Beijing rocked by 26 million lost jobs
An estimated 26 million poor rural Chinese are now without jobs after pinning their hopes on the once-booming manufacturing sector, where work has dried up due to the global economic slowdown, a government advisory body said.
The figure was released one day after Beijing warned of "possibly the toughest year" since the turn of the century, calling for the development of agriculture and rural areas to offset the economic fallout. Though many Chinese cities have seen double-digit growth in recent years, the countryside has lagged behind, forcing peasants to seek urban factory jobs. A recent government survey showed that more than 15 per cent of China's 130 million migrant workers have returned to their hometowns recently, where they are now unemployed, said Chen Xiwen, director of the Central Rural Work Leading Group. Another 5 million to 6 million new migrants enter the workforce each year, Mr Chen added.
"So, if we put those figures together, we have roughly 25 to 26 million rural migrant workers who are now coming under pressures for employment," the official said.
"So, ensuring job creation and maintenance is ensuring the stability of the countryside." China's official jobless tally, which only counts registered urban workers, was estimated last November at 8.3 million. This rate is believed to under-represent the true number of unemployed because it leaves out large swathes of the private or informal economy.
Beijing has stressed that its priority will be ensuring development in the countryside, where many have come to rely on remittances sent home by migrants working in factories or on urban construction sites. Many factory workers have already taken to the streets in recent weeks, protesting against lay-offs. The government already has policies to help rural workers returning home, including help in setting up businesses, Mr Chen said.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
If you think this is bad remember their one child per couple policy and imagine how hard it will be when each worker must pay not only for himself but the social security of both his parents.
China had no real choice but to "modernize" unless they wanted to end up nothing but a warlord's playground after the west realized that China was weak enough to starve. It has happened before. China has had a steady growth rate or 8 or 9% a year for the past decade, every year. That is steady. The only reason it was that high was simply because of a. they had no one stopping them, which was the idea to begin with. And reason number 2 they had room to grow. In the early 90s China was still 90% agrarian. How on earth that could have fed dirt cheap labor I have no idea. Thirdly, they knew what they were doing. For the first time in history the invisible hand of the market was replaced by the iron fist of central planning. Now they face a massive world wide depression. Aren't they lucky at least they are neck deep in foreign currency. And in so many ways they still have so many opportunities to make work for themselves. The West though, up the creek without a paddle.
TRIBULATION TRIBULATION TRIBULATION