Expenses Scandal
The married couple who took taxpayers for £282,731
Andrew MacKay is forced to quit as key Cameron aide over his non-existent second home
David Cameron was under mounting pressure last night to end the political career of one of his closest allies as the MPs' expenses scandal claimed its first casualties.
Andrew MacKay resigned as Mr Cameron's senior political and parliamentary adviser after he admitted claiming a "second home" allowance when he only had one property. He received £140,952 on the London home he shares with his MP wife Julie Kirkbride, who listed it as her main home and claimed £141,779 for a house she bought in her Bromsgrove constituency. Mr MacKay, who does not have a home in his Bracknell constituency, admitted his arrangement now looked "strange" but insisted it had been approved by Commons officials. Asked if he had done anything wrong, Mr MacKay said he had made "an error of judgement that looks wrong". Tory officials say Ms Kirkbride has done nothing wrong and had also had her arrangements approved by the Fees Office. No action is planned against her.
Mr Cameron has promised to take a tough line against Tory MPs who have made suspect claims but he appears reluctant to withdraw the party whip from Mr MacKay – which would ban him from being a Tory candidate at the general election. A survey of 1,400 Tory grassroots members found that 66 per cent believe Mr MacKay should cease to be an MP. The ConservativeHome website found that 82 per cent of Tory members want MPs facing questions about their behaviour to face deselection meetings.
On a day of shame for Parliament, Elliot Morley, a former environment minister, was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party after it emerged he had claimed £16,000 for a mortgage that did not exist. The police have received a complaint about his actions from the Taxpayers' Alliance. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London and chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, said there was a case for the police to be called in to investigate the claims made by some MPs.
Meanwhile, two Labour peers face a six-month suspension from the House of Lords after an investigation into allegations they were prepared to take "cash for amendments". A senior Labour source said Parliament was "having a collective nervous breakdown."
Today, The Daily Telegraph accuses the Justice Minister Shahid Malik, of claiming £66,827, the maximum amount allowed for a second home over three years, despite securing his main three-bedroom home in his constituency of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, for a discounted rent of less than £100 a week. He denied breaking any rules, saying the expenses system was flawed.
The newspaper discloses that Clare Short, the former International Development Secretary who now sits as an independent candidate, claimed the full cost of her mortgage for two-and-a-half years when she was entitled only to the interest. She was asked by the Fees Office to repay more than £8,000. Last night she said she made an "honest mistake" when she switched from an interest-only to a repayment mortgage in 2003.
But the damage over the expenses saga continued to hurt Labour most, with a YouGov survey in The Sun today putting Labour on 22 per cent, its lowest-ever rating, the Tories on 41 per cent and the Lib Dems on 19 per cent.
Labour denied dithering over Mr Morley's case. Although it did not act until after the Telegraph revealed his £800-a-month mortgage claim, Labour sources say the party did not know the full details until yesterday. The party's national executive committee will consider disciplinary action against other Labour MPs when it sits next Tuesday.
Cameron aides denied he had gone soft over Mr MacKay to protect a close adviser. They said there was no need to discipline him because he had promised to abide by the verdict reached by a new Tory scrutiny panel being set up by Mr Cameron. It is likely to order Mr MacKay to repay the money.
Speaking on the BBC's Question Time last night amid a row over the expenses saga, the Lib Dem Home Affairs Spokesman Chris Huhne joined the growing number of MPs calling for the Speaker, Michael Martin, to step down after comments he made on Thursday.
Douglas Hogg, the former Agriculture minister, backed away from a confrontation with the Tory leader. On Wednesday, he cast doubt on the Tory panel's legitimacy. Last night, he agreed to repay £2,200 he claimed for maintaining his country estate "in recognition of public concern". He admitted the cost of cleaning his moat "was not positively excluded from the claim".
Greg Barker, a Tory environment spokesman, will make a "voluntary payment" for capital gains tax.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Currency in tatters, no manufacturing base, economy run into the ground, MPs siphoning money out of the public trough as fast as they can... if anyone anywhere doubted that Britain has joined the league of third world banana republics, let them doubt no more.
He used to have a flat in London but gave it up some time ago and now stays in an inexpensive chain hotel. At a meeting I attended as a representative of another party, I heard him speak about Stroud's continuing tradition of manufacturing and how he is keeping in constant contact with the companies that still make things here.
Definitiely a good'un.
This is FRAUD, is it not?? Fraud against the state and the people. Others have died for less.
The worst thing is not that these people are practised parasites sucking at the public teat but that they are so boldly brazen and indifferent when their FRAUDS are exposed.
If you or I perputrated this crime this we would, rightly be in deep trouble.
If anybody stole a fraction of this from a little corner shop, even if nobody got hurt, they would be in deep trouble.
Why are these greedy fools so comfortable with their greasey excuses when they should be squirming in embarrassment and fear?
If the average person on the street were found guilty of such fraudulent practices, feet wouldn't touch etc!!
1) they didnt realise right from wrong because they are stupid:unfit for government
2)they didnt realise right from wrong because they were mentally ill:unfit for government
3)they did realise they were doing wrong:unfit for government
is there any intelligent people who could give me a different explaination?
So, if we all claim for an extra child allowance giving fictious facts would that just look wrong or would it actually be wrong? Or how about claiming insurance twice for only once incident? Either this man is incredibly stupid or incredibly arrogant and either way he has no business in the Tory Party.
Are the police and the judiciary in their pockets ?
Very propably.
Don't forget, in corrupt regimes police & judiciary are there to protect the ruling classes.
They are not there to dispence justice.
Don't lose sight of the fact that most of our 'laws' involve fines (usally heavy) which go to swell the coffers that these parasites are so freely fleecing.
Apart from, perhaps, a slightly lower turnout in June my instinct says that it won't make any significant difference and that the vast majority of the public will have "got over it" by the time of the next General Election.
Who was it that said "No one ever lost money under-estimating the general public."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p
http://www.virginmedia.com/jobs/feature
This is simply not credible, an elected representative such as Julie Kirkbride has a responsibility and an obligation to ensure that public money is used appropriately wherever she is involved.
As the second home allowance claimed by her husband involved a property she claimed for herself, are we to assume that husband and wife never discussed their financial arrangements. Was she totally unaware that her partner and fellow MP was claiming an allowance on a property that she was also claiming for?
If that is the case, then she would appear so naive and unworldly that many of her constituents might want to consider if they want her to represent them in the future!
I earn less per annum than Elliott Morley claimed for his dodo mortgage. Yet I'm a "gold-plated" over-paid, bottomless-pension-pot owning bastard to an awful lot of people out there.
It's not envy - I'm a graduate and have a lot of things in my life that count for far more than money ever could. No, it's not envy - I'm just tired of it all.