World

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

'Dozens die' in Afghan air strikes says Red Cross

By Sharafuddin Sharafyar, Reuters

US-led air strikes killed dozens of Afghans, including women and children, the Red Cross said today, appearing to confirm an incident that could overshadow a meeting between US and Afghan leaders.

Rohul Amin, governor of Western Farah province where the bombing took place during a battle on Monday and Tuesday, said he feared 100 civilians had been killed. Provincial police chief Abdul Ghafar Watandar said the death toll could be even higher.

If confirmed, those even higher figures could make the incident the single deadliest for Afghan civilians since the campaign to topple the Taliban in 2001.

President Hamid Karzai, due to meet US President Barack Obama in Washington later today for the first time since Obama took office, sent a joint US-Afghan delegation to investigate the incident, his office said.

"The president has termed the loss of civilians unjustifiable and unacceptable and will raise it with Obama," the presidential palace said in a statement.

Civilian casualties are a source of great strain between Washington and Kabul at a time of rising violence by Islamist Taliban insurgents and with US troop numbers due to be more than doubled by the end of the year.

Obama has declared Afghanistan and neighbouring Pakistan to be Washington's main military focus. Karzai, Obama and Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari will discuss strategy for the region at the White House meeting later today.

Jessica Barry, spokeswoman for the International Committee of the Red Cross, said the Geneva-based group had also sent a team which reached the scene of the air strikes yesterday afternoon.

"There were women and there were children who were killed. It seemed they were trying to shelter in houses when they were hit," she said. The team saw houses destroyed and dozens of bodies, providing the first international confirmation of the incident.

Barry said that among those killed was a first aid volunteer for Afghanistan's Red Crescent, who died along with 13 members of his family. She said the team was not able to say whether there were any fighters among the dead.

US forces in Afghanistan acknowledge they were involved in fighting and air strikes in the province's Bala Boluk district, which began on Monday and continued into yesterday after Taliban militants seized a village and clashed with Afghan troops.

A US military spokesman said a US-Afghan investigation team had departed for the area this morning.

Watandar, the provincial police chief, said Taliban guerrillas had used the civilians as shields, herding them into houses in the villages of Geraani and Ganj Abad, that were then struck by US-led coalition warplanes.

"The fighting was going on in another village, but the Taliban escaped to these two villages, where they used people as human shields. The air strikes killed about 120 civilians and destroyed 17 houses," he said, adding the toll was imprecise.

Villagers trucked about 30 dead bodies to the provincial capital Farah City yesterday to prove that dozens had been killed in the strikes, said governor Amin.

"Taliban fighters fought Afghan and foreign troops yesterday and the day before but the casualties from last night's bombings were all civilians," Taliban spokesman Qari Yousuf Ahmadi Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.

"The government and foreign troops must compensate the affected people, we don't want apologies any more," he said.

The mounting civilian casualty toll has become a deep source of friction between Karzai and his US backers.

Afghan and UN investigators say US strikes killed 90 civilians last August. Washington initially denied large numbers of civilians had been killed in that incident, only to acknowledge three months later at least 33 civilians had indeed been killed.

Since then, US and Nato forces in Afghanistan have established new drills they say are intended to reduce the number of civilian casualties. They say they now launch immediate investigations alongside Afghan authorities into all reports of civilian deaths and apologise more quickly than before.

The United States will increase its forces in Afghanistan from 32,000 at the start of this year to a projected 68,000 by year's end, with most of the reinforcements due in the next few months. Other Western countries have about 30,000 troops in the country under the command of a US general.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

US military
[info]thomasth wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:12 am (UTC)
The killing fields - it never stops: this insane and ugly world!
It means nothing who is appointed in the White House.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
Under stooge of the Zionists, Obama is means shit nothing. The Cosha Nostra Zionists who have the money, the army and the media carry on with their genocide of the Middle East. Simple as that!
Re: It means nothing who is appointed in the White House.
[info]psimist wrote:
Thursday, 7 May 2009 at 11:01 am (UTC)
My son thinks your a retard, you have the spelling of a fourth grader and the mind of a monkey.
american terrorist
[info]studentclass wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:48 am (UTC)
this is what we should be calling them, if this was carried out by "muslims" then im sure world media/government would be crying terrorism
US double standards
[info]schweigen2009 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:02 am (UTC)
The US is carrying out strikes that are harming civilians, while asking the Sri Lankan government to stop its offensive against Tiger terrorists! Change of government certainly hasn't changed US duplicity.
Collateral damage
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
Those with a white 'Western' supremacist mindset couldn't care less about the murder of civilians who they regard as mere savages scratching a living from the dirt in a primitive and god forsaken country, especially if they are the hosts of a suspected terrorist hiding in their midst. Nothing can be allowed to spoil another kill and postpone the march of progress to pacify a landscape intended as a location for energy infrastructure. Nothing can be allowed to get in the way of making vast profits from controlling the flow of gas and oil. This is what the white 'Western' supremacist wars in the Middle East and around the Caspian are all about.
And where is our Zionist pal Mr Millipede?
[info]leonard_merryl wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 11:11 am (UTC)
It's strange we don't hear his castrated squawks when his yankee-doodle pals go out a-murdering?? He reserves them only for those the New World Order dislikes (even if they've killed no-one at all). What a gutless little hypocrite he is.
Solutions !
[info]pdanny wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
Hillary Clinton should go to Pakistan and meet Taliban rebel leaders to propose a ceasefire. With that sort of "humanitarian pause" we can prevent civilian deaths. OR they can propose to Taliban rebels to surrender to a "third party", who they (taliban rebels ) choose.
On the other hand UK & EU should press US government to stop offensive attacks. Any other country can join them.
Further, UN should press Taliban rebels to free the civilians. Taliban rebels will say that the civilians are staying with them on their (civilians') will. UN have to confirm that through independent media and not from US forces.
Human rights watch should deploy their "investigators" to watch out for US soldiers who are on war crimes. but the problem is HRW is afraid to report on powerful nations. So HRW will say attacking on afghan civilians is not violation of human rights and not a war crime.
US-led air-strike kills civilians in Afghanistan
[info]candidlee wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 01:22 pm (UTC)
Hello, shouldn't Gordon Brown be appointing a Special Peace Envoy to the USA? They seem to be using heavy artillary and airstrikes near civilians. I'm sure David Miliband must have something to say about that. Not to mention Hillary Clinton.
same old
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC)
The Americans used the Afghans to fight the Russians and when the Afghans won at great cost, the Americans left Afghanistan to the taliban. The US showed that as long as the Taliban were only cruel to it's own people it couldn't care less, it even tried to do business with them.Then the 11tt of september happened and the Taliban and Al-bundy became the root of all evil. Like the Taliban getting into power had nothing to do with the US.

So the first fact we have to accept when talking about the current crisis in Afghanistan is, the Americans started it.

The second fact is, they only know how to solve things by force, so to cure Afghanistan, they will need to destroy it, as we can see from the above story.

It's a shame they can't learn from mistakes, the need for more troops, to do more damage is the current battle cry and I can't see that as a solution.
The thing is they don't care about Afgahnaistan, all they care about is American interests and if that means having troops doing maneuvers in strategic places well so be it.
Let's face it 30 years ago it would have been a wet dream for the Americans to have troops in Afghanistan. So what's changed, they still fear the Russians and the Chinese, look how they reacted to Georgia, just like it was 30 years ago.
Afghanistan is looking more and more like an American side show.
What are the alternatives?
[info]kavallero wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:42 pm (UTC)
There is always an enemy at the gates. The Soviet Union of the Cold War and now Muslim Crazies who don't care about their own lives let alone the civilians who's live they threaten for the sake of publicity. It's a tragedy for sure. War, without fail, always is but to return Afghanistan to a festering haven for extreme anti-democratic and life resticting groups is not the solution.
I don't read about the Afghan government shouting about American withdrawal, not yet anyway.
I'm not a great fan of the U.S. but without them we'd all be speaking Russian sharing our nothing with everyone else.
The Taliban are tearing apart Pakistan now and the won't stop. They will create misery where they
exist.

They and groups like them have to be removed from the earth.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date