Homeland Security, law enforcement officials speak up for 'fusion centres'
The US Department of Homeland Security, law enforcement authorities and some lawmakers has defended information-sharing offices known as "fusion centres" after a sharply critical Senate report said the offices were wasteful and inept.
A national network of fusion centres was begun after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to serve as clearing houses of intelligence for local, state and federal authorities. The aim was to discover and share information about potential terrorist threats.
The critical report, the result of a two-year review by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs permanent subcommittee on investigations, concluded that the 77 centres nationwide had not produced useful intelligence to support counter- terrorism efforts. The report also said the tactics sometimes violated civil liberties.
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, I-Conn., chairman of the full committee, acknowledged in a statement that the centres have some problems. But he said the subcommittee's report focused too narrowly on intelligence going to federal officials in Washington and ignored broader benefits, including better information sharing with state law enforcement agencies.
"I strongly disagree with the report's core assertion that fusion centres have been unable to meaningfully contribute to federal counterterrorism efforts," said Lieberman, a driving force behind the creation of the fusion centres.
Several law enforcement groups, including the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriffs' Association and the National Fusion centre Association, said the report did not address the significant benefits that the centres provide to state, local and tribal law enforcement. "Additionally, the report incorrectly asserts that a majority of the information or intelligence released by fusion centres is untimely, inaccurate and of little use," their joint statement said.
DHS spokesman Matt Chandler said that the report was "inaccurate and misleading" and that Senate investigators "refused to review relevant data," including classified material.
A subcommittee official said that investigators reviewed redacted versions of classified intelligence reports as part of their examination but that they did not refuse to look at any relevant documents.
Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, the ranking Republican on the subcommittee, accused DHS of hindering the investigation and trying to avoid accountability for the fusion centre problems.
"The Department opted not to inform Congress or the public of serious problems plaguing its fusion centres and broader intelligence efforts," he said. "I hope this report will help generate the reforms that will help keep our country safe."
And why are 'southern' ways of speaking spreading north?
life + styleClarissa Baldwin is the brains behind the slogan 'A Dog is for Life not just for Christmas'
Ten best places to live in the UK: Solihull comes top
Paul Walker autopsy: Results reveal Fast and Furious star's cause of death
Mysterious glowing ‘alien-like creature’ spotted in waters of Bristol Harbour. A jellyfish - or something fishy?
From 'terrorist' to tea with the Queen
Nelson Mandela death: his life in pictures
- 1 Cameron's freebie to apartheid South Africa
- 2 Nelson Mandela life story: An unconquerable spirit
- 3 Is this the scariest advert ever? Japanese tyre commercial comes with its own disclaimer and health warning
- 4 A forgotten episode in Russian history leaves links with the Philippines
- 5 Video: Students 'punched and dragged to the ground by their hair' as police break up demonstration
£35000 - £38000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: VB.NET SQL CSS Develop...
£30000 - £45000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: C# .NET Server Side De...
£21000 - £25000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: Graduate QA/Graduate T...
£30000 - £35000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: PHP Developer (MySQL, ...