World

8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

It's payback time, Obama tells banks

Delivering a bruising lecture to Wall Street, President tells financial institutions not to stand in the way of reforms designed to prevent a repeat of the credit crunch

By Stephen Foley in New York

President Obama speaking at Federal Hall in New York yesterday. 'Many of the firms returning to prosperity owe a debt to the American people,' he said

EPA

President Obama speaking at Federal Hall in New York yesterday. 'Many of the firms returning to prosperity owe a debt to the American people,' he said

President Barack Obama went to Wall Street to tell the nation's bankers that they "owe a debt to the American people" and must stop getting in the way of reforms needed to prevent a repeat of the credit crisis.

Exactly after a year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers sparked a full-blown financial panic, the President warned that a "return to normalcy cannot lead to complacency", and he demanded that banks curb excessive bonuses and submit to a raft of new regulations.

He attacked the purveyors of "revisionist histories, or selective memory, who don't seem to recall what we went through last year" and added: "To them I'd say only this: do you believe that the absence of sound regulation one year ago was good for the financial system? Do you believe the resulting decline in markets and wealth and employment was good for the economy?"

The President adopted a lecturing tone in front of representatives of the finance industry at the Federal Hall building, a stone's throw from the New York Stock Exchange. And well he might.

One year on, the government still owns several giant financial institutions (including the insurer AIG and mortgage finance houses Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) and holds powerful stakes in many of the biggest US banks. The financial system was brought to the brink of collapse after years of profligate lending ended suddenly in a failure of confidence and then panic, only to be rescued by trillions of dollars in taxpayer bailouts.

But the President's appearance in the heart of the US financial capital was not just meant to vent some of the public fury against Wall Street, which has been lobbying against greater regulation with increasing force this year. Amidst the bruising battle over healthcare reform, which has whittled away his approval rating, Mr Obama is attempting to shift the focus to his achievements in steering the financial system away from the brink.

"The fact is, many of the firms that are now returning to prosperity owe a debt to the American people," he said. "Though they were not the cause of the crisis, American taxpayers through their government took extraordinary action to stabilise the financial industry. It is neither right nor responsible after you've recovered with the help of your government to shirk your obligation to the goal of wider recovery."

On the floor of the Stock Exchange, traders audibly groaned at parts of the speech, but there was also applause at the end as he promised reforms that "reflect the painful but important lessons we've learned", and that Washington, too, will change the way it does business, by making sure that it doesn't create new spending programmes without working out how to pay for them.

"Restoring a willingness to take responsibility – even when it is hard – is at the heart of what we must do ... and you do not have to wait for a new law to do that. You don't have to wait to use plain language in your dealings with consumers. You don't have to wait to put the 2009 bonuses of your senior executives up for a shareholder vote."

The administration has proposed a blizzard of new laws and rules to curb some of the excesses that led to the credit crisis, and a sweeping overhaul of the way banks are regulated. The President said that there should be no more banks like Lehman Brothers that are "too big to fail". When banks do become big, they will have to become much more conservative, and, should they get into trouble, there will be a new Wall Street-funded scheme for winding them down in an orderly way.

"With so much at stake, we should not be forced to choose between allowing a company to fall into a rapid and chaotic dissolution that threatens the economy and innocent people, or forcing taxpayers to foot the bill," Mr Obama said.

This was the choice facing the Treasury and the US Federal Reserve a year ago when a run on Lehman Brothers drained it of the resources to survive. Although previously major financial institutions had been saved, the Bush administration said there would be no public money this time. It was an attempt to remind Wall Street investors that they must live with the consequences of banks' actions – except that the resulting panic forced a change of course, and other tottering institutions were pumped full of taxpayer money.

The President said yesterday that some of that cash has now begun flowing back to the Treasury, although he warned taxpayers not to expect to get all their money back.

At a glance: The proposals

*A Wall Street-funded system for winding down big firms that get into trouble.

*Greater powers for shareholders to limit executive bonuses.

*New panel of regulators to monitor the financial system as a whole.

*International co-operation to prevent a "race to the bottom" in regulation.

*A new consumer watchdog to ensure mortgages and investments are fair and safe.

*Requirement that banks must hold more capital aside to protect against losses.

*Banks must use central exchanges for risky derivatives trading.

*No more financial firms, such as hedge funds, operating without regulatory scrutiny.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

THE BANKS TOLD ME TO SAY THIS: OBAMA
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 07:07 am (UTC)
Who does he think he's kidding? The Central Banks have been running the world since 1913. If he really wanted to "stick-it" to the Central Banks he should outlaw the "Fractional Banking System" and produce REAL money rather than borrowing it from Central Banks who conjure it up from thin-air and then charge us all interest.
Re: THE BANKS TOLD ME TO SAY THIS: OBAMA
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
spot on . well said!!!
why is he appointing people from wall street??? he has surrounded himself with people from wall street and banks!!! intentional ?? i don´t think so. perhaps we should start asking questions from the bankers!!
Re: THE BANKS TOLD ME TO SAY THIS: OBAMA
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 08:05 am (UTC)
and abolish federal reserve. its a private bank with secret shareholders who raking it from the misery of the nation.
It's payback time all right, but not how you think - I
[info]fin_d_empire wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Obama has already paid Wall Street back handsomely to the tune of trillions of taxpayer bucks that just disappeared down the toilet without the slightest effect on spiraling unemployment and foreclosures. Paid back for what, you ask? Remember Obama's lavish election campaign, all those expensive ads and billboards produced by the country's top ad agencies? Who do you think paid for it?

Big donors are the key to Obama's record haul


International Herald Tribune, August 5, 2008

Given his decision not to accept public financing, Obama is counting on his bundlers to help him raise $300 million for his campaign for the general election and another $180 million for the Democratic National Committee.

An analysis of campaign finance records shows that about two-thirds of his bundlers are concentrated in four major industries: law, securities and investments, real estate and entertainment. Lawyers make up the largest group at about 130, with many working for firms that also have lobbying arms. At least 100 Obama bundlers are top executives or brokers from investment businesses - nearly two dozen work for financial titans like Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. About 40 others come from the real-estate industry.

What did the Wall Street crooks buy with their $100's of millions of campaign donations? Well Obama's cabinet for one:

Rubinomics Recalculated in New Economic Team


The president-elect's choices for his top economic advisers - Timothy F. Geithner as Treasury secretary, Lawrence H. Summers as senior White House economics adviser and Peter R. Orszag as budget director -are past protégés of Mr. Rubin, who held two of those jobs under President Bill Clinton. Even the headhunters for Mr. Obama have Rubin ties: Michael Froman, Mr. Rubin's chief of staff in the Treasury Department who followed him to Citigroup, and James P. Rubin, Mr. Rubin's son.

Instead of deregulation, Mr. Obama has sworn to usher in a period of re-regulation, to avoid the freewheeling risks that Citigroup and the rest of the financial industry undertook after Mr. Rubin, with Mr. Summers, helped tear down the regulatory walls between banks, brokerages and insurance companies, and freed them to trade in unregulated and little-understood derivatives worth trillions of dollars.

What else did they get? A vast ocean of money that nobody really knows where it went and how much it was, since it was all pipelined through the Fed's totally opaque and oversight-free discretion. That's why Bloomberg took the US government to court BTW:
Government loans, spending or guarantees to rescue the U.S. financial system total more than $12.8 trillion since the international credit crisis began in August 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg as of March 31. The total includes about $2 trillion on the Fed's balance sheet.

The Freedom of Information Act obliges federal agencies to make government documents available to the press and public. The Bloomberg lawsuit, filed in New York, doesn't seek money damages.

Not just Bloomberg but also the GAO and Congress are troubled by the secrecy around Obama's payback for his Wall Street backers:
Where Did that Bank Bailout Go? Watchdogs Aren't Sure
[info]herbtibb wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 08:27 am (UTC)
Americans seem to have no savings right now, so Obama Vs The Big Mac begins right now!
It's payback time all right, but not how you think - II
[info]fin_d_empire wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 08:52 am (UTC)
Isn't $12.8 trillion a bit steep for a few hundred million of campaign cash, you might ask. After all, with the gaping crater he blasted in the budget and his utter failure to protect jobs or homes, Obama is guaranteeing that he will go down in history as the president who turned the US into a 3rd-world country.

Dumbya is already smiling again, knowing that the paltry trillions he blew on his wars and tax cuts for the rich will pale in comparison. He can already see Obama becoming the most reviled president in US history as the US economy plunges into a double-dip recession, the US dollar loses its reserve currency role, and US troops are defeated by the Taliban.

So isn't Obama selling himself a bit short? Hell no, and you know why? Because after being plucked out of Chicago's gutter politics and groomed for greatness by warmongering GOP Senator Rick Lugar and being financed to the gills by Wall Street, Obama was still lagging behind McCain one month before the election. Obama was about to be beaten by a dinosaur that everyone thought was a sure loser. He was going to let the military-industrial complex and Wall Street down big time.

So Wall Street did him one last big favor: It stood back and let Lehman collapse, triggering the financial crash that finally catapulted Obama into the White House.

Here's the proof:


Paulson was pleading US banks to buy Lehman and even tried to foist it on Barclay but no dice. The banks knew that McCain wouldn't be able to bail them out the way Obama could with all his hope and change bullshit as a smokescreen.

Here's a closer look at how the Lehman collapse won the election for Obama:



Wall Street knows exactly why Obama gave that September 15 speech: To thank them from the bottom of his heart for the great sacrifice they made for him and to assure them that he would remain their faithful, lying, deceiving sockpuppet to the bitter end.

[info]cm999 wrote:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 11:40 am (UTC)
We all know what is going to happen is nothing. THe world leaders all want international agreement. That wont be met so they will all blame each other and say they tried. So all that will happen is that the banks will go back to how they were only taking even bigger risks as they now know the govt will bail them out what ever it cost. Brilliant!!!! Im glad we spent billions doing this.
my comment keenan riggins
[info]krigg24 wrote:
Saturday, 19 September 2009 at 08:39 pm (UTC)
i think that obama is in the right for appointing the bankers of wallstreet. because i they are the ones holding all the money. i think that he should really stop holding back and stick it to the bankers and take some of there money away. and with there money use it to make the nation a better place.
greatness
[info]batotsai wrote:
Monday, 21 September 2009 at 12:16 am (UTC)
simply put, Bravo

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date