World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Bush 'planted fake news stories on American TV'

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington

Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.

Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.

The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.

"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."

Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.

The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.

The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.

Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.

Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."

The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."

The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]jvaljon1 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 03:58 pm (UTC)
Dear Andrew--you write that:

"The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500)."

Let's give 'em last Spring, up until now. That'd be, umm...March 21 I believe. Up until June 7. How many days?
48, by my rough count.

Now, we don't call Fox FAUX, for nothing. So it occurs to me that they might well have committed these (posted) violations -- umm...ten or eleven times a day, conservatively (LOL!)? About how many times they run their 'news' clips, per day?

Let's see now...$32,500.00, X (say)10 times, would=...

WOW. $32,500,000.00 PER DIEM??? Please, someone, check that number out, because my (admittedly) non-mathematical mind makes that out to be one heckuva number that these people owe the FCC. Enough to re-stock that agency with the watchdogs that BushCo rooted out of each of our Federal agencies, with diligence and zeal, ever since he attained the Presidency???

"Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" from Tv to these odes not surprise me.
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 09:15 pm (UTC)
"Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" from Tv to these odes not surprise me. This is by the way to distress all. Bush is not included.
USA has terrible case of everything form the farced wars to nudity. Despair not. THREE MINUTES MANAGEMENT COURSE
A man is getting into the shower just as his wife is finishing up her shower, when the doorbell rings.
The wife quickly wraps herself in a towel and runs downstairs.
When she opens the door, there stands Bob, the next-door neighbour.
Before she says a word, Bob says, 'I'll give you $800 to drop that towel.'
After thinking for a moment, the woman drops her towel and stands naked in front of Bob, after a few seconds, Bob hands her $800 and leaves.
The woman wraps back up in the towel and goes back upstairs.
When she gets to the bathroom, her husband asks, 'Who was that?'
'It was Bob the next door neighbour,' she replies.
'Great,' the husband says, 'did he say anything about the $800 he owes me?'
Moral of the story
If you share critical information pertaining to credit and risk with your shareholders in time, you may be in a position to prevent avoidable exposure.
Obama to Forge a Greater Role on Health Care
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
President Obama is preparing a push for legislation that will include speeches, town-hall-style meetings and much deeper engagement with lawmakers, officials say.
U.S. Lawyers Agreed on the Legality of Brutal Tactic By SCOTT SHANE and DAVID JOHNSTON Some Justice Department lawyers who argued against using harsh interrogation techniques still went along with a 2005. legal opinion asserting that the methods themselves were lawful. For Sotomayor and Thomas, Paths Fork at Race and Identity
By JODI KANTOR and DAVID GONZALEZ. Judge Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Clarence Thomas have walked parallel paths, but they stand at opposite poles of thinking about race, identity and opportunity.
345,000 U.S. Jobs Lost in May; Unemployment Rate Jumps to 9.4%.The economy shed 345,000 jobs in May, a sharp reduction in the pace of job losses, the government reported on Friday in its monthly employment report. The unemployment rate climbed to 9.4 percent, its highest point in a quarter-century, and economists said the job losses were likely to pile up through the rest of the year. But the letup in the pace of losses fanned hopes that the plummeting job market was showing sustained signs of stabilizing.
We only miss you when you are gone.
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla

7 Types Of People Who Fail In Finance BUSH INCLUDED Part 1
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 09:25 pm (UTC)
7 Types Of People Who Fail In Finance BUSH INCLUDED Part 1
The Pontificator
Pontificators tend to lurk around and blow their own horn at inopportune times, usually when you have a report due in two hours, right before the meeting starts or when you are rushing to the bathroom. Pontificators are focused on themselves, and spend less time thinking about organization or team goals. They also tend to tear down colleagues with biting remarks, and suck up to the boss, but when they meet someone with significantly higher standardized test scores, or well-regarded position within the firm, they worship that person.
The Selfish Jerk
"Selfish jerks" can occasionally profess to care about organization and team goals ? if this opportunistically helps with their image within the company. These people are really only aligned with their personal desires. When the company experiences some kind of adversity ? when it becomes critical for each worker to rise to the occasion - the selfish jerk takes off for a new organization in a heartbeat or works at protecting his or her job. The selfish jerk is typically well-versed in financial subjects and industry benchmarks, is obsessed with researching industry statistics on salary and bonus, and runs a covert operation trying to figure out what co-workers are making in terms of salary and bonus.
The Nerd/Doormat
The nerd/doormats have succeeded in a plethora of academic subjects in high school and college. They are widely read, but unfortunately, doormats have completely ignored their communication skills and have difficulty conveying even simple issues in a succinct and understandable manner. Because doormats are usually bright individuals, they can reject receiving training or courses that will help improve communication or management skills.
The Procrastinator
Procrastinators have succeeded in school and in prior work experiences. This track record of success leads them to believe that their successes were more of a function of individual personality rather than hard work, insights and sheer execution. The procrastinator has become complacent, and waits for quasi-emergencies before stepping up.
The Excel Lightweight
The Excel lightweight excelled in college accounting and finance classes. The lightweight's prowess in understanding the theoretical concepts, however, is no longer sufficient in the real world. In a finance setting, practical skills such as advanced Excel knowledge are a driver for garnering increased responsibilities, higher productivity and spreadsheet formula accuracy. How can you succeed in finance without excelling in its major form of communication, spreadsheets? The Excel lightweight doesn't understand much about keyboard shortcuts, macros, advanced formulas and add-ins.
Sunday, 07 June 200911:35:12 PM
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

7 Types Of People Who Fail In Finance BUSH INCLUDED Part 2
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 09:26 pm (UTC)
The Error-Prone Dummy
The error-prone dummy is typically a junior analyst or junior associate that had connections and got into the firm through the back door. He or she went to the same college as the interviewer, or has a dad who is an investor in the company. You won't find senior people that are error-prone dummies because they've already been ushered out, even with their connections. Accuracy, dependability and reliability are critical success factors in finance. Unfortunately, the error-prone dummy spends time daydreaming about prospective nighttime activities or is more interested in college football scores than work. His or her work product suffers, and the team is stuck wasting time doing re-work or researching what went wrong.
The Apathetic Cyborg
Apathetic cyborgs do not care; they will work only as much as needed to prevent being fired - nothing more. In a setting where people are rushing to meet deadlines, the apathetic cyborg never displays passion. Don't bother telling him or her anything of importance, as it's going out the other ear.
If you want to succeed in finance and within your organization, constantly gather feedback from your peers and managers. There are unique issues and objectives that are critical within finance: teamwork, meeting deadlines on reports, alignment with organizational objectives, excel prowess and clear understanding of initiatives (Sarbanes-Oxley compliance). If you know where you stand, you will be in a position to take concrete action to improve certain areas. Finance is a competitive field and there are not that many chances given to those who are on the radar for getting the boot.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
[info]msmithe wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:12 am (UTC)
Interesting post. I have been wondering about this issue, so thanks for posting. I’ll likely be coming back to your blog. Thanks ever so much, very great article! If you do not mind, please visit my article related to pandeglang district in Banten, Indonesia at Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang or you can visit the second Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang is very pleasure to meet you there. Thank you so much.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date