'Today' showdown leaves Des Browne in tight spot
The Defence Secretary receives a mauling at the hands of John Humphrys
Sunday 13 April 2008
The Defence Secretary Des Browne has been accused of misrepresenting key details of a controversial court case regarding treatment of service personnel on active duty during a mauling at the hands of John Humphrys on yesterday's Radio 4 Today programme.
In a testy encounter between Humphrys, radio's Grand Inquisitor, and the Defence Secretary, both attempted to talk over each over as Humphrys pushed Browne for answers.
It also resulted in a piece of doublespeak from Browne worthy of Sir Humphrey Appleby of Yes Minister. Pressed by Humphrys on troops who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan because of inadequate equipment, Mr Browne said: "Well all of those cases have been examined and in each case which has been examined where the lessons have been learned we have learned those lessons."
A judgement on Friday ruled that British troops serving abroad were protected by the Human Rights Act, and this could have been breached if they weren't supplied with proper equipment.
It was brought by the family of Private Jason Smith, 32, a reservist from Hawick, who died of heat exhaustion while stationed in Basra, as temperatures climbed to 60C (140F).
During an inquest in 2006 the coroner, Andrew Walker, criticised the Ministry of Defence for the death, blaming "serious failures" such as giving the wrong hydration information and inadequate pre-deployment fitness tests. Mr Browne was also attempting to prevent coroners from using the words "serious failures".
Private Smith's family brought the legal action to secure a second inquest, as not all documents had been revealed by the MoD.
The court also ruled, however, that service personnel were subject to the Human Rights Act while on active service.
During yesterday's interview, in which Mr Browne repeatedly tried to avoid answering why he was appealing against the verdict, the Defence Secretary said: "This case came to court because the family challenged the coroner's decision.... He was the defendant. We were an interested party. It transpires that he accepted there needed to be [another inquest] because of an error he made.
"The family wanted to raise the application of articles one and two [of the Human Rights Act] ... and our lawyers said this was an opportunity to deal with this particular phraseology in relation to these rules because a clarification of these rules are important.
"I am completely supportive of coroners' inquests and investigations... and, if there weren't coroners inquests or investigations, there are Board of Inquiry reports, conducted independent of ministers or politicians by the military, and I believe those reports should be shared with families and are shared with families."
Jocelyn Cockburn, of Hodge Jones and Allen, who acted for the Smith family, took issue with some of these comments, however.
"The family wanted the judge to deal with the question of whether armed forces deployed abroad are protected by the Human Rights Act. The MoD sought to argue that the judge should not look at this," she said
"It wasn't only the coroner's failings that led to these proceedings, but the MoD's actions. For instance, they failed to provide disclosure, by withholding the Board of Inquiry report to Jason's family and the coroner.
"I've been shocked at how dysfunctional the armed forces' inquests have been, made worse by the lack of openness on the part of the MoD."
Anger on air
More rows that made TV and radio history:
Sir John Nott
Stormed out of a BBC TV interview with Sir Robin Day in 1982, after being described as a "here today, gone tomorrow minister".
On Radio 4's 'Today' programme in March 1987, presenter Brian Redhead held a minute's silence in response to Lawson's suggestion that he was biased towards Labour.
An aggressive interview in February 1995 resulted in 'Today' presenter John Humphrys facing accusations of "poisoning the well of democratic debate".
An interview with John Humphrys in June 2003 quickly descended into a fierce argument over the Government's exaggerated claims about weapons of mass destruction.
Left in the middle of a debate on Radio 4's 'Start the Week', back in June 1999, after several bad-tempered exchanges with presenter Jeremy Paxman.
Famously slammed the phone down on BBC breakfast news presenter John Nicholson in 1999, when angered by being grilled about cash for questions.
- 1 The black and blue dress: Makers considering a white and gold version
- 2 Husband and wife die holding hands within hours of each other after 67 years of marriage
- 3 What color is The Dress, white and gold or blue and black? An eyewitness gives a definitive answer
- 4 The remarkable archaeological underwater discovery that could open up a new chapter in the study of European and British prehistory
- 5 Fearne Cotton quits Radio 1 after ten years for 'family and new adventures'
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
Half of Ukip voters say they are prejudiced against people of other races
'Cash for access' scandal: Sir Malcolm Rifkind says 'unrealistic' for MPs to live on £67,000 salary
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Aqsa Mahmood branded a 'disgrace' by her parents after claims she recruited three UK girls flying to Middle East
salary equal to £40K pro-rata: Sauce Recruitment: Are you available to start a...
£35000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Creative Front-End Developer - Claph...
£18000 - £24000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The role in this successful eco...
£28000 - £30000 per annum: Ashdown Group: QA Tester - London - £30,000 QA Tes...