UK

6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 4°C

Straw forced into retreat over ‘Big Brother’ data sharing plan

Justice Secretary seeks to allay fears of a drift towards a ‘surveillance society’

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

Jack Straw: Is to write new safeguards into the Coroners and Justice Bill

REUTERS

Jack Straw: Is to write new safeguards into the Coroners and Justice Bill

The Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, will make a U-turn over sweeping new powers which were to allow public bodies to swap the data they hold on individuals.

In a clear sign the Government is worried about growing criticism that it is creating a “Big Brother Britain”, Mr Straw is to rewrite his Coroners and Justice Bill to build in new safeguards to protect the public. He will table several amendments to the measure when it reaches its report stage in the Commons next month.

The climbdown comes after MPs from all parties and civil liberties groups warned that the Bill would mark a major departure from the principle that information collected for one purpose by the Government should not be used for another.

Critics are worried that the measure would pave the way for data sharing to be extended in future without fresh legislation. They claim that ministers would be able to approve public bodies handing over sensitive information to companies. Allies of Mr Straw revealed last night that he now accepts the provisions in the Bill were too broad. They said he has asked officials to draw up plans to tighten the provisions in an attempt to allay fears about a drift towards a “surveillance society”, and thus win public confidence in the measure.

However, the Justice Secretary insists that there is still a case for more data sharing to improve public services. For example, a Department of Work and Pensions project will ease the distress of bereaved families by ensuring they have to report a death to the authorities only once. Another scheme will allow families who qualify for free school meals to get help towards the cost of home computers to access government services, without providing documentary evidence about their incomes.

David Blunkett, who is regarded as a hardliner by civil liberties groups after introducing identity cards as Home Secretary, has lobbied Mr Straw to water down his Bill. He is particularly worried about a proposal allowing ministers to make “information-sharing orders” enabling “any person” to share information which includes personal data.

In a speech today, Mr Blunkett will warn that data sharing is a “major area of public concern”. The former cabinet minister will say: “It is not simply whether the intentions are benign – undoubtedly they are – but whether they are likely to be misused and above all what value their use may have.”

Campaign groups welcomed Mr Blunkett as an unlikely recruit into their ranks yesterday. But they warned that his proposal for the Government to replace plans for compulsory ID cards with proposals to force British people to hold passports would not overcome their objections.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

life imitating art
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 12:19 am (UTC)
this is straight out of "yes minister" - what a laugh
Stasiland GB style
[info]terry_walpole wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 02:02 am (UTC)
Blunkett speak with forked tongue.

And does anyone realy trust a govenment computer system to a. work and b. not be open to every kind of abuse by the thousands of 'honest' people using it?
Let's all see everyone's private data
[info]colincarr99 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 03:59 am (UTC)
Let's be honest, difficult for a politician I know, and have all our private data available from The Pirate Bay. That way there's less chance it will get lost!
NOTHING IS AS IT SEEMS ?
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 05:38 am (UTC)
Labour have succeeded in establishing the most comprehensive intrusive state in the World. Centralist control by a champagne socialist Government. They hope to control from the centre and thus stay longer in power. The Stazi State of former East Germeny would be proud of their efforts. Their Achilles heel has been their inability to store securely that information. There have been countless cases of inefficient leaked and dramatic lost data. They are incapable of controlling this monster and Straw should resign.

This dysfunctional Government have wasted billions of tax payers money on such ill thought out schemes. No amount of spy networking will keep them in power a day longer than the next General Election.
too little too late
[info]forwardplanning wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 09:10 am (UTC)
Too late this cabal have any trust the electorate ever had in them, they have behaved in an abominably traitorous manner and should be dealt with by the force of the Law

Please reopen the Tower of London, failing to save costs we'll just use half a dozen ropes and a few lamp posts and do some Mussolinis, that should help focus their minds a bit on the priorities

Seriously, rather than make the guidelines tighter, just scrap the thing, the people do not want it.

I SAID THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT ANY FORM OF STATE SURVEILLANCE AND DATABASES.
Man of Straw and Blunderkett
[info]billylad wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 09:58 am (UTC)
I wouldn't trust either of these men to order me a cup of tea.
sharing information
[info]snowdonwatcher wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 05:09 pm (UTC)
It is up to me if I want to divulge my income or lack of it to my local council, school, or anyone else for that matter.
I can not stress too highly that my personal information is mine, & I should decide who I tell, when & why. If anyone is going to want to share it around I should have to sign a disclaimer to say "share all you like".

This government wants to control; control who we are, who we see, who we talk too................They appear to want to know everything about us.

It's not just this lot I don't trust......I don't trust the lot who hope to replace them either...........

Please preserve us from the control freaks...............& yes Straw, that includes you!
'Big Brother'.
[info]ron753 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
If we do not get rid of this lot soon, we shall have no freedoms left. What a shower!
[info]jonpaulr wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 07:01 pm (UTC)
Quite right too of Jack to reverse the idea shows he's listening Its O.k for infromation that certain parts of authority have on us ie DVLAto pass on to councils for their to see if wev'e left our cars for long perios in their car aprks etc. But information collected from us by different parts of the state Ie the royal mail knowing whether to deliver party political information to us shouldn't be able to pass this on to bnp coucillors etc
Oxymoron
[info]chrisp666 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 09:39 pm (UTC)
In strawman's case, is not Justice Minister an oxymoron?
DGJYB
[info]charityplayer wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:47 am (UTC)
DGJYB RA
DGJYB RA AL
DGJYB RA AL TAR
DGJHYBRALTAR
VIVA
INIT
data laws
[info]leister777 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 03:35 am (UTC)
As stella rimington said the government is seeking to use terrorism to bring in a big brother surveillance type scenario to bear. As ERIC BLAIR that famous FABIAN wrote 1984 and animal farm AND MOST OF THE LABOUR PARTY all ally themselves to this way of thinking ,would it be the case then that the real conspiracy is with Government TO BRING IN THIS GLOBAL heretical New world order by creating these fears by so called negligent actions which jack straw could then just cover up. I find it astounding that these people are allowed anywhere near a data base with all the abject misery they could cause and even more astounding that no one has challenged their suitability to be in control. All of these fanatical party members are bordering on insane if they think that "absolute" denial will win the day.The labour party were served with a notice under section 10 of the data act 1998 some time ago by me and they were legally bound to answer. They did not bother.They are not above the law. PS. GORDON BROWN CALLING BANKERS SERVANTS, WHAT DOES HE THINK HE IS THEN? A MASTER?
Seeks to Allay Fears.
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Thursday, 26 February 2009 at 03:55 am (UTC)
What rubbish! We are the most watched society in the World, count the street camera's.
Every telephone conversation is now required by law to be recorded as is every text and facscimile message. This man is Stalin reincarnated!

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date