UK

6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 4°C

The Rothschilds and their 200 years of political influence

By Andy McSmith

Nat Rothschild, the financier at the centre of allegations that threaten to engulf the shadow Chancellor, George Osborne, is no stranger to laws which forbid politicians from accepting donations from abroad.

Political donations from overseas are also illegal in the US, where John McCain's campaign team is under investigation for allegedly accepting a benefit in kind from two mega-rich British citizens, namely Nat Rothschild and his father, Jacob, the Fourth Baron Rothschild.

In April, Mr McCain passed through London and spoke at a fund-raising dinner for expatriate Americans, where seats at the cheapest tables cost £500 a head. What caught the eye of Judicial Watch, a Washington-based foundation dedicated to combating corruption, was that the event was held "by kind permission of Lord Rothschild and Hon Nathaniel Rothschild" at the family home in Spencer House, St James's, the only privately owned 17th-century palace in central London.

The US Federal Election Committee is still investigating the allegation that Mr McCain's campaign team broke electoral law by accepting a benefit in kind from the Rothschilds. "We haven't heard from the FEC yet, and don't expect to until after the campaign," Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch said.

The Rothschild family and politics have been intertwined for generations, ever since Nathan Rothschild, who founded the English branch of the family business, financed Britain's war against Napoleon two centuries ago. Nathan was the son of Mayer Rothschild, who founded the family business in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt during the 18th century.

Serena Rothschild, Nat Rothschild's mother, was one of the largest individual donors to the Conservative Party last year. She gave £190,000. She has also helped fund Mr Osborne's office.

When another member of the clan, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, married the New York businesswoman Lynn Forester, they spent the night of their wedding dinner in the White House as guests of Bill Clinton. Lady Rothschild was a fund-raiser for the Democrats, but defected to the McCain camp after her friend Hillary Clinton was beaten to the nomination by Barack Obama.

So it is nothing new for a Rothschild to be mixing with prominent politicians – but generally they do it in a way that does not invite unnecessary publicity. What is unusual about Nat Rothschild's sudden intervention in the affair of the oligarch and the Corfu yacht is the way he has placed himself centre stage. His presumed motive is anger at Mr Osborne's bad manners in passing on what Peter Mandelson had said about Gordon Brown, when Lord Mandelson, Mr Osborne, and Mr Rothschild were guests of the Russian aluminium tycoon Oleg Deripaska.

Despite the now famous photograph that shows Mr Rothschild and Mr Osborne as privileged 21-year-old Oxford undergraduates, they were not close friends and their paths soon diverged. Within two years of that photograph being taken, Mr Osborne had set himself on his chosen career path by taking up a senior post at Conservative headquarters. In the same year, Nat Rothschild, showing no interest in finding a steady job, teamed up with Annabelle Neilson, a model he had met on a beach in India, eloped to Las Vegas, and married her.

His horrified parents must have feared that he was heading off on the same self-destructive course as two of his cousins – Amschel, who hanged himself in a Paris hotel in 1996, and Rafael, who died of a heroin overdose in Manhattan at the age of 23.

But Nat Rothschild emerged from his marriage break-up three years later a changed man. In New York, he met Timothy Barakett, founder of Atticus Capital, a hedge fund that places large and often risky bets on behalf of wealthy clients. Mr Rothschild became co-chairman of the business, which at its peak was managing investments worth more than £20bn. That was before turmoil in the markets – last month, it was reported that £2.5bn had been knocked off the value of Atticus's assets.

Even so, Nat Rothschild is thought to have made much more than the money he stood to inherit as Jacob Rothschild's youngest child and only son. Father and son are now a team, who co-founded JNR, an investment vehicle with offices in London and New York and extensive interest in Russia. It was Jacob who introduced Nat to Peter Mandelson.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

9 - 5; The Prison of Rothschild
[info]suppressed1 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 01:54 pm (UTC)
Wouldn't it be great if citizens of the western world were alerted to the fact that our politicians (who are meant to be representing us) were in fact making deals with and colluding with corrupt individuals and organizations such as the Rothschilds. Why does celebrity gossip and local atrocities make front pages of the newspapers and headline news reports everyday when the bigger story is that people have been lied to and mislead by corrupt organisations such as the Rothschilds and by their own governments since the Napoleonic wars. Society is in a sorry state today and the majority of the problems faced in the western world are down to the fact that governments, royalty and international bankers have colluded or have been manipulated into stripping rights away from individuals and placing it in the hands of wealthy companies. I am only 21 years old and I am shocked about the number of people that are many years older than me that have no idea of how or why the 9-5 prison that they call freedom has been imposed on them. Personally I find it quite disturbing that society has remained ignorant and that the majority of people accept the laws imposed on them without question. Its time for people to wake up and stop letting others manipulate their lives.

When you think about the fact that the British army are in Iraq and Afghanistan, horrifically killing innocent civilians in YOUR name and then you consider the fact that we are meant to live in a democracy, think about the fact that hundreds of thousands of uk citizens have signed petitions telling the government they dont want them to be there yet not one person has written to the government saying we do want them to be there, how is this considered democracy? Possibly the most significant decision a government can make is going to war and we are told our opinion doesn't count, they are going to invade another country and kill the people that live there because they want peace?? Hmmm....very suspicious to me. Democracy is an illusion people like the Rothschilds have publicly stated through history that they care not who writes a governments laws because its the man that controls the nations money supply that controls the nation. We are all slaves to money including governments and im afraid to say that it is people who have been given the responsibility of protecting us ie the governments that have let us down and have let corrupt incestuous organisations such as the Rothchilds imprison us in the stress and guilt fuelled society that we find ourselves in. This information is finally being released into the public domain through the internet and times are changing. If anyone has actually bothered to read this far i would like to say open your eyes, do not immediately believe something because mainstream media has told you it is true.....question everything and voice your opinion!

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date