Decline of a tribe: and then there were five
The last surviving members of an ancient Amazonian tribe are a tragic testament to greed and genocide
FIONA WATSON/SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL
Ururu, front left, with the last members of the Akuntsu, in a picture taken before she died this month. Most of the tribe was massacred by loggers in about 1990
They are the last survivors: all that's left of a once-vibrant civilisation which created its own religion and language, and gave special names to everything from the creatures of the rainforest to the stars of the night sky.
Just five people represent the entire remaining population of the Akuntsu, an ancient Amazonian tribe which a generation ago boasted several hundred members, but has been destroyed by a tragic mixture of hostility and neglect.
The indigenous community, which spent thousands of years in uncontacted seclusion, recently took an unwelcome step closer to extinction, with the death of its sixth last member, an elderly woman called Ururú.
Considered the matriarch of the Akuntsu, and shown in these pictures (which were taken in 2006, and are the most recent images of the tribe), Ururú died of old age, in a hut built from straw and leaves, on 1 October. News of her death emerged last week, when the tribe was visited by human rights campaigners, who have spent the past decade campaigning to preserve their homeland from deforestation.
"I followed the funeral," says Altair Algayer, a local representative of Funai, the Brazilian government agency which protects Indian territories. "She died in a small house. We heard weeping and rushed over, but she had already died." Ururú's death means the entire population of the Akuntsu now consists of just three women and two men. All of them are either close family relations, or no longer of child-bearing age – meaning that the tribe's eventual disappearance is now inevitable.
The slow death of this indigenous community is far more than an unfortunate accident, however. Instead, it represents the long-planned realisation of one of the most successful acts of genocide in human history. And the fate of the Akuntsu is seen by lobby groups as an object lesson in the physical and cultural dangers faced by undiscovered tribes at so-called "first contact".
Much of the Akuntsus' story is – for obvious reasons – undocumented. For millennia, they lived in obscurity, deep in the rainforest of Rondonia state, a remote region of western Brazil near the Bolivian border. They hunted wild pig, agoutis and tapir, and had small gardens in their villages, where they would grow manioc (or cassava) and corn.
Then, in the 1980s, their death warrant was effectively signed: farmers and loggers were invited to begin exploring the region, cutting roads deep into the forest, and turning the once verdant wilderness into lucrative soya fields and cattle ranches.
Fiercely industrious, the new migrant workers knew that one thing might prevent them from creating profitable homesteads from the rainforest: the discovery of uncontacted tribes, whose land is protected from development under the Brazilian constitution.
As a result, frontiersmen who first came across the Akuntsu in the mid-1980s made a simple calculation. The only way to prevent the government finding out about this indigenous community was to wipe them off the map.
At some point, believed to be around 1990, scores of Akuntsu were massacred at a site roughly five hours' drive from the town of Vilhena. Only seven members of the tribe escaped, retreating deeper into the wilderness to survive.
Those seven were not formally "contacted" until 1995, when Funai investigators finally made it to the region and were able to have a 26,000-hectare area of forest protected for them. They included the late Ururú, who was the sister of the tribe's chief and shaman, Konibú.
"We know little of what Ururú's life was like," says Mr Algayer, who was among the Funai team that first discovered the tribe. "In the 14 years that we have been with her, she was a happy, spontaneous person ... She recounts that she had four children who were all shot dead during the massacre. We don't know who her husband was or how he died."
One other member of the group of seven, known as Babakyhp, was killed in a freak accident in 2000, when a tree blew over in a storm and landed on her hut. The others, who still survive, are Pugapía, Konibú's wife, who is roughly 50 years old, their daughters, Nãnoi and Enotéi, who are around 35 and 25 respectively, and a cousin, Pupak, who is in her forties.
Evidence of their suffering is visible in bullet wounds which both Konibú and Pupak showed to cameramen making a documentary about their struggle – Corumbiara: they shoot Indians, don't they? – that was filmed over the last 20 years and has just been released in Brazil.
It is also evident in a simple fact: on its own, the Akuntsu gene pool cannot allow it to survive another generation. Since tribal custom will apparently not allow outsiders to marry in, it is therefore effectively doomed.
The Akuntsu story is not unique. Even if they escape persecution, communities that have never encountered the outside world often face tragedy. Typically they lose between 50 and 80 per cent of their population in a matter of months, since they have no immunity to common diseases.
Ancient ways of life are also frequently corrupted by the arrival of outsiders. Though indigenous tribes rarely have much interest in material possessions, and often don't understand the concept of money, their traditional clothes and rituals are vulnerable to change.
Campaigners now hope the fate of the tribe, which will be publicly highlighted by Ururú's death, will persuade the Brazilian people to further strengthen government protections for indigenous people.
Stephen Corry of Survival International, a human rights organisation that has been working with Funai, said: "The "Akuntsu are at the end of the road. In a few decades this once vibrant and self-sufficient people will cease to exist and the world will have lost yet another piece of our astonishing human diversity.
"Their genocide is a terrible reminder that in the 21st century there are still uncontacted tribes in several continents who face annihilation as their lands are invaded, plundered and stolen. Yet this situation can be reversed if governments uphold their land rights in accordance with international law.
"Public opinion is crucial – the more people speak up for tribal rights, the greater the chance that tribes like the Akuntsu will in future survive."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Being 'Christian' is no guarantee of moral, enlightened behaviour. History shows that the exact opposite is frequently the case.
This species will go the way of those on Easter Island - a global wipeout.
Race (not species, they are from the same ancient mother as you, me and every human on the earth).
There is only ONE! Human beings all belong to the same race... the human race. If we were to talk about black, white, Chinese...etc. we would be talking about different ethnicities not races. I know that anthropology can be a bit obscure for those who haven't been reading the basics but it goes a little something like this.
there are regional biological shallow differences caused by regional environmental pressures on creatures living in symbiosis with it. And there are of course Genetic differences, these are observed between humans at both the individual and the population level. There may be multiple variants of any given gene in the human population (alleles), leading to polymorphisms. Many genes are not polymorphic, meaning that only a single allele is present in the population: that allele is then said to be fixed. We all now know that no two humans are genetically identical, even mono-zygotic twins, who develop from a single zygote, have infrequent genetic differences due to mutations occurring during development and gene copy number variation has been observed but that is a minor type of mutation leading only to our individual uniqueness and to some degree, our population alikeness due to close bonding and genetic pooling within close circle. So, people in west Sahara got to develop darker skin pigmentation because of the sun and heat to survive it. People in all of northern Mongolia, Russia over the Bering like Greenland and Inuits in Alaska and so on have the same bone structure and slit eye lids because of the cold and the almost constant snow white brightness under which they live in. So, there are differences but none is so vast that there have been any mutation created these last hundred of thousands of years to develop a new "Race".
The Race Question is a UNESCO statement issued on 18 July 1950 following World War II. The statement included both a scientific debunking of race theories and a moral condemnation of racism. It suggested in particular to "drop the term 'race' altogether and speak of "ethnic groups."
Signed by some of the leading researchers of the time, in the field of psychology, biology, cultural anthropology and ethnology, it questioned the foundations of scientific racist theories which had become very popular at the turn of the 20th century, alongside eugenics.
These racist theories had been a main influence of the Nazi racial policies and eugenics programme.Today most scientists have argued that race definitions are imprecise, arbitrary, derived from custom, have many exceptions, have many gradations, and that the numbers of "races" delineated vary according to the culture making "the racial distinctions"; thus they reject the notion that any definition of "race pertaining to humans" can have taxonomic rigour and validity.
What could rather be correct is to call it for what it is, "Human genetic variation". Human Genetic Variation is the genetic diversity of humans and represents the total amount of genetic characteristics observed within the human species. Note those two words, "Human Species". See, our race/Species has but one name. And that is Humans are bipedal primates belonging to the species Homo sapiens Latin for "wise man" or "knowing man" and believe it or not, we line up from the Hominidae family, or as some right wing conservatives hate to hear it being said, the great ape family. So there you go, One name for one "Race" Homo Sapiens is said name and both you and I and all other belong to that "Race". Or have you or anyone else seen a white man with black legs, blue feet and pink nose and tail running around sniffing the air out with pointy ears and ogling through peoples windows with luminescent blue eyes? if so please contact me because I would then be the next Nobel Prize winner within my field. LOL!
Yes, yes, ethnic not race, ie, genetic traits :o)
Where we originate from is debatable - creation vs evolution...
James Fenimore Cooper,
"The Last of The Mohicans"
Benjamin from India
and other animal inhabitants, being gradually deprived of their natural territories, come out to attack villagers and destroy their settlements.
While I'm not saying genocide is good telling the Brazillians (many of whom are not wealthy) that they can't use valuable land because native are living on it is not viable. It didn't work in the US or Australia and it's not ging to work here.
and the Catholic church, which has a strong hold in catholic countries, should be cooperative. While the church needs more people to maintain its future presence, otherwise jusification for its existence is threatened, it must look beyond self-preservation for the good of its followers and their descendants.
Governments should have programmes educating people in villages, to make them aware of the disadvanges of having an oversized family they can't afford to maintain.
By the way, ALL land space is valuable, even the ones already inhabited., How would you like to be told by your government to move out of your house and garden (if you have one), and live in barracks
provided by the authorities, so that they can exploit your grounds for oil, gas, or mineral resources?
2: Being a half-Swede by my Swedish Mother thus Educated since early youth in Stockholm.
makes the odds quite good for me to know a thing or two about what makes things run in Brazil and especially when it get to why the natural land and recourses of the big forests are being taken off with thousands of square kilometers a day. It is not the normal citizenry who during these last hundred year high tech industrialized forestry have been benefiting while grabbing away of all living things of our mother earth (the name mine and my fathers tribe and most other tribe use for "her") It is not even a majority of Brazilian National Companies. No, the truth is easy to find and totally available (especially in these days with the world wide web at the reach of your fingertips.
They existed and we didn't know it. One group of people stumbling onto another group of people isn't a discovery, and you might as easily say we were living in obscurity from them before that time. They hadn't discoveredd us yet.
As for planetary aliens, we'll all cross that road when we get there, but we shouldn't use the idea of unknown aliens floating around us for our ignorance and inhuman treatment of Nature's children, the tribes.
You discover a cure for cancer. You might even claim to discover a new planet. These people could as easily be said to have "discovered" us when we stumbled through their home. If someone walks into your house who you don't know, have they "discovered" you. Were you living in obscurity until they ended up in your kitchen? The idea is laughable.
Also, I am Canadian, not, as you suppose, from the U.S.A. Also, you claim that being "discovered by Americans" was bad for Natives. That is silly. Even by your out-dated definitions of a discovery, they were discovered by Europeans. The "discoverers" weren't Americans until after they took America from the natives. I'd think that was obvious.
who are being tricked out of their ancestral forest and jungle homes. The boundless greed of landowners, planters, cattle ranchers and their ilk, - with or without the connivance of governments - has led to this miserable situation for tribal communities. Most of them have been coerced, - or talked into integration by governmental institutions for the purpose of "civilising" the tribes. Ulterior motives on the other hand, are also behind it, enabling governments and private individuals, to exploit the natural resources in tribal, and heretofore ... virgin territories, leading to even more environmental problems with the cutting down of trees, pollution, etc..
The world looks on helplessly, even when courageous rainforest activists do their best, while endangering their own lives in the process.
And by the way, not everyone who comments here are Americans, and those who are, usually have their hearts in the right place!
It is so sad to read these news,and I'm wishing a few members of the tribe who might have been lured to move to big cities in Brazil, come back and give continuation to their own people. I guess there could be hope if something like this happens.
It is unbelievable how selfish human beings are. JUST UNBELIEVABLE!
I know you're focused on atrocities the first American settlers and later...committed against the Native Americans, and I and everyone agree with you completely. The Spanish and Portuguese did the same thing in the South American continent, and some parts of Africa and in Asia, as in the case of the Philippines. So there are people everywhere in this globe who feel the same way as you do, but some went even farther, and organisations, experts, activists and individual sympathisers, do at least something concrete to be helpful, in many cases, even endangering themselves, by participating in projects in the Third World. One should not diminish or underestimate their efforts.
As you feel strongly about injustices, past and present, and rightly so, it might be a good idea for you
to show your solidarity by going to the Amazon and doing something for the tribes, including that of your father's, instead of living in Sweden in safety and personal comfort.
In a world moving at the speeds we are traveling (with the information age), logic should overtake ignorance to help us appreciate where we are.
David_1