UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

The Right Honourable Spongers... and the longest week in their lives

One by one, all three main political parties reeled from fresh revelations over their members' expense claims. Brian Brady and Jane Merrick report

It seems an age ago now: the late-night response from a cabinet minister as the first news of The Daily Telegraph's expenses coup began seeping into Westminster. "Gordon and a cleaning bill?" he sighed, with relief, rather than despair. "This might not be as bad as we feared..."

Barely a week on and it is clear that it is worse than anyone, even the Telegraph executives who finally struck the deal to buy the discs containing four years' worth of MPs' expenses claims, could ever have imagined. The spectacle of hundreds of thousands of receipts, for items ranging from the petty to the extravagant, slithering into the light was never going to be good news for Britain's MPs.

In the hours before the Telegraph published, the Prime Minister had been confronted with the revelations to come, regarding his own claims and those of several members of his Cabinet. The prematurely relieved minister had not understood the gravity of the situation.

He was not alone. A week later, Margaret Beckett, facing a querulous Question Time audience, opted not for the cod apology and blaming of "the system" that had sufficed for many of her colleagues. Instead, the hectoring housing minister decided to take them on. "People can't understand why MPs make the claims that they do," she said. "It's not appreciated that MPs have extra costs that people even in comparable jobs do not have and... no one is allowed to explain."

The bewildered Mrs Beckett had careered from Little Big Horn to her own Ceaucescu moment. MPs' failure to comprehend the furious reaction to the expenses debacle could be more destructive than their legions of contentious claims.

The failure to respond was demonstrated early. The first Telegraph revelations took in heavyweights including Jack Straw, Hazel Blears, Alistair Darling and John Prescott. Commons Speaker Michael Martin reacted by calling in the police – to investigate the leak, not the details disclosed.

No matter, the Telegraph operation was gathering pace regardless, taking in more junior figures including Keith Vaz, Ben Bradshaw, Phil Hope and the Tory Greg Barker. How, the paper enquired, had the care services minister Mr Hope managed to squeeze £37,000 worth of refurbishment into his modest flat? The haughty tone of MPs' letters to the Fees Office betrayed the assumption that allowances were theirs by right; the indignant response when a claim for a cot was knocked back; the reference to "natural justice" in support of an appeal against the rejection of a claim for a £2,100 TV.

The response was not overwhelming contrition. Luton Labour MP Margaret Moran railed against the "misrepresentation" of her claim for £22,500 at a house 100 miles from her constituency, days after nominating it as her second home. Tourism minister Barbara Follett, wife of the millionaire author Ken Follett, insisted that her £25,000 for security for her London home was within the rules.

Elsewhere, colleagues in the spotlight were softening their approach by last Sunday. Hazel Blears, fielding questions over how she had avoided paying £13,000 in capital gains tax when she sold her "second" home, conceded: "I understand entirely why the public hates this." However, the Communities Secretary made it clear where she believed the real blame lay: "The system is wrong; it needs to be changed."

It was a refrain that was to be repeated ad nauseam by squirming MPs in the coming days. When millionaire Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward trotted it out on Newsnight on Monday, to help explain his £100,000 mortgage claims – as well as the 38p Muller Crunch Corner yoghurt and £1.06 pizza from Asda – an incredulous Jeremy Paxman replied: "So you are victims of the system?"

The advance warning of the revelations had not enabled the Government to cobble together a plausible response. Harriet Harman – as a London MP, one of the few not caught up in the second-home scandal – toured the studios holding the line about claims being within the rules and clinging to the promise that action on allowances was already in the pipeline.

Despite the paralysis, the opposition parties remained reluctant to dive in to score points off the Government. On Sunday, David Cameron announced that all Tory MPs would have to "explain why they've claimed what they've claimed", but he refused to condemn the Labour liggers. By Monday morning, it was clear why: after three days of attacks on mainly Labour MPs, the Telegraph finally trained its fire on the Conservatives. Michael Gove had "flipped" his Commons allowance and claimed £13,000 in moving costs. Francis Maude had claimed £35,000 in two years of mortgage interest payments on a flat a few hundred yards from his London home. David Willetts claimed for hiring workmen to replace light bulbs at his second home. Oliver Letwin charged £2,000 to replace a leaking pipe under a tennis court.

Mr Martin proposed "serious change" to the allowances system on Monday, but demonstrated his traditionalist view of the situation with an attack on Labour MP Kate Hoey, after she questioned the wisdom of calling in the police to hunt the leaker. "Some of us in the House have other responsibilities [than] talking to the press," he said. The outburst, repeated the following day when Labour MP David Winnick protested, only increased the pressure on Mr Martin and he ended the week facing a no-confidence motion from the Liberal Democrats.

But he would not be the only casualty. Labour MPs Elliot Morley and David Chaytor have been suspended from the party over claims worth thousands of pounds for "phantom" mortgages". Justice minister Shahid Malik became the most senior victim on Friday after revelations of secret cut-price rental deal on his constituency home, which he designated as his main home. Mr Malik insisted that he had operated "one million per cent by the book" and added: "I am as straight as they come." Three hours later, he was gone.

The Telegraph roll call, however, continues relentlessly. Clare Short – whose noble account of her departure from Tony Blair's cabinet was entitled An Honourable Deception? – was among those embarrassed, claiming the full cost of her mortgage. Norman Baker, a vocal critic of expenses abuse, admitted claiming £20,000 to rent an office he already owned.

The gravity of the situation was beginning to get through by Wednesday, when the start of Prime Minister's Questions was greeted not with the usual raucous jeers, but with absolute silence. Mr Cameron, in proposing immediate action to restore public confidence, had left the Prime Minister looking leaden footed. Lord Tebbit said the way MPs had exploited the system reminded him of "the guy on disability benefit who goes out window cleaning". "I call them welfare junkies," the former Tory cabinet minister said, "and I am afraid that is too close to the truth for some MPs."

The Telegraph refuses to reveal how much it paid for the discs but it surely knew their value. What no one, least of all the MPs struggling to deal with the fallout, yet appreciates is their cost.

The court of public opinion

Come on Mr Chaytor, isn't it time you started living in the real world... along with the rest of the 60,000 of us in this wonderful town. You bring shame on the good name of Bury.

Robin Banks, Constituent of David Chaytor MP

The so-called middle class backbone of our society is as up to its ears in wheezes and dodges to get around taxes and allowances as any benefits scrounger.

jaffgyp independent.co.uk

Oh sure, a few of the most egregious cases will get thrown to the wolves by their local party selection committees come the general election, but most won't, and people will just "vote for Labour" or "vote for the Conservatives" as usual.

David Cantrell, Political blog

They have forfeited the right to the title of "Honourable". If I see the BBC use it in future, I for one will complain. In future years, when people ask why it was lost, we will tell them.

Chris, BBC Have Your Say comment forum

I see. I fiddle my expenses but if I get caught I offer to pay back, on the understanding that nothing else is required of me for justice to be done. At the same time I tell the police to hunt for the bastard who grassed me up.

Trevor Pateman independent.co.uk

Speaker Martin should consider himself fortunate that we are not allowed to string him up by his ankles on a lamp post in Parliament Square and chuck rotting fruit and veg at him.

Tiergarten, guardian.co.uk

I'm voting with my feet at the next election. I have a weeping bunion that I can mark the ballot paper with.

Al Dopa, Twitter

Justice? Nah! To steal is no shame! Shame is to steal and be caught! This is what these tree-hugging PC fanatic leftists bring us. ANARCHY!!!

Audaces Fortuna Juvat, Daily Mail

The INNOCENT should be named along with the guilty. The guilty should be tried for treason for bringing this Country into disrepute. I wasn't surprised to see the two "Leaders" hiding behind two female MPs on last night's Question Time!

Frederika Davis, Daily Mail

The Parliamentary hogs should be sent to the abattoir, not home to get their cheque books.

Organized Rage, Political blog

Please take a look at Britain today and ask yourself: "is foolishness and inefficiency to blame for the appalling state of my country, or is it adept vicious rigor, subversive practice, and organised social control by our supposed "leaders" to blame?"

Enemies of the People, Political blog

At last our MPs realise that everyone has something to hide even when they haven't done anything wrong. Perhaps ministers will now be more inclined to undo the legislation on civil liberties that has given the rest of us something to fear.

C E Evans-Pughe, independent.co.uk

I find myself, surprisingly, agreeing with Stephen Fry that the more people go on about the whole parliamentary expenses saga the more overblown it seems.

Jack Cornwell, Mail online

The Queen should dissolve this Parliament and should drag the Speaker of the Commons to the Tower to be hanged.

comibastard, guardian.co.uk

Margaret Beckett's performance was nothing short of a thundering disgrace. She is out of touch, smarmy, patronising and a liar. It's a scandal and she should be in jail along with the rest of them.

biggsie, guardian.co.uk

At school we had to carry a calendar card, on the back of which was printed the first school rule: "Conduct detrimental to the good name of the school is punishable as such." MPs should do the same, substituting "House" for "school".

David Ball, Telegraph online

The politicians of SW1 are undeserving, untrustworthy and overpaid. They have a sense of self-entitlement that is as unjustified as their use of the term "honourable". We want people in politics who are more like good priests – poor and honest.

Guido Fawkes, Political gossip site

If these expenses had not been leaked, would any of the party leaders have made a stand to clear up a corrupt system?

Frank Skinner, Broadcaster and comedian

As an alternative to incurring the costs of a second home in London, a number of MPs might usefully be offered accommodation by the state. Holloway and Pentonville spring to mind.

Nigel Foster, Daily Telegraph

The only ones who suffer in this benighted society are the people who do the actual work; they are taxed up to the eyeballs to pay for these leeches. Let's have a revolution.

John Tymol, Mail online

It is hypocritical to focus just on the shady dealings of MPs. They make use of the system, but behave in a normal human way.

Michael K Baldwin, independent.co.uk

Paying back the money claimed does not actually remedy the fact that trust – and any semblance of personal integrity – has been destroyed.

Devil's Kitchen, Politics website

I deplore overpaid members of the media circuit who attack public figures for their incompetence and lack of good character, whilst being unable to legitimately justify their grossly disproportionate salaries.

Narinder Purba, Blog

Although MPs have obviously overstepped the mark, after seeing this, I can't help but feel that an element of people's anger is motivated by envy, not wanting someone to have something they haven't got.

Adkult, guardian.co.uk

An honest MP I know – there still are a few – told me how she has to spend a lot of her "spare" time at constituency functions, and is also expected to donate to charities and so on by people who add insult to injury by saying, "Having a day off, then, are you?" when she would far rather be spending time at home with her small son.

Anticant, Political forum

I suggest that people might consider carrying out citizens' arrests on their local MPs and frogmarching them to the police station to be charged with fraud.

Ian Bone, Political blog

For all who love the idea of parliamentary democracy, this has been the worst week of our lives.

John Redwood, MP

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Not Honourable
[info]martinhanson wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
It is now clear that the term "Right Honourable" is a travesty of the truth. It must be discontinued. It would be nice to see a list of those MPs who have not milked the system.
Liz Blackman - Labour Chief Scrounger
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:10 am (UTC)
Liz Blackman, a former Labour whip, treats the allowance system with contempt and has the ghoul to say, 'its within the rules'. RESIGN NOW AND FACE THE ELECTORATE
Clare Short
[info]south_seas wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 02:00 am (UTC)
Although I don't agree with much of what Clare Short says I do think she has principals. She says this occurred a few years ago and she paid back the money years ago. If so it is sloppy journalism to put her name in here
Clean House, Be Thorough
[info]dravazed wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 02:01 am (UTC)
Here in the US, we had Bush and the culture of corruption--moral, political, and financial--that he fostered. Well, now you know what the culture of Blair has brought you...and what it feels like. My sympathies go to you.

I wish all of you much-despised "commoners" in the UK godspeed in cleaning out the house of Commons and clearing the air of the foul smell created by the current herd rooting there.
Re: Clean House, Be Thorough
[info]rojaws wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
It'd be nice if we could clean out the pig-sty, unfortunately us British commoners aren't very good at that sort of thing.
We've allowed our ruling classes to become too powerful & I'm afraid to say that if we manage to get one lot of guzzling pigs out of the trough then we'll just get another lot straight in who are just as bad, if not worse.
Our whole political sysrem & society needs tearing down & re-building from the ground floor up.
Unfortunately the British don't seem to have the gumption to do it, we're just too used to doing what we're told.
There's a hell of a lot of shouting & 'baying for blood' at present about MP's expenses, government corruption, mis-management of the countries finances etc,etc but that's all it is. Noise.
Do you see angry mobs outside the Houses of Parliament or No. 10?
Have you noticed any rioting in the streets?
Thought not.
I'm ashamed to say it but the French are far better than the British at removing unwanted ruling classes.
Re: Clean House, Be Thorough - a script:
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:48 am (UTC)
The Tip of...
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 02:45 am (UTC)
the iceberg methinks. The whole wretched system needs radical overhauling. Every public servant and all who live incredilbly well from state handouts (eg Legal Aid etc) need much closer supervision.
Never in the field of human endeavour have so few lived so lavishly well off the backs of so many tax burdened folk!!!!!!
expenses.
[info]respectedgraham wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 06:02 am (UTC)
We have yet to hear from the 'Fees Office'. Is it true that they encouraged MPs to change their housing arrangements as several have claimed. Secondly how did they interpret the green book in the manner they did..trouser press,false Tudor beams etc. Can't we employ 'impeachment ' to rid ourselves of these leeches.
Scroungers
[info]bangkok_boy wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 07:44 am (UTC)
Whilst it's impossible to defend the indefensible,it was once said that we get the polititians that we deserve. This lot should be shunted off to the tower after sequestration of all their assets. But as long as there are voters who genuinely think that any of this bunch of hypocrites is a "tree hugging, PC fanatic leftist" then we have what we deserve i.e. an uneducated electorate. I challenge any who think that the Blair or Brown governments be, or have been," leftist" to name one "leftist" policy on the statute books in the past 12 years. This lot, all parties, are an out of control right wing rabble, with a handful of honourable exeptions. It began with Thatcher,aided and abetted by Murdoch who spewed out the right wing lies for her deregulating thugs and thieves. These policies were perpetuated by Blair and Brown. What surprises me is that anyone is actually surprised.
rules rule?
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:15 am (UTC)
Externally imposed rules and regulations simply spawn more and more creatively twisted and bent accountants and solicitors ( and keepers of religions) who 'earn a living' devising 'legal' ways to get around them.

The antics of the MP's caught fiddling expenses, of the slippery financiers and bankers running off with big bonuses and fancy pension pots, and of umpteen 'normal' citizens routinely dodging taxes and abusing means tested benefits, all with clear consciences, simply illustrate how far UK society as a whole has drifted from any understanding of an internalised sense of right and wrong.

Constituency owned 'second homes' for MPs
[info]susanna_i wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:45 am (UTC)
Why oh why doesn't each out-of-London constituency purchase a decent but not luxurious pied a terre within say a 30-45 minute commute of Westminster to be used by its member for parliament during the years of his/her service to that constituency. Whenever a new member for that constituency is elected he/she would then take over this residence. At least this way any expenses for running the second home would be directly accountable to the community on behalf of whom that MP was serving. The property would count as an asset to that constituency and it would not be the MPs purse that was lined in the event of its ever being sold. If the MP in question didn't like the home provided for whatever pathetic reason they would be perfectly at liberty to find another at their own expense leaving the constituency free to find some other less picky tenant for the duration of that MPs service.
Susanna, Barnet
Labour does it better !
[info]mike_spain wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
We've finally found an area in politics where Labour excel & beat the other parties hands down and its called milking the system. From petty claims like bath plugs & sanitary towels to porn subscriptions, unjustified claims like BBQ's and patio heaters and on to outright fraud on non existent mortgage payments, as the song goes, ONLY LABOUR DOES IT BETTER !!!!
One or other but not both
[info]caurnie1 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:32 am (UTC)
David MacLEAN will have a hard job explaining away his different definitions of his main home. He can't have it both ways- either he pays CGT or he repays the taxpayers for his expenses. Now we know what he was wanting to hide not protect his constituents but protect his bank balance
so put the poor things out of their misery
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
Who can clean up politics?
[info]richardmcgg wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:38 am (UTC)
As Ed Balls is now proven to be totally clean, why can he not be the man to clean up this mess?
what about
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
the fiddles of snouts (confirmed in this space by 'tominlondon') who live in council accomodation within a bus ride of the circus premises - and let's not forget the judges (who jail single-handed arents for fidldling tuppence to try to make ends meet) found by a recent police raid, to have dosh stashed on safe delposit boxes

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_064814
Register Your Protest
[info]englandism wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:55 am (UTC)
Do not abstain. Do not spoil the ballot. Register your protest:

www.registeredprotest.com
Milking the prople
[info]rosienina wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
Neither right, nor honourable.
what has tree-hugging to do with it?
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
what is that idot talking about, 'tree-hugging lefties'?' if we all hugged trees we would be better people. right or left wing. Up the greens!
What about Europe and MEPs expenses?
[info]old_green wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 12:09 pm (UTC)
It seems astonishing, given that we are in the middle of the election campaign for the European Parliament, that no-one is asking any questions about MEPs expenses, which are much larger and less transparent
Their own money
[info]longon wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:00 pm (UTC)

I have wondered many times over the last ten astonishing days whether many of the items bought by MPs such as home cinemas, silk cushions, chandeliers, electric massage chairs etc etc etc would have been bought if they had had to use their own money (perish the thought), and for me, Fraser Kemp has provided the answer. He bought a television set for! 1699 pounds, must have been some telly. And because he would not be refunded for the whole amount, and was offered a mere 750 pounds, he would have had to pay out of his OWN pocket 949 pounds. So what did he do, he took it back. Discuss

As for titles : Noble Lord, Rt. Honourable, they are somewhat tarnished, I'm in agreement with martinhansson on that.
Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg
[info]podinoldtown wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 03:27 pm (UTC)
The world's so called elite meet to discus what they are going to have in store for us ands it does not get a single mention in any newspaper?

BILDERBERG! BILDERBERG! It's happening near you (in Greece) Google it!
THe expenses scandal
[info]peterjh wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
When the Great Fire of London happened it took advantage of the Great Fire the following year to help bring about the rebuilding of London. When the mad cow disease struck a lot of innocent healthy cattle were slaughtered to safeguard future exports. I think a General Election is needed. This present government would NOT have rectified this fiddle if the Telegraph and Heather Brooke hadn't dug deep and brought about the exposure.
Corruption and Foreign Affairs
[info]jayoosi wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:53 pm (UTC)
Is it not possible that these dishonest lying thieving MP's could have also been paid by rouge pariah countries such as Israel to shape up British foreign policy to suit their interests? I hope that the British public will one day wakeup and question all what they have been told by these so called honourable MPs. Expense claims are for sure only the tip of the iceberg, but it's doubtful that anyone will be allowed to see beyond that...

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date