World

6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 5°C

Obama tries to have it both ways with media

Press banned from photographing Sasha and Malia at the White House

By David Usborne, US Editor

Sasha Obama watches her father arrive on the South Lawn of the White House in a photograph the President's media handlers did not want published

AP

Sasha Obama watches her father arrive on the South Lawn of the White House in a photograph the President's media handlers did not want published

A free press is all well and good, but not when it comes to the children of President Barack Obama, who has introduced unprecedented rules about which pictures we see of Sasha, eight, and Malia, 10, and which ones we don't.

It was several weeks ago, for instance, when photographers on the White House grounds captured the President waving extravagantly at Sasha standing on the Truman Balcony. Great pictures, to be sure, but the press office instantly requested that news agencies not distribute them.

The Obamas are confronting the same dilemma that faced many first families before them. Nothing endears a nation to its leader more than family snapshots. Even Abraham Lincoln acquiesced to a portrait with his son Tad, eight, at a small table. Few photographs are more beloved than the one of JFK Jr and Caroline playing in the Oval Office. On the other hand, the President and the First Lady want to protect the girls from prying paparazzi.

Thus, all credentialed photographers have been told that the girls are fair game only when they are at formal events. Otherwise, prying lenses should stay away, even when they are on the White House grounds.

To reduce the market for paparazzi shots, the White House puts out photos taken by its own photographer. But these are posted only in low resolution. Editors who want to use them have to ask for a high resolution version and it is up to spokesman Robert Gibbs to grant or deny those requests.

If Mr Obama wants to protect the children from being exploited by a voracious modern-day media, he may find himself treading close to being accused of exploiting them himself, with such a controlled drip-drip of images designed to extract maximum political advantage at the lowest parental cost.

"He's going to try to have it both ways until and unless people start to question his value system and his sincerity in playing that role," notes Gerald Shuster, a political communications expert at the University of Pittsburgh.

The girls, meanwhile, may be discovering the downside of having to stay clear of the paparazzi, having to think twice, for example, before venturing even as far as their climbing frame.

The President whose name is attached to the Truman balcony brought his daughter to Washington, but Margaret Truman loathed the bubble-life she found herself living thanks to her father, Harry, and famously called the executive mansion the Great White Jail.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

they are MINORS
[info]rikyrah wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 01:34 am (UTC)
Please explain to me what the news media needs with stories about two CHILDREN?
Muz
[info]muzikal203 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 02:53 am (UTC)
Look, they are little girls and the Obamas want them to have as normal a life as possible, that means NOT seeing their faces on the front of tabloids or on internet gossip sites. Respect their privacy and be glad they are releasing ANY photos of them.
Goodness
[info]muzikal203 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 02:54 am (UTC)
Look, they are little girls and the Obamas want them to have as normal a life as possible, that means NOT seeing their faces on the front of tabloids or on internet gossip sites. Respect their privacy and be glad they are releasing ANY photos of them.
Having it both ways
[info]had_it wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 07:25 am (UTC)
He wants to both satisfy the public's desire to see these kids AND give them as normal a childhood as possible? How odd. What's he trying to do, be both a good parent and a good public figure? Surely the press will put a stop to that nonsense, won't they?
The media is a pathologically obsessive monster
[info]slyfas wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
"He's going to try to have it both ways until and unless people start to question his value system and his sincerity in playing that role," notes Gerald Shuster, a political communications expert at the University of Pittsburgh.

This is pathetic. The guy has said from day one: keep off my children! To try to find an excuse for photographing his children by claiming he wants to have it both ways with the media is irresponsible. Don't the media practitioners have underage children of their own? How many reasonable persons among them would allow their children to become an object of media tit bits? Why are some people obsessed with stupidity like photographing children? What joy do they derive from that?

I am a reasonable man who is not interested a jot about gossips concerning children of stars or famous people. After all, what do these children do that all other children do not do everywhere in this world? For the life of me, let the children live and grow.
Same Old Same Old
[info]virginia_1976 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 10:38 am (UTC)
Chas and Di, Tony and Cherie, Gordon and Sarah, Call Me Dave and Sam ... didn't they and don't they have the same rules for their sprogs? In fact, it's only recently the Brown and Cameron children have been appearing in photos without their faces pixelled out.
Media whores can't expect to have healthy kids
[info]fin_d_empire wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 11:23 am (UTC)
Barack & Michelle shamelessly exploit their celebrity status, hiding behind their brain-dead cultish fan club in order to sell their liberal grassroots backers down the river, the better to serve the Wall Street crooks who financed Obama's campaign extravaganza and the Pentagon/neocon warmongers who propelled him out of the back alleys of Chicago into the Beltway limelight.

Obomber has sold out his political base and traded it for a gaggle of glazed-eyed drooling fans all begging for a new Camelot. The dems are more than eager to create a new royal dynasty now that the last Kennedy has one foot in the croak-hole.

So please bloody spare us the sympathy for these corrupt, warmongering media whores and their brats. The Obamas have no one to blame for their childrens' stunted growth but their own unbridled naked ambition, for which they have prostituted their own kids.
Re: Media whores can't expect to have healthy kids
[info]stembridge wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 12:45 pm (UTC)
What a thoughtful and well balanced response.
Free Press? Surely You Jest
[info]banderman wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
We don't have a free press in America. Where did you hear that rumor? The media is bought and paid for by the ruling elite to get their message out to their weak minded constituents.
Media
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 02:50 pm (UTC)
Paparazzi (and most of the media) are just parasitic vermin who are just out to make a quick few thousand dollars. That is the limit of their mentality and interest. You might just as well throw your kids into a shark pool. Look at how many people they have victimised and destroyed. The Pres. is quite correct in setting limits There is a Pres. and a First lady, I have not heard there are first kids too
Whiny Cry Babies...
[info]mimimason wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 09:09 pm (UTC)
Oh DO quit it with the whining media...and in Britain no less....dont you have a queen to pester?

How is this any different than Prince Charles asking that his kids get privacy. At the same time there will be times when the kids will be public. Bunch of greedy whiney snots!
Who gives a damn?
[info]bilejones wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 12:02 am (UTC)
It's the people that Obama is murdering around the World who matter, not his spawn.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date