World

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Pakistan takes revenge for Taliban 'withdrawal sham'

Fresh military strikes after intercepts disclose strategy of Swat valley militants

By Omar Waraich in Rawalpindi

Pakistani soldiers prepare to attack Taliban hideouts in the Lower Dir district yesterday

AP

Pakistani soldiers prepare to attack Taliban hideouts in the Lower Dir district yesterday

Backed by fighter jets and helicopter gunships, Pakistani troops dramatically expanded a military offensive against Taliban hideouts yesterday after fresh evidence emerged of the militants' determination to extend their reach beyond the Swat valley and towards the capital.

Army chiefs said the operation in Buner, which followed swiftly on the heels of a military bombardment of Lower Dir, was expected to last a week. The aim was to "eliminate and expel" an estimated 500 militants scattered across the strategic valley, which lies just 70 miles north of Islamabad, officials said.

The government of the President Asif Ali Zardari struck a controversial deal in February with the Swat militants, whereby he agreed to impose Sharia law in a vain bid to get the Taliban to lay down their weapons. The accord sparked concern in Washington and London and last week the militants appear to rip it up in any case. They rampaged beyond Swat and into Buner, kidnapping and killing policemen, seizing petrol stations and marble factories and terrorising the local population, before claiming to retreat.

Yesterday's military offensive was triggered by phone intercepts that allegedly revealed how the Taliban had merely staged a withdrawal from Buner. Maj-Gen Athar Abbas, the chief spokesman for the Pakistani military, said that the Taliban had in fact stayed put, continuing to recruit locals for their training camps. "Only a symbolic withdrawal was made," he told reporters at a press conference in the garrison town of Rawalpindi. "Instead [the militants] kept increasing their strength and continued with their activities. As per the latest reports, 450 to 500 militants are occupying Buner. The overall objective is to eliminate or expel [them]."

Military officials then played what they said were phone taps between various Taliban commanders who were leading militants in Buner and the group's chief Maulana Fazlullah, who is believed to be hiding in the mountains of Swat. The conversations were in Pashto and a transcript in Urdu was provided to reporters. The authenticity of the transcripts could not be independently verified.

In one conversation, a commander described as "Fateh", the codename for the Taliban commander Maulvi Khalil, is overheard "vowing to do something that they'll remember". The militants do not give specific details of their plans, preferring to signal their intent with half-finished sentences. More controversially, the transcripts imply that Sufi Mohammed – the frail hardline cleric the government has tasked with brokering the truce with the Taliban – was complicit in the Taliban's stunt of pretending to withdraw from the region.

Mufti Aftab, a Taliban commander, quotes Sufi Mohammed insisting that some Taliban fighters should be seen leaving the valley for the sake of "the media" without displaying "their weapons openly". "These Karakar comrades will be pulled back so that the media can see them [leave], because the commissioner is repeatedly saying we need to show the media something," Mr Aftab says, according to the transcript.

Sufi Mohammed is the father-in-law of Mr Fazlullah. He led a rebellion in Swat during the 1990s and enlisted young men to fight in Afghanistan in late 2001. He was released from prison last year on the condition that he disavowed militancy and helped the government tame the Taliban in Swat.

A top local government official, Syed Muhammad Javed, is also quoted second-hand as urging the media stunt. He has since been suspended from his duties on suspicion of colluding with the Taliban.

The push into Buner marks the second military operation in the past week. "I warn them to vacate the area. We are not going to spare them," said the Interior Minister Rehman Malik.

Yesterday the army said it had already triumphed in Lower Dir, another area bordering Swat, with more than 70 Taliban militants being killed. The fighting has sent civilians fleeing in search of safety. Amnesty International estimated that about 33,000 people had left their homes in Lower Dir over the past two days.

The Pakistani government has come under intense international pressure to crack down on militants within its borders. The US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Pakistan was "basically abdicating to the Taliban and to the extremists", while the US Defence Secretary Robert Gates called on the country's leaders to take action.

Phone taps reveal cat-and-mouse tactics

The following are translated extracts of phone taps of conversations between senior Pakistani Taliban commanders, provided by the Pakistani army. It was not possible to independently verify their authenticity...

Transcript A

Fateh [Taliban commander leading Buner operations]: How has the decision [to stage the withdrawal] been taken?

Mufti Aftab [another Taliban commander]: The decision took place after Maulvi Saab [apparent reference to Sufi Mohammed, the hardline cleric negotiating with the Taliban on behalf of the government] told us to bring back seven, eight cars and show them leaving to the media. Sufi Saab is there and other advisers are there.

Fateh: We'll say that the Taliban from Swat have left Buner.

Transcript B

Mufti Aftab: Right now the subject is Buner. Everyone is saying that they'll take some people out of there and will show them leaving to the media. And they will not display their weapons openly.

Maulana Fazlullah [leader of Taliban in Swat]: OK, we'll tell Suleiman to move these comrades to the side.

Mufti Aftab: These Karakar comrades will be pulled back so that the media can see them [leave], because the commissioner is repeatedly saying we need to show the media something.

Transcript C

Sheikh Saab [Taliban commander]: We've discussed firm plans for what's ahead... First, the situation in Buner is very hot. The army is ready for an attack... Those who remain there should separate, so that the world will see that the Taliban have left Buner, even if it means that in each car there are only one or two Talibs sitting.

Fazlullah: This is fine.

Sheikh Saab: If this okay, then we're coming. Tell the people there that the comrades should move and hide their arms. Some people should leave.

Fazullah: OK, I'll make contact.

Transcript D

Fateh: If they come now, then I've told the comrades to do things this way. This time, we'll blast the mines as well. We'll also fire rockets. And we'll do something that they'll remember. Tomorrow you'll say you didn't know.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

War is Treachery - Bukhari
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 12:58 am (UTC)
I commented this on the Times a week ago:
Shariah Law is a fabrication, and so is the Caliphate (i.e. manufactured about two hundred years after the death of the Prophet Mohamed - Neither He, nor the first four first Commanders followers of the Quran, Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and Ali called themselves Ali, or what they were following Shariah).
The Taleban are bandits, they do not follow the Quran, they follow Bukhari, an Iranian who fabricated traditions besides the Quran.
One such tradition enjoins: "War is treachery, lie to your enemies", how then can you trust these evil-doers?
Now this is once again vindicated...
The day the Muslims will go back to the Moral Principles of their Book, will they see Peace and gain Respect.
My translation of Islam is Peace Making, and a Muslim is a Peace Seeker, seeking peace in His Creator throughout his/her dealings in life.
It took me 25 years to find this out, but I had to let go of the filters purporting to explain the Quran, even the Modern Arabic itself, as the Quran's Arabic is self referenced and explains itself, and there is nothing more damaging and dangerous than the poison of the collected Hadith which have distorted and abused that faith...
Re: War is Treachery - Bukhari
[info]manplant wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 09:29 am (UTC)
I totally agree. The Pakistani elites have proved to be utter scoundrels preying on their peoples hypocricy and racism. Just like any extreme movement around the world, they bring out the worst in peoples. They have used religion in a malicious way for their own ends. The Pakistani population have a lot to answer and pay for for allowing their tribal racist greedy hypocritical tendencies to cloud their judgement when interpreting their religion. They cheered the religious extremists on (Taliban, Al Qaida) when their deeds were adversely effecting innocents such as in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, now the zelots' ire is directed at them they are panicking.
The Pakistanis should be left alone to deal with their own problems and not be given cash aid under any circumstances. It is within their power to defeat these extremists if they choose.
Re: War is Treachery - Bukhari
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 11:13 am (UTC)
Yes and im sure the CIA whom the taliban are fighting would never dream of trying to lie or trick anyone despite the fact that that is pretty much a CIA agents job description. Where are you writing from? The CIA head office of internet operations or the london offices?
Re: War is Treachery - Bukhari
[info]manplant wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 01:49 pm (UTC)
The Taliban are not fighting the CIA. How can they fight something they cannot see? Most of them wouldn't know where the USA is! Besides, CIA money helped set up the Taliban through the ISI, common knowledge. The Taliban are coming up to their sell by date and when convenient they will be disposed of by their daddies, the ISI and CIA! My concern is how ignorant people buy into this Taliban C**P and actually look at them as some kind of heroes. Ignorance is un-Islamic and and this is what the Taliban are.
Re: War is Treachery - Bukhari
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 03:55 pm (UTC)
God, what a prat.
Correction
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 01:02 am (UTC)
I commented this on the Times a week ago:
Shariah Law is a fabrication, and so is the Caliphate (i.e. manufactured about two hundred years after the death of the Prophet Mohamed - Neither He, nor the first four first Commanders followers of the Quran, Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and Ali called themselves Caliphs, or what they were following Shariah).
pakistan
[info]aliantar wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 03:00 am (UTC)
the previous post is ignorant of basic facts, one of which is that a person cannot ignore islamic knowledge that has been gathered during the last 1400 years and claim he has a better understanding because he desires Islam to be to his liking. Firstly, fundamental rules have not changes in islam. its how we apply things which are not clear cut that could be up for question.

I advise you not to make such haste comments with a primitive understanding on such a deep topic.
Re: pakistan
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 10:00 am (UTC)
@aliantar
I am sorry to advise you that the problem is not deep but rather very hollow: you do not agree with their (Taleban, extremists, Jihadists) views so they kill you, and use of traditions that are fully corrupt, inappropriate for conveying a universal message of Peace that claims to heal the rifts of Humanity, sending us back to a dark age of fear, ignorance and terror, and are an insult to the Prophet himself.
You, aliantar and the likes of you are part of the problem, really.
I am sure you do not even understand the Quran and rely on Mullahs to explain it to you?!
From the perspective of the Quran, those are the people who take their Scholars as gods besides The God, and you know where they end up...
Re: pakistan
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
Lies always rely on the foundation of demonisation and generalisation.
Re: pakistan
[info]twohornedking wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 11:46 am (UTC)
nabil2000, please stop posting ignorant and abusive comments. You're embarrasing yourself.
Re: pakistan
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 12:42 pm (UTC)
wow, here are the extremists to the rescue, i am getting famous, or infamous... are you going to kill me now?
Re: pakistan
[info]masmanz wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC)
You are the aggressive one here. WIll you ask your buddies to fire an hellfire on poor Mr. Pakistan?
Re: pakistan
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 08:40 pm (UTC)
@masmanz
Most muslims are already in hell, they just have not realised it yet. I hope they will before it is too late, so that they can get out of it.
Here is for those who have a few neurones left: check http://www.free-minds.org
and if you can afford the e-book buy:
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000063556
not the sectarians -
Peace
With ISI involvement this is a surprise?
[info]solutionsplease wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 03:32 am (UTC)
Given that the radical wing of the military and their ISI counterparts supported the rise of madrassa graduates as political candidates, leading to the rise of the radical muslim party especially in NWFP, and that the support for these groups and the Taliban has continued, is it any wonder these problems have arisen? The question is whether one hand of the army sells out the squaddies trying to get rid of the Taliban--after all, it was at Musharraff's insistance, and with Cheyney's intervention, that the taliban was able to airlift out many of its leaders who were trapped by allied forces at the beginning of the Afghan
incursion.
The lack of attention given to the ISI and its counterparts in the military is astounding given their ability to be the "spoilers" of any attempt to get rid of the Taliban and its allies.
Further attention is needed to the role of Deobandi and wahabist madrassas.
Religion
[info]duoduo1 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 05:51 am (UTC)
Thats what happens when you believe in supernatural entities, you lose reference to reality and anything goes.
Re: Religion
[info]popskihaynes wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 12:46 pm (UTC)
If people wish to believe in God, that is their freedom to do so. Religion has often been used by people with a lust for power to rally the "cannon fodder", that is historical fact. Many of the so called "beliefs" associated with Islam are in fact purely tribal in origin - social rules designed for living in tribal societies and nothing to do with Islam.

When Marx wrote about Religion being the opiate of the people, this is what he was writing about. Religion is not evil but the people who attempt to manipulate it for their own ends are whether the Taliban of some demented fundamentalist Christian Sect in the United States.

Your comment about "...believe in supernatural entities..." is offensive as it was no doubt intended to be but it is also a sure sign that you are ignorant of human nature. Ask yourself whether Hitler used religion in his appeal to the German people, no just fear of "aliens". Did Stalin use religion ? Did Pol Pot or Ide Amin ? Evil has no religion... Now lie down and read your Holy Books of Dawkins.
You reap what you sow.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 07:27 am (UTC)
When a country is ruled by selfish greedy family clans whose agenda is to loot the country whilst putting on the face of the benefactor; it will always result in anarchy.

The religous zealots who are creating havoc are merely a symptom of the greedy elite who rule and rape Pakistan on a daily basis; like the Bhutto Clan and their ilk.

The true tradgedy of Benazir's death is that she did not take a significant number of the ruling elite with her.
Re: You reap what you sow.
[info]twohornedking wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 11:28 am (UTC)
Brilliant post, you really hit the nail on the head. What no one is discussing is the cause of Pakistan's problems, is it's present political status quo. Bipartisan politics run by elite families who do not serve the nation. This has resulted in poor health and justice systems, with the only free schools being run by ignorant mullahs with no real understanding of Islam.
Taliban
[info]brazierdv wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)

Did anyone really believe that agreeing to Sharia Law in the Swat Valley would appease the Taliban? So long as they have weapons and the energy the Taliban will continue to fight. And those who think we can "negotiate" with the Taliban in Afghanistan are duly warned.
Re: Taliban
[info]manplant wrote:
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 at 01:51 pm (UTC)
Yes, the USA and UK taxpayer.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date