World

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

US captain held by Somali pirates is freed

US cargo ship captain Richard Phillips has been freed from captivity at the hands of Somali pirates in a dramatic ending to a five-day standoff with American naval forces, the US Navy said today.

US television channel CNN said Phillips was freed unharmed and that the U.S. military killed three of four pirates who had held him hostage on a lifeboat after trying to seize his vessel. It said a fourth pirate was in custody.

"I can tell you that he is free and that he is safe," Navy Lieutenant Commander John Daniels said. He had no information on how the rescue happened or the physical condition of the captain of the U.S.-flagged Maersk Alabama container ship.

Maersk said it received word of Phillips' rescue from the U.S. Navy at 1330 EDT (1730 GMT) and informed the jubilant crew of the Alabama.

"We are all absolutely thrilled to learn that Richard is safe and will be reunited with his family," Maersk Line chief executive John Reinhart said in a statement.

Phillips, 53, was the first American taken captive by Somali pirate gangs who have marauded in the busy Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean shipping lanes for years.

Three U.S. warships had been watching the situation.

US Navy spotters saw Phillips on Sunday morning, ship owner Maersk Line said in a statement.

The Maersk Alabama, a container carrying food aid for Somalians, was attacked far out in the Indian Ocean on Wednesday, but its 20 American crew apparently fought off the pirates and regained control.

Relatives said Phillips volunteered to go with the pirates in a Maersk Alabama lifeboat in exchange for the crew.

Joseph Murphy, whose son, Shane, was Phillips's second in command and took over the Alabama after pirates left with Phillips, said in a statement read by CNN, "Our prayers have been answered on this Easter Sunday."

"My son and our family will forever be indebted to Capt. Phillips for his bravery. If not for his incredible personal sacrifice, this kidnapping - an act of terror - could have turned out much worse," said Murphy.

"The captain is a hero," one crew member shouted from the 17,000-ton ship as it docked in Kenya's Mombasa port under darkness on Saturday. "He saved our lives by giving himself up."

Experts had expected a quick end to the standoff, but the pirates were holding out for both a ransom and safe passage home. Friends told Reuters the gang wanted $2 million.

The saga has thrown world attention on the long-running piracy phenomenon off Somalia that has hiked shipping insurance costs and disrupted international trade.

Andrew Mwangura, coordinator of Mombasa-based East African Seafarers Assistance Program, said the rescue appeared to be the work of frogmen and the feat would change the stakes in future pirate attacks.

"This is a big wake-up to the pirates. It raises the stakes. Now they may be more violent, like the pirates of old," he said.

Pirates have generally treated hostages well, sometimes roasting goat meat for them and even passing phones round so they can call loved-ones. The worst violence reported has been the occasional beating. No hostages are known to have been killed by pirates.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Misleading, I think
[info]benrg wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:07 pm (UTC)
"US cargo ship captain Richard Phillips has been freed by the Somali pirates who had held him hostage on a lifeboat after trying to seize his vessel, the US navy have reported."

Well, that isn't the idea given by the rest of the article at all. As I read it, Captain Phillips was removed from the pirates' custody with lethal force. Giving the pirates any credit in this matter is disingenuous at best.

Irrespective of the origins of Somali piracy, it has now become an organised criminal activity that completely nullifies whatever political or moral arguments can be offered to excuse it. It must be made utterly plain to such brigands that holding hostages for monetary gain will not be tolerated. Those currently held must be freed without condition (if necessary, extracted from their captors with lethal force) and further acts of piracy should be met with decisive force aimed at both the pirates and their shore-based support structures.
What horrible news for most of the Independent Readers
[info]ihateutoo wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:16 pm (UTC)
I know most of you were pulling for the pirates after you found it was an American captain being held. Oh well, you lost again. Life as usual for most of ya.
Re: What horrible news for most of the Independent Readers
[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:54 pm (UTC)
You have got to be kidding - liberals don't support kidnapping and other criminal activity. Your handle says it all.
He was rescued by our military, not freed by pirates
[info]jpeditor wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:43 pm (UTC)
Get a clue. No amount of kissing up to pirates, jihadis or other tyrannical groups will spare you.
Misleading or misreading?
[info]derkessel wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:59 pm (UTC)
The story doesn't say the Somali pirates freed the American captain. "US cargo ship captain Richard Phillips has been freed from captivity at the hands of Somali pirates ..."
Re: Misleading or misreading?
[info]seadogretired wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:27 pm (UTC)
Good rescue, hope it sends a message.

ihateutoo and jpeditor read it properly.

The US Chest thumping begins.
Re: Misleading or misreading?
[info]benrg wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:09 pm (UTC)
The text of the story was amended. The quote in my original post (see above) is the original first paragraph of the story.

Credit where credit is due to The Independent's team for correcting their error.
It doesnt say that
[info]seadogretired wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:23 pm (UTC)
Now the Chest thumping begins...
[info]desertann wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:05 pm (UTC)
I agree that the title of the story is misleading. The Captain wasn't freed, he was rescued. It also appears that he jumped into the water (a second time), and this gave the navy the opportunity to open fire.
Pirates & Phillips
[info]larry278 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:13 pm (UTC)
The US Navy was extremely lucky when it was able to rescue CPT Phillips from the 4 pirates. While the sailors who rescued the CPT were well trained in doing rescues & other jobs called special actions, that is no assurance that nothing would have gone wrong with the rescue. The well trained sailors had luck going for them. In the USA we say, I'd rather be lucky than be skilled & not have good luck.
We will now be treated to hare brained plans to exterminate all pirates operating in or from Somilia(sp?) & also destroy the country by bombing it 'back to the stone age'. The people of that region don't have the conveniences most American have. They are used to living without regular electric service, civil order or even an effective government. These people would make do & manage to survive.
They are not pampered, effete Yanks who expect cold beer in the fridge, pure water from a tap. Many of my fellow Yanks can't understand that. It will be amusing to see the plans for punishing the pirates & destroying their country. There is little of what we Yanks call an infra-structure in Somilia. We Yanks could destroy Somilia's infra-structure but the people would go on by improvising.
You in the UK will get some hearty laughs when Jingos in the USA blither about destroying Somilia's pirates nests & punishing the pirates.
We Yanks were very luck this time. We, Yanks, may not be so lucky the next time.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]il_767 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:51 pm (UTC)
So piracy is OK because the Somalis are poor ?

You insult every decent person who tries to get by even if they're not well off.

Yes, Somalia is a failed state but tolerating pirate gangs will do nothing to correct the situation.

I hope they get the Barbary Coast treatment, clear out the whole hornets' nest.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]johndingle wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
Larry, are you sure you are an American? Its just that we so rarely refer to ourselves as "Yanks". In my part of the US it is said "I'd rather be lucky than good." I have never heard your more stilted version. Is it a regional thing? Also, I have never heard the term "special actions" which frankly sounds more English (ie Special Boat Service). I have never heard an American say "Jingos", we rarely refer to ourselves as effete (usage of which is ironic), and you repeat the term "my fellow Yanks". So, really, where are you from?

Also, its Somalia. Used, and spelt correctly, many times on this page.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]larry278 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 11:46 am (UTC)
I was born in Ohio, As for the way you sodomize the English language, I it is a regional & educational difference. BTW, spelt is a UK usage & spelling. If you read UK publications, you learn UK usage & spelling. Hey baby, gringos are effete if you admit it or not. Like I wrote, as I had written to a UK paper I used Brit usage. OK, troll, who paid you to write this? Since I live in a barrio on the Atlantic coast, I call myself a gringo. If you get to the east coast, listen to us speak carefully. The Brits & Yanks who no hablo el Espanol don't know that a gringo is a Yankee.
Like I said, my usage is related to my education, I earned & was awarded an MS. OK, troll, go back to high school with your language police schtick. If you ever study at a university in the USA, you might learn UK usages, if you apply yourself.
Where are you coming from? I speak, write & spell as I like. Americans are like that. Make sure you get paid if you decide to reply, troll.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]johndingle wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 12:41 pm (UTC)
I apologize. I was too sensitive to the occasional poster masquerading as an American to make a silly point. I have never heard an American refer to himself as a Yank, and I suspect your views are not those held by the majority of the population. There is an old joke that the world thanks all Americans are Yankees, Americans think Northerners are Yankees, Northerners think that people from New England are Yankees, New Englanders think people from New Hampshire are Yankees, and in New Hampshire, a Yankee is someone with no indoor plumbing. As for myself, I am an American with an English mother, who spent his childhood in Italy and the UK. When I lived in Australia my name was "Septic". I now live in Miami. Yo hablo Espanol, muy mal.

I use some English spellings, and some American. I learned to read from Puffin and Penguin books. Also, I just think grey looks better than gray. But I draw the line at extraneous syllables in aluminum.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]larry278 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 02:48 pm (UTC)
Apology: Too little, too late.
Es lastima que ud habla el Esponal como un gringo.
When I worked & lived in Oz in the 1970's my mates called me Yank. I'm gringo in mi barrio even to people who use Hindi, Arabic & Yiddish.
If you wish you could take up exercise. You get hurt badly jumping to conclusions & running people down. If you plan to go into the bush, you will see that gringos are most effete. It took me months to learn to stay alive in the Thai bush.
Cheers, Yank, if fortune smiles on you, you may get back to Oz. Miami is an interesting place. I went to Miami in 1960 when Castro threw out los Yanquis. I lived there for 10 years. My foster parents took me to Indian River, Co, Fl & I was raised there.
When I was in the USAF, I ended up as a typist & trouble shooter for my CO. He taught me UK English. As you know, people in Miami often affect British English. When you leave the USA, one must use UK spellings & syntax. I use the version of English which gets me the most money. The INDEPENDT & GUARDIAN use UK English, so I write Brit style then. Same thing in Canada & Oz.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]johndingle wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
I'll try to be faster next time, then?

My command of Spanish is about Sesame St. level, which is just enough to understand your regret. Although it is a rather common to hear in Miami. I can see your hands flying up in exasperation. :)

"I use the version of English which gets me the most money." That's damned good advice. Thank you.
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]larry278 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
Que se(a)ra, se(ra). If you are out to make money in Miami, the Spanish speaking people will aid you in learning el Espanol. Since most of the people in my barrio are Puerto Ricans of from the Dominican Republic (la Republica Dominico), I have picked up their patios. All I remember of Cuban Espanol are the really vile obscenities.
BTW, the obscenities are different in each patois. You must be very careful. For instance: If you ask for a loaf of bread en el Espanol de PR & you ask a Cuban (Cubano), you will be asking for a long bolus of feces. If you are in the wrong part of S Fl, you will get a long, fresh bolus of feces-if you don't get shot. Hispanics can be "feo y formal'. That's from Mejico. In English it means: ultra polite & formal. If a Hispanic likes & trusts you, you can exchange obscene words. But be careful.
Miami is a fun place. I got used to the drive by shootings. I can still hit the ground quick. I lived in S Miami. Dadeland was close. Drive by's were common there. Dadeland has probably been closed by now.
You probably know by now not to pick up anything that washes ashore at the beach. If you pick up or get near a brick of marahuana or other dope-you can get shot.
Miami is interesting. If you are honest-you can always get a job. Every cheap crook from the Miss River on east tries their scams in Miami, They get picked up by the cops quickly. Everybody in S Fl can spot ever con known in the Americas & W Europe. The judges like to lock up crooks.
That means that-if you are honest-the word gets around. Everybody knows everybody in Miami (or knows somebody who knows you).
Re: Pirates & Phillips
[info]il_767 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 06:47 pm (UTC)
Such charming manners you display.
Chest thumping
[info]tlr_tom wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:25 pm (UTC)
Let the US chest thump, they did exactly the right thing, the task should now be a combined effort by all the concerned parties to dismantle the Somali pirate fleet, permenentley. This nonsense has gone on long enough! Perhaps when that is done we can help Africa to try and get Somalia back on its feet
Violence will escelate
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:34 pm (UTC)

Subsequent piracy attempts will be much more violent. You have to bear in mind that the value of life in many part of Africa is very low. So when there isnt much to loose, high risks are taken. Watch out all shipping personnel in that area - there will be blood ...
Re: Violence will escelate
[info]il_767 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:56 pm (UTC)
So be it.

You don't cure the problem by feeding it with ransom money etc. Sooner or later the free world must take a stand and fight back.

I read the gov't of the Seychelles is getting worried it could spread to their tourist resorts, there's already been incidents with their fishing fleet.

Re: Violence will escelate
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 10:32 am (UTC)

Yes you are right.

The solution is a stable and independently supported gov in Somalia (even it is an Islamic gov) without interference from the USA.
Why are you punching yourselves in the chest?
[info]mcjadt wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 11:50 pm (UTC)
"the task should now be a combined effort by all the concerned parties to dismantle the Somali pirate fleet, permenentley"

You mean a "War on piracy"? Like the "War on drugs" which has been a dismal and expensive failure? Piracy, like peddling drugs, is attractive because it is profitable. As long as it remains profitable, there will be people willing to do it, no matter what the risks involved. Tooling up the crews of ships will just lead to bigger and bloodier conflicts with pirates.
Re: Why are you punching yourselves in the chest?
[info]benrg wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 11:35 am (UTC)
The obvious solution is to make it unprofitable.

Right now, piracy in the Indian Ocean/Gulf of Aden has some risks (infrequent but high) but enormous and frequent pay-offs that have turned the pirate towns into boom towns. What is needed is to make the risks incredibly high and the rewards minute. Impose 'no-sail zones' around the imperiled shipping lanes and make it known that any suspicious vessel in the zones will be destroyed without warning. Start assessing huge penalties on commercial entities that pay 'tribute' to pirates by paying ransoms to reduce the ease of extracting money from shipping companies. Rescue hostages in the most dramatic way possible with the objective of causing the maximum casualties amongst the pirates and their allies.

If it becomes clear that piracy is nothing but voting for an early death with limited or non-existant monetary rewards, then people will be less inclined to go into the 'business'.
pirates?
[info]jupiter399 wrote:
Monday, 13 April 2009 at 03:04 pm (UTC)
Let hussein order to go in Somalie (lests ee if he does that) and rescue all those been cacture and hold in that infested of murderer muslims dirty land.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date