UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 8° London Hi 8°C / Lo 4°C

Strike union threatens to stop £1.5m cheque for Labour

By Andy McSmith
Tuesday, 15 July 2008

The strike may be the largest mass walk-out in decades

PA

The strike may be the largest mass walk-out in decades

The head of Britain's biggest public-sector union has accused Labour of being "devoid of ideas of how it's going to win the next election" and has begun a review of its £1.5m-a-year contribution to party funds.

Dave Prentis, the general secretary of Unison, spoke out as hundreds of thousands of council workers prepare for the start of a series of strikes in support of a pay claim. The two- day strike to be held tomorrow and Thursday is expected to be one of the largest mass walk-outs for decades.

His warning, in an interview with The Independent, will add to the political pressure on Gordon Brown later this month, when Labour's National Policy Forum meets in Warwick to consider items for the next general election manifesto.

Union leaders want to include a promise to loosen up the laws regulating strikes and are intent to use their financial hold over Labour to increase their bargaining power.

About 490,000 of Unison's 1.4 million members contribute £3 a year each to the Labour Party through a special fund, providing nearly a tenth of Labour's annual income. The union also donates to constituency parties, but has begun a review of how it spends its political funds which, Mr Prentis says, will "leave no stone unturned".

"We have got the worst employment rights in Europe, probably in the industrialised western world," Mr Prentis said. "There are restrictions in place which mean it is very, very difficult to stay within the law and to represent members.

"It's not an issue of secondary picketing or an issue of going back to mass pickets. The issue is that you have a Government that believes in deregulating business and deregulating anything connected with how wealth is created for the few, and yet where we try to represent low-paid working people, we're surrounded with regulation that makes it virtually impossible."

Mr Prentis said it was not just money that is increasing union influence over party policy: it is because union leaders have a better sense than the party leadership about where they want to go.

"We have seen more and more within the party that it's devoid of ideas of how it's going to win the next election," he said. "I don't get the impression from our members that they believe the Labour Party is still understanding what they are going through.

"The electorate want clear choices. They want to know what our party stands for, and what the Tory party stands for. They want clear red water between them. Fudges are not helping anyone."

Unison says they expect around 600,000 employees to join the strike, which would make it one of biggest disputes in Britain, in terms of the numbers involved, since the 1926 General Strike. But the employers, the Local Government Association, estimate the numbers will be closer to 325,000.

The strike will cause delays in collecting rubbish, and will disrupt schools at a time when children are getting ready for end-of-term concerts and other performances. As it escalates, there will be a risk of the kind of "horror stories" about uncollected rubbish or unburied bodies that marked the 1978 Winter of Discontent, which brought down the government.

"At this stage, we want to be very careful in the way in which vulnerable people could be affected by the action," said Mr Prentis. "Nobody wants a Winter of Discontent; nobody wants a Summer of Discontent.

"But at the same time, if our members are taking industrial action; if they're losing their pay; if they're being treated as badly as they are being treated, at some point they have to make a stand."

He insisted that the union had not deliberately timed this week's strike to disrupt the end of the school year. "The action is determined by legislation. We're all parents ourselves," he said.

Unison has estimated that 580,000 of its members, and 50,000 members of the general union, Unite, will take part in the disruption, and that there will be pickets at virtually every local government premises in the country. More strikes, stretching over three or four days at a time, are expected to follow unless councils offer more money.

The employers admit that schools, refuse collection, and adult social care will be affected.

Unison is demanding a pay increase of 6 per cent, or 50p an hour, whichever is greater. Some of its members, such as street cleaners, work full-time for less than £12,000 a year. Mr Prentis claims that councils can afford the increase without raising council tax because of efficiency savings. The employers have offered a 2.45 per cent pay rise, which the unions argue amounts to a pay cut when set against rising food and fuel prices.

Jan Parkinson, managing director of Local Government Employers, said: "Strikes will not change the fact that our last offer was our final offer. If the pay settlement is any higher, councils will be forced to make the unpalatable choice between cutting frontline services and laying off staff."

Who's going on strike?

*Tomorrow's strike could potentially affect any premises in England, Wales or Northern Ireland where the workforce is employed by the local council, including state schools. Teaching assistants, school clerical staff and dinner ladies are being called out, but not the teachers, who belong to a different union. Refuse collection is expected to be disrupted as the collectors strike. There is also the potential threat to the vulnerable as social workers walk out – although the union is exempting members who work with the very vulnerable. The other workers involved include town hall staff, librarians, parks and leisure staff, cooks, cleaners, housing benefit workers, rent collectors, council tax officers, parking attendants dog wardens, street cleaners, architects and surveyors.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

13 Comments

I will be working today and tomorrow and so are 60% of my colleagues. My union GMB accepted the offer by 4.1 and that was the sensible thing to do. I think UNISION will get a shock today I know for a fact there have been mass resignations in Sunderland LEA over this and to call a 2 day strike during the current economic climate is crazy and fails to understand the mood of the people. Prentis is completely out of touch with the real world. This strike will fail.

Posted by Anthony Rowlands | 16.07.08, 05:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

At election time we normally have the "Monster Raving Looney Party" unfortunately at the last election we voted them in both for Parliament and the Unions.
Attacking the people who are going to pay for your payrises while you threaten the funds of the labour party is never going to penetrate the Labour Cabinet's brains (using the term lightly) and no union decides how people live.

Posted by Dave | 15.07.08, 23:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I remember UNISON as the union that tried to get me fired for not being a member. They illegally gained access to my personnel file, but fortunately I was tipped off and kept my job. So much for them standing up for workers rights. They have done more to destroy jobs with their insistance on ludicrous workers "rights" than even the present government's mishandling of the economy.

Posted by Mike N | 15.07.08, 19:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The Labour Party began life as the political wing of the Union movement. That is ancient history now. The unions may still give Labour a lot of cash, but as we're seeing, the link between working people and Labour is weakening, and the party can no longer take union support for granted. This is good. Labour must seriously buck their ideas up or else risk a double whammy: lose the union cash (and the votes that go with it), and then watch it go to the LibDems or whoever instead.

I think it's too late for Labour. As Mr Prentis says, union strength has weakened under Labour, not grown, and any concessions now will look like a sop. Who will court the unions - and their cash - now? Could be interesting.

Posted by Nullius | 15.07.08, 19:23 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Last time I looked the economy was still growing. People should be able to have pay rises reflecting productivity improvemnets without it being inflationary. Isn't it more the problem that the government budget is such a mess that it can't afford pay rises?

Posted by Nigel | 15.07.08, 17:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

2.45% is generous when thousands are losing their jobs in the private sectior. These unions forget that we are now overburdenned with Council Tax & other taxes (direct and indirect).

We need to slash public spending, preferably keeping frontline workers. However we need to rid ourselves of jobsworths and quangos. The Portuguese have drastically cut public sector jobs requiring them to face dismissal if they have 2 consecutive years of poor performance. They have also brought retirement age and benefit in line with public sector workers.

Like many in the private sector, I have liitle sympathy with these strikers excepting a dislike of waste and 'fat cat' pay.

Posted by Steve Marchant | 15.07.08, 16:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

damn right mr davies, what a great idea. This current government does not represent me. how could they? they have no understanding and no care about myself or the average brit.

viva la revolution

Posted by mike | 15.07.08, 15:57 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"Why don't the trade unions form their own party like die Linke in Germany.?"

They did once. The Labour Party began in 1900 as the Labour Representation Committee of the Trades Union Congress. Since then it has drifted quite some way from its roots.

There is room for a new Party in the UK. Millions of people want simple things like affordable homes, public services which work, and are not infested with fat-cat self-serving "consultants" and managerial types, safe streets, an economy which allows them to live decently without plunging into debt, changes to "flexible" labour laws (plain english translation, "easy to sack", hence insecure), and a foreign policy which is made in London, not Washington or Brussels. But none of the major parties offers us the opportunity to vote for such things. And a first-past-the-post electoral system makes it very hard for a new party to gain ground.

Plus there's the spectre of the BNP, our very own home-grown fascists, lurking in the wings.

Posted by John Davies | 15.07.08, 11:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Why don't the trade unions form their own party like die Linke in Germany.?

IMHO bullying Gordon Brown probably isn't the cleverest thing to do right now. To paraphrase Mao the trade unions swim in the sea of public opinion and at the moment opinion of public sector trade unions isn't too good. Presumably Dave Prentis is a student of 1979.?

Posted by wolf | 15.07.08, 11:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"We have got the worst employment rights in Europe, probably in the industrialised western world. .....you have a Government that believes in deregulating business and deregulating anything connected with how wealth is created for the few, and yet where we try to represent low-paid working people, we're surrounded with regulation that makes it virtually impossible."

That's a clear statement, and it's true. NuLabour is, and always has been, Thatcherism in drag, complete with sleaze, cronyism, and yet more privileges for the already privileged. The only mystery is that it has taken the Unions so long to wake up to this. And because Bliar, despite his many faults, was very good at setting up management structures, it will be difficult for ordinary members to take their party back from the apparatchiks who now run it.

So millions of ordinary working people are left without any major party that represents their interests. That's a very dangerous situation in the long run

Posted by John Davies | 15.07.08, 10:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

13 Comments


Preparing for power

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date