Australia's apology to transported children
Thousands sent from UK to Australia for better life were abused and enslaved
Between the 1920s and the 1960s, Britain sent an estimated 10,000 children to Australia to help populate its former colony with "good white stock". The children were promised new lives in an exotic land of plenty; instead, they suffered hunger, privation and abuse in government and religious institutions.
For decades, the former child migrants have been seeking official recognition of what they endured, and asking for restitution. Yesterday the Australian government took a first step, announcing that the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, would formally apologise to them, in a gesture similar to his acknowledgement last year of the wrongs inflicted on the Aboriginal "Stolen Generations".
For victims such as John Hennessy, who was plucked out of a Bristol orphanage and shipped to Australia in 1947, the apology has been a long time coming. Aged 10, Mr Hennessy was sent to an institution run by the Catholic Christian Brothers at Bundoon, north of Perth. He and the other boys were used as slave labour on a building project. They received scant education and little to eat.
One afternoon the boys stole some grapes from the vineyard. Punishment was swift. Mr Hennessy, the ringleader, was stripped naked by one of the brothers and publicly flogged. Ever since that day, he has had a stutter.
Recalling his childhood in an interview years later, he said: "I would never, ever, like my childhood days to come back again. It was so cruel, it was so un-Christian, it was brutality at its worst."
Many of the children exported to the other side of the world believed they were orphans or unwanted by their families. Mostly this was not true: they had been taken from their mothers as illegitimate babies, or placed in orphanages by single parents or families too poor to bring them up. Often they were put on ships to Australia without their parents being informed.
The apology, which will also be extended to Australian-born victims of institutional abuse, follows a series of parliamentary inquiries in Britain and Australia over the past decade. A report by the Australian Senate in 2004 detailed "a litany of emotional, physical and sexual abuse". It also found that children had been routinely deprived of food, education and healthcare.
In February last year, in one of his first deeds after being elected, Mr Rudd apologised in parliament to Aboriginal children removed from their families as part of a state-sanctioned assimilation policy in force for much of the 20th century. That act, which was widely praised, revived interest in the white children who were mistreated, too, far from their parents' protection.
One of those children was David Hill, who, with his two brothers, was sent to a notorious institution, Fairbridge Farm School, west of Sydney. Mr Hill went on to become managing director of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, and two years ago published a book, The Forgotten Children, relating the inmates' harrowing experiences. Among other things, he described how boys worked 15-hour days and had to slaughter farm animals to supply the kitchens. While staff ate a full cooked breakfast prepared by the children, the latter had to make do with cold porridge infested with weevils. None of the boys, not even the youngest at four, were ever shown any affection.
The apology, to be delivered before the end of this year, was announced by the Families and Indigenous Affairs Minister, Jenny Macklin, who said that many former child migrants and other children in institutions "have suffered from a system that did not adequately provide for, or protect, children in its care".
The announcement was welcomed by Caroline Carroll, chairwoman of the Alliance for Forgotten Australians, a support group. Ms Carroll spent 14 years in five different government institutions. "We were told every day that we were the scum of the earth, that we came from the gutter, and that's where we'd end up," she said.
"We were of no importance, there was no individuality, often we were called by a number, not even a name. It's a shameful part of Australia's history."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Where is the apology from the UK government?
I assume not, since I have never heard of anything like this here.
Own citizens locked up in the same prisons, stolen children all over the place. It is a really nasty vicious little country. The people on the ground are nice enough but the government are rather less than human.
This reminds me of the catholic pope's "apology" for the child rapists and child abusers the church protected from the law. So what.
Same for this story, anyone who is still alive should be sued and then thrown into prison, any laws saying it's been too long should be waived in this case. Apology? Bull****.
There may have been very few awful things done by those high up in the Church, but these awful things are not specific only to Catholicism.
There have been plenty of other cases of misuse of a position of trust, for instance teachers abusing students, etc, but think of the few teachers responsible for those atrocities, then think of the abundance of wonderful things teachers do for us.
In the same way, it is only an extremely small percentage of Catholic priests who are the perpetrators of these crimes. The Catholic Church isn't a secluded cult, but a world wide organisation that benefits so many under-priveleged children and people by giving them support, hope and love.
Through various Catholic charities, like Cafod, the Catholic Church gives those in poverty a sustainable livlihood, enabling to send their children to school, and generally giving them a better life.
But what aggravated me was ianwriter40's seemingly uneducated views on Catholicism. If there are 100 bad priests, that stil leaves heck of lot of good preists.
I was just miffed at his idea of abolishing catholicism, from which I went on to post that although there is an extremely small percentage of bad preists, there are also hundreds of thousands of good preists, who do an awful amount of good in the world- not just within parishes, but throughout the whole world, in areas of extreme poverty and conflict.
http://ritualabuse.us
also see
http://childabusewiki.org/index.php?tit
the lies and deceit which we were forced to live with as children changed all forgotten australians and migrant childrens lives unable to live a fruitful life of careers and partners which we learned not to have faith in.. Teri Parish.(ka) Hay
Countries that were born as far away European prisons, populated by deported criminals , has till now pseudo-criminal behavioures deriving, evidently, but having being made up by forcefully immigrated peole, not by willing emigrants.
Australia is not alone in this, even if it is the worst case, just think of the "Aborigens Hunting" practice of 1800 (and maybe first part of 1900) beside the 2 cases mentioned above.
What is amazing to me is, first of all, that all these mistreated people (Aborigens and deportes English babies) have being keeping silent till now, or better, they have been verbally complaining only.
And , obviously, what they got back from Goverments are "words" only, as somebody else commented herebefore.
What these people endured, the extent to which their rights were trumpled upon, amply justifies violent (in civilized terms) actions from their part. Why they did not do something stronger ? Or is that they did not endure such a big mistreating, that they are exagerating ?