World

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

156 dead as Muslim uprising hits China

Deep-seated ethnic tensions erupted into the deadliest outbreak of violence the country has seen since the Tiananmen Square massacre. Claire Soares reports

Protesters gather in Urumqi, the regional capital of Xinjiang province in western China

AP

Protesters gather in Urumqi, the regional capital of Xinjiang province in western China

The Chinese authorities yesterday blamed exiled Muslim Uighur separatists for trouble in the restive western province of Xinjiang which killed at least 156 people and injured hundreds more. But the government was in turn accused of heavy-handed repression which, according to the claim of one Uighur representative, may have left up to 400 people dead.

The violence, which may have been the deadliest in China since Tiananmen Square in 1989, began in the regional capital Urumqi on Sunday night when tensions between Uighurs and Han Chinese boiled over. State television showed images of rioters throwing rocks at police, smashing buses and setting fire to shops and cars, as well as bystanders holding faces streaming with blood. Burnt-out buildings and vehicles continued to smoulder yesterday, broken glass littered the roads and bloodstains dotted the concrete.

It was the second major eruption of ethnic violence in China in less than 18 months. In March last year, protests and riots flared up in the Tibetan capital, Lhasa, with authorities saying 19 people were killed and exile groups saying the real figure was 200. The latest trouble in Xinjiang also comes at an embarrassing time for the Communist Party in Beijing, just three months before it is due to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China.

Urumqi was under lockdown last night. At the Grand Bazaar, usually populated by Uighur vendors touting a dazzling array of daggers or a rogue camel, columns of camouflage-wearing paramilitary police carrying batons and shields marched in a show of strength, defying any more would-be protesters or rioters. And there were cyber restrictions too, with reports that Urumqi residents were unable to access the internet.

The state-run Xinhua news agency reported that 700 suspects had been arrested, including more than 10 key players who fanned the trouble, and that authorities were searching for another 90.

There were other reports that students had been targeted. Mamet, a restaurant worker in the city, told the Associated Press about a raid he had witnessed outside Xinjiang University. "First they fired tear gas at the students. Then they started beating them and shooting them with bullets," he said. "Big trucks arrived and students were rounded up and arrested."

Amnesty International called on Beijing to "fully account for all those who died and have been detained" and demanded "a fair and thorough investigation" into the weekend's events

However, the government was already apportioning blame yesterday. "The violence is a pre-empted, organised violent crime. It is instigated and directed from abroad, and carried out by outlaws in the country," it said in a statement.

Xinjiang's Governor, Nur Bekri, went on state television to accuse Rebiya Kadeer – a Uighur businesswoman who was jailed for years in China before being released into exile in the United States – of stoking the violence. "She had phone conversations with people in China on 5 July in order to incite, and websites ... were used to orchestrate the incitement and spread propaganda," he said.

It was a charge swiftly denied. "It is a common practice of the Chinese government to accuse me for any unrest [in this region] and His Holiness the Dalai Lama for any unrest in Tibet," Ms Kadeer, who heads the World Uyghur Congress (WUC), said in a statement.

There were several conflicting reports, not only of the death toll but whether the victims were Uighurs or Han Chinese. Xinhua said 156 people had been confirmed as killed, and the number was likely to rise. It quoted a senior security official as saying many of the bodies he had seen were Han. "It was like a war zone here, with many bodies of ethnic Han people lying on the road," said Huang Yabo, deputy director of the Urumqi Public Security Bureau.

But in a telephone interview, Alim Seytoff, a spokesman for the WUC, put the death toll closer to 400. "Most of the dead are Uighurs, shot and killed by the Chinese security forces," he said, adding that protesters had been confronted by four kinds of police (regular, anti-riot, Special Police and the People's Armed Police), who had used "lethal force" to disperse them. "This is a very dark day in the history of the Uighur people".

Tensions between the two ethnic groups have risen as the government has encouraged Han migration to Xinjiang. The Uighurs – who now make up just half of the region's 20 million people – complain that they are being culturally destroyed, citing Beijing's plans to raze their ancient Silk Road city of Kashgar as a prime example. The other grievance is that they are being muscled out of jobs and other economic opportunities and this is particularly pertinent in the main city Urumqi where the Han are in the majority.

It is unclear what prompted the hundreds of Uighurs to take to the streets in protest on Sunday. There were reports that a June dispute in one of the region's toy factories between Uighur and Han workers, in which two Uighurs died, was the trigger, but other China-watchers suggested it might be simply pent-up anger at long-standing grievances. There were reports last night that protests had spread to Kashgar, but analysts were doubtful that they will snowball into a mass movement that will really trouble Beijing. "The Chinese are very good at putting things down and keeping a lid on them when they really want to," said Brad Adams, the Asia Director of Human Rights Watch.

The Chinese President Hu Jintao was in Italy yesterday ahead of this week's G8 summit. At a press conference after meeting the Italian ceremonial head of state, Giorgio Napolitano, he made no mention of the situation back home.

Heroine or enemy? Rebiya Kadeer

The woman the Chinese government accuses of masterminding the Uighur protests over the weekend is a 62-year-old former laundry lady with 11 children who lives more than 6,000 miles away from the scene of the violence: there is no doubt that Rebiya Kadeer makes an unlikely radical figurehead.

In 1996, the one-time laundry worker was a successful businesswoman in Xinjiang nicknamed the Millionairess, and a Communist Party member. But in 1997, Chinese security forces killed Uighur protesters in the city of Gulja. Outraged, Kadeer used her considerable influence to mobilise opposition. Two years later, she was imprisoned. Released in 2005, she fled to join her husband in the United States, where she has continued her efforts as president of the World Uyghur Congress.

To the West and her own people, she is a heroic freedom fighter; to the Chinese government, she is a subversive enemy of the state. Her supporters insist she had nothing to do with the demonstrations that erupted in Urumqi. But there is no doubt that she remains a hugely influential voice.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Surely not?
[info]girigirihanasu wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
Sadly, Muslims rampaging, rioting and attacking their non-Muslim neighbours is nothing new. It happens regularly in Egypt, Thailand, Indonesia etc, yet it's rarely reported. The PC press doesn't care about actual victims of Islam, only their own PC street cred.
And of course, it's rarely condemned by the authorities, who are either Muslim themselves (eg Egypt) or simply afraid of encouraging yet more Muslim violence (eg Thailand.) China has taken a stand... albeit OTT. But then, rampaging rioters slitting people's throats are notoriously tricky to deal with...
Re: Surely not?
[info]fazllb wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:34 pm (UTC)
This is not an 'Islamic issue.' The Uihgar are rioting because of repression and subjugation. Religion does not come into it. When the Buddhist monks rioted no one was short-sighted enough to say they are simply doing it because they are Buddhist everyone saw the underlying issues pertaining to human rights and the attempt by the state to destroy Tibetan culture.

During the uprising by the students in Tiananmen Square and the Tibetan uprising there was great solidarity with those groups as people could easily identify injustice. Do these Uihgar who are suffering under the same repressive state apparatus not deserve your support simply because they are Muslim?


Or are you opposed to all opponents of the Chinese state?
156 dead as muslim uprising hits China
[info]repton4 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 12:18 am (UTC)
Here we go muslims at it again,
Re: 156 dead as muslim uprising hits China
[info]eku71 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:46 am (UTC)
Muslims are at what? oh, wait, I get it now. Muslims are at being shot to death while protesting all kinds inhuman treatment forced upon them by those who invaded and annexed their homeland in 1949 while the world simply watched. This is not related to religion. I suggest you do some research, pal.
[info]duncanmcfarlane wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 01:34 am (UTC)
What bigoted comments by the first two posters. The same happened in Tibet not so long ago, to Buddhists, after they were oppressed, beaten, tortured, killed and told they couldnt continue their own culture for decades by the Chinese police, army and government. The Chinese government has never been elected democratically, it runs a one party state where dissidents are tortured, jailed, killed or sent to asylums and work camps for 're-education'. This is not the result of Muslims, this is the result of brutality, occupation and the lack of democracy. Uighuirs in Xinjiang, like Tibetans in Tibet, want to have basic rights, freedom of expression and democracy.
[info]duncanmcfarlane wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 01:36 am (UTC)
Also those are the same kind of prejudiced comments that used to be made about the Jews in the British mandate of Palestine, when some Zionist terrorist groups and militias were fighting the British Empire there. Then the bigots said 'Jews at it again', now they say 'Muslims and immigrants at it again'. Same mindless prejudice, different target. Most Muslims have nothing to do with Bin Laden or Al Qa'ida.
[info]girigirihanasu wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 03:06 am (UTC)
Nobody mentioned immigrants. If Muslims commit atrocities in Chechnya, Thailand, Pakistan, Athens, Denmark, Sudan, Egypt, China, Bali, London, New York, Madrid, France etc (you're surely aware of all of these in this still short century) then there must be a common element. What is the common element? Poverty? Oppression? There is only one common element: the ideology that these people have been indoctrinated with. Read the Koran. Note how it states that the Islam must engage in a perpetual struggle with the non-Muslim world. This ideology warps otherwise fine minds. Being racist is evil. Being bigotted against Muslims is evil (after all, anyone who's born a Muslim can never leave Islam, on pain of death.) But criticising an *ideology* is NOT evil.
[info]repton4 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 04:28 am (UTC)
No one mentioned immigrants, Bin Laden or Al Qaida, The 156 people died in a muslim uprising and all for the sake of Islam
History lesson
[info]abulove101 wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 10:02 pm (UTC)
Islam gave during the birth of the Renaissance. Islam was the first religion to give women rights and educated them also. A primary ex. the first school of the child is the mothers lap. In the house of wisdom women played a big role by as stinting the men and being the writers etc. The problems face in Afghan are is cultural base problems and Iraq is because of corruption of everything. The Taliban entered as freedom fighters against the u.s.s.r. Please look at your facts before posting a uneducated comment.

A little note Islam is fastest growing religion in the world!!! I wonder why. Islam caused the Christians and the Jews to reform but no one can cause them to reform
There is racism and hypocrisy
[info]maryc29 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
In germany they are free to wear what they like, except that muslim women are not? wheres the media now? forced marriages make front page news, but a pregnant women in hijab being stabbed to death inside a court, not a mention? and when her husband tries to help her?...

"The guards thought that as long as he wasn't blond, he must be the attacker so they shot him," al-Sherbini told an Egyptian television station.

they shoot her husband when he tries to help her.

double standards and hyporcisy and no your media is not objective and just and free, they follow their own whims and desires too. your just too brainwashed to know that a lot of what your told is lies and spins.
enough with the racism
[info]unlikelysuitor wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 07:16 am (UTC)
People who talk that way about Islam as a religion of conflict and hate have clearly never met a single Muslim in their life. Blaming someone's religion for their actions only acts to remove what they do from the political context, even to deny the existence of any political context at all.

This way, struggles against oppression, violence, bigotry and economic war can be conveniently classified as ideological struggles between the 'enlightened' west and ignorant, irrational brown people who don't know what's good for them, and want to take over the world because they are brainwashed with evil ideas. Even a cursory reading of history will reveal how terminally flawed this sort of approach is.

The real issue here is the CCP's inability to reconcile cultural diversity within the territory they control. Certain posters on this site appear to share this problem.
Re: enough with the racism
[info]girigirihanasu wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:18 am (UTC)
Racism? Islam is not a race, so how does racism come into it? Islam is a complete ideology, which includes a political aspect. That's why there are Islamic revolutions. The government of a state is directly replaced by Islam. And as for bigotry; I advocate freedom of religion, sexual equality, homosexual rights etc for all, so long as you don't harm anyone else. Islam however, is misogynistic, homophobic, and rejects, reviles and attacks everything that's not Islamic. It is the ultimate bigotted ideology. I can only assume that people like you who attack Islam's detractors share these bigotted ideals.

I have dozens of Muslim friends. Not everybody who is born a Muslim necessarily agrees with all of Islamic ideology. However, they know that to criticize Islam is dangerous and will incur the wrath of the Immans, and perhaps their family and friends. Just as a non-Muslim who criticizes Islam incurs the wrath of people who are totally niaive, have never read the Koran, and who don't know the difference between an ideology and a race.

And just to reiterate; I'm not prejudiced against Muslims for being Muslims; however, I loathe Islamic ideology. So should every free-thinking sane person.


More muslim rioting? there must be a reason!
[info]paganpete1001 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 12:47 pm (UTC)
Thought Muslims were a peaceful lot - when I was a kid we had a muslim family over the road and we used to go over all the time for dessert and stuff, used to play with their kids and so forth - what the hell has happened to make it so horrible these days?
Tribalism is in the Nature of Man
[info]superkeith wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:32 pm (UTC)
It is no shame on China that they have a tribal ethnic incident. Tribalism is in the nature of man and if people will kill one another over wearing the wrong football scarf they will certainly do it over race and religion. Certainly it would be better if there was no tribal conflict but there is NO country in the world where different tribes and different cultures live together in the same area with no strife. There seems to be a basic instinct, not accessible to debate or logic that switches on when the numbers of the opposing tribe become significant and it appears that the bigger the numbers the stronger and more violent the reaction.
The only system that seems to work is if tribally different groups, whether by race or religion, live in separate areas and have the minimal contact required to maintain stable national government. In my opinion the problem in the UK has been confounded by Govt measures to enhance the status of religions and divert massive amounts of taxpayer funds to religious hierarchies. This looks to have had the same effect as an arms dealer funding both sides in a war, the conflict is scaled up. It would be nice if there was no conflict but the nature of man renders this totally impossible.
Glasshouses......
[info]independentmt wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 06:56 pm (UTC)
This situation is complicated, and like most stories, perhaps the truth is somewhere in between. While each case has its own specific background, parallels to this incident can be seen in other inter-ethnic conflicts around the world (Chinese - Malay), Fiji (Fijian - Indian), Indonesia (Chinese- Indonesian), United States - LA, Watts (Black-White), Spain (Basque-Spanish)etc. etc

These incidents are all unfortunate, and due to inequalities (real or perceived) or perhaps by historical rivalries or unexplained racial hatred.

What is clear however, is that when such incidences occur in China, the West seems to exploit them to push its agenda against the Chinese government, justifying and excusing the rioters excesses (Uigher or Tibetan).

On the contrary, I don't think I recall the western media using the LA riots to indict the US government for its oppression of minorities or support / ignore some of the thuggery of the rioters against innocent people, often white (recall truck driver Reginald Denny), in the same way they gloss over violence against Han Chinese.

Furthermore, lack of ethnic violence or strife in Western countries, is not an indication of perfect non-discriminatory societies.

In fact it could highlight the fact that the Maori in NZ (Maori up until the 70s were often caned at school for speaking their language), Aboriginal in Australia (Tasmanian aboriginals were wiped out by the middle of the 20 Century) or North American Indian or Black people in the US, or indigenous and black people in Brazil have been so disenfranchised due to the genocide against their culture and language, that they no longer even understand the notion of independence.

While there are probably genuine grievances in China among certain minorities, I feel it is incorrect and hypocritical for Western governments and media to get behind / support any outburst of riotous violence, in order to take the moral high ground against China. Inter-ethnic violence is a terrible thing, and should not be used by West (media / government) as a tool for advancing self-interest.

Furthermore people should have a look in their own backyards before rushing to judgment on what is happening in their neighbours.










Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date