UK

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Tories may delay plan to reduce inheritance tax

By Nigel Morris, Deputy political editor

Flagship Tory plans to lift millions of families out of inheritance tax could be delayed until five years after a Conservative election victory because of the economic crisis, David Cameron has warned.

The Tory leader also signalled that tax credit payments to middle-class households could be scrapped, in a drive to reduce government spending.

He said the grim economic inheritance of an incoming government would require a situation where "everyone is putting their shoulder to the wheel, and sharing the difficult decisions".

Raising the inheritance tax threshold – funded by a levy on wealthy foreign "non-domiciles" living in Britain – has become a flagship policy for Mr Cameron. Its announcement nearly two years ago was credited with reviving Tory fortunes after Gordon Brown became Prime Minister, and was expected to be an early priority for an incoming Conservative government.

But Mr Cameron yesterday would only commit himself to reforming inheritance tax within the five-year life of a parliament. He told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "It's a promise, something we want to do, obviously in a parliament."

The Tory leader, who this week begins a holiday in France and Greece, also said tax credit payments to some better-off households may be scrapped.

He said: "Tax credits we support. We think they are a good idea to get payments to working families on low incomes.

"But they do go to families who earn over £50,000, so we have to look at that."

He claimed he was the first opposition leader to have "looked the British public in the eye and say: 'You know, we are going to cut public spending'."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The flip flop party
[info]timonsays wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 12:08 am (UTC)
So the Tories are flip flopping once again.

This seems to be their 'standard operating procedure'. Say one thing. Wait awhile. Do another.

Nobody can trust the Tories.

The issue isn't whether you support this proposal or not. It is that the Tories are just totally incapable of deciding on a policy and sticking to it. They are utterly useless.

Just like Labour, in fact.

That is the sad truth. The two main parties are New Labour and Blue Labour.

Only a moron would vote for either of them.
In view of the circumstances , not surprising.
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 12:43 am (UTC)
Cameron is doing the right thing as the economic situation has changed so dramatically since the announcement on inheritance tax. Timonsays describes it as flip flopping, which is a bit silly, all Cameron is doing is simply responding to the ever worsening economic situation, just as Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems had to do the other day. The policy hasn't changed, but the timing has.
Re: In view of the circumstances , not surprising.
[info]cm999 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 07:25 am (UTC)
No he isnt he's exposing the reality of his smoke and mirrors. If as he claimed the cost of relaxing inheritance tax was to be paid for by increasing the tax on the awfull non-doms then what he is actually saying is that either this wasnt the case or he would rather support the already rich non-doms rather than the people of this country.

Its nice to see his true colours coming out before we give him the keys to number 10.
Re: In view of the circumstances , not surprising.
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 06:53 pm (UTC)
You clearly haven't considered the possibility that he will still be taxing the non-doms, but now using the money for more pressing needs in view of the awful financial crisis. This was certainly what I understood him to be saying.
Although he is correct in this policy delay...
[info]pauljs wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 04:08 am (UTC)
I will not be voting for either of the big two parties, the Tories are still in bed with the big financial institutions and will put their interests first, albeit in the belief that this is what is best for everyone, while NuLabour have completely lost all of their fundamental historic ethics in a 12 year misguided attempt to be just like them.
My vote for the countries leadership will go to the Libdems, Vince Cable seems to be the only decent politician with any practical grasp of the concept that the economy ought to work for the benefit of everyone, and although the somewhat liberal impulses of the party members might need to be reined in, I would sooner have people in power who are at least trying to do the best for their constituents rather than feathering their own nests.
I just wish that disillusioned Labour supporters would switch their allegiance to the Libdems, rather than just not voting because at present not voting for labour is, by default effectively voting for Cameron and his Cronies.
Re: Although he is correct in this policy delay...
[info]richardjeff wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 06:06 am (UTC)
Yes, give me Vince Cable anyday.
Re: Although he is correct in this policy delay...
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 09:22 am (UTC)
Yea So does Fred Goodwin. Thanks for billions Vince.
So this is the Tory Flagship Policy?
[info]johngedwards wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)
So this is the Tory Flagship Policy? Well after Cameron has spent the last 12 months indulging in a character assassination of the Prime Minister with his tirade of continual criticism of the government, we now see he is having second thoughts on his Flagship Policy. This is from a man who 'did not see the world recession coming'.
What it does show is an amateurish immaturity and naivety on his part. It is very easy to criticize and work the electorate up into mass hysteria. (Call a 'pot black' long enough and people will believe it).
What is more difficult is to formulate sensible policies (not necessarily popular policies) to rebuild this country in the long term and correct what is wrong.
Any facts on Inheritance Tax?
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
I thought it only affected a few thousand people so it was a characteristic tax cut for the very well off.

Now it affects millions.

Anyone got the facts?

Personally, I would like to see CGT, IT, and income tax merged. It is silly that investing in shares is taxed differently to investing in a home. OK, once in a lifetime one should be able to dispose of a home free of CGT, but all other transfers would be taxed.

And interest on money borrowed should be allowed against income from investments in shares.
BROWN'S INHERITANCE WILL BE SHAMBOLIC:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
Cameron's inheritance relief, an very important policy will be delayed because of Brown's 'scorched earth' policies. This dysfunctional PM is destroying all that he can before being thrown ignimously out of office. He is making life as difficult as possible for any sort of recovery and the longer he remains in office, the more detrimental it is for the British people. The next Government will have to keep all options open, assess the damage, make a thorough analysis of the 'Books' and then make sensible decisions. Nothing can be ruled out when inheriting such an unstable economy.
Working family tax credits
[info]leamutt wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 12:35 pm (UTC)

At last someone is going to put a halt to this stupid hand-out. if you have kids you shd pay!!
iq test
[info]iq47 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 04:00 pm (UTC)
iq test
[info]iq47 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 04:04 pm (UTC)
iq test
[info]iq47 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date