UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

The European elections: Is Cameron leading his MEPs astray?

A senior MEP has spoken out against the Tory leader's decision to pull his party out of the main conservative grouping in Strasbourg and says he will 'bitterly regret' it. Jane Merrick, James Ball and Emily Dugan report

The Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, has courted controversy, notably by remaining seated during a standing ovation for the Prince of Wales when Prince Charles addressed MEPs last year

pa

The Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, has courted controversy, notably by remaining seated during a standing ovation for the Prince of Wales when Prince Charles addressed MEPs last year

David Cameron faced embarrassment over his hardline European policy yesterday as one of his MEPs gave a warning that his stand was heading for "disaster".

Just days before the local and European elections, when all the major parties expect a battering over the expenses scandal, the Tory leader was criticised for his plan to leave the mainstream grouping in the European Parliament and join forces with a party which is anti-gay rights.

Caroline Jackson, the Europhile MEP for South West England who is standing down at the election, said Mr Cameron would "bitterly regret" the decision to withdraw from the European People's Party (EPP), whose members include Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy.

At the same time, a string of senior Tory figures have given a warning that the move risks damaging Britain's influence in the EU if the Conservatives win power.

Last month, The Independent on Sunday revealed that senior Foreign Office officials are also alarmed at the likelihood of a Cameron government leaving the UK isolated in Europe.

Mr Cameron has also said his government could hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty even if it has been ratified by every EU nation.

The criticism was all the more embarrassing for Mr Cameron, shifting the heat of controversy on to his party at a time when Labour and a weakened Gordon Brown government have been bearing the brunt of public anger over the expenses scandal.

Mr Cameron was in Warsaw yesterday to share a platform with the Czech ODS and Poland's Law and Justice (PiS) party. Leading members of the PiS have outspoken views on homosexuality, including banning gay rights marches.

Writing in the European Voice, the European affairs weekly, Ms Jackson said: "If you see an old friend about to drive full tilt into a brick wall, you will want to try to stop him. Today the appalled bystanders are the British Conservative MEPs who oppose David Cameron's pledge to leave the largest group in the European Parliament and form a new group, set apart from the continent's Christian Democrats and conservatives.

"The deed is done. Only those of us not standing again in June have the freedom to advocate an alternative policy. Most of us regard Cameron's policy as a disaster. Events are reinforcing our arguments."

Ms Jackson said the party's influence in the City would suffer, as well as in Europe.

Lord Patten, the former cabinet minister who became a European Commissioner, said: "It is an unwise decision and will reduce the Conservatives' influence in the European Parliament."

The former home secretary Lord Brittan, who also became a commissioner, said: "There is no doubt that the attempt to leave the EPP has annoyed a lot of the European leaders who are members of the EPP and are in government. It will make it more difficult to establish relations with them."

There was further criticism from outside the party. Tim King, the deputy editor of European Voice, said: "This is ideological, not pragmatic. On financial services legislation, for example, Conservative MEPs will be on the outside, which was not the case in the past. Cameron has been so desperate to escape the Christian Democrats that he is going to end up with far-right people, some of whom are racists. All that social liberalism of Cameron Conservatism is not the way that the Law and Justice party of the Poles goes."

Dr Anthony Zito, a European politics expert at Newcastle University, said: "If they follow through with this – and I remain sceptical that they will once they're elected – I think it would be extremely problematic. In terms of British politics they are ceding the ground operating in the European process to Labour and the Lib Dems."

Mr Cameron remained defiant yesterday over his plans, which he wants in place as soon as possible after this week's poll.

A spokeswoman for Mr Cameron said: "Caroline Jackson has always held these views, but these are not the views of the Conservative Party. None of this is new. This is absolutely the right thing to do, to pull out of the EPP and form a new grouping. You cannot say one thing in Britain and another thing in Europe."

Mr Cameron pledged to leave the EPP during his leadership campaign, winning over many Tory MPs from the Eurosceptic right and helping win. In a highly risky strategy, he has refused to order a U-turn despite the widespread condemnation.

The Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, Edward Davey, seized on reports that the Tories have met members of a Latvian party with links to Nazi sympathisers. Mr Davey urged the party to reveal with which parties they had been engaged in talks ahead of Thursday's Euro elections.

In a letter to the shadow Foreign Secretary, William Hague, he said: "The Conservative party's refusal to name its future partners in the European Parliament denies the public the information they need to make their choice at this election. This wall of silence, despite your many secret meetings with potential partners, is utterly disingenuous."

He went on: "Political groups in the European Parliament are the platform for joint political agendas. In Brussels and Strasbourg, the politics of the wider group often informs the voting choice of the national delegation of MEPs. Is it not then grossly hypocritical for you to leave the European People's Party on the basis that they do not reflect your views, only to go about obscuring those parties you will work with after 4 June?

"Is this because they are reportedly made up of homophobes, anti-Muslims, climate change deniers and Nazi sympathisers?

"The electorate is entitled to know what secret deals have been made. What manifestos have been prepared behind closed doors but not put before voters? Where will you stand on climate change? On civil rights and equality? On the economy?

"More radio silence from Conservative HQ will merely confirm the suspicions of many that you are ashamed of your new partners and will do everything to keep them hidden away until after the election."

Caroline Flint, the Europe minister, said: "The shadow Business Secretary, Ken Clarke, has previously described David Cameron's Europe policy as 'head-banging' and now other senior Conservative grandees have described it as a 'rigid commitment to impotence', 'unwise' and 'a mistake'.

"David Cameron should listen to the experienced voices in his party, put the national interest first, and re-think his decision to leave the European People's Party.

"The choice for voters on Thursday could not now be any clearer: vote for influence with Labour or isolation with the Conservatives."

The row came as research for The Independent on Sunday revealed that Labour and Liberal Democrat MEPs have represented the best value for money for taxpayers, while Ukip's members have been the worst.

All MEPs have netted themselves £700,000 each over the past five years in pay and office expenses –not including staffing, travel and attendance allowances. However, an examination of the amount of work each MEP has carried out, including written questions, taking part in speeches and legislation, shows that their work rate has varied considerably.

Robert Kilroy-Silk, the maverick independent and ex-Ukip MEP, cost the most of all British MEPs, at £5,965.71 per minute of speaking, based on the £41,760 he claimed for signing in to the chamber. The cheapest was David Martin, Labour MEP for Scotland, who cost £90.21 per minute. He spoke to the European Parliament more times than all 10 Ukip MEPs combined.

In total, Ukip MEPs passed fewer motions, sat on no committees, filed fewer questions per head and spoke less than any of the major parties. A typical Labour MEP spoke twice as often and tabled five times more questions than a typical Ukip MEP.

Conservative MEPs put in the least activity of the three major parties. They spoke less, asked fewer questions and sat on fewer committees on average, yet claimed more attendance allowance than the other major parties.

Labour MEPs were slightly ahead of the Liberal Democrats in how much they spoke, while Lib Dem MEPs asked more questions. SNP MEPs beat both parties on these counts.

Britain in Europe: Ten leading MEPs

Robert Kilroy-Silk The former chat show host known for his stint in the I'm a Celebrity jungle was elected with Ukip in 2004 but quit to form Veritas. He now sits as an independent.

Daniel Hannan The Conservative MEP became an internet sensation in March when his European Parliament tirade against Gordon Brown became YouTube's most-viewed video.

Caroline Lucas One of two UK Green MEPs, she became the face of the political organisation in England and Wales after being elected the party's first leader last year.

Nigel Farage The Ukip leader has courted controversy, notably by remaining seated during a standing ovation for the Prince of Wales when Prince Charles addressed MEPs last year.

Roger Knapman Farage's predecessor as Ukip leader, who led the party when it voted against admitting east European states into the EU, he was embarrassed in 2006 by the revelation that Polish workers he employed were sleeping in the attic.

Michael Cashman The former Eastenders actor has been an MEP since 1999, but is still better known as his on-screen character Colin Russell, famous for having the first on-screen gay kiss in a soap opera.

Godfrey Bloom The Ukip MEP got off to a rocky start in 2004 after getting a seat on the women's rights committee. He told journalists women did not 'clean behind the fridge enough'.

Giles Chichester The South West member stepped down as the leader of Conservative MEPs last year after an expenses scandal. An inquiry cleared him of wrongdoing.

Tom Wise The Ukip MEP appeared in court with his researcher last month on charges of false accounting and money laundering, charges that both deny.

Mary Honeyball The web-savvy Labour MEP spreads the 'Honeyball Buzz' and voices her views on women's rights through her blog and regular Tweets.

Kate Youed

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

SACK JACKSON NOW:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 04:55 am (UTC)
It was to be expected that retiring MEP Ms Jackson would voice her opinion sooner rather than later. As she is stepping down, her pathetic comments are unwarranted and unnecessary. 85% of the Tory Party back David Cameron and any dissenting voices are going against the will of the majority of its members. Those that object to this wise policy of leaving the EPP should be thrown out of the Party. Jackson has proved to be a stumbling block to progress. Patten and Britton would do well to keep their own council because they are yesterday's men and show a complete lack of forsight.
Re: SACK JACKSON NOW:
[info]49niner wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 06:01 am (UTC)
Ms Jackson has every right to her opinion, and should not be subject to a gagging order from the Tory hierarchy. What happened to honest debate and expression of views? Or don't the Tories believe in that?

The decision to leave the EPP says a lot about the current Tory party. At one time, they'd never have been seen anywhere near the rather odd, reactionary parties they've been courting in places like Poland and Latvia. They are leaving the European mainstream for the lunatic fringe.

Government is a serious business and if you are going to make a success of it, too much ideological posturing will trip you up. It is the business of any British government to promote British interests abroad. Like it or not, the EU is the organisation that speaks for Europe and European governments, with 27 member countries and counting. For a British government to be sitting on the fringes blowing raspberries, which appears to be Tory policy, is both irresponsible and childish.

If the Tories fail to listen to their elder statemen like Lords Brittain and Patten, who know how government and the EU, more fool them. Leaving the EPP is an act of folly. It just shows that the Tories are not yet mature enough to return to government. New Labour are truly awful, but the Tories are plain nuts.
blunder by a once great party
[info]dimlocator44 wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 08:53 am (UTC)
Quite right, 49er. The conservatives have sufficient support to deserve to have reasonable influence in the European Parliament, but instead are opting for the fringes with retrograde Eastern Europeans. Between the Tories on the loony right fringes, UKIP & the BNP, Britain will no longer punch its weight in Europe.

bgarvie: Ms Jackson is entitled to express her view - it's called debate & discussion. Is it perhaps that you feel threatened by this? The Tories remain divided over Europe
Jackson is right
[info]flibberdy wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 09:57 am (UTC)
I wrote lots of letters to the press at the last election, hoping to help goad the Tories into making the mistake of leaving the EPP. It is a monumentally (and obviously) bad decision.

PS: By what criteria do you class an MEP as "leading". Bloom and Kilroy Silk do nothing (I mean *nothing* apart from zillions of idiotic parliamentary questions) as MEPs and have no influence whatsoever. These are on your "leading" list. Graham Watson is leader of the third largest group in the Parliament and doesn't get a mention.
CAMERON & THE CONSERVATIVES
[info]eurobritish wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
All I can say is that hope the Conservatives are never ever elected, if aligning themselves with far right racist and homophobic parties in Europe is the way they are going. What is their ultimate agenda here in the UK, are we going to see a racist homophobic manifesto enacted here? I personally have never trusted them in their so called new guise of caring sharing party, a leopard never changes it's spots and he seems to be even worse than Maggie Thatchers lot.
European Elections
[info]jonshe wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 04:11 pm (UTC)
Plan goes something like this.
Irish approve Lisbon.
Conservative policy good as dead.
Alternate.
Decaln |Ganley/Libertas reform EU
or
Declan Ganley/Libertas save Mr Cameron by stopping an Irish yes to Lisbon.

Either way the Conservatives are helpless in Europe without Libertas
Hard-working UKIP
[info]tomwilde wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 09:38 pm (UTC)
Whatever their statistics on passing motions and filing questions, UKIP have certainly exposed more scandals involving leading EU officials than all other UK parties combined. To give two better-reported examples, (a) its MEPs revealed that Jacques Barrot, France's European Commissioner-designate, had been given to a suspended jail sentence in France in a political funding case and (b) it managed to table a no-confidence motion in the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, in order to force him to appear before the EU Parliament to answer questions about a free holiday he had taken on the yacht of shipping magnate Spiros Latsis (just before Latsis was given European Commission clearance to receive state aid from the Greek government). Other parties' MEPs more often attend powerless committees and file pointless or sycophantic questions; but UKIP's MEPs are feared by the official holding the real power in the EU. That's why I'll be voting for them.
Re: Hard-working UKIP
[info]dimlocator44 wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 11:04 pm (UTC)
I spot a UKIP troll. The Committees aren't powerless, the questions usually relevant. UKIP does nothing other than jeer from the sidelines, & as such aren't taken very seriously.

Only the British Parliament in Westminster can negotiate UK exit from the EU, so even on the UKIP's own terms, a vote for them at the European elections is futile (except to give them a chance to cash in like Farage, Wise, Mote, & quite possibly others).
(no subject) - [info]xiashixiong789 - Friday, 16 October 2009 at 05:47 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]xiashixiong789 - Friday, 16 October 2009 at 05:55 pm (UTC) Expand

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date