useless he embodies the spirit of "New" Labour perfectly and even has praise for that loathsome reptile Alistair Campbell!. Lets hope that the day comes soon that he and all the rest of them are consigned to the dustbin of history for good.
2-Jags back to haunt us! Oh no...
[info]sidevalve wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 08:15 am (UTC)
Why on earth has this idiot crawled out of the woodwork again to haunt us? Ever since he drove 200 yards 'to protect his wife's hairstyle', when his job was preaching to the rest of us about how we should be taking the bus, he has deserved nothing but derision and scorn. Owning 2 Jaguars but being environment minister, thumping members of the electorate, humping is secretary instead of the wife whose hairstyle he supposedly cared about, and then the barely-credible claim that he suffered from an eating disorder (aah, diddums...) were just waystages in this tubby Ananias's terrible career, but finally he got what he deserved and faded from our newspapers and TV screens. But now he is threatening to surface again, And bizarrely, there still seem to be a few people to take him seriously. But actually, who cares what he says and thinks? He is a has-been, and the sooner he is gone ad forgotten the better. O.K., so Harriet Harperson isn't much of an improvement, but I don't think she's got long either...
Prezzzza..
[info]philydog wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC)
If his party is wallowing in defeatism he still appears strangely oblivious to the fact that his own well documented antics are a significant contributing factor.
Re: Prezzzza..
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:26 am (UTC)
I think that that must be true. Labour Should get rid of its Zanu - new- wing and try to remember which side its bread is buttered; Bliar stole the true heart of the Labour party by trying to turning it into a party for small minded middle class people, when its true home lay in the real working class

In the final analysis Labour died with the last people to know real poverty and deprivation and mass unemployment when people needed to stick together; Bliar was a honey-tongued manipulative little man but he forgot the rule in politics- always look after your own
Hattie and co
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:45 pm (UTC)
[info]geedale wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:32 am (UTC)
Mr Prescott i wish you would stop blaming other MPs for Labour downfall...What you should be doing is apologizing for the part you've played in bring the Labour party down....ie, using two Jags, claiming expenses for toilet seats, Affairs with staff, playing croquet when you should have been working...Its not ministers like Harriet Harman that as ruined the Labour party its MPs(freeloaders) like YOU...
Swipe
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:41 am (UTC)
I somehow suspect that rather a lot of people would like to take a swipe at Harrieet Harman.
Re: Swipe
[info]adullamite wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
:) :) :)
Harperson
[info]geiseric wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
If Harperson is so concerned about equality then perhaps she should address the fact that due to the block grant, spend per head in Scotland is about £1500 pa more than in England. This allows (IIRC) the Scots free prescriptions, free hospital parking, free nursing care for the elderly, and no university tuition fees. This is probably the biggest inequality that currently exists in the UK. But somehow Harperson doesnt care. It just isnt part of her agenda of white man bashing.
Re: Harperson
[info]adullamite wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 12:31 pm (UTC)
Scotland, you appear to forget, is a different nation forced into a union against its will, by Englishmen.
Maybe you should let them run your affairs, it would improve things it seems.
Re: Harperson
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 01:41 pm (UTC)
Scotland was not forced into the Union by anyone. The Scottish King James VII freely choose to become James II of England, putting these two kingdoms under one king. Though there were separate legal systems they were combined in 1707 under the Act of Union Act which scotland had to enter into because it had bankrupted itself trying to invade Panamar.

It anyone forced the Scots into the Union it was the Scots themselves because of their own poor decisions.
Re: Harperson
[info]adullamite wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC)
I think you mean James VI not VII. Roman numerals are so difficult eh? There again the fact that England refused to trade with nations that traded with Scotland could be 'misinterpreted' as 'economic bullying?'

Scots law was not 'combined' under the union.......

Do you wish to proceed or just find a history book?
Re: Harperson
[info]geiseric wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 02:27 pm (UTC)
Seems to me that they aleady do and things havent improved, except for the Scots.
Re: Harperson
[info]adullamite wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 02:45 pm (UTC)
Did you realise James VI was king of the two nations long before 1707?

If simple things like this are not noticed, how can you comprehend todays world?
Study history, it tells you about people!
Life for the Scots and the English is better for all people since Labour came to power. Failures in recent years, caused by American banks, cannot be blamed on the wrong folk.
Re: Harperson
[info]geiseric wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC)
I am quite aware of how the Stuarts came to rule England. I am also aware that Charles I was executed after the civil war and James II was chucked out after the Glorious Revolution. I am also aware that the Stuarts made later attempts to regain power in England (Bonnie Prince Charlie) but failed.It seems the English have had previous experience of being ruled by Scots but didnt really care for it. Sadly these lessons have been forgotten by most people.
Scotland signed the act of union (1707) because it was broke after the failure of the Darien Scheme, and needed English money.
Having said that, I don't see how all this is of direct relevance to the block grant, which was the subject of my original post.
Re: Harperson
[info]bibes01 wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 06:00 pm (UTC)
"Life for the Scots and the English is better for all people since Labour came to power. Failures in recent years, caused by American banks, cannot be blamed on the wrong folk." (posted by adullmite)


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....


As in the seminal lyrics of Dudley Moore "Laugh, I nearly shat.."

I saw the crash of 1987 coming. I fact I predicted the Stock Market crash a month before it happened. I new there was going to be a crash last year. It was obvious (Brown didn't see it coming however...). And it wasn't simply caused by American banks but began by the socialist manipulation forcing banks to lend to impoverished minorities under Clinton's watch.

Yep, life is great just now isn't it Mr. dullman?

And as for fatty Prescott delivering is Billy Bunteresque views, bring it on!

A fat loser hung like a chipolata by all accounts who dumped is squeeze at the first sign of scandal. No wonder he's not into equal rights to women.


Remember when he apologised to the Labour Party conference?

He apologised to the delegates....but not his wife.

Fat twat.
Well Sack Her Then
[info]foxtrotuk wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:42 am (UTC)
There you are, Gordon - straight from the horse's mouth!

Sack her!
Re: Well Sack Her Then
[info]filka_morozov wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)

The horse's mouth? Surely JP talks with the certainty of another of the horse's orifices located beneath the beast's tail.
[info]ptstroud wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
"[Prescott] blamed a lack of talent for Labour's failure to communicate a clear message to the public." Probably said by the least talented Labour minister of all times, and whose communication skills approached zero.
(no subject) - [info]alicegirl12325 - Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 02:59 pm (UTC) Expand
the clench-bottomed bird-brain is not capable of 'championing' anything else
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:31 pm (UTC)
she is an unmitigated counter-productive disaster for women's and children's rights - no better than a harridan personification in high office of justification for Blair's misogyny, ever since she undertook to act as that rat-brain's footsoldier to attack the children of single-handed parents - and she gets worse with age
Labour's blatant discrimination has lost my vote
[info]do_they_get_it wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:43 pm (UTC)
Harriet Harperson does my head in! People like her are causing a breakdown of social cohesion.

There is now rampant discrimination being officially sanctioned towards white males of UK origin in the Civil Service, Police, Fire Service etc at all levels. All in the name of a twisted form of positive discrimination.

I know what I'm talking about because I believe that I've experienced it, first hand! I applied to the Met Police, to fill the position of PCSO and after filling out all the forms, having background checks carried out etc, I had full day of assessments at the Police Training College Hendon. About 6 weeks later, I found out that my application had been rejected because there was a possibility that I may have said or done something that could be deemed as racist but no evidence was provided.

With regards to the results of my assessment, I "smashed down the door" so to speak, in written English I got 100% even though the minimum pass is only 33% but that doesn't matter to the equality zealots because they have their own agenda. I'm sorry, I forgot, this isn't about merit, we're talking about Ms Harperson's equality or from my perspective inequality. Even if a Polish male who had only just arrived in the country and had applied for the same position, he would have been ahead of me on points right from the start, without having to lift a finger. As an indigenous male, the Police can check my record for any misdemeanour's going right back to childhood, what checks do they carry out on foreign nationals that have only been here a short time?? Probably non.

Gloucestershire Police recently admitted that they deselected 100 police applicants those only crime was to have been white and of UK origin. At least that police force had the guts to hold up their hands and admit that they behaved illegally. I'm sure that non of those guys were out of work and were desperate to get back into employment were they?? I know I was! Maybe I should write to them asking for copies of the letters that were sent out to those guys (under the freedom of Information), in order to find out if any of the letters were identical to the one that I received from the Met Police?

The Avon and Somerset Fire Service even banned white males from attending a recruitment day because it was trying to boost its levels of ethnic minorities! I feel like voting for UKIP or even the BNP why not?? I mean if any of the other parties had any real meaningful message I would reconsider but they don't. It's that simple. And lets get this right, the BNP are called racist but our Government isn't???
Please, don't make me laugh.

I feel so disillusioned with this country that given a chance, I would emigrate tomorrow, I jest not.

The working classes in this country have been defecated on by this government but the government is either too stupid or arrogant to admit it. I predict that Labour will be out of power for at least 15 years, They don't deserve to govern any more. They are not only incompetent but they also conspired to maintain the "status quo" with regards to the "all expenses paid club" while saying "yes times are hard, we are all tightening our belts."

Talk about patronising, well lets admit it, we're just plebs who should keep our mouths shut and vote whoever fools us into believing that they will help us. I feel sorry for the few MPs that really want to make a difference, people like Frank Field that wanted to reform the benefits system but had the door slammed in his face by Blair and Brown. He has also published all, yes all, his expenses online for quite sometime. How many MPs could say the same??? You could probably count them on one hand!

END OF RANT!




The ONLY organised political gang willing to even consider your legitimate complaint
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:02 pm (UTC)
should they hold any power to mitigate bthe discrimination, is the BNP, already used by angry Real Labour Britain to fire two warning shots over the heads of ranks of subversive quislings who govern.

As for Hattie clenchbottom, actual feminists and real women like Campbell, Mowlem, Dunwoody and Erin Pizzey have been nothing but righteously contemptuous

http://sites.google.com/site/workwebg/blairite-misogyny
Stop going on about women's rights, Prescott tells Harman
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 09:49 pm (UTC)
John Prescott believes Labour's campaigning lacks direction
Never laugh at anyone as someone is laughing at you.
It takes two to form a cabinet and kichen
Tea is water and balck leaves of tree
If one lacks direction get a GPS and guide
If you don't both of you will sink it requires you help the sailor and captain to reach ashore.
But who am I telling?
Hurray for Press coat and the laundry man but who is Harman?
I like Baroness Vadera who was born in Uganda but her family fled Idi Amin's regime and came to Britain when she was 15. She attended Oxford University and then joined UBS Warburg, where she worked for 15 years before being headhunted to the Treasury.
"She is an excellent minister. Her expertise in this area is such that there is no one better to do this job," he said. You see and she is a woman. Is Harman a woman? Okay we toss.
Vadera will not draw a salary but the experience will allow her to command a high salary in the private sector
Any one with me? or I go alone to vote for her?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
People like your 'Vadera' are fatally flawed by product of discrimination and tokenism
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:08 pm (UTC)
they are consequently no less damaged goods than the creature born with silbver spoon in mouth - their protection from competition with all-comers merely takes a different form
People like your 'Vadera' are fatally flawed by being product of discrimination and tokenism
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:09 pm (UTC)
typo corrected
Re: People like your 'Vadera' are fatally flawed by product of discrimination and tokenism
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 27 September 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
Unless you work in a special company, nobody will stop you in the hallway at work to ask if your career provides meaning and personal fulfillment for you. That's a question you need to periodically ask yourself. I think career happiness starts with your personal life vision and your continuing assessment of whether you are accomplishing it in the career you are pursuing. If you decide your career is not the right career for you, these thoughtful exercises will help you to assess your interest in a new career. My twenty-seven year old niece, as an example, is unhappy in marketing and may return to college to study her original career choice - medicine. (She played college soccer and the practice schedule precluded the needed science and lab classes.) It's never too late to identify your passion and pursue it.
Please forward this newsletter, in its entirety, to your colleagues, coworkers and friends, because you want to add value to their work and lives.
How do you rate Sarah Palin?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
'women hold up the other end of the sky' - Tom Sanks the cleanest revolutionary of them all
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 27 September 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
the *other* end
Re: 'women hold up the other end of the sky' - Tom Sanks the cleanest revolutionary of them
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 27 September 2009 at 11:45 am (UTC)
YOU are dirty man but i like the dung
Why?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
How about some gossips on Sunday morning for a change instead of breaking farts fast I mean
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 26 September 2009 at 10:00 pm (UTC)
Let us gossip what says you
The first women of the G-20 Summit: How they measure up to their famous husbands
Michelle Obama played hostess to the spouses of leaders from all over the world during the G-20 Summit that began Thursday in Pittsburgh. Opening night included a reception at the Phipps Conservatory (where Mrs. Obama wore a controversial dress by designer Thakoon). Other events on the first ladies' itinerary included an intimate dinner at Teresa Heinz Kerry's farm, a tour of the Pittsburgh Creative and Performing Arts School, and a visit to the the Andy Warhol Museum
Narrow your eyes and tell me that what you see on the streets doesn't resemble what you always imagined the last days of the Roman Empire would have been like ? women costumed as though for an orgy that has lost its savour, hoisted on to shoes that make them walk like hobbled horses, parodies of themselves weighed down with gigantic party handbags costing more than an English teacher earns in a month and bearing someone else's initials; while the men, worried for their jobs but still spending, spending, peer after them uncertain whether what they feel is desire or derision.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-it-doesnt-matter-if-theres-a-recession-or-not-because-armageddon-is-on-its-way-1793518.html
Darling is a lovely boy. He ought to take the place of Ed Balls
PVM Oil Futures Ltd issued a statement on Thursday after rumours of irregular trading swept through London and Asian oil markets the previous day.
A rogue trader has left a London-based oil brokerage with losses of almost $6.1 million pounds 10m
is that round six? Good. no? Yes?
Nothing makes it harder to fall asleep than knowing how important it is to fall asleep. So when the pressure's on, try chowing down on one of these snacks before bedtime to ensure some serious shut-eye; they're all hand-picked and approved by the Eat This, Not That! nutrition team. These 8 sleep-better foods and drinks have been shown to induce feel-good relaxation chemicals, calming your nerves and slowing your racing brain. You can thank us ... tomorrow morning--after a long, restful night.
NONFAT POPCORN
OATMEAL WITH SLICED BANANA
1 CUP OF PLAIN YOGURT WITH 2 TABLESPOONS MIXED NUTS
A HANDFUL OF PRETZELS
1 GLASS OF WINE
RED BELL PEPPERS
http://health.yahoo.com/experts/eatthis/38272/8-perfect-sleep-better-foods/
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
WOMEN AT ARMS Gossips I love on Sunday ONELINERS I LOVE
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 27 September 2009 at 12:08 pm (UTC)
WOMEN AT ARMS
Wartime Soldier, Conflicted Mom
By LIZETTE ALVAREZ
The U.S. military has in large part adapted to women
fighting successfully alongside men. Motherhood, though,
poses a more formidable challenge.
QUOTATION OF THE DAY -
"There's not going to be an upsurge in job openings for quite a while, not until employers feel confident the economy is really growing."
- THOMAS A. KOCHAN, a labor economist at M.I.T.
THIS is from NYTImes USA
These painful periods for W. and Bill Clinton, falling low after starting with such grand hopes, are recounted in two new books.
The pen-and-tell by Bush speechwriter Matt Latimer, ?Speech-less,? is being denounced by some former Bushies and Republican commentators as a ?Devil Wears Prada? betrayal. (Except, in this case, the Devil wears Crocs. Preparing to make a prime-time address explaining why the 2008 economic bailout wasn?t socialism ? ?We got to make this understandable for the average cat,? the president tells his speechwriters ? W. pads around the White House in Crocs, an image that?s hard to get out of your head.)
?The guy is a worm,? Bill Bennett told Wolf Blitzer about Latimer, adding: ?He needs to read his Dante. He probably hasn?t read ?The Inferno.? The lowest circles of hell are for people who are disloyal in the way this guy is disloyal, and at the very lowest point Satan chews on their bodies.?
The Devil Wears Crocs
President Obama has discovered that the military is not
monolithic in support of the plan and that some of the
civilian advisers he respects most have deep reservations.
Iranian Protester Flees After Telling of Torture
By NAZILA FATHI
Ibrahim Sharifi received threats after telling opposition
figures that he was raped and tortured in a Tehran prison.
California Struggles With Paroled Sex Offenders
By SOLOMON MOORE
Officers are struggling to keep track of parolees in a
state that discharges more than 120,000 inmates annually.
Taking Health Care Courtship Up Another Notch
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
White House officials say they have begun an aggressive
campaign to line up votes for a health care bill.
Enter the Recession's Waiting Room
By DAVID SEGAL
In a factory town in Nebraska, workers and companies
alike are in callback limbo.
If choosing to be an organ donor were easier, would more
people donate? It's a question for behavioral economicshttp://uk.mc231.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?.gx=1&.tm=1254051660&.rand=2vo38ulb7f4st#_pg=showMessage&sMid=3&&filterBy=&.rand=1094799909&midIndex=3&mid=1_22126_ACm9ktkAAFD8Sr8TpQ3EjlHWUHA&m=1_25835_ACy9ktkAABz4Sr84bgVyPHFyfjY,1_23417_AC69ktkAADtLSr8lJAJ2fi4gZUY,1_22767_ACu9ktkAAF4BSr8WvAJDrgfyZtU,1_22126_ACm9ktkAAFD8Sr8TpQ3EjlHWUHA,1_21449_ADC9ktkAAAHWSr8QWwVzwWjwUic,1_18757_ACy9ktkAAF54Sr6Q0AuSiQMRiAQ,1_11194_ACm9ktkAABQ6Sr3x4wGRj09JaMI,1_4453_ADC9ktkAAJEgSrz6eQEokAuWqpM,1_5052_AC69ktkAAQCbSry9LwB%2FPWL%2FSEk,&sort=date&order=down&startMid=0&pSize=25&hash=2c35761f5001156b6c1735aca3efe064&.jsrand=2345182
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date