Jobs terminated as California goes bankrupt
Political stalemate on $12bn deficit forces Schwarzenegger to sack thousands of workers
EPA
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is struggling to prevent his administration from running out of money
Arnold Schwarzenegger has sent redundancy notices to 20,000 government employees and shut down California’s last remaining public works projects yesterday, as state politicians failed to pass a budget that will prevent his administration from running out of money.
The Governor of California, who is spending billions more each month than he can raise in taxes, has insufficient funds left to settle outstanding bills and is days away from being forced to start issuing “IOU” notes to creditors and civil servants.
The state senate has been unable to agree on a package of tax increases that will stave off bankruptcy. The administration is currently operating at a loss of $12bn (£8.4bn) a year – a figure that is rising exponentially and will hit $42bn next year.
Late on Monday night, with a proposed budget one vote short of the two-thirds majority it needs to pass, exhausted senators were sent home to sleep. They were ordered back to the chamber at 10am yesterday, and told that no one would be allowed to leave before a deal was reached.
“Bring a toothbrush,” the senate president Darrell Steinberg advised them. “I will not allow anyone to go home to resume their lives, or any other kind of normal business.”
Politicians had already spent the entire weekend in Sacramento trying to break the gridlock, with sometimes surreal results: at one point on Saturday, they were forced to surrender car keys to security guards, to ensure that no one took advantage of a short toilet break to run away. The tortured nature of proceedings, in the face of looming crisis, leaves California, one of the world’s wealthiest regions, on the brink of becoming the first state in US history to be declared insolvent.
Civil servants are already being forced to take two unpaid days off a month, while billions of dollars in income tax repayments have been frozen. State prisons are so underfunded that a court last week ordered the release of 55,000 inmates to ease overcrowding.
Maintenance work on California’s infrastructure has all but ceased – the last 275 projects will be halted this week – and the state’s falling credit-rating, has made it tricky for Mr Schwarzenegger to tide himself over by borrowing funds on Wall Street.
The crisis highlights the particular pressures that the economic crisis has wrought on a region where mass immigration places a disproportionate strain on public schools, prisons and hospitals. California has America’s second highest foreclosure rate after Nevada, with one in every 173 homes receiving a repossession notice last month. Income tax revenues are in steep decline, with unemployment at 9.3 percent. Though Governor Schwarzenegger has faced public criticism, he has only limited ability to manage finances thanks to California’s obsession with “direct democracy” in which small interest groups can enact laws by electoral “proposition”.
Property tax has been frozen for many homeowners since a proposition passed in the late 1970s. A separate measure, introduced in the 1980s, means that income tax cannot be raised without the agreement of two-thirds of the state’s lawmakers.
Meanwhile, previous borrowing means that roughly 10 per cent of all California’s cash is required to service its debt. A raft of other ballot measures control spending, meaning that only a quarter of Mr Schwarzenegger’s spending is considered “discretionary.” The rest has been “earmarked” for a particular cause.
The result is political gridlock. A minority of Republicans at the state senate and assembly, most of whom were elected on the back of “anti-tax” pledges, are able to block tax rises – while the majority of Democrats refuse to countenance spending cuts.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
I'd like to point out that over the past few years, the Democrats have already made spending cuts worth several billions of dollars, without new taxes. The Democrats are nevertheless willing to compromise further, accepting an additional 15 billion dollars of cuts in the current budget compromise, agreed to by the Democrats, Governor, and Republican leaders of each house. It is up to the Republican members to compromise, as their leaders have done.
The Independent
Jobs terminated as California goes bankrupt
By Guy Adams in Los Angeles
Wednesday, 18 February 2009
Dear Editor,
While public finances in California may be in dire straits, as in many other parts of the world and worsened by the on-going finance debacle, your correspondent does injustice to issue-based participatory democracy.
He writes that in California "small interest groups" can enact laws. This is incorrect. A person or group can make a proposal but before it goes onto the ballot (for plebiscite of the electorate) it must gather support of many thousands of citizens. Then the people must decide if they want to accept the proposal or not. Not only tax and finance but the whole range of state and local government policy can be tackled in this way. More detail may be found via the I&R - GB link below.
Prof. John G. Matsusaka of the Marshall School of Business and Law School at the University of Southern California writes, "A review of all initiatives approved since 1912 shows that no more than 32 percent of appropriations in the 2003-04 budget were locked in by initiatives, and initiatives placed only minimal constraints on the legislature's ability to raise revenue. Moreover, it seems likely that the legislature would have allocated much of the money to its dedicated purpose even if not required to do so by initiative. Initiatives do not appear to be a significant obstacle to balancing the state budget in California."
Regards,
Michael Macpherson
Dr. Michael Macpherson
Psycho-Social and Medical Research PSAMRA ~ Integral Studies
Guildford and Berlin
Founder
I&R - GB Citizens' Initiative and Referendum
Campaign for direct democracy in Britain
http://www.iniref.org/
But, nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
It is interesting to note that following the sterling work in lowering taxes achieved by citizen initiative referendums, together with similar action to mandate increases in government spending, it is not surprising that California faces bankruptcy. The problem, of course, is that the citizens have only achieved two of the three necessary changes needed to bring about real democracy. The third change needed is to mandate that any deficiency in public finances brought about by the implementation of the first two changes shall be funded from the sale of politicians assets.