World

5° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Coup leader willing to hold early election

Honduras tries to fend off sanctions but rejects calls to re-instate ousted President

By David Usborne

Exiled Honduran President Manuel Zelaya arrives at the presidential palace in San Salvador to meet his counterpart, Mauricio Funes, on Thursday

AFP / GETTY

Exiled Honduran President Manuel Zelaya arrives at the presidential palace in San Salvador to meet his counterpart, Mauricio Funes, on Thursday

The self-declared leaders of Honduras showed signs of softening yesterday, indicating a willingness to bring presidential elections forward or even hold a plebiscite on re-instating the man they ousted last weekend.

First murmurs of possible compromise emerged from Tegucigalpa just hours before the scheduled arrival of the head of the Organisation of American States, Jose Miguel Insulza, who had given the coup leaders until today to reverse course or face sanctions.

Before the visit, Mr Insulza said he was not prepared to negotiate or meet with the interim government headed by Robert Micheletti, who has been declared president. "I cannot say I am confident," he said. "I will do everything I can but I think it is very hard."

There had been plans for President Manuel Zelaya to return to the capital this weekend, but Mr Micheletti flatly stated that he would be arrested should he set foot in Honduras.

Mr Zelaya came to power in 2006 as the leader of the centrist Liberals but he subsequently allied himself with President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and tacked leftwards. Already at odds with the country's business elite, he then began moves to change the constitution to allow him to run for a second term. Congress and the courts supported his removal from the presidential palace at gunpoint on Sunday.

But the overthrow of Mr Zelaya has triggered unusual unity in the hemisphere. Even the US and Venezuela have united to demand his re-instatement. Honduras has seen ambassadors withdrawn and trade barriers thrown up against it. The streets of the capital have been the scene of clashes between supporters of the coup and Zelaya loyalists and there were fears last night of fresh violence.

Mr Insulza said: "We hope the coup leaders recognise the damage they are doing to the country and the world and allow the return of President Zelaya."

Asked about bringing forward elections planned for November, Mr Micheletti said he would have "no objection if it would be a way of resolving these problems".

He did not rule out a referendum on restoring Mr Zelaya to power either but said it would be hard to organise. There was little change in tone, however, when it came to Mr Zelaya personally. "For the peace and calm of the country I would prefer he does not come in," Mr Micheletti told Honduran radio. "I do not want even one drop of blood spilled in this country."

The country itself seems split on the issue. Before his rude awakening and involuntary dispatch to Costa Rica on Sunday, Mr Zelaya had not only earned the wrath of the other main institutions of government but had also seen his approval rating among voters slump to 30 per cent or less. Mr Chavez moved to lower the temperature of the crisis after indicating earlier this week that he was prepared to invade Honduras after his ambassador was briefly detained.

He indicated instead that he was talking about ending the standoff with contacts in Honduras and outside it. "We are in contact with people inside and in various parts of the world," Mr Chavez said. "Of course, one wants to do more but that country has its sovereignty and we have to respect it."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

election?
[info]yurism wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
What kind of "election" would it be under the Micheletti junta? Easy to predict.
leave them alone!
[info]kayfur wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 07:15 pm (UTC)
I must be living in a parallel universe, because what I have seen in Honduras is how the institutions have, legally, cut short a problem in waiting. And what is more unbelievable to me is that you, the so called "independent" are so biaised towards the far left. Yesterday I read Mr Hari's column and felt sick and let down. He, who has been living in poor areas of Latin America, according to him but not saying in what country or countries he has been, could certify the advances of the leftist "democratic" governments in South America. What's more, he was praising Hugo Chavez!! Mr Hari, just so you know, the wages in Venezuela have NOT increased a 130% since Chavez "took" power, there are more than 150 crime-related deaths on the slums surrounding Caracas every weekend, there are food and medicines shortages (ie: thyroxines, insulines etc), the people that voted against him after his own coup (in which I include my wife and myself) are not able to apply for a job in the public sector and are not even able to apply for credit. Mr Hari and Mr Editor, you are free to choose what side to be with and what to write, but I would ask you to not to try to mislead the people, in this matter at least, because there is one little and poor democratic country at risk of being wiped away by the "Revolucion del siglo XXI"'s forces together with that other risk to democracy, Mr Obama. Thank you for the opportunity.
Re: leave them alone!
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 09:56 pm (UTC)
Plus the other "risk to democracy" that is the UN, the OEA, and just about every democracy on the planet speaking out against this "curiously legal" coup.
Re: leave them alone!
[info]kayfur wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 06:24 pm (UTC)
No need for sarcasm. You could start by checking the Honduran Constitution that states clearly that any attempt to change the number of times that a president can run for re-election would be illegal. Plus, just so you know, the OEA president is a former guerrilla fighter and belonged to the Sandinista Movement. Also, almost every democracy on the planet are forgetting that the expulsion of Mr Zelaya was ordered by the High Court of Justice, the Parliament (as a whole, including Mr Zelaya's deputies and some of his ministers)and every single institution in the country, including the Church. I only wish we could have that efficiency and love for a country in every single democracy that rushes to condemn and attack a little but proud country without thinking on the whys and hows. Unfortunately, Honduras will be forced to dig in to the pressure of those "democracies" like Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Bolivia, not known to respect the citizens' rights.
Re: leave them alone!
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC)
Another poster here has posted a relatively eloquent description of what is at stake in terms of the constitution; perhaps you wish to say if you disagree with his/her analysis? (http://opinion.independentminds.livejournal.com/989948.html?thread=9852412#t9852412) T
Re: leave them alone!
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 07:35 pm (UTC)
[to continue and] to sum up a relevant part, it appears the (non-binding) public consultation would have been on the possibility of writing a new constitution, not doing something against the current one.
Re: leave them alone!
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 07:39 pm (UTC)
[continued]
Insulza a Sandinista? I wish he had fought against the Somoza dictatorship, not you? Instead he is not Nicaraguan but Chilean and what I remember him for are his efforts as part of the Chilean Concertacion government to protect another rightwing dictator, Pinochet, when he was arrested in London.

So his background again is not particularly leftwing in this regard, however, he appears to be doing his job in this case.

Yes, other Latin American countries are sadly familiar with the history of US-backed bloodshed in the continent, so it is a welcome relief to see them joining with Uribe and the US in condemning the forcible, military removal of an elected president on spurious grounds.
A snippet
[info]mysterywarbler wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 04:01 pm (UTC)
"President Micheletti stated, ?The Government of Honduras, repudiates the claims of imposing unilateral measures and reaffirms its full sovereignty and the right to exercise the rules in accordance with its constitution." and that ?The OAS is a political organization, not a court of Justice ".

With such a strong response against the wishes of the OAS, Insulza admitted that little would change in the short term.


During the course of the week there have been massive rallies in support of the new government and it seems Honduras is willing to dig in until the international community chooses to look at the legalities of the case based on the Honduras Constitution."

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/honduras-withdraws-oas-political-organization-not-judge

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date