UK

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Voters turn on main parties

Poll shows 80% want independent candidates to challenge 'unethical' MPs at ballot box

By Nigel Morris, Deputy political editor

Voters are clamouring for independent candidates to challenge MPs caught up in the Commons expenses scandal at the next election.

A survey published today discloses that almost 80 per cent of electors believe non-party candidates should stand against MPs caught behaving "unethically". More than half of voters – 53 per cent – said they would "seriously consider" voting for an independent and 63 per cent believed the presence of more independent backbenchers in the Commons would strengthen democracy. Three Tory backbenchers have said they will not contest the next election and several Labour MPs are expected to be barred from standing again. However, dozens of MPs accused of milking the expenses system will face the voters in the election which is likely to take place next spring.

The ComRes survey suggests they could be in danger of losing their seats to unaligned candidates who manage to capture the public mood of anger at MPs. The poll found that 78 per cent of people wanted independents to stand against MPs who had submitted "unethical" claims.

The scandal took a fresh twist last night when the whistleblower who passed the information on to The Daily Telegraph was revealed as John Wick, a former SAS officer. Mr Wick claims he was passed the data by a source in the Commons, but refused to reveal whether he had been paid by the paper.

Yesterday, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said that the systematic humiliation" of MPs was threatening Britain's democracy. Dr Williams said the issues raised by the expenses scandal were grave, but that "many will now be wondering whether the point has not been adequately made: the continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy".

Ian Gibson, the Labour MP who claimed expenses on a flat where his daughter was living, was referred to the party's "star chamber" yesterday, which will decide whether he should be deselected as a candidate. He has said he is ready to stand down in Norwich North if voters want him to quit.

Celebrities could mount high-profile challenges to sitting MPs. Esther Rantzen, the television presenter, has said she would be "80 per cent certain" to stand against Labour's Margaret Moran, who claimed £22,500 for treating dry rot at a home 100 miles from her Luton South constituency while Lynn Faulds Wood, the television consumer campaigner, said she is considering running for a parliamentary seat.

Phillip Oppenheim, a former Tory minister, is threatening to try to unseat the Tory Andrew MacKay, who resigned as David Cameron's parliamentary aide over his "unacceptable" claims.

Independents won two of the 646 parliamentary seats at the last election – Richard Taylor in Wyre Forest and Dai Davies in Blaenau Gwent. Dr Taylor, who has held his Worcestershire constituency since 2001, said he was delighted at the upsurge of support for independents.

He is preparing an advice booklet for people considering standing for Parliament and said: "We need a government with a small majority. If you had an appreciable number of independents, it would keep ministers on their toes because no one knows which way we are going to vote."

Martin Bell, who served as an anti-sleaze MP between 1997 and 2001 after ousting Tory Neil Hamilton, said the expenses furore had made the ground more fertile for independents. He has refused to rule out standing against cabinet minister Hazel Blears at the election and said: "It's always hard to stand against the main political parties. There are no inherited or traditional votes – no one votes for you because their grandfather did."

Jonathan Bartley, from think-tank Ekklesia, which commissioned the ComRes survey, said: "We see the growth in independents as part of a wider process to break open the political system." The Jury Team, an umbrella group for independents, said it aimed to field a candidate in every constituency at the general election. It already has a full slate of candidates in place for next month's European elections.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
Voters turn on main parties. Arch bishop comments
[info]celticwelshman wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:54 am (UTC)
If a radical party were to gain power the arch bishop is probably concerned he himself might be out of a job, such as it is.

Quote "the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said that the "systematic humiliation" of MP's was threatening Britain's democracy. Dr Williams said the issues raised by the expenses scandal were grave, but that "many will now be wondering whether the point has not been adequately made: the continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy".
So if I am not mistaken, he is saying that WE are responsibly for running "democracy" into the ground and not those involved in the present expenses debacle?? What democracy can he be on about?
Then>>>
" many will be wondering if the point has not been adequately made"? not for me it hasn't I don't know about you? when those deemed in, to use a word they seem very fond of, 'Error' are booted out and loose all claim to the cash cow they have been used to in the past, I will be somewhat pacified. these statements by the arch bishop beggar belief.

I feel so very sorry for all those affected by the expenses issue, don't you? I wonder when it will dawn on their selfish, mean little minds that they have asked for all they are getting and more, it's their own stupid fault and no one else's. both those that have put forward morally challenged claims and others for simply looking on whilst sucking their thumbs.

I am sickened day after day with their constant squirming & wriggling, voicing their mealy mouthed excuses for their so called "Errors" "Mistakes" & " Accounting errors" good lord, when will it sink into their pathetically challenged gray matter that what they are guilty of borders on the criminal as it is, being protected by those self made rules, with out those, they would be guilty of criminal activity, fraud being one of them for their dodgy mortgage claims. obtaining money under false pretenses, and in some cases one would have difficulty in not actually using the word "Theft"
Re: Voters turn on main parties. Arch bishop comments
[info]longon007 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC)


It is not the media that is bringing down democracy, but bent MPs. Parliament has been turned into s sick pantomime, with duck ponds, moats and now even a good old fashioned chimney sweep has joined the ever growing cast. Tory Jonathon Djanolgy, whose personal fortune is something like three hundred million pounds, has charged us for having three of his chimneys swept. Some people have more neck than a giraffe.

No, we have not had the point made, we have yet to see what is at the bottom of this reeking cesspit, then, and only then will the point possibly have been made. Til then, it would be best if DrWilliams kept his nose out.
Re: Voters turn on main parties. Arch bishop comments - [info]joeljoel321 - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Democracy? - A leap of faith.
[info]nled63 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 03:58 am (UTC)

Hilarious - calls are made by Rowan Williams & others to let the rest of the gang off the hook because they fear "damage to democracy". I've got some news for these individuals - the damage has already been done, democracy has already been betrayed by those apponted by the public to uphold the principle. No, this mess deserves the reaction that it has received from the public, & why should anybody suppose that electing independent MPs would somehow "damage democracy"? Independent MPs are independent of the two main parties, that's all, & the two main parties are moribund, defunct in their present form. I say bring on the independents - let us rebuild integrity. let us take that "leap of faith"
The political- thief class
[info]borderreiver1 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 04:45 am (UTC)
Regards celticwelshman 12:54...
An excellent posting Sir, which also adequately sums up my sentiments.

When you think of how hard we all have to work to keep our families in a home,pay exorbitant taxes,and make some kind of pleasantness out of this life,then it is particularly sickening when these so-called politicians bleat about how hard done to they are.
Most of these parasites are all ready well heeled,before they start raping the financial system.
Its a case of much wants more.
And as for this Williams character-well I'm starting to think that he's also part of this cosy little set up
In fact-its rather like the middle ages with the Barons snuggling up to the church,with its 'mutual' benefits.
Anyone who can not see what is the sub text of this must be pretty dim.
It appears to me that the political class view the average citizen as peasants-and appear to excecise the arbitary perogative of doing what the want,when they want,to who they want and expect the sort of pay package of a top company director,or doctor.
They are referring to themselves as proffessionals-what an absolute insult to anyone who has had to train to be something useful.
Proffessionals?
Proffessional liars,squanderers,charletans,and bums.
Re: The political- thief class
[info]celticwelshman wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
Thank you borderreiver1.
I am beginning to think as time passes, whilst observing this pathetically inadequate charade being enacted by the leaders of the main parties that nothing less than co-ordinated voter power in the streets is going to kick them into some kind of direct action, the problem being of course that direct action would likely include the police vis the public and not as it should be, the Met, Scotland Yard and other constabularies throughout the land, conducting a thorough & searching investigation into the present expense situation, it also occurs to me the other serious issues of misconduct may come to light considering the seemingly corrupt & mentally challenged personalities these folk seem to have.
Perhaps the thorough and searching investigation into the much vaunted green book and its authors might be in order for starters?
As the days roll by, talk about hanging on in there until the bitter end.

Credit has been given to Cameron for taking the initiative, how so? it follows he had to be one of the thumb suckers I spoke of in the original post, standing around, watching all this take place in the past? if not, it speaks for itself doesn't it? hence the blundering rhetoric of the past couple of weeks. If he were to openly claim that he was not aware of it, he would surely be signing his own political death warrant wouldn't he? for if he was the leader his words are designed to make us think he might be, I would have thought he should have made it his business to know what his minions were up to and possibly have got in there to make some kind of effort at getting the problem sorted out, at least in his own party? after all, what a vote winner that would have been in the next G/E. At least Brown is acting true to form, being perceived to be a bit dim in the affairs of parliament & only concerned with his own ambition of being and remaining PM.

One thing that occurs to me in all this is the fact that many good and true politicians that are long dead would be turning over in their graves if they could only see the utter mess and corrupt scandal that our present crop of, to use your comment here,"Quote; Professional liars, squanderer's, charlatans, and bums." are making of running our country...what an awfully humiliating legacy?
I am sickened right through to my bones by all of this. Gradually as time goes on, I am beginning to think that the BNP might just have something to offer the country, & that just isn't my way of thinking at all. I feel I am being forced into a corner.

Concerning positive police action, a little story out of my long gone past comes to mind, in the late 60's, I recall giving a guy thumbing on the roadside, a lift as I made my way home after work, after he had got into my vehicle, I barley had time to select a gear before a police car dived in front and behind of me preventing me for going anywhere, my vehicle door was snatched open and I was handcuffed to the steering wheel, my new passenger was dragged out of the vehicle and the contents of a duffel bag he was carrying was dumped on the roadside, it contained some folded up lengths of copper tubing. We were both arrested and I was locked up for three days, the arrest happening on a Monday evening and my court appearance was on the following Thursday. I was fed on cold bacon sandwiches and cold tea, to then appear in court being accused of adding and abetting this guy dispose of his ill gotten gains, my solicitor made mincemeat of their case, using the argument, would a bus driver, if he had picked up my passenger have been treated in the same way? never the less, it was an example of how the police can kick into action if they wish to do so... makes one wonder about the reasons they have for holding back now?
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 01:40 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:19 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 03:02 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 05:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]collin_brown - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 05:18 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 05:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]almightymat - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The political- thief class - [info]drg40 - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC) Expand
Good Postings
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
It has really all been said in thesepostings--so--here, here and bravo.
democracy
[info]johnsharp7 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:36 am (UTC)
"the silly voters won't agree, won't understand we need bigger salaries, so let's deceive them" ditto Blair's wars? Brown's ridiculous accounting? Lisbon treaty? I'm a Tory in a safe Labour seat, my MP is obedient to the whips on every issue. I have no voice, no choice. I don't want my MP to be a social worker sorting out errors from badly made laws. I want Parliament to think more and do less better. The Commons has lost its point and purpose. The Expenses revelation has triggered deeper doubts and deeper anger.
Re: democracy
[info]celticwelshman wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Well my friend, Proportional Representation might just be the very medicine you require don't you think? it would at least give you some kind of voice, for I feel "safe seats" as such would largely become things of the past.
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
Dr Williams seems to be a very other-worldy cleric who would do very well to bury himself back in his library with his books, and keep his mouth shut, since every time he opens it he betrays how completely out of touch he is with the people outside his very narrow world.

I think everyone else has said it all in the above comments.

I shall be voting independent if there is a candidate to vote for. I might even stand myself as it shouldn't be too difficult to get votes away from our sitting mp with all this going on. He does strange things like stay at home and get his secretary to read the gist of letters from constituents to him over the phone, which he then gives her the gist of the answer to, and she writes the replies for him. He's rubbish - we caught him out when his reply bore no resemblence to the letter that had been written to him. Both times we've had dealings with him he's been useless so we can't be the only ones with 100% dissatisfaction rating.

I hope there's a choice, there wasn't in the last election.
A quick election will never produce radical reform
[info]young_granny wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:01 am (UTC)
Why are some people calling for an immediate election when they say they want Reform?
Answer they do not want Reform.
It is quite obvious that whichever party gets in will never pass the radical reforms needed; they are cushie for 5 years and hope for more.

The only way to get Reform is to force it before a different crowd take office. Not suffle the same old pack.
The present way run by the Political Parties and their foot-ball mob of blind supporters who bay for their own, but not the democratic public good is at the root of much of the trouble as are the 'safe seats'. We need Proportional Representation NOW.
archbishop.
[info]darryn87 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:02 am (UTC)
archbishop williams is a pathetic fraud. the church of england has become a sad joke since his appointment as archbishop, as has the state itself. the sooner britain gets it's much needed revolution and boots these repellent crooks out of power and influence, the better for the british people. in america, congressman ron paul has drafted a bill that if supported by enough of his colleagues, could spell the end of the federal reserve and the gangsters behind it. the same thing needs to happen in britain. the bank of england works on the same principles as the federal reserve, and is itself responsible for the never-ending cycle of poverty, mass migration and corruption that the british people have tolerated for too goddamn long! put an end to it and string up these internationalist banksters and the talking heads of the liberal and neo-con media they own.
Right honorable thieves!
[info]rn_at_pd wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:05 am (UTC)
Would agree with the Arch bishop that 'the point had not been adequately made', at least not until the MP's, who have made the disgracefully fraudulent claims, are prosecuted and/or admit they have stolen from the British taxpayer.

Their constant denials are threatening our democracy. Each of them (notwithstanding the MP's who haven't committed fraud) have the path to partial redemption open to them and the chance to do the 'right honorable' thing- stand down NOW!
Nothing can change without proportional representation
[info]robertclondon wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:07 am (UTC)
The whole problem of corrupt, dead-wood MPs is caused by our electoral system. First past the post enables even a donkey to be elected if it is the right colour donkey (not being donkey-ist there, mind you, just an example). With single transferable voting, the people can choose the candidate as well as the party and there is also a much greater chance of people voting for more independent minded MPs because there is competition between the candidates.
Re: Nothing can change without proportional representation
[info]longon007 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 02:36 pm (UTC)

indeed, but some people with the brains of a donkey HAVE been elected!
The nation cannot wait for the election
[info]mishmos wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
I have not met one person who is not anxious to cast their vote against the main political parties.
I will never again vote for any mainstream party candidate. Even the even tempered friends I have are absolutely furious at the greed and sleaze and this is only what we know so far. What on earth is there that we don't know.
The archbishop of canterbury should climb back up his ivory tower and do what he does best - theorise.
All these comments in support of the swine who have rules over us and taken a "don't do as i do, do as i say" attitude are really just reinforcing the fact that they are far too removed from reality until it bites them on the arse.
They work for us not themselves and we need people with a concience and brain not just cunning for greed and self serving pruposes but to make our country a better place.
Whilst we are at it, we don't really need as many MP's and could probably cull them by a third as a reasonable start.
Closing Ranks
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 11:03 am (UTC)
Whatever happened to my article, criticising the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams for hypocrisy and selective defence of the flock?
Was the fact that, I suggested the Establishment was closing ranks from attacks by the people who have become victims of its oppressive regime, responsible?
Or was it because I suggested, Parliament, The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams and The Independent sat on their hands, while Zionist forces massacred Palestinians for 22 days?

The Terrible Trinity:

Parliament: Deceit , Fraud and Duplicity
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams: Hypocrisy, Pusillanimity and Misguidedness.
The Independent: Censorship, Partisan and Disingenuous.

Perhaps the queen and the military will join them later?
keep publishing details of expenses
[info]frank598 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
Rowan Williams out to keep his unelected bearded snout out of this matter.

It is essential that we have total transparancy in the matter of MPs expenses, and it is obviously only going to happen thanks to the Daily Telegraph.
MP's Expenses
[info]billedmunds wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
It was most interesting to hear Andrew Mackay explain that he had been told by the Telegraph that though they knew about his expenses scam they were not going to publish the details and expose him. He went on to say that it was the Tory Star Court that had exposed his claims. This would seem to suggest that the Telegraph was shielding Cameron's cronies from being exposed and also suggests that there might be other top Tories who are equally culpable.
Duck Island song
[info]thirdman01 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:06 pm (UTC)
Sorry Dr Rohan Williams you are wrong. The humiliation of MPs is reclaiming our democracy not damaging it. This is England and we are a Christian democratic country. I remember you down grading our Christian democratic values in favour of other views. We want to reclaim our nation and democracy which has been eroded under New Labour with all this failed political correctness.

Let us have a Duck Island song. It goes. The working class can kiss my bottom. I have got my expenses claim it at last.

I am surprise our none elected dictator Brown in his ineptness does not recruit the arrogance of Jonathan Ross for his special advisor?

It is the sheer pettiness. From bath plug Home Secretary Smith, 17 silk cushions Keith Vaz, two toilet seats Prescott and our Justice Minster Malik massage chair. Pure greed when our Home Secretary claims 88p for a bath plug and adult movies for he husband to watch, Would Keith Vaz really have bought 17 silk cushions if he was paying instead of the public. These claims also reveal that MPs do and claim for a lot of gardening. Is gardening essential to parliamentary duties?

Sleaze iso covering sleaze. Our Olympics Minister Jesse Jewel is now off the radar after here husband Mills was jailed in February, for perjury in the Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi case. New Labour Baroness Uddin who claimed 60,000 pounds on an empty property is also off the radar, like the New Labour Lords who wanted bribes to alter law.

The humiliation will take a long time to complete. More resignations and criminal cases are required.

Dr Rohan Williams may I remind you that arrogance, avarice and greed are not Christian values. Please do your job. Your suggestion that we go easy on these MPs is not helpful to our democracy.

when will the point be made?
[info]martinthebandit wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 01:51 pm (UTC)
'many will now be wondering whether the point has not been adequately made: the continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy'

I am wondering when the thieves will end up in prison. i suspect then i will consider the point to have been made
Rowan Williams has nil street cred
[info]gaius_godd wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 01:53 pm (UTC)

Rowan William has no street credibility. Nobody listens to or cares about the old ex-Druid's establishment-supporting opinions.

The Greens and UKIP will benefit from the tide of scum that has washed up around the other three major Parties. Nobody with a brain will or should vote for this lot of expenses scroungers.

Let's train our sights on Local Councils and the BBC next!
Margaret Moran complied with the Green Book, partly
[info]palestinian_ian wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 04:32 pm (UTC)
Its obvious from the dilapidated condition of Margaret Moran's constituency office that she seems to have complied with the Green Book rule that caims cannot relate to party political activity of any sort, nor must any claim provide a benefit to a party political organisation. Unfortunately her claim for 22,500 pounds for treating dry rot at a home 100 miles from her Luton South constituency, is contrary to the rule that claims do not give rise to the appearance of giving rise to, an improper personal financial benefit to themselves.
I want my red book and the paintbrush
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:31 pm (UTC)
I want my red book and the paintbrush I am very confused with the daily painting that I see. Better to take up the artist?s job then to go voting. I have a headache as is.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Re: I want my red book and the paintbrush
[info]longon007 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:40 pm (UTC)


Sorry about the headache, too much writing, have a rest in a dark room.
Re: I want my red book and the paintbrush - [info]famulla - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Archbishop
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:41 pm (UTC)
What do you know about anything? Your job is trying to make people believe in a mythical superbeing - your a bit like that kid in Peanuts who wants to tell the world about the Great Pumpkin. Why don't you take off the dress and go and get a real job too? I'm surprised we haven't heard similar from Archbishop "Uncle Tom" Sentamu too...

He is probably more concerned the house of Lords will be abolished where currently a cushy seat has his name on it.
Voters turn on main parties
[info]sirjasp wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:43 pm (UTC)
Lets hope that they do!
The more votes that the smaller parties receive, the more likely we are to have a truly representative democracy.
Filling in my postal ballot papers yesterday for the EU elections, I was very interested to learn about the 'other' parties and there is plenty of choice;
British National Party
Christian Party
English Democrats
Jury Team
No2EU: Yes to Democracy
Pro Democracy: Libertas.eu
The Green Party
Socialist Labour Party
The Peace Party
The Roman Party. Avel
United Kingdom First
Most interesting was the Jury Team, acting as an umbrella group for independents - It would be nice to see parliament full of independent MP's who can vote without pressure of party whips.
What I'd really like to see, is a system of proportional representation in our own general elections so that parliament is made up of many of these.
Perhaps the days of the political party are on the wane.
It's a great time for change1

Give the Hell
[info]thirdman01 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:30 pm (UTC)
Give them hell is what I say. Use our undemocratic system to our advantage. Vote for all the independents and minority parties.

Convince your friends and family to vote. Remember every vote we cast cancels one of theirs. Not voting does not cancel one of theirs.

Go and vote on mass.

Remember it not only these expenses. It is also New Labour spin and sleaze.

This failed New Labour multiculturalism, political correctness gone mad, immigration out of control, our national assets sold to foreign ownership with the post office next in line. Ripped off on water and energy bills. A devastated economy and crime statistics manipulated.

With luck we should especially be able to wipe this failed New Labour experiment totally off the political map. They are even traitors to their own working class.

So vote and wipe them out,
Boycott Them
[info]neil639 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:04 pm (UTC)
If all of us, en masse, boycott the main political parties, but it will mean literally everyone who is disillusioned with our corrupt and dishonest politicians, and our corrupt and archaic political system, then we just might, repeat might, be able to get some radical political changes in the UK. Otherwise we will have to take to the streets - just as the French so successfully do.
[info]unexpectedtiger wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:11 pm (UTC)
I seem to be alone in thinking this story becoming immensely tedious, and caring less and less as time goes on. A couple of MPs have behaved fraudulently, and they should be dealt with by the police, maybe fifteen or twenty have made claims which are not illegal but are still outrageous, and they should be deselected, but the rest? Yes, they took advantage of the system, but how many of the people here commenting with such holier-than-thou outrage would have done any differently?

For that matter, if there were say twenty Green, BNP, UKIP or independent MPs, does anyone seriously think that none of them would be sucked into this? (In the case of UKIP, some of their MEPs have already done worse). By all means vote for a fringe party, but do it because you believe in their policies or their ideology, not just because they aren't in parliament yet.

Time to deal with the expenses rules and move on, so we can talk about, oh, I don't know, the economic crisis, the climate crisis, national and global poverty, the continuing squeeze on world food supply, etc. etc.
Know thy political enemy intermitly, before casting that vote!
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:41 pm (UTC)
I have watched the following video testimony four times. I have been left uterly confussed as to who the real enemy is. Do 'they' still walk among us? I invite readers to put their prejudicies aside for 94 minutes and watch this 20 year old film before passing posting reply comment.

I need to know I'm not going crazy!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7277751690450162669
Re: Know thy political enemy intermitly, before casting that vote!
[info]almightymat wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC)

Collin!

Fancy seeing YOU here! I'm just reading the paper online before going out to the park and you've posted exactly the same video, of a speech by holocaust denier DAvid Irvine, on every single article that I've looked at.

One would be trempted to think that you're not even reading the news articles, but are just posting the same comment on every page?

But the, accusing Nazi supporters of having a one size fits all approach to politics is a little unfair....actually, forget that, it's not unfair at all!

See you on the next page! X
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date