Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump faces lawsuit accusing him of violating US constitution by accepting foreign payments

Mr Trump's defence will be taxpayer funded as the Justice Department reviews the case

May Bulman,Rachael Revesz
Monday 23 January 2017 09:21 GMT
Comments
Watchdog alleges that since Mr Trump refused to divest from his businesses, he is now getting cash and favours from foreign governments through guests and events at his hotels, leases in his buildings, and valuable real estate deals abroad
Watchdog alleges that since Mr Trump refused to divest from his businesses, he is now getting cash and favours from foreign governments through guests and events at his hotels, leases in his buildings, and valuable real estate deals abroad (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

A group of constitutional scholars and legal experts, including former White House ethics lawyers, are filing a lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of violating the US constitution by allowing his hotels and other business operations to accept payments from foreign governments.

President Trump's defense will be carried out by the Justice Department and will be taxpayer funded.

The legal action, brought by watchdog organisation Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), will seek a court order on Monday forbidding Trump from accepting such payments, which it will allege are forbidden by the Constitution's emoluments clause.

Such lawsuits are among the few outlets through which the administration can be challenged now that Republicans are in control of the government. The administration has dismissed the lawsuit as "without merit" but is still being reviewed by the Justice Department.

In a statement, the watchdog alleges that since Mr Trump refused to divest from his businesses, he is now getting cash and favours from foreign governments through guests and events at his hotels, leases in his buildings, and valuable real estate deals abroad.

“Trump does business with countries like China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, and now that he is President, his company’s acceptance of any benefits from the governments of those countries violates the Constitution,” the statement reads.

“When Trump the president sits down to negotiate trade deals with these countries, the American people will have no way of knowing whether he will also be thinking about the profits of Trump the businessman.”

The legal action, which will not seek any monetary damages, will ask a federal court in New York to order the President to stop taking payments from foreign government entities, including those from patrons at Trump hotels and golf courses and loans for his office buildings from certain banks controlled by foreign governments.

Kellyanne Conway says President Trump will not release his tax returns

The lawyers on the case reportedly include CREW’s board chair and vice-chair Norman Eisen and Richard Painter, the top ethics lawyers for the previous two presidents, as well as Constitutional law scholars Erwin Chemerinsky, Laurence H. Tribe and Zephyr Teachout.

CREW Executive Director Noah Bookbinder said: “We did not want to get to this point. It was our hope that President Trump would take the necessary steps to avoid violating the Constitution before he took office.

“He did not. His constitutional violations are immediate and serious, so we were forced to take legal action.”

“President Trump has made his slogan ‘America First, so you would think he would want to strictly follow the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause, since it was written to ensure our government officials are thinking of Americans first, and not foreign governments.”

Earlier this month Mr Trump announced that he would hand control of his company to his two eldest sons, but that he would retain an ownership stake in a trust that holds his business assets while he is President — a deal that watchdogs said will not prevent conflicts of interest.

The billionaire also revealed that while making preparations for office, he was still involved with making decisions for the business, saying he had rejected a $2bn (£1.65bn) development deal in Dubai the previous weekend.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in