The end of playtime?
Monday, 4 August 2008
GETTY
Boys play football on a London street in 1950, but parents seem increasingly afraid of letting their children play outside
Play time is over for children, with up to half of youngsters banned from climbing trees, playing conkers or riding their bikes by over-protective parents who are terrified that they might get hurt.
ICM research for Play England shows that half of seven to 12-year-olds are banned from climbing trees. Four in 10 were banned from playing in their local park or recreational area without an adult present and one in three cannot ride a bike without parental supervision.
One in five had been banned from playing conkers and one in six were not allowed to play chase because over-protective parents had ruled that it was too dangerous.
Yet parents were much less vigilant when it came to internet safety, the study found. Three-quarters of children aged seven to 12 were allowed to surf the internet without adult guidance.
Professionals in child welfare warned that children's development was being damaged by parents' obsession with safety, which was depriving youngsters of adventurous play.
Adrian Voce, director of Play England, said playing was "an essential part of growing up ... Adventurous play both challenges and excites children and helps instil critical life skills. Constantly wrapping children in cotton wool can leave them ill-equipped to deal with stressful or challenging situations they might encounter later in life. Children both need and want to push their boundaries in order to explore their limits and develop their abilities."
The research also found that children were less likely to play outdoors than their parents had been when they were growing up. Of the adults surveyed, 70 per cent said they had experienced most of their play outdoors. In comparison, just 29 per cent of children broke beyond the four walls of home, or a designated playground, to experience creative "adventure" play. Only one in four children experienced most of their adventurous play in natural wild spaces or their local streets.
More than three-quarters of children said that they wanted more chances to experience adventurous play arguing that it made them feel "happy", "free" and "confident". And 80 per cent of adults agreed that children should be free to experience adventurous play even if it puts them at risk of minor injury.
Bike-riding and skateboarding ranked as the top adventurous activity for both boys and girls, the poll found. However, boys cited playing computer games as their second favourite "adventurous" activity, followed by exploring new and unfamiliar places.
Girls were more likely to have their adventures outdoors, citing exploring new places as their second-favourite activity, followed jointly by playing with nature and playing in a playground or park.
In his book Paranoid Parenting, the sociologist Professor Frank Furedi describes the culture of fear that has led parents to restrict their children's movements outdoors. Professor Furedi complained that in 1971, eight in every 10 eight-year-olds were allowed to walk to school alone. Today it is thought to be fewer than one in 10.
There has been growing concern that health and safety fears have stifled schools, encouraging them to ban traditional playground games such as conkers, snowball fights and cartwheeling, or prohibited pupils from doing the backstroke in swimming lessons. Last month, John F Kennedy Primary in Washington, Tyne and Wear, banned the sack race and the three-legged run from sports days – in case the pupils were hurt.
In 2005, the headmaster of Cummersdale Primary School, in Carlisle, bought six pairs of industrial safety-goggles for pupils to wear when they played conkers in the playground. However, the survey's findings showed that a large proportion of children were being banned from taking risks by their parents.
Josie Gleave, of Play England, argued that the low probability of accidents made playgrounds one of the safest places for children to be. The risk of a fatal playground injury is approximately one in 30 million and three-quarters of injuries sustained on the playground consist of minor cuts or bruises.
"The research shows that children need to experience challenging play in order to develop important life skills and to better manage risk and challenge in their daily lives," she said.
"However, opportunities for children to take such risks are limited. This is due to our risk-averse culture and an increase in health and safety constraints. It is clear that we need to address the current 'cotton-wool culture' and to provide children with more opportunities for adventurous play."
The researchers interviewed 1,030 children and young people, aged from seven to 16, and 1,030 adults.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
57 Comments
As a thirty-something parent of five- and seven-year-old boys, when they're older, I'd love for them to play like I did as a kid, growing up on the outskirts of town where fields and trees were a stones throw away but that sad truth is I've been made paranoid by the media to where I don't want them to be the next James Bulger or Keith Bennett...
Posted by Mark | 05.08.08, 02:57 GMT
I didn't read the story but know it is a case where the parents work for the state who is going to regulate you to death, make nature against the law and put a bar code on you via an RFID tag.
You reap what you sow.
Posted by Rick Lee | 05.08.08, 00:20 GMT
William Brown. I'm sorry if you misunderstood me. I am absolutely a child of running with friends across building sites, fields, other peoples gardens, scrumping, spud-guns, bangers, air-rifles, breaking several bones before I reached double figures, etc etc..I'm all for it. My three young-uns get the idea. Though I now live in a bucolic setting in rural Luxembourg, I grew up in Liverpool not too long ago, and the advice at the time when there's were rabid child predator cannibals around still applies: when you walk home, stick with a couple of friends and come straight home first.
As for the Daily Mail reference, I refer to those who have never faced up to the outside as it is and learned to deal with it, and now they fear and despise it. As I said, pitiful people cowering under the perceived umbrella of power.
Posted by troy | 04.08.08, 22:37 GMT
I grew up in a street where i played football, tennis, cricket, i climbed walls and trees and the neighbours new me and my siblings as the kids from next door having fun.
Now children aren't able to play in their own streets because there is too much traffic and people care more about their cars than they do about children welfare.
Children are driven from their own streets where they are known by they neighbours, onto the end of the street where, instead of being billy and tommy, when joined by other children also kicked off their streets, they are viewed by adults as a gang. adults are scared to talk to children and vice versa and its all because their isn't enough green space to play and the media tell us that every teenager carries a knife.
I think as parents we have a personal responsibility to know our areas, our children and their friends and play a more active role supporting children to feel a real sense of belonging, to be children and have fun
Posted by Jay Goulding | 04.08.08, 22:07 GMT
As I mentioned in the first of my six posts, nobody listens to those who suffer from crime. Thank you for the kind suggestion Twiggins, but i have already tried to tell the world what is happening where I live. The mass media are only interested in the impovrished if what they say can reinforce the idea that they deserve to be poor.
The gang where I live have actually pulled people out of their homes and beat them up in the last year; sooner or later they'll kill someone. Then the Police can claim it an unusual occurrence n a law abiding area. The press might take an interest then; it'll be too late for at least one person.
Posted by Robert Price | 04.08.08, 20:53 GMT
I do agree that children can't do right for doing wrong. Castigated if they stay in and watch TV, told that they are feral kids if they go out and play. We need to look at our attitude to them. I played football and cricket in the street as a child, but now children get told that such games are not allowed.
Posted by Andrea | 04.08.08, 18:06 GMT
let us face it the children are wrong whatever they do. They cant go on bikes because of the traffic. which is fair enough. If they play football in the street they are in trouble - if they play hopscotch the neighbours fetch the police out the schools will not let them play conkers - etc etc/ Plus as a parent you cannot let them go to a park to play because of the paedophiles whose human rights are of more concern to the pc brigade than the rights of the children
Posted by shirley | 04.08.08, 17:23 GMT
I read the article and was about to post a scornful response to parents who shield their children from innocent games but after having read the anguished postings from parents terrifed of their children's safety I have thought again and totally agree with them
This Government presides over a situation where many young people do not know right from wrong, are morally bankrupt and have been brought up to believe they are the centre of the universe. Freedom starts by understanding where your limits lie and where the next persons begins otherwise it become oppression for the majority. I do not have words to describe my feelings about this cynical, immoral, greedy Govt who seem unwilling to apply the Law. I believe it has been a long term strategy to keep people ignorant, illiterate and vicious breaking down everything that was fine about Great Britain but it has back-fired on them as those same people are now turning on them.
Posted by crawford | 04.08.08, 16:52 GMT
My mummy didn't let me have a bike, let alone ride one, even though we had moved to Canada where EVERYONE else rode bicycles. Did it scar my development and lower the quality of my life as an adult later on? Y-E-S it did, and rather a lot, thank you. There were other problems too, but that was one of the worst in my own experience of my ridiculously sheltered childhood.
To this day, I am disgusted at my own timidity, i.e. with my very SELF, nearly as much as I'm disgusted with my own mother (who I believe is still living). And I'm over 50 now, never married, always badly employed till 15 years ago when I had to give up working altogether due to chronic anxiety and other issues.
Posted by Tim A. | 04.08.08, 16:36 GMT
Robert Price tell Panorama about this. They'll embarass the Government for you.
Posted by Twiggins | 04.08.08, 16:24 GMT
57 Comments