We were wrong to try to hold inquiry in secret, Miliband says
Foreign Secretary apologetic after series of U-turns on Iraq
Friday 26 June 2009
Latest in UK Politics
Related articles
On Facebook
From the blogs
Disclosure: We’d never even been to a club when we made our first single
For most of us, reaching eighteen years of age opens up a new world for exploration, spontaneity and...
Top of the posts: Drunken rants, the Western Fail and misogyny pushers
The most read blogs this week, as determined by stats.
Sepp Blatter: Penalty shoot-outs must remain, they’re football’s great leveller
As England supporters, we should scorn at any such deciding factor within football. On so many occas...
Why do some men consider the street as a female meat market?
Pronouncements on sexual inequality in the UK are normally met with an eye roll by my generation. As...
David Miliband admitted yesterday that the Government had been wrong to attempt to hold the inquiry into the Iraq war in secret.
The Foreign Secretary also acknowledged that ministers had been forced to drastically change their position by the force of public opinion.
Mr Miliband, the first minister to make the controversial announcement that evidence would heard behind closed doors and then initially left to weather the storm of protest which followed said: "The unanimity of view that actually we need public sessions for this inquiry is something that the Government has listened to."
Asked if Gordon Brown had "got it wrong" when he insisted last week that the inquiry would be behind closed doors, Mr Miliband said: "We obviously did. There is no question about that. No one is arguing that we changed our position."
The Independent revealed that senior military officers such as General Sir Mike Jackson, the head of the Army at the time of the Iraq invasion and Lord Butler and Lord Hutton, who had headed previous inquiries related to the war, wanted the hearings to be in the public. Former prime minister, Sir John Major, was among those who also opposed a secret hearing.
Mr Brown was forced to let Sir John Chilcot decide on the terms of the inquiry and Sir John stated that in his view it was "essential" that as much of the evidence should be heard in public as possible.
A humiliating Commons defeat for the Government on the issue was averted on Wednesday when Mr Miliband withdrew another of the initial Downing Street plans for the inquiry – that it would not apportion blame – and agreed that the final report could "praise or blame whoever it likes".
The retreat helped the Government see off a backbench revolt over the inquiry arrangements, although its majority was still slashed to 39.
A Tory motion demanding a re-think and a Commons vote on the inquiry's terms of reference was backed by 19 Labour MPs.
Earlier, Downing Street denied that Mr Brown had struck a deal with Lord Mandelson to spare Tony Blair from having to give evidence to the inquiry in public as the price of saving his premiership.
There had been claims that Lord Mandelson had won an "explicit" assurance from Mr Brown that the inquiry would be fully private and that it would be "manageable".
However, both Lord Mandelson and Mr Brown were said to have been taken by surprise by the strength of the opposition from senior military and Whitehall figures to a closed inquiry.
The Prime Minister's spokesman dismissed the report as "flawed", insisting that Mr Brown had not entered into any deals. We would certainly deny the suggestion that the Prime Minister has done any sort of deal," the spokesman said. We are not having the inquiry in secret so the whole premise of the article does seem to fall down on that basic point."
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Osborne adviser leaked budget information to Murdoch's man
- 3 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 4 Schoolboy spiked brownies with cannabis in cookery class
- 5 News in pictures
- 6 Britain's waste: Now it's coming back to haunt us
- 7 Lawyers told Hunt to stay out of Sky deal
- 8 In pictures: The bewildering face of China
- 9 UK plans for euro-immigrants surge
- 10 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Osborne adviser leaked budget information to Murdoch's man
- 3 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 4 Society: The only way is Finland
- 5 Schoolboy spiked brownies with cannabis in cookery class
- 6 Fat? Really? Olympic hope laughs off official’s jibe – but others aren’t amused
- 7 'Hello mum, this is going to be hard for you to read ...'
- 8 African monkey meat that could be behind the next HIV
- 9 Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
- 10 French in uproar over oral sex anti-smoking posters
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Playing a game-changing role during the Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Ridley Scott: The most macho man in movies?
Gallic gourmets put France back on culinary map
The outsider: Margaret Howell
For men only: A pilgrimage to Mount Athos
Feeding a hungry world – or meddling with laws of nature?



Comments