World

Partly Sunny with Showers 13° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Schwarzenegger welcomes debate over legalising cannabis

Reuters

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said yesterday he welcomes a public debate on proposals to legalise and tax marijuana, which some suggest could provide a lucrative new revenue source for the cash-strapped state.

The Republican governor, whose term in office expires at the end of next year, was asked about the idea of treating pot like alcohol at an appearance in northern California to promote wildfire preparedness.

"No, I don't think it's time for that, but I think it's time for a debate," he said. "And I think we ought to study very carefully what other countries are doing that have legalised marijuana and other drugs, what affect it had on those countries, and are they happy with that decision."

The former Hollywood actor, who has admitted smoking marijuana in the past, cited his native Austria as a country where "they want to roll back some of the decisions that were made in European countries."

He said a decision to legalise marijuana, which has been outlawed in the United States since 1937, should not be made on the basis of raising revenues alone.

Schwarzenegger's comments come days after a statewide Field Poll found that 56 per cent of California voters support the idea of legalising cannabis for recreational use and taxing its proceeds.

A bill introduced in the state Legislature by Assembly man Tom Ammiano, a Democrat from San Francisco, would do just that - permitting taxed sales of marijuana to adults while barring sales to or possession by anyone under age 21. A similar regulatory structure already exists for alcoholic beverages.

Ammiano said his proposal would generate up to $1.3bn in revenue for the state, which faces another multibillion-dollar budget shortfall just weeks after a landmark deal closing a $42bn deficit.

He and others who support legalising cannabis say such a move also would improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes and would end environmental damage to public lands used for illicit cannabis cultivation.

But in 2004, Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have eased rules on how much medical marijuana patients can possess in California.

Voters in California, the nation's most populous state, became the first to approve the use of marijuana for medical purposes in 1996, putting the state at odds with federal law.

Under the Bush administration federal agents stepped up raids against medical marijuana dispensaries in California and other states that have passed similar laws.

But US Attorney General Eric Holder said in March that the Justice Department under President Barack Obama has no plans to prosecute such dispensaries in those states in the future. However, Obama, who also has acknowledged smoking cannabis in his younger days, recently dismissed the idea of legalising marijuana on a national level.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Bigger fools than we know them to be
[info]blastarrbxiii wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:55 am (UTC)
"He and others who support legalising cannabis say such a move also would improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes and would end environmental damage to public lands used for illicit cannabis cultivation. "

If these Americans can't see that the biggest crime generator in the United States of America is their Drug dependence/usage and whether they legalise part of it or not, this isn't going to clear things up down the line.
Then they are bigger fools than we know them to be.

"Environmental damage to public lands used for illicit cannabis cultivation." in the US.
Is akin to a drop of cooking fat, dripped off a greasy cheese burger on to a grain of sand on a beach that has a Million Barrels of crude oil from a wrecked oil tanker washing up on to it.
"Intent to supply...?
[info]voogshok wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 12:40 pm (UTC)
No no, officer, honest,
you know, because....

"this time it's personal"
Or maybe
[info]voogshok wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 12:58 pm (UTC)
"hashta la vista, baby"
Happy daze
[info]clothcap wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 02:13 pm (UTC)
Many people smoke in preference to alcohol. A good move considering the high toxicity and addictiveness of alcohol and the side effects like road accidents and violence compared to the low toxicity of hemp that is less harmless than aspirin. And no hangover.

It produces 10 times more biofuel than corn using less fertilizer. It can produces biodegradable plastic bags, better quality material than denim and better quality paper than the wood pulp industry- cheaper. More than 2000 other products.
http://hemp-resource.com/

Anti cancer research stymied by ostriches and fake media (like the bbc) scares moves ahead anyhow. It impedes progression as well as avoids the killer.
CC
Breast cancer:
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/news/archive/newsarchive/2007/november/18362440

Colon cancer:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cannabis%2Bcolon%2Bcancer

Leukemia:
http://www.labnews.co.uk/news_archive.php/987/5/cannabis-destroys-cancer-cells/

And much more if you care to search.

More:
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis.shtml
http://www.masscann.org

Hemp makes people happy and not just by inhaling the smoke. Industries could be (were) built on it.
Can't be having that in a socialist country now can we?
Softdrugs vs. harddrugs
[info]solipsistident wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:51 pm (UTC)
Here in Norway cannabis is usually seen as just as evil as heroin, cocaine, amphetamine etc.

That means that any thoughts of legalisation are considered to be heresy. However, cannabis is ready available from local dealers, and during periods it is sold openly at some places in Oslo.

The problem is the complete lack of control over groups using drugs, and dealers selling cannabis just as easily as the harder stuff. Young kids get easily dragged into such groups and are introduced to a variety of drugs. Sometimes the availibility of cannabis is problematic, but heroin etc. might be abundant at that time.

The result the last years was that Oslo had more deaths due to overdoses than the Netherlands, definitely not the most drug-free country.

It seems to me that legalisation is the only rational option. You cannot explain to youngsters that cannabis is dangerous, while at the same time allowing the much more dangerous harddrug alcohol to be sold openly. Once they have experienced (good!) cannabis, any such effort is just plain stupid. It undermines the credibility of the police and the entire political system.

But worse, the refusal to differentiate between cannabis and harddrugs has caused numerous youngsters to be introduced to highly addictive narcotics, and has caused numerous fatalities.

Any effort to avoid such fatalities seems to be on beforehand meaningless, if you cannot differentiate dangerous from relatively harmless narcotics. Furthermore, the recreational use of cannabis doesn't cause any serious problems and would cause even less problems if it can be done without danger of serious repercussions by the authorities.

Abuse of any substance should of course be avoided. Obviously current strategies to avoid abuse so far followed haven't worked. Time to try new strategies...
and then again....
[info]voogshok wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 01:49 pm (UTC)
Obviously....
"I'll be blow-back"

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date