Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

White House says Trump can choose who gets a press pass after CNN files lawsuit over Jim Acosta ban

CNN and Mr Acosta claim that his First and Fifth Amendments are being violated every day he is banned from the White House

Clark Mindock
New York
Wednesday 14 November 2018 21:51 GMT
Comments
Video explainer: How the Jim Acosta video was doctored

The White House has pushed back against a lawsuit filed by CNN over the revocation of reporter Jim Acosta's press pass, claiming that Donald Trump and his staff have the right to determine which journalists are given permanent access.

The cable news network is suing a number of members of the administration, including the president, after Mr Acosta’s was banned for what the White House has called inappropriatel behaviour during a press conference when an intern attempted to take a microphone away from him.

“The President and White House possess the same broad discretion to regulate access to the White House for journalists (and other members of the public) that they possess to select which journalists receive interviews, or which journalists they acknowledge at press conferences,” Justice Department lawyers said in a court filing.

The lawsuit filed by CNN and Mr Acosta alleges that their First and Fifth Amendment rights were violated when the White House decided to revoke the journalist’s pass, known as a Secret Service “hard pass”. The First Amendment of the United States ensures the right to free speech and the press, and the Fifth Amendment ensures the right to due process.

The lawsuit is set to have a hearing on Wednesday afternoon, and the case will be heard by Trump appointee Judge Timothy J Kelly.

Mr Acosta and CNN are asking Mr Kelly for a temporary restraining order, and a preliminary injunction so that the journalist can return to the White House immediately.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs are also seeking a court declaration that the president’s action was “unconstitutional, in violation of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment”.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Historically both Republican and Democratic administrations have had a permissive approach to press access, providing credentials to outlets both national and more obscure.

The case could have implications for other reporters in the White House, with CNN claiming that other networks and media outlets could be treated in the same way. The Trump administration - and the president himself - is known for its open disdain for sections of the press corps covering the executive branch of government.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in