Genital mutilation: Women fight Africa's taboo
They broke the silence from tribal elders and politicians – but paid a high personal price for trying to protect millions of young girls from the knife
The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was ripped apart by a bloody civil war, but in fact the public humiliation was exacted in the diamond-rich eastern town of Kenema just this month. The woman's alleged crime was reporting on female genital mutilation.
While the attack was condemned by media watchdogs as "disgraceful behaviour worthy of a bygone age", one woman who was not surprised was Rugiatu Turay. When she was 12 Ms Turay was stolen away by family members and underwent what some politely refer to as "circumcision". She calls it "torture". For the past six years, she has been waging a war against the practice, which many in Sierra Leone, including senior politicians, see as an initiation rite.
Her organisation, the Amazonian Initiative Movement, tries to protect young girls from the knife. "I picked the name because I am trying to talk about strong, powerful women," she says Ms Turay, who works with her 20-strong staff in and around the northern town of Lunsar. So far, she has persuaded about 400 practitioners of female genital mutiliation (FGM), who are often called soweis, to lay down their blades and stop their role in the traditional bondo ceremony. "Silence means consent. But if you say the truth people listen ... We go to the schools, mosques, everywhere."
As reward for her tenacious efforts, she has received death threats and been attacked by juju men, sometimes armed with magic, sometimes with machetes. She describes a time when more than a hundred people paraded a symbolic corpse outside her home to suggest her own death: "They came right in front of me sharpening their cutlasses."
But so many times has she failed to die, that locals now think she is immune. "Now they believe I have special powers. They do nothing to me."
Ms Turay was mutilated at her aunt's house where she was staying with her three sisters and her cousin. "We didn't even know that we were going to be initiated," she says. "They called me to get water and then outside they just grabbed me."
She was blindfolded, stripped, and laid on the ground. Heavy women sat on her arms, her chest, her legs. Her mouth was stuffed with a rag. Her clitoris was cut off with a crude knife. Despite profuse bleeding she was forced to walk, was beaten and had hot pepper water poured into her eyes.
"My mother had always told me never to let anyone touch me there. I was scared and I tried to fight them off. Nobody talked to me but there was all this clapping, singing, shouting," recalls Ms Turay. "When I tried to walk on the seventh day I could not walk. All they could say is 'Today you have become a woman'."
Ms Turay is among the estimated 94 per cent of girls who undergo FGM in Sierra Leone. The practice – which forms part of a ceremony of initiation rites overseen by women-only secret societies such as bondo and sande – can cause severe bleeding, infection, cysts and sometimes death, but is largely ignored.
Reasons for the process vary, but many people cite tradition and culture, saying it is essential preparation for marriage and womanhood; binds communities to each other and to their ancestors; and restricts women's sexual behaviour.
Last year, UN agencies came out strongly against the practice, labelling it "painful and traumatic", a violation of human rights and demanding it be abandoned within a generation. "It has no health benefits and harms girls and women in many ways," said the UN's World Health Organisation (WHO). "The practice causes severe pain and has several immediate and long-term health consequences, including difficulties in childbirth."
Yet many international aid organisations are too scared to do anything about it in public for fear of being labelled cultural imperialists. A recent Sierra Leone child rights bill dropped any mention of FGM at the last minute, and politicians – including President Ernest Bai Koroma – baulk at the mention of the subject.
A decade ago, a female politician who later became the minister for social welfare said: "We will sew the mouths up of those preaching against bondo." More recently, politicians are rumoured to have sponsored mass cutting ceremonies, which can be relatively costly affairs in one of the world's poorest countries, in an effort to secure votes in elections.
"Secret societies have become intertwined with modern political life in Sierra Leone and retain considerable power and influence," wrote the anthropologist Dr Richard Fanthorpe in a paper commissioned by the UN.
When I asked President Koroma – whose country receives more aid per person from Britain than any other donor recipient – about his position on the practice, it was the first time I saw the usually affable leader lost for words. Unable to reach for his usually ubiquitous wide toothy smile, he meandered awkwardly through an answer: "Let people in civil society deal with this issue."
That leaves the fight against FGM, which the WHO says has been conducted on 92 million African girls – and rising by up to three million a year – to the odd brave soul such as Ms Turay. The 26-year-old is among a number of anti-FGM campaigners slowly achieving results. In her effort to keep some safe from cutting, Ms Turay has even adopted 14 children from Sierra Leone and Guinea.
Girls under 15 regularly undergo the cutting and for the newly initiated, it remains a frightening process shrouded in secrecy. "You should not tell anybody about circumcision or else your stomach will swell and you'll die," one young girl who didn't know her age told me quietly in her local Temne language.
Ms Turay hopes her struggle will help break such taboos of talking about the cutting in public, although it may also spur more reactionary moves, such as this month's punishment meted out to the journalist in Kenema. And it is no easy task persuading the practitioners to abandon what they see as a rite of passage. Girls as young as five are trained to become circumcisers and it is an income-generator in a poverty-stricken country, still struggling to shrug off the legacy of the 1991-2002 civil war.
"I didn't like it when it happened to me and I worry about the pain of the girl, but I do it because they pay me, and because we met our ancestors doing it," says practitioner Marion Kanu, 35, whose two children are also practitioners.
Others have seen the error of their ways. "I regret it now," says another sowei who has vowed to stop. But it is not always easy to hang up the knife. One woman practitioner who said she would stop the cutting was kidnapped by members of the bundu society. Both her and her baby were beaten and taken to the bush for three days without food or water; the mother was raped. Her life was saved only by Ms Turay's intervention.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
It is so hypocritical of the west to denounce female circumcision and yet allow male circumcision carry on.
ABSOLUTE MAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS KNOT HU MAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS KNOT YU MAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS KNOT EVEN YE MEN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS SUB HU MAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS SUB U* TAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS SUB U* TAN ORANG
ABSOLUTE MAN IS ZOO MAN
KNOT *TZU MAN
ABSOLUTE MAN IS XU MAN XI
ABSOLUTE MAN IS ZOO MAN ZEEE
ABSOLUTE MAN IS KNOT ZU MAN CHI CHi CHy
ABSOLUTE MAN IS IM
IM IN CHi IN CHIN
IN LA TIN
IM CHIM PAN ZEE
SEE
HOMO EXTINQKTUS
IN
ROME
IN ROMA
INIT
IM IS YT
IN GYT
TYGMI
PIGMY
PIGMEAT M8*
Male and female circumcision are two different things. With male circumcision, there is positive reduction in health issues such as reduction in cervical cancer with in long term monogamous relationship. There is lots of literature on male circumcision, and several medical organizations have published policy statements on the topic.
Besides girls and women are now vaccinated against that type of cervical cancer (at least there are here in the UK) so it is no longer a benefit.
There is a substantial loss of sexual pleasure from being circumcised however and that is a fact that will not change.
This is also very sad (reread on the original article):"Yet many international aid organisations are too scared to do anything about it in public for fear of being labelled cultural imperialists."
Finally circunsicion doesn't put on risk the baby and is false that there is any loose of sexual pleasure, or many other lies I saw in the comments.
Note, that I didn't write "male" after circunsision, because clitoris mutilation IS NOT circunsision.
The argument should be, with no immediate medical benefit, does anyone have the right to amputate any other person's appendages.
All needless circumcision is a crime.
Stop both forms of circumcision NOW.
how would you like it if someone cut off part of the head of your penis
For males: There are religious reasons for Jews, Christians & Muslims.
Male non-believers can undertake it on the basis of hygene and reduction in related health issues.
HI GUISE
GNU MAN IS U MAN
KNOT YU MAN
U MAN IS IT
UI IS IT IN INRI IN INTI INIT IN IRON IN ROMA IN ROME
AND IN DGJHEHWRUSALEM IN SALEM
BRUTAN MAN
TO THIS PURPOSE THE NATURAL PHILOSOPHERS SAY THAT
NATURE DOES NOTHING IN VAIN,
AND MORE IS IN VAIN
WHERE LESS WILL SERVE,
FOR NATURE IS PLEASED WITH SIMPLICITY,
AND AFFEKTS KNOT THE POMP OF SUPERFLUOS KAUSES
I understand you are probably a muslim, so believe allah wants you mutilate your sons, but please stop spouting your UTTER LIES about male curcumcision being more hygienic. NO. The revierse is true - and a few boys die of infection and lose their penises or have them terribly mutilated by circumcision. There is NO significant reduction in disease thru male circumcision - all a lie promoted by the religious and the puritanical who thought it stopped masturbation (why 80% american males are mutilated, and australians and the royal family - look how nuts they are are).
It is A TERRIBLE THING to cut a natural piece of flesh from one's son, thereby exposing an internal organ so its skin thickens and scars. The vast majority of little foreskin infections in uncircumcised males sort themselves out easily - just as women's genital infections do. Or would you cut out their vaginas if a woman gets thrush? A foreskin is there for a reason. Or if you like, GOD put it there for a reason, just like your lips, eyelids, earlobes etc. Do you want to remove them too? Your God's not much of a God is he if he misdesigns a penis then so much that you have to cut it to pieces eh...
I know several men who are depressed, suicidal and really suffering because their parents chose to mutilate their genitals. But of course, teh circumcised don't know what they are missing. I thank goodness I am not circumcised. And I hate the way circumcised penises look - raw, mutilated - like an eye without an eyelid. YUCK!
There are NO HEALTH BENEFITS TO MALE CIRCUMCISION - SO DO NOT LIE! And do not forget the poor boys who die, get their penises cut or burnt off or otherwise mutilated because of this unnecessary barbaric practise in the first place. It has NO place in the modern world - or do you want to start keeping slaves again and having several 12 year old wives?
Easy tiger! @wormery.
So by your arguments on Gods laws vs modernity, now that you have condoms, you will be sleeping with your sister as you dont have to worry about genetic contimation?
With all the shouting about "no health benefits", can we assume that you are a world renouned scientist who has just completed long term research on the subject of male circumcision?
The Muslims (Arabic phase of Islam) have inherited this law from Hebrew (Jewish) and Aramaic (Christian) phases of Islam. This law goes back a long way. You need to understand the religion of Abraham before you start making irrational comments about Islam. There is much more to Islam than what you'll get in the media.
God has created many aspects of mankind which cannot be explained by scientists, eg, why create a brain which is (to our crude understanding) only used 20% on average (evolution doesnt explain this either)? etc etc. Obviously, you have made it clear that you are a disbeliever - thats your understanding of this life.
Did you watch a discovery channel documentary called "Eve". It was three part series about the orgins of humans. Scientists have found that each of us (all races in the world) come from one original physical mother. They found this by examining the DNA from people around the world. So what was once a religious belief regarding Adam and Eve, has now become a fact. So you and me are linked by blood to a single mother, like it or not :-)
So, dont go all "we are too modern for religion" on me, my cousin (by DNA)!
Please play again sometime.
Firstly, you analogy re. condoms is absurb
Second, you must be very careful about 'research by renowned scientists' - much research shows confirmation bias, especially, in this case, is carried out by people from culture where circumcision is standard and by circumcised scientists (ie USA). Also, so many people in the medical profession are circumscised (Asians and muslims). The research shows a negligible difference showing slight reduction in cancer BUT you MUST remember too all the boys who die when circumcised, those who lose their genitals, those who are horribly scarred and them kill themselves. Also, the hippocratic oath states a doctor should DO NO HARM - cutting off a naturally present PROTECTIVE piece of skin, which has a function in keeping an internal organ moist, protecting it, and increasing lubrication during sex, and thus pleasure, is IMMORAL and against that oath - why many doctors won't do it. Some even think repressed anger from circumcised men leads to anger and violence and aggression - look at the USA, muslim countries etc.
Third, I do not watch the dumbed down Disocovery Channel because I am not 15 years old and do not like dumbed down crap made for dumb american teenagers. The idea we only use 20% of our brain IS A MYTH LONG DISPROVEN. Also, if one goes back far enough we are all interelated, yes - but that DOES NOT PROVE THE STORY OF ADAM AND EVE. There is a theory of the 7 daughters of Eve I have heard of to show we all come from 7 women 2 million years ago, not one. We are also all realated to fish and every animal and lifeform because of the FACT OF EVOLUTION which has disproved most of the bible and the koran.
Your DNA is 98% the same as an ape and 58% the same as a cabbage and a banana - thus proving the fact of evolution.
The fact is my friend, you are attempting to justify circumcision because it is part of your religion - like a vegetarian attempting to prove it is the best diet after becoming veggie for sentimental reasons. FACT: Circumcision is unnecessary and NO operation should be performed unnecessarily.
And by the way, I probably know more about Islam and its history than you matey, so do not trot out the muslim excuse 'oh you do not understand islam because of the zionist media'. Actually, I understand it and its many versions extremely well.
Mutilating their children should not be an option parents have.
LOVE IN HEARTS,
WITH CINNAMON STYQKS KLOVES AND KUSTARD TARTS,
PLAYS ON THE DEVILS* TENDER PARTS,
UPSETS APLL KARTS,
FIRES OFF QKUPYDS* DARTS,
WAR WITH THE DEVIL STARTS
SIERRA IS SPANISH FOR SERGIO = SURGERY
LEONE IS SPANISH DOGSKRYPT FOR LYON
SIMBA IS AFFRIKANO FOR LION = THE KING OF THE BEASTS
BUT THE LION OF ZIMBABWE IS A PUSSY KAT
THAT IS WHY MUGABE HAS GNUFFING TO SAY ABOUT THE PRIDE AND THE SHAMEFUL DISGRACE OF AFFREAKA MAN
HOMO AFREAKANUS
KOLON
IF YU KNOW WOT YT MEANZ
RESPEKT
AS THEY SAY IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH
It is also true that most people don't begin forming memories until between the ages of 5-8 and very rarely do people have memories before the age of 2. Males in the western world don't have to live with the trauma of circumcision (which in the large majority is the choice of parents and doctors who think of it as a health benefit) and if you talk to any circumcised man he will most likely tell you he still feels a lot of pleasure from intercourse -- there's whole debates about it online; these little girls have to remember AND feel the pain of the procedure the rest of their lives, if they don't die of infection first.
I'm not saying male circumcision should or shouldn't be stopped, I'm just saying that I don't think anyone can say it's on the same level as FGM.
www.privacy-center.pro.tc
The purpose of the clitoris is to give pleasure and sexually stimulate a woman before and during sex. It has to be nearly impossible for most of these women to achieve orgasm post mutilation. It's another example of how many African societies treat promiscuity and adultery as problems created by women, as if men have no control over (or responsibility for) themselves.
How dare you say that this is merely us imposing "western" values on another culture. Either you accept the consensus of the UN and WHO definition of acceptable practices, or stop taking their aid money. Mutilating pre-teens and a harmless procedure performed on infants for purpose of cleanliness have no business being mentioned in the same argument.
I can't believe people are still pushing for circumcision under the falsehood of "cleanliness". The relentless quotes about how circumcision is done to ?circumvent? medical complications are ridiculous in that uncircumcised men have a higher chance of developing BREAST CANCER than penile cancer that which the circumcision is supposed to "prevent" or "drastically lower" the chance of.
Also, so many people can be heard parroting on about how the foreskin serves no purpose. Well, hm.. other than the fact that it contains one of THE highest concentrations of sensitive nerves to be found on the male body (up to 3-5 times more so than on the part that's left after it's cut off), it's not recommended by any major medical association; and if it is, please feel free to quote me one (a decisive study, and one that's not funded by a religious group please). But, hey; it's been the cultural norm for centuries. Why ask questions when we can just cut the thing off, right?
Oh wait... for the sake of taking preventative measures, how about we cut out the appendix and tonsils too? I mean, better to get it done early right? (And don't forget the mammary tissue.) Also, the greatest benefit to be rendered, in terms of preventing UTI's for the male, is still only that which is on par with the average female..
If not even a moderate minority of medical associations recommend what is, otherwise, known to be a heavily endorsed procedure by religious sects, then perhaps it's time to think about how the underlying reason for circumcision in the western world was really one fueled by religion and superstitions which were camouflaged by skewed, and extremely biased, 'medical' findings. At one point, not but a hundred years ago, circumcision was said to even cure schizophrenia, "the shakes", depression (ha!), and even headaches (!?).
I'm sorry, but it's 2009 people: KNOCK OFF THE FORCED GENITAL MANIPULATION!..
Also, as for the argument that it "looks better", studies show that this opinion is heavily weighted in the preconceived cultural standards of the men and women asked. In the U.S. around 9 out of 10 of women who've only been with a circumcised male say they prefer a man circumcised. However, this number drastically changes with women who'd had experiences with both a circumcised and uncircumcised male. Funny how in European and Scandinavian regions the ratio is almost exactly opposite -- that is, the numbers are in favor of men still intact.
p.s. The 2-3% rate of complications resulting from circumcisions performed in the United States automatically quashes such talk about preventative safety measures.. It's entirely ridiculous how the people of developed economies are still mindlessly submitting to the whole "it's cleaner" philosophy. If the foreskin is really such a hassle to maintain, then why aren't there droves of uncircumcised men aren't lining up to get their genitals mutilated on their own volition and for non-religious purposes? Hmm. Why not? Because it's THE MOST SENSITIVE PART OF THE PENIS! That is, for one that's still intact.. And no, it can't be "stretched out" to reacquire the 10,000-15,000 erotogenic nerve endings that are lost in the procedure.
The U.N. is, in fact, a proponent of condom use, first and foremost -- stating circumcision as a ?possible? alternative for cases where condoms are unavailable. Another ?possible? scenario would be to cut the penis off all-together now wouldn?t it? The U.N. would, mostly likely, not deny figures pertaining to a lower rate of HIV transmission sustained through intercourse as a result -- but then again, I?m sure they wouldn?t go around recommending it without a preferred alternative, either.
Also, you might want to look up the definition of ?harm? before spouting off about how genital detachment is something of a ?harmless? procedure. And then, if you?re still dubious, go ahead and take a knife to a piece of your own, (today), and then please, by all means, please let us know if your definition still holds.
As for a girl, it is absolute mutilation and has no value whatsoever except to keep her from ever having sexual desires and cause her to rebuff her wedded partner's advances. Her parents would have to be heartless [regardless of belief] to allow anyone to victimize their female child.
Now I'm not discounting the unfortunate event regarding your grandchild, but what I'm saying is that, either way, these things happen..
To be candid, let me ask -- and I don't mean to be overly insulting -- but:.. How is it, if no one could get close enough to properly bathe a child,.. could then someone find themselves close enough to carry out and perform a procedure of circumcision? I mean, I find myself puzzled, seeing how such a procedure would involve the exact part which the child, seemingly, would had fought for with tooth and nail to preserve from a bath? (Dart gun?) =|
I am, also, not speaking solely for the blokes here. My position of defense is meant to encompass the protection of women as well. ..Even more so in the context of extreme violations which are apparently still taking place in particular cultures in Africa.
I just found it ironic (and was immediately set off) by statements defending a cultural position that it's OK to preemptively remove a part of the male genitalia whilst attacking another culture's position that it's OK to do so on a female.
As I said, it ALL needs to stop and any removal of any parts of these areas should not be done as a preemptive measure of preventing an already uncommon form of infection or cancer. (And need I remind everyone, again, that females have a higher chance of such instances occurring in comparison to both circumcised and uncircumcised males?)
But yes, as a non cultural-relativist I have to say that certain parts of Africa need guidance for the reformation of, or complete elimination of, certain acts and practices. This obviously would include putting a halt to the atrocities inflicted upon the innocent female population.
WAS A BIT OF A FAILURE,
WHEN IT CAME TO HUMAN RIGHTS
KALI KALI
KALI MAMA
KALI BHABI
ET SET E RA ET AL ET EL AD INFINITUM
THROWING THE WYFFE ONTO THE HUSBANDS' PYRE
SAVES FIREWOOD DON'T IT
It is suspected that every year as many as 25,000 - 30,000 UK girls (who are supposed to enjoy the protection of our laws which make FGM entierly illegal) are quietly shipped out to 'FGM friendlier' cultures for their own personal experience of genital 're-engineering'.
This is not Africa's Taboo. It's everyone's.
While there are people in the world who want F/MGM done to their own, and places they can go to avoid the legal consequences - they will.
So before we start attacking one particular culture's faliures to protect all it's citizens from such acts, we should take a long hard look at how we, as a country, are failing to protect all of our children.
WE
WHU IZ WE
25,000 - 30,000 UK girls IS UNKL SAM DOGSKRYPT GRINGO DINGO LINGO
IT IS A LIE
STAND OUTSIDE THE FRIDGE AND SAY THAT
INSPEKTED AND FOUND FALSE
WE WEE WEE
WEE PEE
WEE P
WEEP
WEEPA
YU SPEEQK 4 U KNOT WE
YU R KNOT WE
YU R KNOT US
USPEEKA
we should take a long hard look at how we, as a country, are failing to protect all of our children
DA HAV *TCHILL
http://www.researchasylum.org.uk/?lid=1
Experts believe 74,000 first-generation African immigrant women in the UK have undergone female circumcision.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3528095.s
DIS IS*NE UNKL SAM DOGSKRYPT GRINGO DINGO LINGO
DIS HAS*NE BIN INSPEKED N FOUND 2 B FALSE.
UNKL SAM DID*NE CONDUCKT DIS RESEARCH.
FGM in the UK is found most commonly among immigrants from Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and Yemen. The most severe forms of FGM -- Types 2 and 3 -- are the most commonly performed. It is frequently practiced in the cities of Cardiff, London, Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield.
No precise data is available on FGM. Estimates of the number of UK girls and women involved vary considerably from upto 30'000 considered *at risk* of FGM from mainly charity & media sources to the much more conservative government estimates (and documented cases):
All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health (2000-NOV): 10,000 at risk; 3,000 to 4,000 new cases each year.
Labor force survey (1999): 5,444 girls under the age of 16 are at risk; 69,875 women have been mutilated either in the UK or in their countries of origin.
"YU SPEEQK 4 U KNOT WE
YU R KNOT WE
YU R KNOT US
WE
WHU IZ WE?"
Good question :)
I SPEEQK FOR ME
I SPEEQK WITH 'WE'
THE 'WE' WHU SERVE TO PROTECT U N ME
OUR HUMAN RIGHTS
OUR RIGHT 'TO BE'
THE 'WE' WHO CREATED:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1959)
The African Charter on Rights and Welfare of the Child (1990)
The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1992)
The United Nations Declaration on Violence Against Women (1993)
The World Conference on Human Rights, Declaration and Programme of Action, Vienna (1993)
The United Nations High Commission on Refugees, Statement Against Gender-Based Violence (1996).
FGM violates these (and other) human rights conventions that protect women and children from cruelty and violence and ensure them "bodily integrity" and access to health care, education, and self-realization.
For while the 'I', the individual ...any individual, can have great influence. It takes a 'WE', a group, a community, a collective: to create national & international rights & laws. It also takes a 'WE' to enforce them.
p.s. I LIKA URE POETREE
I like your human right to freedom of speech even more.
JAZZME KONNy
Something else, let God work alone! I live with Muslims, and I have Muslim friends too, and I know about their religion, but female genital mutilation is something social, and has nothing to do with religion... Besides, religion is nothing but social traditions!
From a victim (cess)