Voters deliver ominous warning to Brown
Friday, 2 May 2008
Gordon Brown was given a "bloody nose" in his first election as Labour leader, as the results from the council polls were announced early today. Labour suffered heavy losses in the 159 authorities in England and Wales where elections were held yesterday, as Mr Brown paid the price for the economic gloom and his decision to abolish the 10p lower rate of income tax.
The Conservatives had predicted they would gain more than 200 seats, a significant advance which would raise their hopes of victory at the next general election. They predicted Labour would win its lowest share of the vote since records began in 1973.
But with around 50 councils counting ballots today, Labour's total deficit could hit 250 or 300 before Mr Brown's pain is complete.
The Tories gained Nuneaton and Bedworth from Labour, ousted the Liberal Democrats in West Lindsey and took control in Bury, Harlow, Southampton, Maidstone and Wyre Forest – councils where no party previously enjoyed a majority.
A BBC projection of the national share of the vote, based on 1.5 million votes cast, put the Tories on 44 per cent, the Liberal Democrats on 25 per cent, with Labour trailing in a humiliating third place on 24 per cent and other parties on 7 per cent.
The results were a huge setback for Mr Brown. When he succeeded Tony Blair last year, Labour had high hopes that he would enhance the party's performance in the polls. It would be highly embarrassing for him for Labour to do worse than last year, when it won 27 per cent in the council elections, and in 2004, when it managed only 26 per cent amid a backlash over the Iraq war.
A Tory spokesman said: "Gordon Brown has had his Life on Mars moment. He went to sleep in 2008 and today he's waking up with support back to the worst his party has seen since records began in 1973."
George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor, said: "These are the first elections Gordon Brown has fought as Prime Minister, so they are not mid-term in the classic sense. Labour have done their big gamble in Parliament, they have changed their leader without even having a leadership election let alone a general election and we will see how he does."
Labour figures conceded the party had suffered a "mauling" but insisted that yesterday's elections were fought against the worst economic backdrop since the party won power in 1997.
Tony Lloyd, chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party, warned that the Government needed to show people what "it is there for" and demonstrate its fitness and competence. He said: "The Prime Minister, like the rest of the Government and rest of the Labour Party, has got to listen to what the public has been saying. They want the Government to listen to their concerns."
Reports to Labour headquarters from local officials said the party had struggled to persuade its natural supporters to turn out. Labour aides said the party's performance in the council polls had been weakened by channelling scarce resources into the London mayoral campaign.
They conceded that the combination of the global credit crisis, an unpopular Budget and the row over the 10p rate had provoked a voter backlash. Labour MPs said that last week's promise to compensate some of the 5.3 million losers from the tax shake-up had come too late to limit the damage in yesterday's elections. Several MPs reported that angry low-paid workers had walked into their constituency offices brandishing payslips showing their tax bills had gone up.
Mr Brown will accept responsibility for the poor results today. He will try to fight back by launching new policies on "bread-and-butter" issues to show that the Government has not lost touch with the problems facing ordinary families. They will include extra help for first-time buyers to get on to the property ladder. The Prime Minister will focus on policies and will resist calls to freshen up his government by carrying out a swift cabinet reshuffle. Allies said there was no question of him being forced out before the general election.
The scale of the huge task facing Mr Brown is shown by The Independent's latest monthly "poll of polls", in which Labour has dropped to a new low since he succeeded Mr Blair. The weighted average of the opinion polls taken in April puts the Tories on 40 per cent, Labour on 30 per cent and the Liberal Democrats on 18 per cent. If the results were repeated at a general election, Mr Cameron would win an overall majority of 12.
It is the first time the Tories have enjoyed a 10-point lead since the "poll of polls" began in 2005. Labour's rating is its joint lowest, equalling its position a year ago, before Mr Blair resigned.
John Curtice, a professor of politics at Strathclyde University, who compiled the figures, said: "Labour now finds itself as unpopular as it was in Blair's final months, and with a leader that is unpopular as Blair ever was. In short, the party is back at square one – except that, compared with 12 months ago, the public have lost confidence in the future of the economy."
Labour's popularity, which had already taken a knock after the March Budget, suffered another blow when the row over the tax shake-up erupted during the local-election campaign. In the six polls taken since then, Labour averaged just 29 per cent, with the Tories on 40 per cent. In the past month, Mr Brown's personal ratings fell back again. However, there was little sign that Mr Cameron's ratings have improved.
Although people feel more gloomy about the economy, Professor Curtice said: "Labour's one hope is that perhaps the Tories have still not done enough to convince sufficient people that they could do any better."
There was more gloomy news for Mr Brown last night in an ICM survey for the BBC. It found that Mr Cameron is regarded by the public as more competent and decisive and as more of an asset to his party than Mr Brown.
Some 58 per cent of people regard the Conservative leader as competent, while only 46 per cent say the same of the Prime Minister. More than half (52 per cent) think that Mr Cameron is decisive, while Mr Brown scores only 38 per cent.
Mr Cameron is seen as an asset for the Tories by 68 per cent, with only 24 per cent regarding him as a liability. In contrast, a majority (52 per cent) consider Mr Brown a liability for Labour and only 42 per cent an asset.
Mr Clegg, in his first election as Liberal Democrat leader, would be pleased to push Labour into third place. But the ICM poll suggests he has not yet made much impression on the public. Three in 10 people (29 per cent) are unable to say whether he is an asset or a liability. Some 43 per cent see him as an asset and 27 per cent a liability.

Comments
31 Comments
This is exactly the nature of bad tidings the Republicans in the USA are expecting from a Democratic presidency from 2008-2012. That is why the neocons here in The States do not care about McCain now. McCain himself has been strutting about saying really stupid, DUMB things, as if he himself could care less about this (USA) election. Britain has been ahead of the curve politically relative to US politics ever since Reagan-Thatcher, and both countries seem determined to make the same big mistakes. That is why I find British politics so interesting now. Our biggest problem here in the US in the immediate future will be the Congressional Democratic Blue Dogs - a group of conservative DC Beltway insiders determined to take advantage in the next 4 years to enhance their coiffures, to the detriment of the Democratic Party, the country, and by extension the world. This is why it is so important for us to have Obama rather than Clinton who has sided firmly with the Beltway bandits.
Posted by BZAG | 03.05.08, 04:47 GMT
It has not been past Labour Party practice to punish their leaders, however badly they have performed but Mr Brown should not take comfort from this. Today's New Labourites are far more self - centred than the old true Labourites and like as not they would sell their grandmothers on hire purchase.
It would take just one serious division (like the 42 days detention proposals) to give dissenting rebels a real chance to force the PM's resignation. How? By forcing him to make it a vote of confidence then threatening to vote against unless he resigns.
Of all his errors, the last thing Mr Brown would want would be to go down as the PM who destroyed any hope of their recovery after last night's debacle.
My guess is he'd go quietly.
Posted by Maurice Smith | 03.05.08, 00:49 GMT
Mr Brown has received a bloody nose due to the smoking ban. Mr Cameron will receive the same if he doesn't be very clear on stopping this devisive legislation. The people are talking now even if the clowns in gobernment choose to ignore them. Let's hope that Mr Cameron doesn't make the same mistake.
Posted by Owl | 02.05.08, 23:11 GMT
As a former lifelong Labour supporter, why did I switch?
Soaring petrol & food prices, out of control immigration, the blanket ban on smokers, being taxed on everything (so it seems), the rich/poor divide steadily getting wider.... I could go on.
Roll on general election, Labour have lost the plot, and its core Northern working class smokers - me included.
Posted by Liesa Madsquiz | 02.05.08, 22:39 GMT
Why I will never vote NuLabour again, ever:
1. No social justice, do MPs have to go through the hoop of means-testing to claim allowances ,like those do who fall through the safety net through unemployment or sickness and try to claim benefits that they have paid for through their National Insurance?
2. They have never done anything except tinker with the poorest state pension in the Western World.
3.Child poverty? Don't they mean FAMILY poverty? And there is so much poverty around in the UK for all to see. In fact I have seen less in Eastern Europe and this Prime Minister wants to save Africa and the far East! Please start at home
4 So fed up hearing the same old soundbites, "hard working families, long term decisions, etc ets......."
5. So sickened by always looking to USA for policy initiatives--no wonder inequality has increased these last 11years!
Posted by cyril mitchell | 02.05.08, 20:33 GMT
The smoking ban is not the reason but a reason for labours poor showing. It is one of a number of pledges they have broken with the voters. They introduced fee's in universities, they went to war with Iraq, a recession is looming, and while thousands of flats are being built for professionals and students there is a housing crisis for those needing LA housing. The smoking ban is significant. The govt ignored the polls where the majority asked for an extension, not an outright ban. Now, millions of smokers and non smokers have had there social lives ruined, the elderly and vulnerable were even more isolated than they were before.and thousands of businesses are going to the wall with hardworking families losing their incomes and homes. This is not even to examine what it is doing to cultural life as the centres of communities are destroyed. For what? Because the govt ignored its own research which stated that there was no epidemiological link between passive smoking and mortality. I am a life long socialist and treasure my right to vote. However, i voted against labour and will continue to do so until they start listening to the people who vote for and pay for them. US. Amend the smoking ban and give us freedom to choose as discerning adults.
Posted by Coley | 02.05.08, 18:36 GMT
Good riddence to bad rubbish.
Posted by Arnold Ward | 02.05.08, 16:32 GMT
It never fails to surprise me just how out of touch politicians are but even the media are way off the mark over the reasons for the local election results. The economy is an issue with voters but it is not the reason in any way for Labour performing so badly.
Labour had a terrible night and will lose the next election if they continue to believe these results are due to the global credit crunch. Average Joe of every creed and colour is sick of the way Labour has handled issues like crime, immigration and tax. For instance does anyone seriously think that Gary Newloves family and the countless other familes that have been torn apart by violent crime care in the slightest about the global credit crunch. They would give all the money in the world to bring back their loved ones
The state of the global economy is a worry, the 10p tax rate was a mistake but it has been rectified. If I hear the credit crunch is the reason why Labour has preformed so badly again I'll scream!
Posted by Craig H | 02.05.08, 16:18 GMT
"The control freakery" is what made me go and vote, the vindictive smoking ban and not giving us a voice on the Lisbon treaty. The power has gone to the MPs heads, some of of them. They forget who put them there. They lied to their voters, it is not their Country to give away. I have never been so angry in my life.
As for the power of the drug companies, I will not even go there!
Posted by mandyv | 02.05.08, 14:29 GMT
Brown should resign today. he is a laughing stock.
Posted by Marie Harrison | 02.05.08, 14:27 GMT
31 Comments