Pay curbs plan for bankers
Conservative Republicans stall deal to bail out financial industry as McCain proposes $400,000 salary cap for senior executives
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Negotiators in Washington scrambled in vain late into the night to salvage a compromise deal aimed at bailing out American's financial industry after last-minute objections were raised by some conservative Republicans.
For most of yesterday, both sides on Capitol Hill seemed on course to announce a deal to make $700bn (£350bn) available to buy soured mortgage-related assets from financial institutions, though with several conditions attached, notably provisions to cap the future pay packages of the bank executives.
Markets soared on hopes that the outline deal would be announced at the conclusion of a meeting called by George Bush and attended by party leaders and both men hoping to succeed him.
Both candidates had put the issue of compensation at the top of their list of conditions. John McCain said: "The senior executives of any firm bailed out by Treasury should not be making more than the highest-paid government official." That would cap pay at the level of the US president, namely $400,000, but it remains to be seen if Congress will heed McCain's call to the letter.
Hopes of a deal being announced last night were scotched when Senator Richard Shelby, who has consistently opposed the package as originally proposed by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, abruptly appeared before cameras outside the White House insisting no such deal was close.
A sombre Barack Obama later said that he had arrived in Washington believing that a deal was close but "that something happened in the intervening hours". But he insisted the game was not over. "I think eventually we are going to get a deal but I think there is still some work that needs to be done."
Christopher Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, could not disguise his frustration after the White House meeting, saying the last minute complications made the effort look more like "a rescue plan for John McCain". He added: "It does no good to be distracted for two or three hours by political theatre." Another Democrat said: "We're trying to rescue the economy, not John McCain's campaign."
The position of Mr McCain remained opaque. He neither endorsed the plan nor specifically spoke against it.
The Arizona Senator, meanwhile, said that without a deal today he will not attend the first presidential debate scheduled to take place tomorrow evening. It was a high-risk gamble that risks backfiring on him. Disentangling what Senator McCain believes to be the best way forward on securing a bailout package and what he thinks might be best for his ailing presidential campaign was almost impossible.
The compromise being backed by Democrat leaders – and largely also by Mr Obama – includes several new conditions. Only a fraction of the money will be released upfront. An independent panel would be created to oversee its implementation. Members of Congress are acutely aware the proposed bailout, to be financed with taxpayers money, has triggered public outrage.
The issue of executive pay, and particularly golden parachutes, became one of banner importance to those who were sceptical that the government should hand out money without demanding something in return from the bankers whose investments have brought the economy to the precipice.
The final version of the package would be likely to include a phased schedule for releasing the $700bn as well as measures aimed at keeping homeowners in their homes even if they are struggling with payments. It is also likely that, for its money, the government will demand some equity stakes in the firms involved.
Mr Obama insisted yesterday that "not one dime" of the package go to rewarding CEOs whose decisions contributed to the meltdown.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments