World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Images of 'Amazon's Tiananmen'

Peru accused of cover-up after indigenous protest ends in death at Devil's Bend

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

The bloodied face of a protester as behind him fellow protestors are arrested by police

The bloodied face of a protester as behind him fellow protestors are arrested by police

First, the police fire tear gas, then rubber bullets. As protesters flee, they move on to live rounds. One man, wearing only a pair of shorts, stops to raise his hands in surrender. He is knocked to the ground and given an extended beating by eight policemen in black body-armour and helmets.

Demonstrators getting worked-over by the rifle butts and truncheons of Peru's security forces turn out to be the lucky ones, though. Dozens more were shot as they fled. You can see their bullet-ridden bodies, charred by a fire that swept through the scene of the incident, which has since been dubbed "the Amazon's Tiananmen".

The events of Friday, 5 June, when armed police went to clear 2,000 Aguaruna and Wampi Indians from a secluded highway near the town of Bagua Grande, are the subject of a heated political debate. They have sparked international condemnation and thrown Peru's government into crisis.

Yet until today, details were shrouded in mystery. Now, pictures have emerged. They were taken at the scene by two Belgian aid workers, Marijke Deleu and Thomas Quirynen, and provide compelling details of the chaotic confrontation that killed a reported 60 people, many of them unarmed, with vast numbers still unaccounted for.

"At first, we saw police firing guns and tear gas at a mass of protesters," said Ms Deleu, who reached the highway at 7am, an hour after heavily armed police arrived at the location, 870 miles north of Lima. "Then we saw them beating and kicking people detained on the ground. Later, they shot people in the back as they started fleeing."

A dossier of photographs, many too graphic to be printed in this newspaper, will be shown to MPs at the House of Commons on Monday by Ms Deleu and Mr Quirynen, who are volunteers for Catapa, a Flemish organisation supporting indigenous communities in Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala.

Called Death at Devil's Bend, it attempts to explain what happened when police tried to evict the indigenous tribespeople, who had been blockading the road for several weeks in protest at new laws allowing energy and mining companies to exploit swaths of their ancestral homelands.

One series shows police stopping a passing ambulance. They force four injured protesters out of the vehicle, and beat them for several minutes, claiming, without any apparent justification, that their vehicle was carrying concealed weapons. Another, taken later in the day shows rows of wounded being treated in local hospitals. Nineteen are at Bagua Grand; 47 in Bagua Chica. Many have heavy bruising, and bandages covering bullet wounds.

"Several people said they had been shot while they were fast asleep," said Ms Deleu. "They claim the police woke them up by opening fire. One of the bodies had a bullet wound in his shoulder, which suggested to me that he'd been shot while lying down."

Further pictures, which will only fuel rumours of a government-orchestrated cover-up, show twisted corpses of native Indians lying by the side of the road. When tribal leaders tried to collect them, they came under fire and were refused access. By the next day, the corpses had disappeared.

The Peruvian President, Alan Garcia, has claimed 32 people were killed in the incident, of which 23 were police officers. However human rights lawyers and news reports put the number of confirmed deaths at closer to 60, and say hundreds are still missing.

Until this week, many international observers have been unable to visit the region because of a curfew. Pressure groups have accused security forces of burying and burning corpses to hide the extent of the death toll.

"There needs to be an independent investigation to establish exactly what happened," said Jonathan Mazower of Survival International, which will today publish Ms Deleu and Mr Quirynen's dossier on its website. "Our initial reaction to these dramatic photographs is that they may provide the first impartial account of what actually went on."

The pictures emerged as Alberto Pizango, the head of Aidesep, the organisation representing 56 of Peru's indigenous tribes, arrived in Nicaragua, after being granted political asylum. Last week, he was prosecuted for "sedition, conspiracy and rebellion".

Meanwhile Mr Garcia has been forced to suspend the introduction of laws allowing foreign companies to exploit the rainforest. His Prime Minister Yehude Simon resigned on Monday, joining populist minister Carmen Vildoso, who quit last week during a general strike in protest at the incident.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

amazon censorship
[info]monkeys69 wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 07:24 am (UTC)
why are some pictures too graphic to print? all over the world news stations and papers print pictures us english deem 'too graphic' surely if an incident has taken place then the pictures should bear witness to it...? why do you feel that people are not adult enough to view them, and no it has nothing to do with some sick voyerism
Re: amazon censorship
[info]lady_icedragon wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 08:21 am (UTC)
Some of us would like to view the photos, but do not want to see those that are particularly gory - and I do not think that has anything to do with being 'adult'. I am sure many people feel the same way. (I think this paper goes further in publishing graphic content than many other sites and publications - both in language and images)

To separate this out would require a separate set of photos, for those who want to 'opt-in' to see the more graphic content. But to even offer that feature does feel like sick voyeurism.
Re: amazon censorship - [info]dydor - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:44 pm (UTC)
The photos are available on the internet. They show soldiers ripping open stomachs, shooting people in the eye and elsewhere in the head, it shows children being hurled over cliffs. There are numerous sites. Use your googles for Alberto Pizango, Amazonians and Garcia, war in Amazon 2009, etc. The crimes committed by the vile Garcia government reflect those of other dictatorships, from Iran's election and firing on protestors to the corrupt W Bush's Abu Gharib prison. Even the photos Obama does not want the world to see are available, but Garcia's carnage is far more odious as his armed thugs went after those who were defenseless and attacked boys carrying wooden spears. It is time for Garcia to flee one more time.
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 11:59 am (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]arthur_ide - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 02:51 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 03:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]arthur_ide - Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 03:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Monday, 29 June 2009 at 03:11 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]arthur_ide - Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]arthur_ide - Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 03:56 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 12:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]arthur_ide - Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 03:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: amazon censorship - [info]doru001 - Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 04:40 pm (UTC) Expand
Amazon's Tiananmen
[info]barneyson wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 08:36 am (UTC)
So Tiananmen has indelibly entered the international lexicon. Yet Beijing still avoids all mention of it. It just goes to show - the harder you try to stifle the truth, the stronger it becomes.....
They should have learned from the Iraqis
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
Living over the US's oil or other resources is just asking for trouble.
Re: They should have learned from the Iraqis
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:47 pm (UTC)
True in part--but the greatest offender is Shell Oil (incorporated in the UK with its corporate headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands) and Argentine Oil, followed by PetroPeru that is already racked with scandal as Leon (and his daughter who sits in the Peru Congress) are deeply involved in graft and corruption to siphon off the profits for their own base desires.
Peru
[info]jocelynlamont wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
Why was there no UN nation sending over airplanes to stop what was going on? What class of United Nations have we. Utterly useless - evidence at Gaza was enough. Basically humans at a deep level of consciousness, taught the folly of religions, are complacent about the loss of life. This is the loss of rare and valuable genetic human life and sense of freedom. It is noticeable too that humans are jealous of nations, indigenous or complete where health and physical beauty reigns - the "ashkenazi" jew with all his european defects enjoys killing the indigenous handsome arabs and these governments dealing with European and the US enjoy killing the free indigenous citizens they are taught to be afraid of by the US and the UK, whose paranoid sense of self and empire enables them try to control the world.
Re: Peru
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:50 pm (UTC)
The UN is a useless and worthless pawn of the USA, UK, Germany, France and Japan. It does nothing that will not upset the Big 5 who have permanent seats on the Security Council. The USA and UK are primarily responsible for the atrocities in the Amazons, as both governments continue to support the dictator Alan Garcia and the radicals who support him while Peru continues its racist policy of disenfranching the indigenous people.
Remember Sendero Luminoso?
[info]jinglebunny wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 09:38 am (UTC)
This is why, for a while, Guzman and his Peruvian Communist Party Shining Path militia had a lot of support from a lot of people, especially in indigenous rural areas.

Perhaps it's time to label the Peruvian government a "state sponsor of terrorism" and treat them accordingly.

And identify the multinationals who've been filling President Garcia's bank account and bring them before an international tribunal.
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso?
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:58 pm (UTC)
Peru is a primary state sponsor of terrorism--against its own people. Like the USA the bulk of its tax revenue goes for a totally corrupt military and police force. Little is done for education (I have a nephew in Peru who has had four years of the English language and does not know the days of the week, months of the year, or how to count to 100 in English). The teachers are notoriously bad (when I applied to teach English at Universidad el Senor de Sapain, Universidad Cesar Vellijo, Universidad Catolica, and others, I was either told I was over educated (I have earned ten doctorates) or was a "threat to the other faculty"--thus teachers have at best an MA, but most have a BA, while in the public and private schools the giant share only have completed secondary education. Math is weak, history is about Peru, music is Peruano, and those who get a basic education seek (BA) seek to go to UK, USA, Canada or Spain to pursue additional education and cannot use the language efficiently.

Housing is costly--a lot of about 20 x 100 m costs $100,000 in the provinces--so many families live together in one room; hunger is common, and in Puno children are dying from the cold while Garcia and his government live in palaces and eat regularly. Crime is a daily event, and murder merits at most 20-30 years in prison, while rape is rejected as a crime by the police, theft is hourly and if the thief is over 50 that person is told to go home and pray, as the government controls and is controlled by the churches: Roman Catholic, Episcopal/Anglican, evangelical which demands total allegiance and offers nothing and yet is a major part of the curriculum.

Nothing will change until Peru enters the secular world, dump TLC (NAFTA), and takes charge of its own natural resources, cutting military spending to help the poor, and training competent people so that the nation is no longer a servant to USA interests.
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]arthur_ide - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 02:58 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 04:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]arthur_ide - Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 03:13 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 05:02 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]arthur_ide - Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 05:42 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Remember Sendero Luminoso? - [info]doru001 - Saturday, 27 June 2009 at 05:54 pm (UTC) Expand
Peru
[info]jocelynlamont wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 09:39 am (UTC)
Why did the UN not intervene - infact their utter uselessness has already been witnessed this year in Gaza. It is evident that people deep in their consciousness trained by religions have no conscience beyond their own existence - infact one can suggest that the physical beauty and freedom of the indigenous peoples of this worl including the Arabs rouses the jealousy of Western "civilization" - the Israeli likes to kill the Arab and the UK and USA have trained many foreign armies in utterly ruthless murder of their own people.
Re: Peru
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 12:42 pm (UTC)
What on earth has any of this got to do with Israel or the Arabs?!

I wish people like you - and there is a depressingly large number of you on the Indie threads - would stop trying to link and conflate *every single issue and event*, anywhere in the world, with the Arab-Israeli problem!

There are bulletin boards and discussion forums by the *thousands* covering that issue, where you can bang on - and on - about it to your heart's content.

But when you try to hijack a thread on a *completely different topic* just to ride your favourite hobby horse, you come across as a single-issue fanatic, and someone who does not actually *care* about the victims in this story at all, and whose remarks are therefore not only completely irrelevant but also rather callous.

Stay on topic or get off the thread, you silly woman!

However, that being said, I agree with your comments about the UN - they show themselves to be utterly inept and impotent in situations like this; UN = Useless Numpties.
Peru
[info]jocelynlamont wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 09:50 am (UTC)
Why did the UN not intervene - infact their utter uselessness has already been witnessed this year in Gaza. It is evident that people deep in their consciousness trained by religions have no conscience beyond their own existence - infact one can suggest that the physical beauty and freedom of the indigenous peoples of this worl including the Arabs rouses the jealousy of Western "civilization" - the Israeli likes to kill the Arab and the UK and USA have trained many foreign armies in utterly ruthless murder of their own people.
Re: Peru
[info]ganef wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 10:00 am (UTC)
It did not take long to bring in Israel into a story about a south American country. How a tiny country, the size of Wales, with a population of 7 million (20% Muslim) does this is a mystery to me?
Re: Peru - [info]doru001 - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 11:09 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Peru - [info]doru001 - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Peru - [info]raymondode - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 11:26 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Peru - [info]arthur_ide - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC) Expand
American involvement
[info]thomohawk wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 10:34 am (UTC)
The key passage in this article is "when police tried to evict the indigenous tribespeople, who had been blockading the road for several weeks in protest at new laws allowing energy and mining companies to exploit swaths of their ancestral homelands". This refers to a free trade agreement that was initiated against the will of the electorate with the US & no doubt down the barrell of a gun via the World Bank or the IMF in order to 'service' or to be granted a strings-attached loan. US policies in South America have been disgusting, following the Friedmanite doctrine at the expense of the poor. The ultimate ambition of course is for a free trade area stretching from Alaska to Argentina & Chile, which would allow mainly American corporations to exploit resources & cheap labour. The Friedman shock doctrine has already been implemented in Argentina, Brazil, Chile & Bolivia via repressive regimes that were supported wholeheartedly by US administrations. The blowback of these policies has only recently been felt as populations in these countries have elected left-leaning parties into power, particularly in Bolivia where Morales reversed corporation & land laws & who enjoys an approval rating that is the best in Latin America & could only be dreamed of by Gordon Brown.
Re: American involvement
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:09 pm (UTC)
An excellent response, as the USA is primarily responsible for feeding the overwhelming greed of Garcia who now will do anything to filter more money from the USA into his own pockets. Born in Iowa (and initially educated there), I left the USA disgusted with the holocaust the USA has pursued in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere (but that is USA history from the Philippines and Panama in the 19th century to Vietnam today), and fled to Peru as USA forces killed women and children, built secret torture prisons from Iraq to Siberia, Poland to Peru, etc, and am saddened that this greed has spilled over into Peru--a once free and proud nation. NAFTA serves only USA interest, and works against everyone else (including Canada that cannot export its timber into the USA without a war of words), and does nothing for the Peru economy but extend tokenism. The USA's thoroughly corrupt CIA overthrew (on the orders of Henry Kissinger) the legally elected government of Salvador Isabelino Allende Gossens, a phsycian who served as the President of Chile from November 4, 1970 until the U.S. backed September 11, 1973 coup d'etat that ended his democratically elected Popular Unity government. The USA backed Pinochet, and other dictators around the world, installing Saddam Hussein under Reagan with Rumsfeld raising Hussein to Iraq's president. Now, the USA is supporting Garcia who is among the worse dictators, but then the USA championed mass murderer Alberto Fujimori and his daughter and son who will in a short time become presidents and dictators of Peru. While foreign interests continue to control Peru there will be no peace in Peru and the Amazonians will remain targets for a bloated military loyal to Garcia.
More Sand River than Tiananmen
[info]bobav wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 10:50 am (UTC)
Less a Tiananmen than Sand River or Wounded Knee. This was not a massacre undertaken against those who demanded democratic reforms and who were of the same racial/cultural background/s as the perpetrators, but one against those who stood in the way of the multinationals exploitation of resources and land grabbing capitalization of indigenous homelands.
where's the truth??
[info]tomtom70 wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 12:17 pm (UTC)
"amazon's tiananmen" what a stupid headline!! the opposition was crushed in China, but in Peru they "won". the prime minister resigned and Parliament overturned the horrible decrees on their land. journalists in Peru say they found no evidence of further killings of natives as you suggest here. police officers held as hostages where tortured, maimed and killed. of course it is very difficult to know the truth, hidden somewhere in the middle of all this mess. another irony: nicaragua's Ortega grants asylum to an indian after crushing the miskitos in the 80's...
Re: where's the truth??
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:16 pm (UTC)
It would help if you read more closely papers other than the tabloids. Simon resigned as prime minister of Congress, but only when he was able to broker a temporary peace. Parliament was forced to overturn the decrees depriving the Amazonians of their land out of fear of future bloodshed. What you claim to be "journalists in Peru" are self-made for the most part, and the greatest number work for El Comercia, La Industria, RRP, etc--and are recipients of government subsides--so similar to the rantings on Fox News--lacking credibility. The police were not held "as hostages" nor "tortured, maimed and killed" but died in armed conflict with the Amazonians. I live here. I watched. I have no time for Ortega as he has denied human rights to the women of his nation, but he granted asylym to Alberto Pizango, the head of Aidesep, to embarrass Yehude Simon and Alan Garcia after Bolivia, Argentina and Brasil refused such a humanitarian act. While 23 police did die, over 200 Amazonians were ambused and killed, with bodies of women and children thrown off cliffs. Your history of South America is weak, and your repetition of the official Garcia line on this tragedy is obvious.
Rights - for whom?
[info]ambricourt wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC)
Ambricourt

Again indigenous people are subject to the rapacity of international corporations. My understanding is that Canadian and American corporations are responsible for the real, or potential, devastation of the aborignal people's homeland. It's been going on for decades and has contributed to guerrilla/"terrorist" protest: poor and frightened people have no other way of attempting to protect their living-space.

Who remembers Rio Tinto and Bougainville? Who cares?

What reports circulate about Canadian destruction of native peoples' habitat? Demure democratic Canada is home to several of the world's most destructive mining companies, both in Canada - especially Alberta - and around the world.

And Australia? The take-over of aboriginal land and resources is a tale too terrible to be told.

During a previous presidency, Peru's Alan Garcia cooperated with multinational corporations to pillage his country. Now back in power, he is again their tool.

NAME THE CORPORATIONS. NAME THE CEOs AND CONTACT PERSONS. PUBLISH PHOTOGRAPHS OF THEM, not dead natives.

And when will a courageous journalist write about the corporate practice of destroying aboriginal peoples and their habitat in diferent parts of the world? He might start by googling John Perkins.com to glimpse how things have been done behind the "democratic" stage-scenery.

You are mis-informed
[info]jacksondevive wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:35 pm (UTC)
I am sorry you got your information wrong. While I am against what happened, and the law that provoked this, the police were only responding. I was there. I saw it. I saw the natives, the darker skinned locals, throwing what looked like home made spears, and shooting home made bow and arrows, and using these sling shots things. I with the police had not been there, but I promise you the protester were absolutely NOT peaceful. They started with the violence first. I'm sorry but to compare this to Tiananmen, is obsurd, ignorant, and stinks of a limited education. But hey at least you have a glorifying headline.
Re: You are mis-informed
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:22 pm (UTC)
Where were you. I am there. The weapons thrown were wooden spears that shattered when they hit the ground. And the defenders of the Amazon were not all "darker skinned locals" as the Amazonians also have white people (I am very white), and some did use sling shots as none had guns (but a few do now, thankfully). The protesters were peaceful--they blocked the highway so Shell Oil and Oil Argentina could not get through to rape their land, they refused food to the miners who wanted to strip mine the lush vegetation and further end the rain forests. The first to shoot was a 22 year old "police" officer--at a pregnant woman. If you were truly there, why not write about the police officers in full uniform throwing people over the cliff? Is you were truly there, why not recount the heliocopters shooting at the police from the safety of the airspace between them and the people who owned the land for generations?
The horros of the misrule of Alan Garcia are unknown
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 02:38 pm (UTC)
to the world. The national police attempted to remove the local Amazonians from the highway that was allowing Shell Oil to rape and pillage and land they had lived on for generations without compensation. The police, armed thugs, fired on the crowd protesting, killing women and children whom the police threw over the cliff to 400 feet below, and assassinated hundreds of men. Garcia mourned 23 of these thugs being executed in retaliation as Garcia is attempting to restore his tarnished image. He had been president before Fujimori (who was tried, convicted, and sentenced to under 30 years in prison for crimes against humanity, sending death squads to kill over 2000 students and professors, among others, after suspending the Peru Constitution and its Congress and ruling worse than anyone in Peru history).

Garcia has been a continuing embarrassment--he had a record inflation of over 7649% in 1986, and his cummulative inflation before he fled in disgrace (first to Guatamala, then to France) was 2,200,200% (which is even recorded on wikipedia.com) One of the largest landowners on the coast of Peru, he has a colored past that nears the atrocities of Fujimori (when not raiding the Peru Treasury to send his children to USA schools, so that Keiko could ultimately sit with her uncle and mother in Congress [and now run for the presidency to pardon her father]). Under Garcia's orders, the army and police were told to "shoot them [the Amazonians] in the head" and leave no survivors. I live now in Peru near the Amazons, and the sky was black with smoke as military and police heliocoptors filled the airwavs and shot at the civilians indiscriminately. Garcia should be tried, sentenced, convicted and imprisoned for crimes against humanity, while Alberto Pizango, the only hero of this dark time and of the people of the Amazon merits the Peace Prize and worldwide acclamation for standing up against the tyrant Garcia and his gaggle of goons.
[info]stevejones1234 wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:27 pm (UTC)
Massacres seem the only things Alan Garcia is capable of organizing.
Photos of the real conflict
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 03:34 pm (UTC)
While Garcia has his apologists, the photos of the war between armed police and stick-carrying Amazonians who were fired on from heliocopters, etc. can be seen at:

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2009/2009-06-15-02.asp (environmental news)

http://amazonwatch.org/peru-protests.php

Even the bishops say it is genocide. Peru's Health Ministry found high levels of several heavy metals in the blood of the Achuar people living along the Corrientes River in northern Peru. Experts say that the metals (which can cause neurological problems) probably came from water pumped into streams and the river as a byproduct of oil drilling. See: http://www.wcr.ab.ca/news/2009/0601/peru060109.shtml

video from an anthropologist: http://memeticshift.com/

police beating and kicking unarmed civilians: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2009/2009-06-06-01.asp

jacksondevive has no idea of what he was talking about, and I seriously doubt he was there. The police invaded private homes and set them ablaze, forcing fire even on to the clothing of children: http://intercontinentalcry.org/police-violently-attack-peaceful-indigenous-blockade-in-peru/
Re: Photos of the real conflict
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 05:09 pm (UTC)
Thanks for enriching the consistently poor coverage of Latin American affairs in the British mainstream press.
Re: Photos of the real conflict - [info]arthur_ide - Friday, 19 June 2009 at 11:02 pm (UTC) Expand
Garcia Suspended From Putting Forward Laws Allowing Foreign Companies To EXPLOIT...."
[info]rontruth wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 04:42 pm (UTC)
Within the words of the sentence taken from the article about the removal of people who are likely the descendants of a people who have likely inhabited the land they hold sacred, lies the heart of the real problem. Unfettered capitalism is a sin against Almighty God! His Son, Yeshua Ha-Maschiach (Jesus, the Messiah) once asked some religious leaders of His day on earth, "Why do you break the Commandment of God by your traditions?"

But, I keep forgetting that, to most "Christians," their religion seems only to be just another religion of either daily or weekly sanctimonious ceremonies, with verbalized meanings and participation in rituals that symbolize penitence and supposed "forgiveness," but with only a corporate-style mass grouping of "believers" who, having gone through their appointed rituals, feel freed. On such an emotional high, they leave, go home, and move quickly on to the next pleasure. But, where is the real change in their lives? Where is the boring-made-sweet that Jesus preached and lived? Every soldier who "did his ordered duty to his country," is as personally guilty as those who ordered him to do what he did to these innocent people. This indictment includes those "foreign companies" at whose behest these atrocities have been committed!
This is a horrendous act of brutality
[info]mizkm wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 05:44 pm (UTC)
I feel shame for the country of Peru and will not now travel there. I cannot support this kind of horror with my tourist dollars.
M
Re: This is a horrendous act of brutality
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Friday, 19 June 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC)
Thank you. Until all people and all nations boycott Peru and Peru made goods, there will never be freedom or equity in Peru. The people here make less than $200 a month as day laboring Chollos carrying bricks on their back, but the white minority in Merck SA, Banco Continental, Banco del Credito de Peru, etc. make over $2000 a month. The law mandates an 8 hour day, but few, very few work only 8 hours, whereas the rule is 10-14 hours a day, six days a week under the worse conditions. Starvation is common and the children in the mountains are dying of the cold weather.
peru
[info]powderblue8 wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:41 pm (UTC)
these people are heroes,

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date